山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 63-68.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.528

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

山东省非综合征型耳聋患者十四项遗传性耳聋基因突变筛查结果分析

刘双双1,牛玉萍1,孙越1,弭兆元1,史桂芝2   

  1. 1. 济南英盛生物技术有限公司, 山东 济南 250101;
    2. 中国科学院生物物理研究所, 北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-11 出版日期:2016-08-16 发布日期:2016-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 史桂芝. E-mail:laurelshi@qq.com E-mail:ssliu1129@126.co
  • 作者简介:刘双双. E-mail:ssliu1129@126.co

Screening analysis of fourteen hereditary deafness gene mutation in patients with Non-syndromic hearing loss in Shandong province.

LIU Shuangshuang1, NIU Yuping1, SUN Yue1, MI Zhaoyuan1, SHI Guizhi   

  1. 1. Jinan Ying Sheng Biotechnology Limited, Jinan 250101, Shandong, China;2. Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2015-12-11 Online:2016-08-16 Published:2016-08-16

摘要: 目的 筛查山东地区遗传性耳聋基因常见的致病突变位点,从分子流行病学角度阐明本地区的耳聋基因突变特征,为进一步的临床耳聋基因突变检测提供依据。 方法 选择非综合征型耳聋患者845例和听力正常且无听力损失家族史者351例,应用单管双色荧光PCR方法进行检测,对检测结果进行分析。 结果 耳聋患者845例中,GJB2基因235delC、299_300delAT、176_191del16、35delG、155delTCTG、512insAACG位点的阳性检出率分别为19.1%、6.7%、0.9%、0%、0%、0.5%;GJB3基因538C>T、547G>A位点的阳性检出率分别为0.1%、0%;SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G、2168A>G、1174A>T、1229C>T位点的阳性检出率分别为12.9%、3.8%、1.4%、0.7%;mtDNA 12S rRNA基因A1555G、C1494T位点的阳性检出率分别为3.9%、0.1%。正常听力人群,GJB2基因235delC、299_300delAT位点和SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G、2168A>G位点的携带率分别为1.4%、0.9%、1.1%、0.6%,其余10个位点的携带率均为0%。 结论 山东地区常见的耳聋突变位点为:GJB2基因235delC、299_300delAT、176_191del16、512insAACG;SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G、2168A>G、1174A>T、1229C>T;mtDNA 12S rRNA 基因A1555G。其中以GJB2基因235delC和299_300delAT、SLC26A4基因IVS7-2A>G和2168A>G、mtDNA 12S rRNA基因A1555G位点突变频率较高,可作为本地区耳聋基因筛查项目中的热点突变,从而有针对性地指导山东地区耳聋基因检测项目的开展。

关键词: 非综合征型耳聋, GJB2, 线粒体DNA, 突变位点, 山东地区, SLC26A4

Abstract: Objective To screen the common causative sites responsible for hereditary deafness genes in Shandong and to clarify deafness gene mutation patterns in this region by a molecular epidemiological study, thus to provide a basis for further detection and clinical diagnosis of hereditary deafness. Methods Totally 845 cases of patients with non-syndromic hearing loss and 351 cases of normal hearing people without family history of hearing loss were selected. The targeted mutations were detected by the single-tube two-fluorescent PCR method, and the obtained PCR results were analyzed. Results In 845 hearing-loss patients, the positive rates of 235delC, 299_300delAT, 176_191del16, 35delG, 155delTCTG and 512insAACG in GJB2 gene were 19.1%, 6.7%, 0.9%, 0%, 0%, 0.5%, respectively; the positive rates of 538C>T and 547G>A in GJB3 gene were 0.1% and 0%, respectively; the positive rates of IVS7-2A>G, 2168A>G, 1174A>T and 1229C>T in SLC26A4 gene were 12.9%, 3.8%, 1.4% and 0.7%, respectively; the positive rates of A1555G and C1494T in mtDNA 12S rRNA gene were 3.9% and 0.1%. In normal hearing people, the carrier rates of 235delC, 299_300delAT in GJB2 gene and IVS7-2A>G, 2168A>G in SLC26A4 gene were 1.4%, 0.9%, 1.1% and 0.6%, respectively, while the carrier rates of all the other ten sites were 0%. Conclusion In Shandong province, the common mutation sites for hereditary deafness were as the following: 235delC, 299_300delAT, 176_191del16, 512insAACG in GJB2 gene; IVS7-2A>G, 2168A>G, 1174A>T, 1229C>T in SLC26A4 gene and A1555G in mtDNA 12S rRNA gene. Five of these nine sites, GJB2 gene 235delC, 299_300delAT, SLC26A4 gene IVS7-2A>G, 2168A>G and mtDNA 12S rRNA gene A1555G, showed relatively high frequencies of mutation and could be used as the hotspots in this screening project. This study can therefore be a direction for future screening of hereditary deafness gene mutations in Shandong province.

Key words: Mutation site, Non-syndromic hearing loss, GJB2, Shandong province, SLC26A4, mtDNA

中图分类号: 

  • R764
[1] Marazita M L, Ploughman L M, Rawlings B, et al. Genetic epidemiological studies of early-onset deafness in the U.S. school-age population[J]. Am J Med Genet, 1993, 46(5):486-491.
[2] 孙喜斌, 于丽玫, 曲成毅, 等. 中国听力残疾构成特点及康复对策[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2008, 6(2):21-24. SUN Xibin, YU Limei, QU Chengyi, et al. An epidemiological study on the hearing-impaired population identified in China and proposed intervention strategies[J]. Chin Sci J Hearing Speech Rehabilitation, 2008, 6(2):21-24.
[3] 戴朴, 刘新, 于飞, 等. 18个省市聋校学生非综合征性聋病分子流行病学研究(Ⅰ)-GJB2 235delC和线粒体DNA 12SrRNA A1555G突变筛查报告[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2006, 4(1): 1-5. DAI Pu, LIU Xin, YU Fei, et al. Molecular etiology of patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss from deaf-mute schools in 18 provinces of China[J]. Chin J Otology, 2006, 4(1):1-5.
[4] 梁永宏. 938例婴幼儿听力筛查的现状分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2009, 24(16):2233-2235. LIANG Yonghong. Analysis of screening status of 938 cases of infant hearing[J]. Maternal Child Health Care Chin, 2009, 24(16):2233-2235.
[5] 李海波, 李琼, 李红, 等. 非综合征性聋突变热点的流行病学分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012, 26(13):589-594. LI Haibo, LI Qiong, LI Hong, et al. A literature review of epidemiological studies on mutation hot spots of Chinese population with non-syndromic hearing loss[J]. J Chin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 26(13):589-594.
[6] 柯肖枚, 路远, 刘玉和, 等. connexin 26 基因突变与国人遗传性无综合征耳聋相关性分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2001, 36(3):79-85. KE Xiaomei, LU Yuan, LIU Yuhe, et al. Study on mutations in the connexin 26 gene among Chinese with nonsyndromic hearing loss[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol, 2001, 36(3):79-85.
[7] 史桂芝, 宫露霞, 聂文英, 等. 新生儿非综合征型听力损失GJB2基因的突变分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2005, 85(10): 689-692. SHI Guizhi, GONG Luxia, NIE Wenying, et al. Mutations of GJB2 gene in infants with non-syndromic hearing impairment[J]. National Med J Chin, 2005, 85(10):689-692.
[8] Dent K M, Kenneson A, Palumbos J C, et al. Methodology of a multistate study of congenital hearing loss: preliminary data from Utah newborn screening[J]. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet, 2004, 125C(1):28-34.
[9] Sobe T, Vreugde S, Shahin H, et al. The prevalence and expression of inherited connexin 26 mutations associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss in the Israeli population[J]. Hum Genet, 2000, 106(1):50-57.
[10] 于飞, 韩东一, 戴朴, 等. 1190例非综合征性耳聋患者GJB2基因突变序列分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2007, 87(40):2814-2819. YU Fei, HAN Dongyi, DAI Pu, et al. Mutation of GJB2 gene in nonsyndromic hearing impairment patients: ANalysis of 1190 cases[J]. National Med J Chin, 2007, 87(40):2814-2819.
[11] Dai P, Yu F, Han B, et al. GJB2 mutation spectrum in 2,063 Chinese patients with nonsyndromic hearing impairment[J]. J Transl Med, 2009, 7:26.
[12] Lerer I, Sagi M, Ben-Neriah Z, et al. A deletion mutation in GJB6 cooperating with a GJB2 mutation in trans in non-syndromic deafness: A novel founder mutation in Ashkenazi Jews[J]. Hum Mutat, 2001, 18(5):460-461.
[13] Everett LA, Glaser B, Beck JC, et al. Pendred syndrome is caused by mutations in a putative sulphate transporter gene(PDS)[J]. Nat Genet, 1997, 17(4): 411-422.
[14] 赵亚丽, 李庆忠, 翟所强, 等. 国人前庭水管扩大患者SLC26A4基因的特异性突变[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2006, 14(2):93-96. ZHAO Yali, LI Qingzhong, ZHAI Suoqiang, et al. Specificity of slc26a4 mutations in chinese patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct[J]. J Audiol Speech Pathol, 2006, 14(2):93-96.
[15] Yuan Y, Guo W, Tang J, et al. Molecular Epidemiology and Functional Assessment of Novel Allelic Variants of SLC26A4 in Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss Patients with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct in China[J]. Plos One, 2012, 7(11):e49984.
[16] 王大勇, 王秋菊, 兰兰, 等. 130例婴幼儿听力损失的听力学和基因学分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2009, 44(3):177-181. WANG Dayong, WANG Qiuju, LAN Lan, et al. Audiological and genetic studies on 130 infants with hearing loss[J]. J Chin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2009, 44(3):177-181.
[17] Zhu Y, Li Q, Chen Z, et al. Mitochondrial haplotype and phenotype of 13 Chinese families may suggest multi-original evolution of mitochondrial C1494T mutation[J]. Mitochondrion, 2009, 9(6):418-428.
[18] 纪育斌, 韩东一, 王大勇, 等. 山东省聋哑学校485例耳聋患者易感基因突变检测分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2009, 89(36):2531-2535. JI Yubin, HAN Dongyi, WANG Dayong, et al. Evaluation of deaf-mute patients with sensitive deafness gene screening in shandong province[J]. National Med J Chin, 2009, 89(36):2531-2535.
[1] 孟玮,于振坤,郑雅丽,李光飞,梁龙君,王小敏. 术前模拟力学研究在拟植入耳赝附体先天性外中耳畸形患者中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 27-30.
[2] 廖礼兵,刘绮明,宗凌,翟锦明,张建国. 42例耳鸣伴听觉过敏患者特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 31-36.
[3] 侯小兵,任同力,张毅博. 69例梅尼埃病伴耳鸣的发病特点及影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 37-40.
[4] 许明,罗兴谷,唐洪波,江青山. 儿童突发性聋的临床特征及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 41-44.
[5] 陈伟,胡中南,童钊君,李湘宇,刘文君. 青中年无眩晕、心脑血管疾病病史的突发性聋患者高刺激率听性脑干反应特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 45-49.
[6] 朱文燕,金新,佘万东,马永驰. 突发性聋30例精神心理状况分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 50-52.
[7] 孟立新,李健,韦善文. 鼓膜微管置入术治疗中耳不张76例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 61-65.
[8] 王春雨,张芬,王贝贝,李宇玥,王小雨,李志云,张庆泉. 喉白斑32例临床诊治分析及再认识[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 114-116.
[9] 黄芳,郑智娟,谢磊. 突发性聋患者焦虑、抑郁与病情阶段的关系及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 1-6.
[10] 黄娟,庞宇峰,龚静蓉,董玥辉. 耳鸣声学特征与扩展高频听阈的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 7-10.
[11] 黄颖铭,万保罗,靳钰炜. 复方倍他米松联合盐酸利多卡因辅助治疗突发性聋的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 11-13.
[12] 陈涛,刘善平,卢永田. 中耳炎鼓室窦CT分型与手术方式初探[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 14-16.
[13] 周佳蕾,孙世冰,李晓艳. 婴幼儿宽频声导抗测试[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 91-94.
[14] 鄢慧琴,王豪. 难治性良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 86-88.
[15] 高芳芳,王启荣,于淑东,古林涛,石业华,耿博. 人工耳蜗植入术295例语言康复临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 62-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!