山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 4-5.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.159

• 鼻内镜下治疗难治性鼻出血 • 上一篇    下一篇

鼻内镜治疗难治性鼻出血121例疗效分析

余鹏举1,许风雷2,江满杰2   

  1. 1.江苏省昆山市中医医院耳鼻咽喉科, 江苏 昆山 215300; 
    2.南京军区南京总医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科, 南京 210002
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-25 发布日期:2013-08-16
  • 作者简介:余鹏举。 Email:ypj1025@163.com

Electric coagulation hemostasis under nasal endoscopy for 121 cases of intractable nosebleed

YU Peng-ju1, XU Feng-lei2, JIANG Man-jie2   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan  215300, Jiangsu, China; 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Nanjing 210002,China
  • Received:2013-05-25 Published:2013-08-16

摘要:

目的   分析难治性鼻出血的鼻内镜治疗效果,并与传统的填塞止血方法进行比较。方法   回顾分析2011年1月至2012年12月接受治疗的鼻出血患者的临床资料。比较鼻内镜下止血组与鼻腔内填塞止血组患者的治疗效果、疼痛程度、术后并发症、再出血(治疗后至随访2个月结束)、出血量(治疗开始至随访2个月结束)、术后鼻腔恢复通气时间、鼻黏膜恢复时间等。结果   鼻内镜组治愈率高于鼻腔内填塞组,差异有统计学意义(97.2%,69/71 vs 84.0%,42/50;P=0.0095);术后2个月内鼻内镜组再出血率低于鼻腔内填塞组,差异有统计学意义(5.6%,4/71 vs  46.0%,23/50;P<0.001);治疗中及治疗后鼻内镜组疼痛评分平均值均低于鼻腔内填塞组,差异均有统计学意义(3.08±0.72 vs 4.72±0.49; P<0.001; 2.59±0.48 vs 4.21±0.58; P<0.001);鼻内镜组患者术后并发症发生率低于鼻腔内填塞组,差异有统计学意义(21.1%,15/71 vs 42.0%,21/50; P=0.0134);鼻内镜组总出血量低于鼻腔内填塞组,差异有统计学意义[(35.75±9.83) mL vs (64.89±14.32)mL, P<0.001];鼻内镜组术后恢复通气时间短于鼻腔内填塞组,差异有统计学意义[(3.34±0.87)d vs (7.14±2.31)d, P<0.001];鼻内镜组患者术后鼻黏膜恢复时间早于鼻腔内填塞组,差异有统计学意义[(5.68±3.21)d vs (9.31±3.76)d;P<0.001)。结论   鼻内镜下电凝止血术疗效可靠,并发症少,术后恢复较快,可作为难治性鼻出血的首选治疗方法。

关键词: 鼻内镜检查, 并发症, 疼痛, 填塞止血, 难治性鼻出血

Abstract:

Objective    To study the clinical effect of electric coagulation hemostasis under nasal endoscopy for treatment of intractable nosebleed. Methods    Clinical data of intractable nosebleed patients received treatment at our hospital from 2011 to 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A received nasal endoscopic treatment and group B received packing hemostasis treatment. Cure rate, complications, pain scale, recovery and rehaemorrhagia rate were compared between the two groups. Results    Group A had a higher cure rate than group B(97.2%, 69/71 vs 84.0%, 42/50; P=0.0095).The pain scales were lower in group A both peri-treatment and post-treatment than in group B (3.08±0.72 vs 4.72±0.49; P<0.001; 2.59±0.48 vs 4.21±0.58; P<0.001). The group A patients had a sooner recovery than group B patients (P<0.001). Group A patients had a lower rehaemorrhagia rate than group B patients(5.6%, 4/71 vs  46.0%, 23/50; P<0.001). Conclusion    Electric coagulation hemostasis under nasal endoscopy is a safe and effective treatment for intractable nosebleed.

Key words: Nasal endoscopy, Complications; Pain, Packing hemostasis, Intractable nosebleed

中图分类号: 

  • R765.23
[1] 张汝祥,田昊,马有祥. 鼻内镜鼻窦手术前筛窦颅底高度的CT评估价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 75-77.
[2] 仇书要,刘大波,钟建文,杨李强. 儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征等离子[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 34-37.
[3] 霍红,李五一,王剑,杨大海,金晓峰,田旭,牛燕燕. 等离子辅助悬雍垂腭咽成形术后重度咽狭窄的治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 58-61.
[4] 祝青萍, 万玉柱. 儿童急性鼻窦炎眶并发症的临床表现及治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(1): 91-94.
[5] 吴博,胡国华. 异物致颈部脓肿三例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(1): 100-102.
[6] 徐磊,朱鹃芬,程雷. 成年人扁桃体切除术三种手术方式的临床比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 49-52.
[7] 张剑伟,王国庆,倪泽. 颅咽管瘤误诊为蝶窦囊肿1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(3): 109-110.
[8] 陈秀梅,宋西成. 颈部坏死性筋膜炎7例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(3): 65-67.
[9] 龚单春,张海东,张庆翔,何双八,于振坤. 精细化甲状腺腺叶切除操作技术[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 5-9.
[10] 房居高. 强化手术技能和规范诊疗是提高甲状腺癌疗效的根本[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 1-4.
[11] 李厚杰,渠倩,徐世才,刘领兵,张永超,王绪增,刘磊. 经鼻内镜中下鼻道联合扩大入路治疗上颌窦后鼻孔息肉[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 62-64.
[12] 庞宇峰,龚静蓉,邹阳,黄娟. 改良自制鼻咽通气管在FESS术后填塞中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(1): 47-50.
[13] 程友,薛飞,王天友,陈伟,季俊峰,王志颐,许莉,杭春华. 经鼻蝶入路垂体瘤切除术后并发蝶窦炎的分析及处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(1): 54-57.
[14] 崔长霞, 陶祥臣, 朱伟. 表层角膜屈光手术后疼痛及角膜刺激症状的观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 60-63.
[15] 王俊喜, 喻国冻, 陈乾美. 气管切开术1063例中并发症的产生种类及原因分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 43-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!