JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY) ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 84-85.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.057

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of pseudoaccommodation measured by optical quality analysis system

WANG Jing1,2, WU Qin2, WU Hao3, LIU Chunlei2, BI Hongsheng4   

  1. 1. Graduate Student of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong, China;
    2. Departement of Ophthalmology, Jinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250001, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Ophthalmology, The 5th People's Hospital Of Jinan, Jinan 250022, Shandong, China;
    4. Ophthalmology Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250002, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-01-28 Revised:2015-04-17 Published:2015-06-16
  • Contact: 毕宏生。E-mail:hongshengbi@126.com E-mail:hongshengbi@126.com

PDF (PC)

734

Abstract: Objective To study pseudoaccommodation of different intraocular lenses with a double-pass system, and the results were compared with those by the defocus method and push-up method. Methods A total of 30 outpatients with age-related cataract were selected in this study. All the enrolled eyes were implanted with the same aspheric intraocular lens. The pseudoaccommodation of each selected eye was measured by optical quality analysis system(OQAS), defocus system and push-up method one month after the operation. Results The average pseudoaccommodation by OQAS examination, defocus method and push-up method was 2.34D, 2.5D and 2.93D, respectively. There's no statistical difference between OQAS examination and defocus method(P>0.05). But there's statistical difference between OQAS examination and push-up method(P<0.05). Conclusion The pseudoaccommodation measured by OQAS was relatively small. The results measured by OQAS was in close agreement with that measured by defocus method.

Key words: Pseudoaccommodation, Optical quality analysis system, Push-up method, Intraocular lens, Defocus method

CLC Number: 

  • R779.66
[1] Naka Zawa M, Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1983, 96(5):435.
[2] 杨亚波, 姚克, 姜节凯, 等.单焦点后房型人工晶状体眼的调节[J].中华眼科杂志, 1996, 32(1):98-100.YANG Yabo, YAO Ke, JIANG Jiekai, et al. Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with monofocal posterior chamber intraocular lens[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 1996, 32(1):98-100.
[3] 吴宪巍, 何伟.人工晶状体眼伪调节研究进展[J].国际眼科杂志, 2008, 8(7):1423-1425.WU Xianwei, HE Wei. Advanced research on pseudophakic accommodation ofeyes with artificial lens[J]. Inter J Ophthalmol, 2008, 8(7):1423-1425.
[4] Saad A, Saad M, Gatinel D. Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(1):28-33.
[5] Díaz-Doutón F, Benito A, Pujol J, et al. Comparision of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and double-pass instrument[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006, 47(4):1710-1716.
[6] Artal P. Understanding aberrations by using double-pass techniques[J]. J Refract Surg, 2000, 16(5):S560-562.
[7] 年婉青, 周艳峰, 何亚芬. 人工晶状体眼调节力的研究进展[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2012, 12(1):1672-1674. NIAN Wanqing, ZHOU Yanfeng, HE Yafen. Progress in the study of pseudophakic accommodation[J].Inter Eye Sci, 2012, 12(1):1672-1674.
[1] PAN Ruolin, LIAO Xuan, LAN Changjun, TAN Qingqing, XIE Lixuan, HUANG Huan, QIN Suyun, WANG Yan. Experimental study on the influence of decentration and tilt on the optical properties of monofocal intraocular lens with different diopter [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(1): 38-46.
[2] LIU Zhen, ZHOU Weiwei, LIU Hanjing, ZHANG Yi, ZHU Yuguang, ZHU Yan. Influence of Alpha angle of intraocular lens on visual quality after the implantation of extended depth-of-field intraocular lens [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2026, 40(1): 47-53.
[3] MA Jiling, WANG Xiaoming, LI Yan, MU Yanxiao, JIN Lin, KONG Hui, YANG Naifu, DANG Guangfu. Evaluation of three different aspheric intraocular lens tilts and decentrations in capsular bags after cataract surgery based on CASIA2 [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(4): 76-85.
[4] WANG Daoguang, MA Yuanxiao, WANG Yucheng, REN Mengjia, CAI Keli. A controlled study of visual function after implantation of AT LISA 809M bifocal and Proming A1-UV monofocal intraocular lens [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(1): 39-45.
[5] DUAN Lian, MENG FanlanReview,DANG GuangfuGuidance. Effect of dry eye on refractive cataract surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 1-6.
[6] SUN JiOverview,LI CanGuidance. Prediction and stability of axial intraocular lens position after cataract surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 7-12.
[7] HUANG ZiyanOverview,DUAN GuopingGuidance. Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual quality after cataract intraocular lens implantation [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 13-18.
[8] HUANG ZiyanOverview,DUAN GuopingGuidance. Effects of tilt and decentration on visual quality after various intraocular lens implantations [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 26-31.
[9] SUN Lu, ZHANG Shunhua, WU Yuzhou, CHEN Lulu, CAO Di, GAN Linyang. Short-term clinical outcomes of regional refractive intraocular lens implantation in patients with an angle alpha of 0.5-0.8 mm [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 32-37.
[10] YU Tengfei, LI Yansong, LIU Zhen, ZHOU Weiwei, ZHU Yan, ZHU Yuguang. Effect of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% on visual quality after phaco and extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation with dysphotopsia under mesopic condition [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 45-50.
[11] REN Qing, ZHANG Feng. A case of oculocutaneous albinism combined with bilateral complicated cataract and literature review [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 66-69.
[12] LI Jing, ZHANG Hui, WANG Jing. A clinical study on the effect of using different intraocular lens implants on visual quality [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(2): 90-95.
[13] LI Bin, FANG Xuejun, WU De, HUANG Min. Agreement study of implantable collamer lens based on NK and KS formulas in the early stage after surgery [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 33-41.
[14] WEI Peipei,LI Can. Visual quality and complications after implantation of multifocal intraocular lens [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(2): 141-146.
[15] LI Ying, JIANG Yang. A discussion on the choice of surgical methods for correction of myopia [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 1-6.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Website Copyright: Editorial Office of Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
Address: No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, Shandong, China. Post code: 250100 Tel: +86-0531-88366912 Email: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd