山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 83-88.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2024.345

• 论著 • 上一篇    

基于EyeSi手术模拟器评估眼科医师白内障手术水平

黄旗,邓旭雯,王佩佩,陈烨群,古学军   

  1. 南昌大学附属眼科医院 白内障科, 江西 南昌 330006
  • 发布日期:2025-09-19
  • 通讯作者: 古学军. E-mail:ndfsyk1001@ncu.edu.cn

Research on evaluating the cataract surgery level of ophthalmologists using eyeSi surgical simulator

HUANG Qi, DENG Xuwen, WANG Peipei, CHEN Yequn, GU Xuejun   

  1. Department of Cataract, the Affiliated Ophthalmic Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, China
  • Published:2025-09-19

摘要: 目的 探讨专家眼科医师与新手眼科医师在EyeSi手术模拟器进行白内障手术模块中的得分表现。 方法 在南昌大学附属眼科医院选择10位高年资主治以上眼科医师(专家组)和15位住院及低年资主治医师(新手组)参加试验。每位参与者在EyeSi手术模拟器白内障手术模块CAT-B的5个项目(包括撕囊、水分离、劈核和超乳、IA皮质吸除、人工晶体植入)中操作三次,取最高分作为该项目得分。 结果 专家组在CAT-B模块的5个测试项目(撕囊、水分离、劈核与超乳、IA皮质吸除、人工晶体植入)中得分均高于新手组,差异具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。专家组在撕囊居中性、连贯性、液波形成充分性、超声能量使用效率、皮质残留清除彻底性、人工晶体植入准确性等关键指标上得分高;在角膜内皮损伤、悬韧带损伤、前后囊破裂、操作时间延长等扣分项目中扣分少。 结论 专家组在准确性、操作效率和组织保护方面表现优于新手组。EyeSi手术模拟器能够客观评价眼科医师的白内障手术水平,可作为临床眼科规范化培训和白内障手术教学效果评估的有效工具。

关键词: EyeSi手术模拟器, 白内障手术, 规范化培训, 手术教学

Abstract: Objective To explore the scoring performance of expert and novice ophthalmologists in the cataract surgery module using the EyeSi surgical simulator. Methods A total of 10 senior attending or higher-level ophthalmologists(expert group)and 15 residents or junior attending ophthalmologists(novice group)from the Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University were recruited. Each participant performed three operations on the five items of the EyeSi cataract surgery module CAT-B(including capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, nucleus splitting and phacoemulsification, IA cortical aspiration, and intraocular lens implantation), with the highest score recorded for each item. Results In the 5 test items of the CAT-B module(capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, nucleus cracking and phacoemulsification, IA cortical aspiration, and intraocular lens implantation), the expert group scored higher than the novice group, with statistically significant differences(P<0.05 for all). The expert group achieved higher scores in key indicators such as capsulorhexis centrality, continuity, adequate fluid wave formation, ultrasound energy efficiency, thorough cortical removal, and accurate intraocular lens implantation. Meanwhile, they had fewer deductions in negative aspects like corneal endothelial damage, zonular damage, capsular rupture, and prolonged operation time. Conclusion The expert group outperformed the novice group in terms of accuracy, operational efficiency, and tissue protection. The EyeSi surgical simulator is capable of objectively evaluating the cataract surgery skills of ophthalmologists and can serve as an effective tool for standardized ophthalmic clinical training and assessment of cataract surgery teaching effectiveness.

Key words: EyeSi surgical simulator, Cataract surgery, Standardized training, Surgical teaching

中图分类号: 

  • R776.1
[1] O'Brart D. The future of cataract surgery[J]. Eye(Lond), 2025: 13. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03745-x
[2] Hashemi H, Fayaz F, Hashemi A, et al. Global prevalence of cataract surgery[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2025, 36(1): 10-17. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000001092
[3] Hashemi H, Fayaz F, Hashemi A, et al. Global prevalence of cataract surgery[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2025, 36(1): 10-17. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000001092
[4] 刘子源, 曾司彦, 敖明昕, 等. EyeSi模拟手术训练系统对专科医师白内障手术操作培训有效性的研究[J]. 眼科, 2022, 31(5): 390-393. doi:10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2022.05.014
[5] Iskander M, Ogunsola T, Ramachandran R, et al. Virtual reality and augmented reality in ophthalmology: a contemporary prospective[J]. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol(Phila), 2021, 10(3): 244-252. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000409
[6] Lowe S, Mares K, Khadjesari Z. Immersive technology in ophthalmology education: a systematic review[J]. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn, 2021, 7(6): 600-604. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000906
[7] Lin JC, Yu ZE, Scott IU, et al. Virtual reality training for cataract surgery operating performance in ophthalmology trainees[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 12(12): CD014953. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD014953.pub2
[8] Hutter DE, Wingsted L, Cejvanovic S, et al. A validated test has been developed for assessment of manual small incision cataract surgery skills using virtual reality simulation[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13: 10655. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32845-5
[9] Nair A, Lansingh VC, Bacchav A, et al. Results from a construct validity study: Does real-life experience in cataract surgery translate into performance on a surgical simulator?[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2023, 64(8): 1213.
[10] 黄天泽, 陈迪, 李莹. 机器学习在眼表疾病诊断及角膜手术中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 13-19. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.329 HUANG Tianze, CHEN Di, LI Ying. Advances of machine learning in the diagnosis of ocular surface diseases and guiding corneal surgical procedures[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 13-19. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.329
[11] 刘子源, 曾司彦, 王薇, 等. 利用虚拟现实技术进行白内障手术考核的有效性研究[J]. 继续医学教育, 2023, 37(3): 65-68. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2023.03.017.
[12] Jaud C, Salleron J, Cisse C, et al. EyeSi Surgical Simulator: validation of a proficiency-based test for assessment of vitreoretinal surgical skills[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2021, 99(4): 390-396. doi:10.1111/aos.14628
[13] 潘玉珂, 秦颖嫣, 范舒欣, 等. EYESi模拟器结合Wet-lab在白内障手术培训中的效果评价[J]. 眼科学报, 2023, 38(11): 736-745. doi:10.12419/2311140001 PAN Yuke, QIN Yingyan, FAN Shuxin, et al. Effect evaluation of EYESi simulator combined with Wetlab in cataract surgery training[J]. Eye Science, 2023, 38(11): 736-745. doi:10.12419/2311140001
[14] 徐椿鸿, 乔春艳, 王立肖, 等. EYESI模拟器在住院医师白内障手术培训中的应用[J]. 重庆医学, 2023, 52(1): 158-160. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2023.01.032
[15] Carr L, McKechnie T, Hatamnejad A, et al. Effectiveness of the eyesi surgical simulator for ophthalmology trainees: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Can J Ophthalmol, 2024, 59(3): 172-180. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2023.03.014
[16] Yang L, Al-Ani A, Bondok MS, et al. The impact of extended reality simulators on ophthalmic surgical training and performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17, 623 eyes[J]. Eye(Lond), 2025. doi:10.1038/s41433-025-03722-4
[17] 孙极, 李灿. 白内障术后人工晶状体轴向位置预测与稳定性相关影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 7-12. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.237 SUN Ji, LI Can. Prediction and stability of axial intraocular lens position after cataract surgery[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 7-12. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.237
[18] 钟红, 朱兴平. 初学者连续环形撕囊联合多象限充分水分离在软核白内障超声乳化术中的应用[J]. 实用防盲技术, 2023, 18(2): 73-75. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3835.2023.02.009
[19] Ravindra MS, Bali J, Adarsh DC, et al. Posterior polar cataract: Hydrodissection and nucleus rotation in manual small-incision cataract surgery not a taboo with proper fluidics[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2022, 70(11): 4051-4053. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1588_22
[20] 吴春, 林雨. 自制垂直刃超薄劈核刀预劈核与传统拦截劈核用于白内障超声乳化中的对比研究[J]. 中外医学研究, 2021, 19(26): 1-4. doi:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2021.26.001 WU Chun, LIN Yu. Comparative study of the application of prechop using self-made vertical-blade ultra-thin nuclear chopper and traditional stop-and-chop in phacoemulsification[J]. Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2021, 19(26): 1-4. doi:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2021.26.001
[21] Song XZ, Li L, Zhang XM, et al. Comparing the efficacy and safety between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Can J Ophthalmol, 2025, 60(1): e1-e10. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.05.030
[22] Gasteratos K, Paladino JR, Akelina Y, et al. Superiority of living animal models in microsurgical training: beyond technical expertise[J]. Eur J Plast Surg, 2021, 44(2): 167-176. doi:10.1007/s00238-021-01798-1
[23] 朱子诚, 温跃春, 董凯, 等. 离体猪眼在眼科规培生临床实践教学中的应用[J]. 实用防盲技术, 2022, 17(3): 120-122. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3835.2022.03.009 ZHU Zicheng, WEN Yuechun, DONG Kai, et al. Application of isolated pig eyes in clinical practice teaching of ophthalmology training students[J]. Journal of Practical Preventing Blind, 2022, 17(3): 120-122. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3835.2022.03.009
[24] Körber M, Fellinger J, Fritsche M, et al. Ophthalmic surgeries on post mortem porcine eyes with picosecond ultrashort laser pulses[J]. Front Med(Lausanne), 2024, 11: 1345976. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1345976
[25] 曾雅婷, 霍昊然, 王晓睿. 生猪价格波动对养殖规模调整的非对称影响分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 25(3): 17-29, 78. doi:10.13331/j.cnki.jhau(ss).2024.03.003 ZENG Yating, HUO Haoran, WANG Xiaorui. Analysis of the asymmetric influence of hog price fluctuation on the adjustment of breeding scale[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Sciences), 2024, 25(3): 17-29, 78. doi:10.13331/j.cnki.jhau(ss).2024.03.003
[26] Ruiss M, Kronschläger M, Schlatter A, et al. Comparison of methods to experimentally induce opacification and elasticity change in ex vivo porcine lenses[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 23406. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-02851-6
[27] 李佳骏, 李柯然, 商卫红. 虚拟-现实手术模拟系统在眼科住院医师微创白内障手术培训中的应用效果[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2022, 22(5): 701-705. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2022.5.01 LI Jiajun, LI Keran, SHANG Weihong. Application and effect of virtual-reality surgery simulation system in minimally invasive cataract surgery training for ophthalmology residents[J]. International Eye Science, 2022, 22(5): 701-705. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2022.5.01
[28] 王敏希, 殷丽敏, 包兴旺, 等. 虚拟现实技术在白内障超声乳化手术培训中的应用[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2023, 25(1): 140-141
[29] Sonmez SC, Sevgi M, Antaki F, et al. Generative artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: current innovations, future applications and challenges[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2024, 108(10): 1335-1340. doi:10.1136/bjo-2024-325458
[30] Kaur K, Gurnani B, Venkatesh D, et al. Commentary: Changing era of modern cataract surgery-The role of virtual reality-based simulators in manual small-incision cataract surgery training modules[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2022, 70(11): 4016-4017. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2233_22
[31] Nayer ZH, Murdock B, Dharia IP, et al. Predictive and construct validity of virtual reality cataract surgery simulators[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2020, 46(6): 907-912. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000137
[32] Lin JC, Yu ZE, Scott IU, et al. Virtual reality training for cataract surgery operating performance in ophthalmology trainees[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 12(12): CD014953. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD014953.pub2
[33] Ferris JD, Donachie PH, Johnston RL, et al. Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 6. The impact of EyeSi virtual reality training on complications rates of cataract surgery performed by first and second year trainees[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2020, 104(3): 324-329. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313817
[34] Oseni J, Adebayo A, Raval N, et al. National access to EyeSi simulation: a comparative study among U.S. ophthalmology residency programs[J]. J Acad Ophthalmol(2017), 2023, 15(1): e112-e118. doi:10.1055/s-0043-1768933
[1] 段练,孟凡兰,党光福. 干眼对屈光性白内障手术的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 1-6.
[2] 李爱军,崔小梅. 白内障术前房颤人群综合路径管理现状横断面调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 38-44.
[3] 李曼,王艳玲,赵露. 白内障术后粪肠球菌眼内炎1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 56-59.
[4] 谭燕,李灿. 人工晶体度数计算公式的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 95-98.
[5] 唐唯,李元彬. 屈光性白内障手术新进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 149-158.
[6] 毕宏生. 精准屈光性白内障手术规划[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 1-4.
[7] 郭颖媛,张德军,管国芳,文连姬,张辉,于多娇,马帅帅. 3D打印技术在耳鼻喉科住院医师规范化培训中的应用探索[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 119-122.
[8] 孙洪义, 张晗. 2型糖尿病患者超声乳化白内障摘除并人工晶体植入手术后黄斑区光学相干断层扫描改变[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 72-76.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!