山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 87-91.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.373

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

功能性鼻内窥镜鼻窦手术粘连的潜在危险因素及其预测价值

陈东1,余红2,李洋1,黄强1,方敏1   

  1. 陈东1, 余红2, 李洋1, 黄强1, 方敏11. 江油市人民医院 耳鼻咽喉科, 四川 江油 621700;
    2. 江油市人民医院 病理科, 四川 江油 621700
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-26 出版日期:2020-07-20 发布日期:2020-08-28

Potential risk factors and evaluation of a predictive risk score model for postoperative adhesion in functional endoscopic sinus surgeryCHEN Dong1, YU Hong2, LI Yang1, HUANG Qiang1, FANG Min1 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Jiangyou Peoples Hospital, Jiangyou 621700, Sichuan, China; 2. Department of Pathology, Jiangyou Peoples Hospital, Jiangyou 621700, Sichuan, ChinaAbstract:Objective〓

This study was conducted to explore the preoperative risk factors for postoperative adhesion in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS)undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery(FESS), and to construct a risk score model to evaluate their predictive effect. MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 323 patients with CRS who underwent FESS at our hospital between January 2015 and June 2018. The risk factors for postoperative adhesion were screened using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. The risk score was assigned according to the odds ratio(OR)value, and a receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was drawn to evaluate the predictive effect. ResultsPostoperative adhesion occurred in 35 patients(10.8%). The logistic regression results showed that concha bullosa, primary FESS, operative experience less than 10 years, and a history of middle turbinate resection were independent risk factors for postoperative adhesion in FESS. The OR values were 1.12(95% CI: 1.06-1.18), 3.87(95% CI: 2.23-5.51), 3.19(95% CI: 2.07-4.31), and 2.24(95% CI:1.95-2.53), respectively. The risk score model assigned 1 point for vesicular middle turbinate, 4 points for first time FESS, 3 points for operative experience less than 10 years, and 2 points for middle turbinate resection. The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC)was 0.784(95% CI: 0.672-0.896, P<0.05). When 4 points were selected as the cut-off point, the Jordan index was the largest, with a sensitivity of 75.1% and a specificity of 73.6%. ConclusionThe incidence of postoperative adhesion in 323 patients with CRS who underwent FESS was 10.8%. The risk score model has certain reference value for predicting high-risk postoperative adhesion.   

  1. Key words:Functional endoscopic sinus surgery;
    Synechiae;
    Risk factors;
    Risk assessment scoring功能性鼻内窥镜鼻窦手术(functional endoscopic sinus surgery, FESS)是用于药物治疗不能充分控制的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(chronic rhinosinusitis, CRS)的金标准外科手术。中鼻道鼻腔粘连形成是FESS最常见的并发症, 会对疾病预后和患者生活质量产生不良影响[1]。即使对CRS患者采取了最佳的手术方式和仔细的术后清理, 仍有一部分患者会出现术后粘连[2]。识别术后粘连的高风险人群有利于及时采取积极防治措施。因此, 本研究旨在探究CRS患者某些固有的一般人口学特征、术前临床特征及术者因素是否会对FESS术后发生粘连的风险产生影响, 并探讨和建立术后粘连风险评分体系, 对预测效果进行评价。
  • Received:2019-07-26 Online:2020-07-20 Published:2020-08-28

摘要: 目的 探究行功能性鼻内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)患者发生术后粘连的术前危险因素,并构建风险评分模型,评价预测效果。 方法 对2015年1月至2018年6月进行过FESS的323例CRS患者进行回顾性分析。采用病例对照研究方法分析术后粘连的危险因素,采用多因素Logistic回归分析筛选影响因素,根据比值比(OR)值进行发病风险赋值,并绘制ROC曲线评价预测效果。 结果 35例(10.8%)患者发生术后粘连。Logistic回归结果显示泡状中鼻甲、首次行FESS、术者经验<10年以及中鼻甲切除史是FESS术后粘连的独立危险因素,OR值分别为1.12(95% CI:1.06~1.18)、3.87(95% CI:2.23~5.51)、3.19(95% CI:2.07~4.31)、2.24(95% CI:1.95~2.53)。发病风险评分模型为泡状中鼻甲赋值1分、首次行FESS赋值4分、术者经验<10年赋值3分以及中鼻甲切除史赋值2分。ROC曲线分析表明,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.784(95% CI:0.672~0.896,P<0.05),选择4分作为截断值时,约登指数最大,此时灵敏度为75.1%,特异度为73.6%。 结论 323例CRS患者行FESS术后粘连的发生率为10.8%,风险评分对预判术后粘连高风险者有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 功能性鼻内窥镜鼻窦手术, 术后粘连, 危险因素, 风险评分

Abstract: Objective This study was conducted to explore the preoperative risk factors for postoperative adhesion in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS)undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery(FESS), and to construct a risk score model to evaluate their predictive effect. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 323 patients with CRS who underwent FESS at our hospital between January 2015 and June 2018. The risk factors for postoperative adhesion were screened using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. The risk score was assigned according to the odds ratio(OR)value, and a receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was drawn to evaluate the predictive effect. Results Postoperative adhesion occurred in 35 patients(10.8%). The logistic regression results showed that concha bullosa, primary FESS, operative experience less than 10 years, and a history of middle turbinate resection were independent risk factors for postoperative adhesion in FESS. The OR values were 1.12(95% CI: 1.06-1.18), 3.87(95% CI: 2.23-5.51), 3.19(95% CI: 2.07-4.31), and 2.24(95% CI:1.95-2.53), respectively. The risk score model assigned 1 point for vesicular middle turbinate, 4 points for first time FESS, 3 points for operative experience less than 10 years, and 2 points for middle turbinate resection. The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC)was 0.784(95% CI: 0.672-0.896, P<0.05). When 4 points were selected as the cut-off point, the Jordan index was the largest, with a sensitivity of 75.1% and a specificity of 73.6%. Conclusion The incidence of postoperative adhesion in 323 patients with CRS who underwent FESS was 10.8%. The risk score model has certain reference value for predicting high-risk postoperative adhesion.

Key words: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery, Synechiae, Risk factors, Risk assessment scoring

中图分类号: 

  • R764
[1] Adriaensen GFJPM, Lim KH, Fokkens WJ. Safety and efficacy of a bioabsorbable fluticasone propionate-eluting sinus dressing in postoperative management of endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2017, 7(8):813-820. doi:10.1002/alr.21963.
[2] Zheng XL, Zhao YX, Xu M. Efficacy and safety of 3 nasal packing materials used after functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a comparative study in China[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2017, 23:1992-1998. doi:10.12659/msm.899553.
[3] 程友, 李泽卿, 张勇, 等. 经鼻蝶垂体瘤切除术后脑脊液鼻漏的影响因素分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2014, 20(2):134-136. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201402011. CHENG You, LI Zeqing, ZHANG Yong, et al. Risk factors in cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea following transnasosphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Skull Base Surgery, 2014, 20(2):134-136. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201402011.
[4] Maharaj DD, Virk RS, Bansal S, et al. Comparison of basal Lamella relaxing incision and combined conventional medialisation and controlled synechiae in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomised prospective study[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2018, 132(7):605-610. doi:10.1017/S0022215118000944.
[5] Manji J, Habib AR, Macias-Valle L, et al. Comparing the efficacy of Silastic and gloved-Merocel middle meatal spacers for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2018. doi:10.1002/alr.22119.
[6] Mantovani M, Rinaldi V, Torretta S, et al. The dragonfly splint: a new disposable device designed to prevent both medial and lateral turbinate synechiae after sinonasal surgery[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2014, 25(2):547-550. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000000388.
[7] Testa D, Marcuccio G, Panin G, et al. Nasal mucosa healing after endoscopic sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis of elderly patients: role of topic alpha-tocopherol acetate[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2017, 29(Suppl 1):191-195. doi:10.1007/s40520-016-0647-x.
[8] 马明忠, 周霞, 伊纪亮, 等. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎鼻内镜术后鼻腔粘连的预防及处理探讨[J]. 中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2017, 25(4):276-277. doi:10.16542/j.cnki.issn.1007-4856.2017.04.011. MA Mingzhong, ZHOU Xia, YI Jiliang, et al. Prevention and treatment of nasal adhesion after endoscopic surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology in Integrative Medicine, 2017, 25(4):276-277. doi:10.16542/j.cnki.issn.1007-4856.2017.04.011.
[9] 张敏, 王永良. 鼻内窥镜术后粘连发生情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2015, 12(4): 80-82. ZHANG Min, WANG Yongliang. Investigation on the occurrence status of adhesion after nasal endoscopic operation and its influence factors[J]. China Medical Herald, 2015, 12(4): 80-82.
[10] 林庆洪, 王龙海, 张玉琴. 鼻内镜手术治疗慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉的临床观察[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2015, 21(3):252-254. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201503024.
[11] 岳伟. 鼻内镜鼻窦手术中鼻腔鼻窦解剖变异与慢性鼻窦炎的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016(1):64-66. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.500. YUE Wei. Relationship between sinonasal anatomic variation and chronic sinusitis in endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2016(1):64-66. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.500.
[12] 张万红, 赵玉林, 李星丹. 泡状中鼻甲引流通道的三维CT影像学观察[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 31(10):753-756. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.10.004. ZHANG Wanhong, ZHAO Yulin, LI Xingdan. 3D computed tomographic study of concha bullosa drainage pathway[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2017, 31(10):753-756. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.10.004.
[13] 董吕华, 毛华杰, 赵波. 两种术式治疗泡状中鼻甲的临床研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2014, 21(11):611-612. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2014.11.017.
[14] 沈勤峰, 沈小燕, 朱荣强, 等. 鼻内镜下中鼻甲功能性部分切除治疗慢性鼻窦炎76例分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5):82-85. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.176. SHEN Qinfeng, SHEN Xiaoyan, ZHU Rongqiang, et al. Role of functional middle turbinectomy in functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2018, 32(5):82-85. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.176.
[15] Jiang RS, Liang KL. The influence of functional endoscopic sinus surgery on sleep related outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Int J Otolaryngol, 2019, 2019:7951045. doi:10.1155/2019/7951045.
[16] Corbett M, OConnor P, Byrne D, et al. Identifying and reducing risks in functional endoscopic sinus surgery through a hierarchical task analysis[J]. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol, 2019, 4(1):5-12. doi:10.1002/lio2.220.
[17] Dubny S, Peluso F, Masson I, et al. Application of a health risk assessment model for cattle exposed to pesticides in contaminated drinking waters: a study case from the Pampas region, Argentina[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 196:585-592. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.013.
[18] Zhou HX, Hu YH, Li XQ, et al. Assessment of the risk of venous thromboembolism in medical inpatients using the Padua prediction score and caprini risk assessment model[J]. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2018, 25(11):1091-1104. doi:10.5551/jat.43653.
[19] 万晓龙. ERCP术后胰腺炎危险因素分析及预测效果评价[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2018, 26(8):677-680. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2018.08.11. WAN Xiaolong. Analysis of the risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis and assessment its predict effect in patients of gastroenterology department[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Digestion, 2018, 26(8):677-680. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2018.08.11.
[20] 祝语. 慢性鼻窦炎病因及发病机制[J]. 科技风, 2016(23):167. doi:10.19392/j.cnki.1671-7341.201623159.
[1] 杨秀芬,尤冉,马秀梅,王康,王艳玲. 以医院为基础的中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变流行病学调查及危险因素的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 75-79.
[2] 郝文培, 翟华蕾, 孙晓彤, 张雅妮, 朱艳辉, 孔倩倩, 程钧, 张婷. 角膜再移植原因与植片失活的危险因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 134-140.
[3] 黄河,欧阳晖. 下咽癌共病食管癌的高危因素及预后分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 82-86.
[4] 郎永耀,杨云,刘晴,徐林弟,林子萍. 咽喉反流性疾病的影响因素及治疗效果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3): 119-123.
[5] 姜秀颖,李元彬. 后房型人工晶体脱位的临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 105-110.
[6] 崔乐,关凯,李丽莎,李俊达,王子熹,徐迎阳,王良录,尹佳. 蜜蜂研究人群中蜂毒过敏患病率及相关危险因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 63-66.
[7] 沈翎,林宗通,林兴,杨中婕. 儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征危险因素的[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 25-29.
[8] 王国强, 赵春红, 霍红, 龚志云, 宋伟伟, 严丽霞, 李雪华, 王伟丽. 早产儿听力筛查结果及其听力障碍危险因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 7-10.
[9] 葛星, 吕玲双, 潘铭, 时巧梅, 许建峰, 林友结, 孙雅慧, 神平. 打鼾相关流行病学现状及其影响因素调查研究——以徐州地区为例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(5): 10-13.
[10] 李学忠, 刘洪英, 李心沁, 蔡晓岚. 睡眠呼吸紊乱成人患者健康相关危险因素调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(4): 6-10.
[11] 赵源庆1,郭家亮1综述张峰2审校. OSAHS与心血管疾病研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(2): 33-37.
[12] 梅芳,陈志钧. 超低和极低出生体质量儿早产儿视网膜病变及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 76-78.
[13] 李烨,陆美萍,唐少文,沈冲. 大学生打鼾的危险因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(1): 1-3 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!