山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 17-20.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

3~4月龄及5~6月龄婴儿听性脑干反应的正常值分析

余崇仙,杨克林,张晓敏,汪平   

  1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科, 安徽 合肥 230022
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-14 修回日期:2010-07-14 出版日期:2010-08-16 发布日期:2010-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 杨克林(1951- ),女,教授,主任医师,从事耳科及临床听力学研究。 Email:kelin1951@sina.com
  • 作者简介:余崇仙(1981- ),女,硕士,医师,从事临床听力学研究。 Email: wendy0091-cn@sina.com

Normal values of auditory brainstem responses in 3-4 months and 5-6 months old infants

YU Chong-xian, YANG Ke-lin, ZHANG Xiao-min, WANG Ping   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, Anhui, China
  • Received:2010-04-14 Revised:2010-07-14 Online:2010-08-16 Published:2010-08-16

摘要:

目的    观察正常婴儿听性脑干反应(ABR) 潜伏期及阈值正常值范围,为早期干预治疗提供依据。 方法    应用美国ICS CHARTR诱发电位仪对40例(80耳)听力正常的婴儿和20例听力正常成人进行ABR 检测,根据年龄分为A组(3~4月龄)、B组(5~6月龄)、对照组。建立不同月龄婴儿ABR正常值范围,讨论性别、耳别、月龄对测试结果的影响及阈值测定的临床应用。结果    80dB nHL 短声刺激下,A组ABR 波Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ潜伏期的正常值范围分别是: (1.52 ±0.19) ms、(4.20±0.20) ms、(6.34 ±0.26) ms ;B组ABR 波Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ潜伏期的正常值范围分别是: (1.50 ±0.09) ms、(4.05 ±0.16) ms、(6.16 ±0.25) ms ;对照组ABR 波Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ潜伏期的正常值范围分别是: (1.43 ±0.10) ms、(3.63 ±0.15) ms、(5.50 ±0.16) ms。随着月龄的增长,婴儿各波的潜伏期( PL)和波间期( IPL) 均缩短;但6月龄时仍未达成人水平。A、B两组各波的潜伏期及波间期与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组与B组比较Ⅲ、Ⅴ波潜伏期及Ⅰ-Ⅲ、Ⅰ-Ⅴ波间期差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。女婴潜伏期和波间期短于男婴(A组内Ⅰ-Ⅲ波间期除外), A组内男女间Ⅴ波潜伏期差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组内男女Ⅲ、Ⅴ波潜伏期及Ⅰ-Ⅴ波间期差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);各组内左右耳差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。各月龄组及正常成人ABR反应阈差异无统计学意义。 结论    建立不同月龄婴儿ABR 潜伏期及阈值正常值标准,为听损伤的早期诊断和随访监测提供可靠依据。

关键词: 听性脑干反应;婴儿;正常值;早期诊断

Abstract:

Objective    To investigate normal parameters of the latency and the thresholds of auditory brainstem response (ABR) in infants of 3-6 months old for early treatment. Methods     40 normal infants and 20 normal adults underwent ABR tests. The infants were divided into 2 groups: group A(3-4months) and group B(5-6 months). Each group consisted of 20 infants (40 ears). The ABR data were analyzed to determine normal ranges for ABR. The influences of gender, age and ears on different sides on testing results were analyzed. Results     At 80dB nHL, the range of latency for wave Ⅰ, Ⅲ, Ⅴ of ABR in 3-4 months old infants was (1.52±0.19) ms, (4.20±0.20) ms, (6.34 ±0.26) ms, respectively; In 5-6 months old infants, the corresponding results were (1.50 ±0.09) ms, (4.05 ±0.16) ms, and (6.16±0.25) ms; In normal adults, counterparts were (1.43±0.10) ms, (3.63±0.15) ms, and (5.50±0.16) ms. The Peak latency (PL) and interval peak latency ( IPL) of infants became shorter with the increase of the age, but failed to reach adult levels even in 56 months old infants. There were significant differences for PL and IPL between group A and control group, and between group B and control group. The PL of wave Ⅲ, Ⅴ and IPL of Ⅰ-Ⅲ,Ⅰ-Ⅴ between group A and group B were significantly different.  PL and IPL of female infants were shorter than the males, except for the IPL of Ⅰ-Ⅲ in group A. There were significant differences in the PL of wave Ⅴ between male and female infants in group A. The data showed that there were significant differences in the PL of Ⅲ, Ⅴ and the IPL of Ⅰ-Ⅴ between male and female infants in group B (P<0.05), but not between the sides of ears (P>0.05). The thresholds of ABR among all infants and adults demonstrated no significant difference. Conclusion     It is necessary to set up normal criteria of ABR for infants so as to diagnose early and follow-up effectively, which makes early interventions possible.

Key words:  Auditory brainstem response;  Infant;  Normal range;  Early diagnosis

中图分类号: 

  • R764.5
[1] 田天捷1,耿阳1,叶青1,2,张先增3,谢树森3,沈帆1. 细胞凋亡与激光对内耳损伤关系的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(2): 35-38.
[2] 张阳. 内耳免疫反应中细胞凋亡及Bcl-2与Bax的表达[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(3): 34-36.
[3] 杨燕1,李宁2,于江2,张珂2,吴淑荣2,高希宝2. 铬对大鼠听力的损伤及锌、硒的拮抗作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(3): 37-40.
[4] 张恩东,李大建,苗乐杰. 重症监护病房与母婴同室新生儿听力筛查比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(2): 29-31.
[5] 薛秋红,陈小林. 个人音乐播放器对大学生人群听力影响的调查研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(1): 41-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!