山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 7-10.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.453

• ·论著· • 上一篇    下一篇

耳鸣声学特征与扩展高频听阈的关系

黄娟,庞宇峰,龚静蓉,董玥辉   

  1. 2013WYQJ09)第一作者:黄娟。 E-mail:yueguangcaojuan@163.com通讯作者:庞宇峰。 E-mail:yfent@qq.comDOI:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.453耳鸣声学特征与扩展高频听阈的关系黄娟, 庞宇峰, 龚静蓉, 董玥辉(上海市第五人民医院耳鼻咽喉科, 上海 200240
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-30 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 庞宇峰. E-mail:yfent@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市第五人民医院科研课题项目(2013WYQJ09)

Relationship between the psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus and high frequency hearing threshold

HUANG Juan, PANG Yufeng, GONG Jingrong, DONG Yuehui   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, The Fifth Peoples Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200240, China
  • Received:2017-10-30 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-20

摘要: 目的 探讨纯音听阈正常的耳鸣患者耳鸣音调与扩展高频听阈的关系。 方法 对156例纯音听阈正常的耳鸣患者进行耳鸣生理声学检测,以纯音听阈正常的无耳鸣患者为对照组,对两组均进行扩展高频听阈检测。按年龄(25~35岁、36~45岁、46~55岁、≥55岁)分组,比较各组扩展高频听阈的平均值。将耳鸣组患者按耳鸣音调进行分类:低频组(125 Hz、250 Hz、500 Hz)、中频组(1.5 kHz、3 kHz)、高频组(4 kHz、6 kHz、8 kHz、≥9 kHz),一共9组,将各扩展高频平均听阈值(9 kHz、10 kHz、11.2 kHz、12.5 kHz、14 kHz、16 kHz)与对照组患者分别比对分析。 结果 耳鸣组和无耳鸣组之间比较,扩展高频各频率平均阈值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但各年龄组之间对比,年龄、是否耳鸣对扩展高频平均听阈都有显著影响。耳鸣音调1.5 kHz耳鸣组中9 kHz、耳鸣音调3 kHz耳鸣组中11.2 kHz、耳鸣音调4 kHz耳鸣组中10 kHz、耳鸣音调6 kHz耳鸣组中10 kHz和11.2 kHz、耳鸣音调8 kHz耳鸣组中10 kHz和11.2 kHz、耳鸣音调≥9 kHz耳鸣组中10 kHz、11.2 kHz和12.5 kHz平均阈值与对照组比较差异有统计学意义。 结论 扩展高频听阈下降与是否耳鸣、年龄有关。10 kHz、11.2 kHz平均听阈值下降与中、高频耳鸣有关联,特别是对高频耳鸣的患者很敏感,可以作为早期评估高频耳鸣患者早期耳蜗功能的敏感指标。

关键词: 声学特征, 扩展高频听阈, 耳鸣

Abstract: Objective To investigate the relationship between the pitch of tinnitus and high frequency hearing threshold(HFHT). Method A total of 156 patients with tinnitus and normal hearing thresholds between 125 and 8 000 Hz were included. Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus and HFHT were recorded. The HFHTs of subjects with normal hearing thresholds but without tinnitus were measured as a control group. The patients were then divided into four groups according to age(25-35 years old, 36-45 years old, 46-55 years old, and ≥55 years old). The patients were divided into nine groups based on their tinnitus pitch: low-frequency group(125 Hz, 250 Hz, and 500 Hz), middle-frequency group(1.5 kHz and 3 kHz), and high-frequency group(4 kHz, 6 kHz, 8 kHz, and ≥9 kHz). The data available from the nine groups and the control group were analyzed. Results No correlation was found between the groups with and without tinnitus. Age, presence of tinnitus, and interaction had significant influence on HFHT. There was no difference between the low-frequency and control groups. In the middle-frequency group, there was significant hearing loss related to frequency, including at 9 kHz in the 1.5 kHz group and at 11.2 kHz in the 3 kHz group. In the high-frequency group, there was significant hearing loss related to frequency, including at 10 kHz in the 4 kHz group, at 10 kHz and 11.2 kHz in the 6 kHz group, at 10 kHz in the 8 kHz group, and at 10 kHz and 12.5 kHz in ≥9 kHz group. The hearing levels at 11.2 kHz in the 8 kHz and ≥9 kHz groups were statistically significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.01). Conclusion HFHT correlated with age and presence of tinnitus. The decrease of hearing thresholds at 10 kHz and 11.2 kHz in the middle-frequency and high-frequency groups may be a sensitive indicator for alterations in the basal cochlea, which could lead to clinical therapy for high-frequency tinnitus.

Key words: High frequency hearing threshold, Psychoacoustic characteristics, Tinnitus

中图分类号: 

  • R764
[1] Fabijańska A, Smurzyński J, Hatzopoulos S, et al.The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and extended high-frequency audiometry in tinnitus patients. Part 1: Normally hearing patients with unilateral tinnitus[J]. Med Sci Mon Inter Med J Exp Clin Res, 2012, 18(12):765-770.
[2] Omidvar S, Jafari Z, Mahmoudian S, et al. The relationship between ultra-high frequency thresholds and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults with tinnitus[J]. Med J Islamic Repub Iran, 2016, 30(1):449.
[3] 蔡艺,汤建国,李旋.扩展高频气导听阈和耳鸣的关系[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2004,18(1):8-11. CAI Yi, TANG Jianguo, LI Xuan. Relationship between high frequency hearing threshold and tinnitus[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol, 2004, 18(1):8-11.
[4] Vielsmeier V, Lehner A, Strutz J, et al. The relevance of the high frequency audiometry in tinnitus patients with normal hearing in conventional pure-tone audiometry[J]. Biomed Res Inter, 2015, 2015(3):1-5.
[5] 韩德民.临床听力学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:11.
[6] 赵娟,张华,吉彬,等.扩展高频测听对常规纯音测听正常的耳鸣患者早期听力损失的诊断价值[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2010,24(7):318-319.
[7] 李桂芳,王春华,刘朝兵.250例耳鸣患者听力结果分析[J].河北医科大学学报,2016,37(7):806-813. LI Guifang, WANG Chunhua, LIU Chaobing. The analysis of hearing results in 250 patients with tinnitus[J]. J Hebei Med Univ, 2016, 37(7):806-813.
[8] 宋凡,陈秀兰,王斌,等.急、慢性耳鸣的临床和心理声学特征分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2017,15(1):71-76. SONG Fan, CHEN Xiulan, WANG Bin, et al. Clinical and psychoacoustic characteristics in patients with acute and chronic tinnitus[J]. Chin J Otol, 2017, 15(1):71-76.
[9] Prabhu PP, Chandan HS. Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder[J]. Audiol Res, 2014, 4(1):52-55.
[10] 陈秀兰,秦兆冰.伴感音神经性聋的耳鸣患者临床表现及心理声学特点[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2011,18(2):77-79. CHEN Xiulan, QIN Zhaobing. Clinical and psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus patients with sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Chin Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 18(2):77-79.
[1] 廖礼兵,刘绮明,宗凌,翟锦明,张建国. 42例耳鸣伴听觉过敏患者特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 31-36.
[2] 侯小兵,任同力,张毅博. 69例梅尼埃病伴耳鸣的发病特点及影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 37-40.
[3] 张玉波,岳丽艳,尹晓妍,吕哲,单春光. 耳鸣治疗仪联合银杏叶提取物注射液治疗突聋伴耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 50-53.
[4] 朱江彬,南兵卫,陈涛, 郝宗生. 低中频下降型突发性聋听阈恢复后残留耳鸣治疗体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 5-7.
[5] 狄国华, 刘俊茹, 赵延祥, 高英恺. 利多卡因联合天麻素耳后注射治疗特发性耳鸣[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 5-7.
[6] 钟晓声, 杨海弟, 郑亿庆. 突发性聋伴耳鸣患者耳鸣特征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 15-18.
[7] 王坛, 安丰伟, 陈剑秋, 林家峰, 侯晓智, 解翠丽, 王英, 林娟. 腭肌电图引导下治疗腭肌阵挛性耳鸣[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 12-14.
[8] 朱亚骄, 薛飞, 王秋萍. 90例耳鸣患者心理声学特征研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(5): 14-17.
[9] 张令1,孙传义1,许安廷2. 以耳聋就诊的岩尖胆脂瘤1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(2): 93-94.
[10] 沈峰. 单唾液酸四己糖神经节苷脂钠治疗突发性耳聋临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(1): 24-25.
[11] 曹效平,王天生,顾东胜,黄爱萍. 正常听力耳鸣患者听尼特TM检测及高刺激率听觉脑干反应结果及分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(4): 6-9.
[12] 洪燕丽,许海波,黄翠莲. 利多卡因耳后封闭治疗神经性耳鸣疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(6): 30-.
[13] 魏婷婷1,赵德安1,高兴强1,苏文玲1,朱艳双1,赵岩2. Arc/arg3.1基因在耳鸣大鼠模型听觉脑干中的表达情况[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2010, 24(01): 21-24.
[14] 杨传华,孙华清,韩朝冬 . 耳鸣对患者身心状况的影响调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(3): 197-198 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!