山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 1-6.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.449

• ·论著· •    下一篇

突发性聋患者焦虑、抑郁与病情阶段的关系及影响因素分析

黄芳,郑智娟,谢磊   

  1. 天门市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 湖北 天门 431700
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-26 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-20

Relationship of anxiety and depression with illness stage in patients with sudden hearing loss and its influencing factors

HUANG Fang, ZHENG Zhijuan, XIE Lei   

  1. Tianmen First Peoples Hospital of Hubei Province, Tianmen 431700, Hubei, China
  • Received:2017-10-26 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-20

摘要: 目的 探讨突发性聋患者焦虑、抑郁与病情阶段的关系,并分析焦虑及抑郁发生的影响因素。 方法 于2016年1月至2017年1月纳入急性期突发性聋患者45例(急性期组)、慢性期突发性聋患者71例(慢性期组)、健康志愿者30例(对照组),进行问卷调查。应用汉密尔顿焦虑(HAMA)及抑郁(HAMD)量表测评并对比各组焦虑及抑郁发生情况。统计患者一般资料、发病及治疗相关资料,通过回归树分析测评患者发生焦虑、抑郁的影响因素。 结果 急性期组HAMA、HAMD得分及焦虑、抑郁发生率明显高于慢性期组和健康对照组(与慢性期组对比,Z=-9.100,P<0.001;Z=-9.091,P<0.001; χ2=31.209,P<0.001; χ2=35.845,P<0.001;与健康对照组对比,Z=-7.336,P<0.001; Z=-7.324,P<0.001; χ2=21.674,P<0.001; χ2=23.148,P<0.001);慢性期组HAMA、HAMD得分及焦虑、抑郁发生率与健康对照组对比,差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.018,P=0.308; Z=-0.042,P=0.967;P=0.671;P=0.722)。发生焦虑或抑郁患者中,急性期患者占比更高2=31.209,P<0.001; χ2=35.845,P<0.001),耳聋轻度耳鸣无或轻度患者占比更低2=12.650,P<0.001; χ2=18.629,P<0.001),发生抑郁患者中,男性患者占比更低2=4.424,P=0.035),差异有统计学意义疾病阶段就诊时耳聋程度是患者发生焦虑及抑郁的主要影响因素慢性期组中无效患者发生焦虑或抑郁患者占比更高,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.445,P=0.014; Z=-2.815,P=0.005)。 结论 急性期突发性聋患者焦虑及抑郁发生率较高;疾病阶段、就诊时耳聋程度是患者发生焦虑及抑郁的主要影响因素;慢性期组患者疗效越好,焦虑及抑郁风险越低。

关键词: 抑郁, 分类与回归树, 突发性, 焦虑,

Abstract: Objective To investigate the relationship of anxiety and depression with illness stage in patients with sudden hearing loss, and to analyze the factors influencing anxiety and depression. Methods Forty-five patients with sudden hearing loss in the acute stage(acute group), 71 subjects with sudden hearing loss in the chronic stage(chronic group), and 30 healthy subjects(control group)were enrolled from January 2016 to January 2017. The degrees of anxiety and depression in each group were evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety(HAMA)and Hamilton Depression(HAMD)scales. General information and data of illness and treatment were recorded, and the factors influencing anxiety and depression were analyzed using the classification and regression tree. Results The HAMA and HAMD scale scores and the incidence rates of anxiety and depression in the acute group were much higher than those in the chronic and control groups(compared with the chronic group, Z=-9.100, P<0.001; Z=-9.091, P<0.001; χ2=31.209, P<0.001; χ2=35.845, P<0.001. compared with the control group, Z=-7.336, P<0.001; Z=-7.324, P<0.001; χ2=21.674, P<0.001; χ2=23.148, P<0.001). These indexes were similar between the chronic and control groups, although the differences were not statistically significant(Z=-1.018, P=0.308; Z=-0.042, P=0.967; P=0.671; P=0.722). In the patients with anxiety or depression, the proportion of those with acute illness was higher(χ2=31.209, P<0.001, χ2= 35.845, P<0.001), and the proportions of those with mild deafness and no or mild tinnitus were lower(χ2=12.650, P<0.001; χ2=18.629, P<0.001). In the patients with depression, the proportion of males was lower(χ2=4.424, P=0.035). These differences were statistically significant. The disease stage and degree of deafness were the main factors influencing anxiety and depression in all the patients. In the chronic group, the patients with poor prognosis had a higher prevalence of anxiety or depression; the differences were statistically significant(Z=-2.445,P=0.014; Z=-2.815,P=0.005). Conclusion In this study, the patients with acute sudden hearing loss had high prevalence rates of anxiety and depression. Disease stage and degree of deafness were the main factors influencing anxiety and depression. The patients with chronic illnesses who received treatment with better efficacy had lower risks of anxiety and depression.

Key words: Classification and regression tree, Depression, Anxiety, Sudden hearing loss

中图分类号: 

  • R764.43
[1] Naibogllu B, Külekçi S, Sürmeli M, et al. Efficacy of multimodality approach to sudden hearing loss [J]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg, 2015, 25(2): 77-81.
[2] Sano H, Okamoto M, Ohhashi K, et al. Self-reported symptoms in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss [J]. Otol Neurotol, 2013, 34(8): 1405-1410.
[3] 何丽,陶丽,刘辉,等.高氧液结合心理护理综合治疗对突发性耳聋疗效观察与分析[J].河北医药,2014,25(16):2550-2551.
[4] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会.突发性聋的诊断和治疗指南(2005年,济南)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(5):325.
[5] Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating [J]. Br J Med Psychol, 1959, 32(1): 50-55.
[6] Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness [J]. Br J Soc Clin Psychol, 1967, 6(4): 278-296.
[7] 石秋兰,卜行宽,王俊国,等.耳鸣致残量表中文版的研译与临床应用[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2007,27(5):476-479.
[8] Chung SD, Hung SH, Lin HC, et al. Association between sudden sensorineural hearing loss and anxiety disorder: a population-based study [J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 272(10): 2673-2678.
[9] 赵群,王英力,王洪芹,等.突发性聋住院患者焦虑抑郁状况分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2015,13(3):533-535. ZHAO Qun, WANG Yingli, WANG Hongqin, et al. Psychological disorders in patients with sudden deafness[J]. Chin J Otol, 2015, 13(3):533-535.
[10] 王木清,江文霞.突发性耳聋患者焦虑状况调查[J].中华现代护理杂志,2013,19(18):2148-2150. WANG Muqing, JIANG Wenxia. Investigation of anxiety status of patients with sudden deafness[J].Chin J Mod Nurs, 2013, 19(18):2148-2150.
[11] Chen J, Liang J, Ou J, et al. Mental health in adults with sudden sensorineural hearing loss: an assessment of depressive symptoms and its correlates [J]. J Psychosom Res, 2013, 75(1): 72-74.
[12] 钟晓声,杨海弟,郑亿庆,等.突发性聋伴耳鸣患者耳鸣特征[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2015,29(4):15-18. ZHONGXiaosheng, YANGHaidi, ZHENG Yiqing, et al. Characteristics of tinnitus in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J].J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2015, 29(4):15-18.
[13] 赵坚,魏峻,李莹,等.突发性耳聋疗效与预后的多因素回归分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2016,44(7):88-90.
[14] 魏欣,林杰,王刚.经常规治疗有效的突发性耳聋预后因素分析[J]. 海南医学,2013,24(20):3016-3019.
[1] 吕丹,李如珍,刘明秋,孟新宇,李俊义. 不同类型良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者焦虑、抑郁状态及睡眠障碍的发生率与相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 62-67.
[2] 翟雪纯,边欣,陈敬彩,邓家钰,叶子,杨萍丽. 慢性额窦炎患者焦虑抑郁特点及横断面研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 35-43.
[3] 王莹,蔡燕文. 以听力减退为主要表现的中枢神经系统表面铁沉积症1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 89-96.
[4] 郑泽皓,魏佳俐,刘嘉涛,周玉麒,孙文婷,李雨轩,白鹏. 特定部位针刺法治疗突发性聋的疗效及安全性评价:一项系统综述和网状Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 114-127.
[5] 李洁,苏维娜,林倩,张奇舒,侯成,杨振娇,相丽丽. 两例耳聋病例中MARVELD2基因变异的遗传学分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 128-134.
[6] 李莉琳,李馨仪,关建. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与抑郁症共病机制的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 89-96.
[7] 林育珊,卢标清. 巴曲酶个性化用药治疗全频下降型突聋[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 115-121.
[8] 王鑫,原晶晶,郝鹏鹏,闫占峰,刘建华,钟利群,刘思溟,吴薇,赵晓阳,张莹. 中药复方治疗突发性聋的疗效和可能机制:一项结合网络药理学研究的回顾性临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 6-17.
[9] 董雪林,张治军. 掩蔽声治疗慢性主观性耳鸣的焦虑抑郁状态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 18-24.
[10] 郭翔,马永强,伊海金. 突发性聋磁共振检查的现状与进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 140-144.
[11] 李培培,卢彦青,侯楠. 机器学习预测模型在突发性聋中的临床应用研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 145-151.
[12] 陈丹萍,何子键,虞幼军,周晓娓. 儿童突发性聋10年住院病例的疗效及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 16-22.
[13] 李钰,刘皓,王敏,付小龙,李文. mTOR通路在耳蜗中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 112-118.
[14] 曹影,邱月,陈智斌,费兵,李东,张晓凤,王惠,康欣乐,王海旭,怀德,李秀婷,束明阳. 难治性突聋耳后注射神经节苷脂联合鼓室内注射甲泼尼龙治疗前后言语识别率及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 15-21.
[15] 周静,毕秀丽,肖雨,胡俊,付小龙,于亚峰. 盐酸氯米帕明保护听觉毛细胞免受新霉素诱导的损伤[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 22-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!