山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 1-6.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.065

• 论著 •    

双卵双胎和单卵双胎新生儿听力筛查结果分析

李为,赵毅,葛玥铭,付洪涛,王进东,张晓龙,董洁,程钰翔   

  1. 唐山市妇幼保健院 耳鼻喉科, 河北 唐山 063000
  • 发布日期:2023-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 程钰翔. E-mail:chengguoan199968@sina.com;
  • 基金资助:
    2018年度河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划(20181356)

Analysis of hearing screening results of dizygotic and monozygotic twins

LI Wei, ZHAO Yi, GE Yueming, FU Hongtao, WANG Jindong, ZHANG Xiaolong, DONG Jie, CHENG Yuxiang   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, Tangshan Maternal and child Health Care Hospital, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China
  • Published:2023-03-30

摘要: 目的 对照分析新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)双卵双胎和单卵双胎新生儿听力初筛结果,探讨其听力特点及相关因素。 方法 随机抽取2018年8月17日至2019年7月21日唐山市妇幼保健院NICU的120对双胞胎,共240人,根据受孕方式(体外受精胚胎植入、自然受孕)、孕检B超结果及新生儿的性别将其分为双卵双胎组和单卵双胎组,待生命体征平稳后,采用瞬态耳声发射(TEOAE)仪进行听力筛查,用SPSS 23.0软件统计初筛未通过率,探讨其听力特点及相关因素。 结果 240人中双卵双胎124人,未通过率37.10%(46/124);单卵双胎116人,未通过率31.90%(37/116)。两组的受孕方式及生产方式相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001,P=0.006),其余指标差异无统计学意义。 结论 双卵和单卵来源对双胎的听力初筛未通过率差异无统计学意义;双卵双胎多为体外受精胚胎植入,单卵双胎多为自然受孕;双卵双胎的剖宫产率高;新生儿的性别及出生体质量<1 500 g等因素对听力初筛结果无显著影响。

关键词: 听力筛查, 耳声发射, 单卵双胎, 双卵双胎, 新生儿重症监护病房, 瞬态诱发性耳声发射

Abstract: Objective In this study we analyzed the hearing screening results of dizygotic and monozygotic twins in neonatal intensive care unit(NICU), to compare and discuss the hearing characteristics and factors related to positive screening. Methods Overall, 120 pairs of twins, totaling 240 infants in the NICU of the Tangshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital were analyzed. Participants were divided into the dizygotic and monozygotic twin groups, and data regarding the method of conception(in vitro fertilization embryo implantation or natural conception), gender, and b-ultrasound results of pregnancy examination were collected. A transient otoacoustic emission(TEOAE)instrument was used for hearing screening after the infants' condition was stabilized, and vital signs had become stable. SPSS 23.0 software was used to calculate the failure rate of initial screening, and the risk factors and related factors were analyzed and summarized. Results In total, we analyzed 240 infants, including 124 dizygotic twins with a failure rate of 37.10%(46/124)and 116 monozygotic twins with a failure rate of 31.90%(37/116).The two groups were significantly different in terms of the methods of conception and delivery(P<0.001, P=0.006), but no significant difference was found in any other indices. Conclusion Dizygotic and monozygotic sources had no significant effect on the failure rate of hearing screening in twins. Dizygotic twins were found to be mostly conceived by in vitro fertilization embryo implantation, while monozygotic twins were predominantly naturally conceived. The cesarean section rate of dizygotic twins was high. Factors such as sex pair and birth weight <1 500 g had no significant effect on the results of preliminary screening.

Key words: Hearing screening, Transient otoacoustic emissions, Dizygotic twins, Monozygotic twins, Neonatal intensive care unit, Transient otoacoustic emission

中图分类号: 

  • R764.5
[1] 袁涛, 曾祥丽. 新生儿耳聋防控体系建设的历程与现状(1): 新生儿听力筛查[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2018, 26(2): 209-214. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2018.02.023 YUAN Tao, ZENG Xiangli. History and present situation of prevention and control system of neonatal deafness(1)-newborn hearing screening[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2018, 26(2): 209-214. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2018.02.023
[2] 张恩东, 李大建, 苗乐杰. 重症监护病房与母婴同室新生儿听力筛查比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(2): 29-31. ZHANG Endong, LI Dajian, MIAO Lejie. Comparative study of newborn hearing screening between the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2011, 25(2): 29-31.
[3] 唐俊湘. 3301例新生儿听力及耳聋基因联合筛查结果分析[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2016. doi:10.7666/d.D01025990
[4] 孙磊, 郭玲. 听力筛查未通过的新生儿听力损失的高危因素研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2013, 28(10): 1608-1610. doi:10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2013.28.27 SUN Lei, GUO Ling. Study on high risk factors of neonatal hearing loss failing in hearing screening[J]. Maternal and Child Health Care of China, 2013, 28(10): 1608-1610. doi:10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2013.28.27
[5] 陶方英, 龚正鹏. TEOAE与AABR在高危新生儿听力筛查中的联合应用[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2013, 11(2): 235-238. doi:10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2019.10.007 TAO Fangying, GONG Zhengpeng. Combined TEOAE and AABR screening in high-risk newborns[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2013, 11(2): 235-238. doi:10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2019.10.007
[6] 韩德民. 新生儿及婴幼儿听力筛查[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2003: 58-171.
[7] 段聪军. 新生儿耳声发射、AABR与耳聋基因联合筛查的临床应用[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(26): 4515-4517. doi:10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2015.26.40 DUAN Congjun. Clinical application of combined screening of newborn otoacoustic emission, AABR and deafness gene[J]. Maternal and Child Health Care of China, 2015, 30(26): 4515-4517. doi:10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2015.26.40
[8] Hille ETM, van Straaten HI, Verkerk PH, et al. Prevalence and independent risk factors for hearing loss in NICU infants[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2007, 96(8): 1155-1158. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00398.x
[9] 陈惠球, 陈敬国, 黄超. 早产儿AABR听力筛查初筛时间探讨[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2017, 2(11): 124-125. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-2479.2017.11.097 CHEN Huiqiu, CHEN Jingguo, HUANG Chao. The effect of different initial screening times on the rate of spontaneous auditory brainstem response in preterm infants[J]. Journal of Clinic Nursing's Practicality, 2017, 2(11): 124-125. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-2479.2017.11.097
[10] 陆洋, 孙晓勉. 新生儿听力及耳聋基因联合筛查研究进展[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2015, 26(5): 1088-1091. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2015.05.067 LU Yang, SUN Xiaomian. Research progress on combined screening of neonatal hearing and deafness-related genes[J]. Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research, 2015, 26(5): 1088-1091. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2015.05.067
[11] 黄丽辉, 韩德民. 新生儿耳聋基因筛查的质控体系建立[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2015, 22(2): 60-62. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2015.02.003 HUANG Lihui, HAN Demin. Establishment of quality control system for neonatal deafness gene screening[J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2015, 22(2): 60-62. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2015.02.003
[12] Berg AL, Spitzer JB, Towers HM, et al. Newborn hearing screening in the NICU: profile of failed auditory brainstem response/passed otoacoustic emission[J]. Pediatrics, 2005, 116(4): 933-938. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2806
[13] Stein LK. Factors influencing the efficacy of universal newborn hearing screening[J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 1999, 46(1): 95-105. doi:10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70084-5
[14] 凌琴音, 李茂清, 徐碧红, 等. 7840例新生儿听力筛查和听力损失高危因素分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2016, 24(3): 280-282. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2016.03.015 LING Qinyin, LI Maoqing, XU Bihong, et al. Analysis of hearing screening and high risk factors of hearing loss in 7840 newborns[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2016, 24(3): 280-282. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2016.03.015
[15] 王晓丽, 吴丹, 李丹慧, 等. 3371例重症监护病房新生儿听力筛查结果分析[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2017, 15(6): 692-697. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2017.06.017 WANG Xiaoli, WU Dan, LI Danhui, et al. Hearing screening in 3, 371 NICU newborns[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2017, 15(6): 692-697. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2017.06.017
[16] 李明颖, 马艳萍, 高梦莹, 等. 囊胚质量对冻融胚胎移植临床结局的影响及囊胚移植选择策略[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(15): 2453-2456. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2018.15.001 LI Mingying, MA Yanping, GAO Mengying, et al. Effect of blastocyst quality on clinical results of frozen-thawed embryo transfer and strategy of blastocyst transfer[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2018, 34(15): 2453-2456. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2018.15.001
[17] 耿女, 纪文娴, 张娜娜, 等. 心理干预措施对行辅助生殖技术治疗不孕症患者的幸福感及妊娠率的影响[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2018, 10(9): 82-84. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2018.09.23 GENG Nv, JI Wenxian, ZHANG Nana, et al. Effects of psychological interventions on the well-being and pregnancy rate of patients with infertility treated by assisted reproductive technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology, 2018, 10(9): 82-84. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2018.09.23
[18] 赵雪雷, 黄丽辉, 王现蕾, 等. 72例0~4岁双胎儿童的临床听力学及病因学分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32(13): 979-983. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.13.005 ZHAO Xuelei, HUANG Lihui, WANG Xianlei, et al. Analysis of clinical audiology and etiology in 72 twins aged 0-4 years[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2018, 32(13): 979-983. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.13.005
[19] 李翔, 曾莠蔓, 罗宇迪, 等. 体外受精-胚胎移植中移植不同培育时间、单双胚胎的不孕症患者受孕及妊娠结局观察[J]. 山东医药, 2019, 59(27): 67-70. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2019.27.019 LI Xiang, ZENG XiuMan, LUO Yudi, et al. Observation on conception and pregnancy outcome of infertile patients with single or double embryos transplanted at different incubation time in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer[J]. Shandong Medical Journal, 2019, 59(27): 67-70. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2019.27.019
[20] 张怡, 严思思, 丁锦丽, 等. 囊胚发育速度及形态学评分对冻融胚胎移植周期单囊胚移植结局的影响[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2019, 28(2): 107-111. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2019.02.002 ZHANG Yi, YAN Sisi, DING Jinli, et al. Influence of delayed blastulation and morphological score on the pregnancy outcome of elective single blastocyst transfer in frozen cycles[J]. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2019, 28(2): 107-111. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2019.02.002
[21] 刘萍, 陈平, 王智楠, 等. 新生儿重症监护病房听力联合筛查结果及随访分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2014, 28(10): 705-707. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2014.10.010 LIU Ping, CHEN Ping, WANG Zhinan, et al. Analysis of TEOAE and AABR hearing screening and follow-up in NICU[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2014, 28(10): 705-707. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2014.10.010
[22] 黄丽辉. 解读2010年版新生儿听力筛查技术规范[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2011, 19(6): 495-496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2011.06.002 HUANG Lihui. Interpretation of the 2010 edition of the technical specification for newborn hearing screening[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2011, 19(6): 495-496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2011.06.002
[23] 史冬梅, 益欢欢, 史霞, 等. 自动听性脑干反应及耳声发射联合使用在新生儿听力筛查中临床意义[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2018, 16(2): 199-204. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2018.02.014 SHI Dongmei, YI Huanhuan, SHI Xia, et al. Combined automatic auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emissions hearing screening in newborns with different disease statuses and gestational ages[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2018, 16(2): 199-204. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2018.02.014
[24] 倪坤, 孙世冰, 李晓艳. 1 000 Hz声导抗在高危新生儿听力筛查中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 43-47. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.378 NI Kun, SUN Shibing, LI Xiaoyan. Application of 1000 Hz acoustic immittance in hearing screenings of high-risk newborns[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(1): 43-47. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.378
[1] 段新艳,宋忠义,王宁,訾希存, 潘新良. DPOAE与高刺激率ABR在听力正常耳鸣患者中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 6-10.
[2] 盘琳琳, 方旭华, 翟丰, 桂一丁, 边洲亮, 陈洁. 新生儿动脉血血气分析与听力筛查结果相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 20-24.
[3] 倪坤, 孙世冰, 李晓艳. 1 000 Hz声导抗在高危新生儿听力筛查中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 43-47.
[4] 盘琳琳, 孔令漪, 翟丰, 陈洁. 新生儿听力障碍常见危险因素及听力筛查方法研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 131-137.
[5] 李元超,吴玮,王刚,屈昌北,王磊,芦文俊,李丹,韩浩伦,刘钢. 模拟失重及飞船内稳态噪声对大鼠听功能的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 11-16.
[6] 王国强, 赵春红, 霍红, 龚志云, 宋伟伟, 严丽霞, 李雪华, 王伟丽. 早产儿听力筛查结果及其听力障碍危险因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 7-10.
[7] 周晓娓, 王跃建, 段光荣, 虞幼军. 听力诊疗网络平台的开发[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 79-84.
[8] 余崇仙,杨克林,张晓敏,汪平 . 听力筛查未通过婴幼儿的客观听力评估[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(6): 38-41.
[9] 刘志奇1,2,刘立思1,杨琨3 . 新生儿听力筛查11894例结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(2): 8-12.
[10] 张恩东,李大建,苗乐杰. 重症监护病房与母婴同室新生儿听力筛查比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(2): 29-31.
[11] 张俊瑶 朱富高 孙美红. 6159例新生儿听力筛查结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(4): 38-40.
[12] 杨 琨,刘志奇,黄治物 . 正常新生儿226Hz及1000Hz探测音鼓室导抗测试[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(5): 420-423 .
[13] 曲 玲 . 243例未通过听力筛查的婴幼儿ABR结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(2): 189-190 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!