人工耳蜗术后编程中神经反应遥测阈值及行为T值的比较分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.346

山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 23-26.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.346

• 人工耳蜗植入术与言语康复·论著 • 上一篇下一篇

人工耳蜗术后编程中神经反应遥测阈值及行为T值的比较分析

罗琼,黄艳艳,陈正侬,冯艳梅,时海波

上海交通大学附属第六人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 上海 200233

收稿日期:2017-08-12 出版日期:2017-10-16 发布日期:2017-10-16
通讯作者: 时海波. E-mail:haibo99@hotmail.com; 冯艳梅. E-mail:feng.yanmei@126.com
基金资助:
上海市教育委员会高峰高原学科建设计划(20152526,20152233);上海市申康医学发展中心促进市级医院临床技能与临床创新三年行动计划——常见疾病适宜技术研发与推广应用项目16CR4026A,专科疾病临床“五新”转化项目16CR3041A

Relationship between neural response telemetry threshold and T-level behavior in patients with cochlear implants.

LUO Qiong, HUANG Yanyan, CHEN Zhengnong, FENG Yanmei, SHI Haibo

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Six Peoples Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China

Received:2017-08-12 Online:2017-10-16 Published:2017-10-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解人工耳蜗术后神经反应遥测(NRT)阈值的变化,NRT与行为T值之间的相关性,以及长期行为T值的变化,为人工耳蜗植入术后的患儿编程提供帮助。方法 20例接受Nucleus CI24R型多导人工耳蜗植入的患儿,在开机时及6个月调试时对1、11、20号电极进行NRT阈值测试,通过NRT值进行电子耳蜗程序设置;开机后1年和2年对患儿进行行为T值测试,并设置程序;收集开机时及6个月的NRT值分别与1年及2年的行为T值比较。结果 1号电极开机时和6个月时NRT相互比较差异无统计学意义,11号和22号电极开机时和6个月时NRT差异有统计学意义,三对电极1年与2年行为T值差异都无统计学意义;开机时NRT阈值与行为T值的相关关系中:开机时NRT阈值与行为T值只有22号电极呈正相关,其余两电极中无相关关系。6个月NRT阈值与行为T值的相关关系中:1号电极6个月NRT阈值与行为T值均为正相关;22号电极开机6个月NRT值与1年行为T值为正相关,其他无相关关系。结论各电极NRT阈值自开机时基本保持稳定,NRT阈值与行为T值部分电极具有相关性,开机时和最初几次调机时患儿不能配合进行行为测试可以选择NRT阈值来参考调试耳蜗;1年和2年的行为T值也基本稳定,说明患儿术后1年能较好配合行为T值测试,对于配合较好者的患儿可以适当延长调试时间。

关键词: 神经反应遥测, 调机, 人工耳蜗

Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between neural response telemetry(NRT)threshold and T-level behavior in patients with cochlear implants, and to explore how we can render NRT more useful for us to obtain the best map for patients with cochlear implants who may not cooperate well to obtain accurate T-level behavior. Methods Twenty children were implanted with the cochlear Nucleus CI24R system. At each mapping procedure, the NRT thresholds of electrodes 1, 11, and 20 based on the evoked responses were tested. The children had accepted a time for experience and training until they could cooperate well for testing and the T-level behavior could be used for mapping. The changes in the NRT threshold and the correlation between the NRT threshold and the T-level behavior at 12 and 24 months after switch-on were then compared. Results There was no significant difference in the NRT thresholds of electrodes 1 and 22 at 6 months, and there was a significant difference in the NRT threshold of electrode 11 at 6 months. There was no significant difference in the T-level behavior between the three pairs of electrodes at 1 and 2 years. The NRT threshold was compared with the T-level behavior after switch-on, and only electrode 22 exhibited a statistically significant difference, while the other two pairs of electrodes did not exhibit statistically significant differences. The 6-month NRT threshold was compared with the T-level behavior, and a significant difference was noted in electrode 1. The 6-month NRT thresholds of electrodes 11 and 22 and the 1-year T-level behavior was statistically significant, and the 2-year T-level behavior was not statistically significant. Conclusion The stability of the NRT threshold of each electrode is maintained from the time of initiation, and the correlation between NRT threshold and T-level behavior 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报31卷5期 -罗琼,等.人工耳蜗术后编程中神经反应遥测阈值及行为T值的比较分析 \=-indicates that children cannot cooperate initially to perform the behavior test. The NRT threshold can be used to refer to the cochlea. The 2-year T-level behavior also remained stable, indicating that children can better match the 1-year T-level behavior after testing, with the better children being appropriate to extend the debugging time.

Key words: Cochlear, Neural response telemetry, Mapping

中图分类号:

R764

罗琼,黄艳艳,陈正侬,冯艳梅,时海波. 人工耳蜗术后编程中神经反应遥测阈值及行为T值的比较分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 23-26.

LUO Qiong, HUANG Yanyan, CHEN Zhengnong, FENG Yanmei, SHI Haibo. Relationship between neural response telemetry threshold and T-level behavior in patients with cochlear implants.[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2017, 31(5): 23-26.

参考文献

[1] 陈雪清, 韩德民, 王硕, 等. 儿童人工耳蜗植入术后神经反应遥测阈值与行为反应值的关系[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2002,9(5):261-263. CHEN Xueqing, HAN Demin, WANG Shuo, et al. The relationship between the thresholds of neural response telemetry and T or C-levels for children with cochlear implant[J]. Chin Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002, 9(5):261-263.
[2] 王硕, 韩德民.神经反应遥测技术在多导人工耳蜗病人听觉评估中的应用[J].国际耳鼻喉头颈外科杂志,2002,26(6):338-340.
[3] Arts HA, Garber A, Zwolan TA. Cochlear implants in young children[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2002, 35(4):925-943.
[4] Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, et al. Summary of results using the nucleus C124M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential[J]. Ear Hear, 1999, 20(1):45-59.
[5] 杨彩虹,赵德安,陈雪清,等.儿童人工耳蜗植入术后神经反应遥测阈值的变化[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,21(13):598-600. YANG Caihong, ZHAO Dean, CHEN Xueqing, et al. The change of neural response telemetry thresholds in children with cochlear implant[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2007, 21(13):598-600.
[6] 杨烨,陈杰,钱晓云,等.神经反应遥测用于人工耳蜗植入患儿术后康复效果预估和编程的意义[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2015,23(5):522-526. YANG Ye, CHEN Jie, QIAN Xiaoyun, et al. Instructions of neural response telemetry for prediction of the rehabilitation effects and mapping in children cochlear implant[J]. J Audiol Speech Pathol, 2015, 23(5):522-526.
[7] 杨烨,高下,陈杰,等. 语后聋人工耳蜗植入的参数变化规律及意义[J]. 中华耳科学杂志,2012,10(4):455-458. YANG Ye, GAO Xia, CHEN Jie, et al. Patterns of cochlear implant parameter adjustment in patients with post-lingual deafness and their significance[J]. Chin J Otol, 2012, 10(4):455-458.
[8] Hughes ML, Vander Werff KR, Brown CJ, et al. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users[J]. Ear Hear, 2001, 22(6):471-486.
[9] 陈雪清,韩德民,赵啸天,等.人工耳蜗植入术后阈值与舒适阈特性的分析[J]. 中国临床康复,2004,8(32):7145-7147. CHEN Xueqing, HAN Demin, GUO Xiaotian, et al. Characteristics of threshold and comfortable levels after artificial cochlear implantation[J]. Chin J Tiss Engineering Res, 2004, 8(32):7145-7147.
[10] 陶勇,郑芸,王恺,等. 人工耳蜗植入编程中NRT值和行为测试T值比较分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2011,25(4):162-164. TAO Yong, ZHENG Yun, WANG Kai, et al. Compare NRT threshold and behavior T-level in cochlear implant patients[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 25(4):162-164.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

人工耳蜗术后编程中神经反应遥测阈值及行为T值的比较分析

Relationship between neural response telemetry threshold and T-level behavior in patients with cochlear implants.

HTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

多维度评价

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	冯蕾,吴丹凤. 人工耳蜗植入后对侧耳是否联合使用助听器声调识别的对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 27-31.
[2]	王海霞,郑金秀,陈曦. 人工耳蜗植入患者MRI检查的若干问题探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 38-40.
[3]	王一红, 李瑞玉, 陈彩龙, 王晓燕, 林美福, 周硕. MSCT多模态三维重建观测颞骨结构及对人工耳蜗手术的指导意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 1-4.
[4]	陈世琴, 胡金旺. 儿童与成人人工耳蜗植入术并发症比较及处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(5): 25-28.
[5]	王雅宁, 王启荣. 自制凹面形头皮拉钩在人工耳蜗植入术中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(5): 91-91.
[6]	尹海英, 古林涛, 于淑东, 王启荣. 人工耳蜗植入术围手术期处理及注意事项[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 19-21.
[7]	田颖，纪旭，张涛，杨宁，惠莲，姜学钧. 儿童人工耳蜗植入术后电诱发复合动作电位分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(5): 15-18.
[8]	徐学海，严星，钟翠萍，安飞，蔺文愧. 内耳畸形聋儿人工耳蜗植入术常见类型及手术并发症[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 40-42.
[9]	李东梅1，许安廷1，程想2，张寒冰1，尹海英3，纪彩丽1. 人工耳蜗植入术后听力及言语康复效果相关因素的初步研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2010, 24(01): 16-20.