山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 7-14.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.418

• 论著 • 上一篇    

镫骨肌反射阈存在的突聋患者预后及影响因素

孙永强1, 2,宋忠义2,王春芳2,李晓2,傅莹2,潘新良1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医院 耳鼻咽喉科,山东 济南 250012;
    2.山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛) 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,山东 青岛 266035
  • 发布日期:2023-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 潘新良. E-mail:panxinlent@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)科研启动基金资助项目(QDKY2018ZD03);青岛市医疗卫生重点学科B类基金

Prognosis and influencing factors in sudden deafness patients with acoustic stapedius reflex threshold

SUN Yongqiang1,2, SONG Zhongyi2, WANG Chunfang2, LI Xiao2, FU Ying2, PAN Xinliang1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University(Qingdao), Qingdao 266035, Shandong, China
  • Published:2023-03-30

摘要: 目的 分析镫骨肌反射阈存在的突聋患者的预后情况,探讨其影响因素。 方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年12月收治的282例镫骨肌反射阈存在的突聋患者的临床资料,采用Excel进行数据整理,SPSS 26.0对收集的资料进行描述性分析及统计分析,对性别、年龄、就诊时间、是否伴有耳鸣、眩晕、基础疾病(糖尿病、高血压、冠心病)、听力曲线类型、听力损失程度、镫骨肌反射阈、镫骨肌反射阈与纯音听阈差值(A-T)等因素进行统计学分析。 结果 282例镫骨肌反射阈存在的突发性聋患者中,治愈101例,显效8例,有效54例,无效119例,总有效率57.8%。耳聋侧别(P=0.907)、伴随症状(P眩晕=0.686,P耳鸣=0.534)、基础疾病(P高血压=0.338, P糖尿病=0.262, P心脏病=0.780)、镫骨肌反射阈(P0.5 kHz=0.152, P1.0 kHz=0.701, P2.0 kHz=0.810)、镫骨肌反射阈与纯音听阈差值(P0.5 kHz A-T=0.413, P2 kHz A-T=0.092)在镫骨肌反射阈存在的突聋患者预后有效组和无效组组间差异无统计学意义,而年龄(P=0.022)、性别(P=0.001)、突聋就诊时间(P<0.001)、听力曲线类型(P=0.004)、听力损失程度(P=0.008)和1 kHz镫骨肌反射阈与听阈差值(P1 kHz A-T<0.001)是预后有效的影响因素。 结论 在镫骨肌反射阈存在的突聋患者中,性别、年龄、就诊时间、听力曲线类型、听力损失程度和1 kHz镫骨肌反射阈与听阈差值对耳聋预后有影响,镫骨肌反射阈值变化与突聋患者预后差异无统计学意义,但可以通过1 kHz镫骨肌反射阈与听阈差值预估突聋患者疗效,提高患者治疗信心。

关键词: 突聋, 预后, 镫骨肌反射, 镫骨肌反射阈

Abstract: Objective Analyze the prognosis of sudden deafness patients with acoustic stapedius reflex threshold and explore its influencing factors. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 282 patients who suffered sudden deafness with acoustic stapedius reflex threshold from January 2018 to December 2021. Excel was used for data processing, and SPSS 26.0 was used for descriptive and statistical analysis of the collected data. Statistical analyses were conducted on factors such as gender, age, time of medical treatment, tinnitus, vertigo, basic diseases(diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease), hearing curve type, degree of hearing loss, acoustic stapedius reflex threshold, difference between acoustic stapedius reflex threshold and hearing threshold(A-T). Results Among 282 cases of sudden deafness with acoustic stapedius reflex threshold, 101 cases were cured, 8 cases were markedly effective, 54 cases were effective, and 119 cases were ineffective. The total effective rate was 57.8%. Deafness side(P=0.907), accompanying symptoms(Pvertigo=0.686, Ptinnitus=0.534), basic diseases(Phypertension= 0.338, Pdiabetes=0.262, Pcoronary heart disease=0.780), acoustic stapedius reflex threshold(P0.5 kHz=0.152, P1.0 kHz=0.701, P2.0 kHz=0.810), the difference between acoustic stapedius reflex threshold and the pure tone hearing threshold(P0.5 kHz A-T=0.413,P2 kHz A-T=0.092)of patients who suffered sudden deafness with acoustic stapedius reflex threshold had no significant difference in prognosis. However, age(P=0.022), sex(P=0.001), visit time of sudden deafness(P<0.001), type of hearing curve(P=0.004), degree of hearing loss(P=0.008)and difference between 1 kHz acoustic stapedius reflex threshold and hearing threshold(P1 kHz A-T<0.001)were effective prognostic factors. Conclusion In sudden deafness patients with acoustic stapedius reflex threshold, gender, age, visit time of sudden deafness, type of hearing curve, degree of hearing loss and difference between 1 kHz acoustic stapedius reflex threshold and hearing threshold have an impact on the prognosis of deafness. The change of acoustic stapedius reflex threshold has no significant correlation with the prognosis of sudden deafness patients. However, the effect of sudden deafness patients can be estimated by the 1 kHz acoustic stapedius reflex threshold and hearing threshold difference to improve patients confidence in treatment.

Key words: Sudden deafness, Prognosis, Acoustic stapedius reflex, Acoustic stapedius reflex threshold

中图分类号: 

  • R764.43
[1] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会.突发性聋诊断和治疗指南(2015)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 50(6): 443-447. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2015.06.002
[2] 伦杰, 张亚楠, 薛建军. 突发性耳聋患者临床治疗效果及相关影响因素分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2016, 22(3): 198-202. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201603006 LUN Jie, ZHANG Yanan, XUE Jianjun. Analysis of clinical therapeutic effect and related influencing factors in patients with sudden deafness[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Skull Base Surgery, 2016, 22(3): 198-202. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201603006
[3] 宋攀攀, 何静静, 沈珊珊, 等. 不同阶段突发性耳聋患者焦虑、抑郁的调查[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2013, 42(5): 56-60. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-548X.2013.05.017 SONG Panpan, HE Jingjing, SHEN Shanshan, et al. Anxiety and depression survey in different stages of patients with sudden hearing loss[J]. Journal of Medical Research, 2013, 42(5): 56-60. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-548X.2013.05.017
[4] Jack Katz. 临床听力学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2006: 179-185.
[5] Shi L, Zhao R, Li XX, et al. A review of the neurobiological mechanisms that distinguish between loudness recruitment and hyperacusis[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2022, 28: e936373. doi:10.12659/MSM.936373
[6] Preyer S, Gummer AW. Nonlinearity of mechanoelectrical transduction of outer hair cells as the source of nonlinear basilar-membrane motion and loudness recruitment[J]. Audiol Neurootol, 1996, 1(1): 3-11. doi:10.1159/000259185.
[7] Zhang MS, Zwislocki JJ. OHC response recruitment and its correlation with loudness recruitment[J]. Hear Res, 1995, 85(1/2): 1-10. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(95)00026-Z
[8] 余茜, 左汶奇, 钟时勋. 平坦下降型突发性聋患者耳蜗电图与预后的关系研究[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2021, 29(6): 663-667. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.06.015 YU Qian, ZUO Wenqi, ZHONG Shixun. Correlation between electrocochleogram and prognosis in patients with sudden deafness of Flat type[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2021, 29(6): 663-667. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.06.015
[9] 张呈辉. 突聋患者耳蜗电图与预后的关系[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2016, 24(3): 288-290. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2016.03.018 ZHANG Chenghui. Relationship between cochlear electrogram and prognosis in patients with sudden deafness[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2016, 24(3): 288-290. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2016.03.018
[10] 梁思玉, 肖其珍, 陈果, 等. 1 000 Hz阈值对评估低频型突发性聋预后的临床意义[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2020, 18(6): 1034-1037. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2020.06.007 LIANG Siyu, XIAO Qizhen, CHEN Guo, et al. The significance of threshold at 1 000 Hz in low-frequency sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2020, 18(6): 1034-1037. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2020.06.007
[11] 杨仕明. 听觉损伤后毛细胞再生与聋病基因治疗策略[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2009, 7(4): 271-277. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2009.04.003 YANG Shiming. Strategies of inner ear hair cell regeneration and gene therapy for hearing loss[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2009, 7(4): 271-277. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2009.04.003
[12] Jia SP, Yang SM, Guo WW, et al. Fate of mammalian cochlear hair cells and stereocilia after loss of the stereocilia[J]. J Neurosci, 2009, 29(48): 15277-15285. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3231-09.2009
[13] 刘佳丽, 李洪涛. 254例突发性耳聋预后的影响因素分析[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022, 44(4): 385-389. doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202108215 LIU Jiali, LI Hongtao. Prognostic factors of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: analysis of 254 cases[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(4): 385-389. doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202108215
[14] 周长明, 郑茜玲, 杨川, 等. 176例突发性耳聋患者的临床特征分析[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2017, 15(2): 111-114. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2017.02.009 ZHOU Changming, ZHENG Xiling, YANG Chuan, et al. The clinical characteristics of 176 patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation, 2017, 15(2): 111-114. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2017.02.009
[15] 冰丹,兰兰,关静,等.年龄对突发性耳聋的预后影响[J].中华耳科学杂志, 2018,16(3): 312-318. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2018.03.011 Bing Dan, Lan Lan, Guan Jing, et al. Age and prognosis of sudden deafness[J]. Chinese Journal of Otologists, 2018, 16(3): 312-318. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2018.03.011
[16] Hiroaki Sato, Shigeru Kuwashima, Shin-Ya Nishio, et al. Epidemiological survey of acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2017, 137: S34-S37. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1297538
[17] W Maier, J Schipper. Prognostic relevance of anamnestic and diagnostic parameters in low-frequency hearing impairment [J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2006, 120(8): 613-618. doi: 10.1017/S002221510600137X
[18] Korres S, Stamatiou G A, Gkoritsa E, et al. Prognosis of patients with idiopathic sudden hearing loss: role of vestibular assessment[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2011, 125(3): 251-257. doi: 10.1017/S0022215110002082
[19] Erdal Samim, Rahmi Kilic, Ali Ozdek, et al. Combined treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss with steroid, dextran and piracetam: experience with 68 cases[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2004, 261(4): 187-190. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0659-y
[20] A Ceylan, F Celenk, Y K Kemalo glu, et al. Impact of prognostic factors on recovery from sudden hearing loss[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2007, 121(11):1035-1040. doi: 10.1017/S0022215107005683
[21] 梁敏, 吴悔, 陈建勇, 等. 前庭诱发肌源性电位预测突聋患者疗效的临床价值[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 27-32. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.063 Liang Min, Wu Hui, Chen Jianyong, et al. Clinical value of vestibular evoked myogenic potential to predict prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(5): 27-32. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.063
[22] Chengfang Chen, Guanggang Shi, Mingqiang He, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss in aged people: a retrospective study[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2019, 139(11): 959-965. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1657589
[23] 付剑芬, 傅江涛, 林洪斌, 等.老年突发性耳聋流行病学特征及发病相关影响因素和预防措施分析[J].中国预防医学杂志, 2019, 20(11): 1036-1039. doi:10.16506/j.1009-6639.2019.11.006 Fu Jianfen, Fu Jiangtao, Lin Hongbin, et al. Epidemiological characteristics, risk factors and preventive measures of sudden deafness in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2019, 20(11): 1036-1039. doi:10.16506/j.1009-6639.2019.11.006
[24] 杨安妮,李琦,李湘平.突发性聋预后研究进展[J].中华耳科学杂志, 2021, 19(2): 306-310. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2021.02.024 YANG Annie, LI Qi, LI Xiangping. Advances in research on prognosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Chinese Journal of Otologists, 2021, 19(2): 306-310. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2021.02.024
[25] 韩朝, 丁娟. 中耳肌肉生理及病理[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 6-10. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.038 Han Chao, Ding Juan. Physiology and pathology of middle ear muscle[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(5): 6-10. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.038
[1] 姜超,周炫辰,韩杰,岳志勇. IVc期下咽癌特征分析及列线图预后模型构建[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 49-54.
[2] 程瑶,张震,杨吉,冯成敏,邓启成,张西,赵锐,朱鑫,吴俊志,刘海,邓世山. CIP2A在下咽癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 40-44.
[3] 刘盼,王川,赵泽祺,吴梅,徐继峰,李巍,张伟强,刘稳. 头颈部转移性透明细胞癌5例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 45-50.
[4] 王中卫,杨林,郭亚,孙斌,王亚利,马秀龙,任宏涛,包兴. 鼻咽癌患者miR-429、miR-200C表达与预后关系分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(3): 81-86.
[5] 王莹莹,周涵,董伟达,邢光前,陈智斌,张清照,张立庆. 外耳道腺样囊性癌的远处转移及预后分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 1-6.
[6] 谭玉芳,易天华. 鼻咽癌放疗后突发性聋18例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 35-39.
[7] 黄俊伟,陈学军,刘宏飞,陶冶,李祖飞,陈平,张洋. 细胞周期蛋白E2在下咽癌中的表达及其意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 132-137.
[8] 周芳茗,谢艳,刘洋蒋路云. 鼻源性头痛的研究动态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 130-133.
[9] 徐进敬,胡京华,吴元庆,邓毅,喻唯唯. CO2激光显微手术在喉癌前病变和早期声门型喉癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 129-133.
[10] 陈慧君,宋圣花,董伟达,周涵. 术前外周血纤维蛋白原水平对喉癌预后的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 110-114.
[11] 丁玉静,兰兰,王秋菊,冀飞,熊芬,谢林怡,丁海娜,夏寅,赵辉. 外伤导致听力损失的临床特点及预后[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(1): 9-14.
[12] 宗小芳,胡国华,钟时勋,雷艳,江黎珠,康厚墉. 影响低频下降型突发性聋不伴眩晕预后的相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(1): 33-37.
[13] 陈雪松,付伟伟,刘江涛. 中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值和血小板淋巴细胞比值对调强放疗鼻咽癌患者的预后价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(1): 50-53.
[14] 柳杨凡,贾建,万保罗. 喉白斑76例临床表现及病理分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 162-165.
[15] 冯剑,周涵,宋圣花,赵青,张佳程,刘雅琴,沈宇杰,董伟达. 鼻腔鼻窦腺样囊性癌15例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 87-91.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!