泪道激光联合引流管植入治疗泪道阻塞的临床观察

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.180

山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 84-86.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.180

泪道激光联合引流管植入治疗泪道阻塞的临床观察

张晓莉,于泓,韩冬梅,杨瑞民,戚伟

河北省廊坊市人民医院眼科, 河北廊坊 065000

收稿日期:2017-04-24 出版日期:2017-08-16 发布日期:2017-08-16
通讯作者: 张晓莉. E-mail:zhulei197106@163.com

Lacrimal duct laser combined with drainage tube implantation for the treatment of lacrimal duct obstruction.

ZHANG Xiaoli, YU Hong, HAN Dongmei, YANG Ruimin, QI Wei

Department of Ophthalmology, Langfang City Peoples Hospital of Hebei Province, Langfang 065000, Hebei, China

Received:2017-04-24 Online:2017-08-16 Published:2017-08-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究泪道激光联合引流管植入对泪道阻塞患者眼表状态的影响。方法选取2014年1月~2015年12月收治的120例泪道阻塞患者,采用数字奇偶法随机分为对照组和观察组,每组60例,其中对照组行常规手术治疗,观察组行泪道激光联合引流管植入术。分析观察组术前、术后1个月及术后2个月的泪膜破裂时间和泪液分泌量。结果对照组治疗总有效率为75.0%低于观察组约91.7%(P<0.05);观察组各个时间段的泪膜破裂时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后2个月患者的泪液分泌量较治疗前差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1个月泪液分泌量较治疗前上升,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论泪道激光联合引流管植入治疗泪道阻塞患者,可取得较好的治疗效果,且对患者眼表状态无明显影响。

关键词: 引流管植入, 临床疗效, 泪道阻塞, 泪道激光, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To explore the impact of lacrimal duct laser combined with drainage tube implantation on the ocular surface of patients with lacrimal duct obstruction. Methods Between January 2014 and December 2015, we treated 120 cases of lacrimal duct obstruction. A digital parity method randomly divided these individuals into a control group(60 individuals)and an observation group(60 individuals). The control group received conventional surgical treatment. The trial group received laser treatment combined with lacrimal drainage tube implantation. The data from the trial group were retrospectively analyzed. The percentage of cases in which treatment was effective was analyzed. Tear film break-up time(following extubation)and tear secretions were also analyzed. Results In the control group, treatment was effective in 75.0% of cases. This percentage was significantly lower than that in the trial group, where treatment was effective in 91.7% of cases(P<0.05). The tear film break-up time did not significantly differ between groups. Tear secretions following extubation were not significantly different between groups. In the trial group, tear secretion was significantly increased at one month after treatment compared to before treatment(P<0.05). Conclusion The use of laser treatment combined with a lacrimal drainage tube implantation was found to be a better therapeutic option than the conventional treatment for lacrimal duct obstruction. Laser combination therapy had no effect on the state of the ocular surface.

Key words: Lacrimal duct obstruction, Lacrimal duct laser, Drainage tube implantation, Clinical efficacy, Influence factors

中图分类号:

R779.6

张晓莉,于泓,韩冬梅,杨瑞民,戚伟. 泪道激光联合引流管植入治疗泪道阻塞的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 84-86.

ZHANG Xiaoli, YU Hong, HAN Dongmei, YANG Ruimin, QI Wei. Lacrimal duct laser combined with drainage tube implantation for the treatment of lacrimal duct obstruction.[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2017, 31(4): 84-86.

参考文献

[1] 吴海云, 潘曼. 鼻内镜下逆行置管治疗鼻泪管阻塞的临床观察[J]. 广西医学, 2007, 29(1): 120.
[2] 张琳, 杨文蕾. 泪道阻塞性疾病的诊断与治疗[J]. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志, 2010, 10(1):2-5. ZHANG Lin, YANG Wenlei. Diagnosis and treatment of lacrimal passage obstruction[J]. Chin J Ophthal Otorhinolaryngol, 2010, 10(1):2-5.
[3] Semchenko, Marina, Abakumova, Maria, Lepik, Anu, et al. Plants are least suppressed by their frequent neighbours: the relationship between competitive ability and spatial aggregation patterns[J]. J Ecol, 2013, 101(5):1313-1321.
[4] 周丽. 泪道激光术后联合泪道引流管环形置入术治疗慢性泪囊炎及泪道阻塞[J]. 实用防盲技术, 2012, 7(3):100-101. ZHOU Li. Lacrimal drainage tube ring implantation combined with laser for treatment of chronic dacryocystitis and lacrimal ducts obstruction[J]. Journal of Practical Preventing Blind, 2012, 7(3):100-101.
[5] 曾招荣. 泪道药物灌注和泪道插管治疗泪道阻塞的疗效对比[J]. 广西医学, 2005, 27(1):126.
[6] 赵思山, 刘荣春, 隋晓斌,等. Nd∶YAG激光泪道疏通术联合泪道引流管置管治疗泪道阻塞[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2011, 28(5):415-416.
[7] 赵婓, 张达清. 泪道激光联合泪道引流管治疗泪小管、泪总管阻塞的诊治体会[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2012, 20(3):42-43.
[8] 秦海燕, 韩莉. Nd∶YAG激光联合硅胶管植入治疗泪道阻塞疗效观察[J]. 青海医药杂志, 2010, 40(1):14-15.
[9] Theodoropoulou S, Sutherland MS, Haddow K, et al. Success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2013, 127(8):794-798.
[10] 张新霞, 杨玉新, 张海涛,等. 球头硅胶管逆行泪道植管术治疗鼻泪道阻塞的疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 眼科新进展, 2014, 34(9):882-884. ZHANG Xinxia, YANG Yuxin, ZHANG Haitao, et al. Cuative effects and its related factors of retrograde intubation with ball-head silicone tube into lacrimal canal for nasolacrimal duct bostruction[J]. Recent Adv Ophthalmol, 2014, 34(9):882-884.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

泪道激光联合引流管植入治疗泪道阻塞的临床观察

Lacrimal duct laser combined with drainage tube implantation for the treatment of lacrimal duct obstruction.

HTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

多维度评价

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王坛,武珂,李连庆,宫丽丽. 皮下免疫治疗注射后出现全身不良反应的伴发因素及处理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 71-74.
[2]	廖礼兵,刘绮明,宗凌,翟锦明,张建国. 42例耳鸣伴听觉过敏患者特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 31-36.
[3]	孟立新,李健,韦善文. 鼓膜微管置入术治疗中耳不张76例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 61-65.
[4]	侯小兵,任同力,张毅博. 69例梅尼埃病伴耳鸣的发病特点及影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 37-40.
[5]	伦杰,张亚楠. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉复发的相关影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 80-83.
[6]	苏怡,谢景华,潘晓李,曾国庆. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴或不伴鼻息肉患者鼻内镜手术的疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 86-89.
[7]	谢朝峰,林宏浩. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎手术预后的临床影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 90-93.
[8]	何迎雪, 丛琳, 杜怡峰. 阿尔茨海默病患者睡眠障碍的研究新进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(4): 1-5.
[9]	贺艳艳，肖淑烽，董彩蓉. 荧光素眼底血管造影后不良反应的影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(5): 75-76.
[10]	李秀贵，吴欣怡 . 泪道激光成型联合硅胶管植入术治疗泪道阻塞[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(2): 89-90 .