青中年无眩晕、心脑血管疾病病史的突发性聋患者高刺激率听性脑干反应特征分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.521

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨青中年无眩晕、脑血管疾病病史的突发性聋患者高刺激速率听性脑干反应(ABR)的特征。方法将2016年1月至2017年5月就诊的46例青中年突发性聋患者及同期体检的30例听力正常者纳入研究对象。患者均无眩晕、心脑血管疾病病史,单侧发病。对患者患侧、健侧、体检对象双侧进行纯音测听和高(51.1次/s)、低(11.1次/s)刺激速率ABR检测,结果分别纳为患侧组、健侧组、对照组,观察2种刺激速率的ABR Ⅰ~Ⅴ波间期差值(△IPL)水平,比较3组检测结果及异常率。根据患侧△IPL水平,将患者分为患侧正常组、异常组与未引出组,对比3组疗效。根据检测△IPL水平,将患者划分为健侧正常组、异常组与未引出组,对比3组疗效。结果健侧组与对照组纯音听阈检测结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。健侧组、患侧组高刺激速率ABR未引出率及△IPL异常率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。健侧组中,高刺激速率ABR未引出或△IPL异常者,其患侧亦表现出高刺激速率ABR未引出或△IPL异常。患侧正常组临床疗效明显好于异常组和未引出组,健侧正常组临床疗效明显好于异常组和未引出组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论青中年无眩晕、心脑血管疾病病史的突发性聋患者,其高、低刺激速率ABR Ⅰ~Ⅴ波△IPL异常或无法引出高刺激速率ABR者较多,且患侧出现上述表现,对侧亦可能存在同样表现。患侧及健侧存在上述表现可能导致患者不良预后。

关键词: 刺激率, 青中年, 突发性聋, 听性脑干反应

Abstract: Objective To investigate the characteristics of auditory brainstem response(ABR)to high-frequency stimulus in young and middle-aged patients with sudden deafness and no history of vertigo or cardiocerebrovascular disease. Methods A total of 46 young and middle-aged patients with sudden deafness and 30 volunteers with normal hearing were enrolled from January 2016 to May 2017. All patients had no history of vertigo or cardiocerebrovascular disease, and all exhibited unilateral onset of sudden deafness. Pure tone audiometry, high-(51.1 times per second)and low-(11.1 times per second)frequency stimulation ABRs were tested for the affected side of patients, the normal side of patients, and both sides of volunteers; the results were categorized as the affected side, normal side, and control groups, respectively. The difference in I-V interpeak latency between high- and low-frequency stimulation ABRs(△IPL)and the rate of ears with abnormalities among the 3 groups were compared. Based on the △IPL of their affected side, patients were subdivided into affected side abnormal, normal, and no △IPL groups; the clinical curative effect was compared among the 3 groups. Based on the △IPL of their healthy side, patients were again subdivided into healthy side abnormal, normal, and no △IPL groups; the clinical curative effect was compared among the 3 groups. Results The test results of pure-tone audiometry were similar in the normal side and control groups(differences between these groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05)). The rate of ears that could not elicit ABRs to high-frequency stimuli and ears with abnormal △IPL in affected side and normal side groups was much greater than the corresponding rate in the control group; these differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). Patients who could not elicit ABRs to high-frequency stimuli from the normal side exhibited a similar lack of ABRs from the affected side. Patients with abnormal △IPL from the normal side also showed abnormal △IPL from the affected side. The clinical curative effect in the affected side normal group was much better than in the abnormal group and the no △IPL group; these differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). The clinical curative effect in the healthy side normal group was much better than in the abnormal and no △IPL groups; these differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). Conclusion For young and middle-aged patients with sudden deafness and no history of vertigo or cardiocerebrovascular disease, it is common to observe abnormal △IPL between high- and low-frequency stimulation ABRs, as well as ears that could not elicit ABRs to high-frequency stimuli. If these characteristics are present on the affected side, they may be present on the healthy side; these characteristics in either side may be associated with a poor prognosis.

Key words: Sudden deafness, Auditory brainstem response, Stimulation rate, Young and middle-aged

中图分类号:

R764.43

陈伟,胡中南,童钊君,李湘宇,刘文君. 青中年无眩晕、心脑血管疾病病史的突发性聋患者高刺激率听性脑干反应特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 45-49.

CHEN Wei, HU Zhongnan, TONG Zhaojun, LI Xiangyu, LIU Wenjun. Characteristics of auditory brainstem response to high-frequency stimulus in young and middle-aged patients with sudden deafness and no history of vertigo or cardiocerebrovascular disease[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2018, 32(5): 45-49.

参考文献 13

[1]	余力生,杨仕明.突发性聋诊疗进展[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013,48(5):432-435. YU Lisheng, YANG Shiming. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of sudden deafness[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2013, 48(5):432-435.
[2]	钱怡,钟时勋,胡国华,等.突发性耳聋的分型治疗及预后分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2015,40(8):1159-1163. QIAN Yi, ZHONG Shixun, HU Guohua, et al. Treatment and prognosis for sudden deafness[J]. J Chongqing Med Univ, 2015, 40(8):1159-1163.
[3]	Lima JP, Velasco IT, Barbeiro DF, et al. Auditory brainstem response in gerbils submitted to ischemia and sepsis[J]. Codas, 2015, 27(2):155-159.
[4]	吴子明,张素珍,杨伟炎,等.后循环缺血概念的提出及神经耳科的对策[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2008,16(1):27-29.
[5]	中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会.突发性聋诊断和治疗指南(2015)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2015,50(6):443-447. Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; Society of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese Medical Association. Guideline of diagnosis and treatment of sudden deafness(2015)[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 50(6):443-447.
[6]	Hsu YH, Hu HY, Chiu YC, et al. Association of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss With Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 142(7):672-675.
[7]	艾毛毛,于锋,周枫.高刺激速率ABR对突发性耳聋预后评估的价值[J].中华耳科学杂志,2016,14(1):82-85. AI Maomao, YU Feng, ZHOU Feng. High-frequency stimulation ABRs in patient with sudden hearing loss[J]. Chin J Otol, 2016, 14(1):82-85.
[8]	黄召辉,林霖,王涛,等.最大长度序列诱发听性脑干反应的线性与非线性成分引出率和稳定性分析[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2016,35(2):148-154. HUANG Zhaohui, LIN Lin, WANG Tao, et al. Analysis on Elicitation and Stability of Linear and Nonlinear Components in Maximum Length Sequence Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response[J]. Chin J Biomed Engin, 2016, 35(2):148-154.
[9]	胡鸿,史波宁.Ⅴ波潜伏期差值与Ⅰ-Ⅴ波间期差值的关系研究[J].中华耳科学杂志,2016,14(3):370-373. HU Hong, SHI Boning. Relationship between high/low stimulation rate ABR wave Ⅴ latency differential and Ⅰ-Ⅴ inter-peak latency differential[J]. Chin J Otology, 2016, 14(3):370-373.
[10]	贾俊蒙,毕巍,武斐,等.高刺激率听性脑干反应在突发性耳聋治疗效果预测中的应用[J].山东医药,2017,57(7):92-94.
[11]	张燕霞,张强伟,任鸿杰,等.1196例突发性聋预后影响因素分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2015,13(1):126-131. ZHANG Yanxia, ZHANG Qiangwei, REN Hongjie,et al. Factors Affecting Prognosis in Sudden Deafness: An Analysis of 1196 Cases[J]. Chin J Otology, 2015, 13(1):126-131.
[12]	马荣峰,朱富高,孙美红,等.突发性聋预后的相关因素分析及疗程选择[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2016,30(4):69-74. MA Rongfeng, ZHU Fugao, SUN Meihong, et al. Analysis on the relevant prognostic factors of sudden deafness and selection of course of treatment[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2016, 30(4):69-74.
[13]	Chung JH, Lee SH, Park CW, et al. Clinical significance of arterial stiffness in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Laryngoscope, 2016, 126(8):1918-1922.

相关文章 15

[1]	许明,罗兴谷,唐洪波,江青山. 儿童突发性聋的临床特征及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 41-44.
[2]	朱文燕,金新,佘万东,马永驰. 突发性聋30例精神心理状况分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 50-52.
[3]	宋峰,甘彬,许安廷,王坚. 长时程低强度噪声暴露对豚鼠内毛细胞带状突触的影响分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 41-44.
[4]	张玉波,岳丽艳,尹晓妍,吕哲,单春光. 耳鸣治疗仪联合银杏叶提取物注射液治疗突聋伴耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 50-53.
[5]	朱江彬,南兵卫,陈涛, 郝宗生. 低中频下降型突发性聋听阈恢复后残留耳鸣治疗体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 5-7.
[6]	刘阳云,张彩霞,江文,陈琼,常恩格,赵花香,杨会. 突发性聋患者血脂分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 1-4.
[7]	马荣峰,朱富高,孙美红,付涛,张晓恒,曹琳. 突发性聋预后的相关因素分析及疗程选择[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 69-74.
[8]	衡伟伟,后婕,魏先梅,佘万东. TNF-α和IL-8在突发性聋患者血清及外周血单个核细胞中的表达及其意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 40-45.
[9]	钟晓声, 杨海弟, 郑亿庆. 突发性聋伴耳鸣患者耳鸣特征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 15-18.
[10]	张彩霞, 刘阳云, 陈志喜, 江文, 李正贤, 陈琼, 常恩格. 鼓室激素注射为初始治疗的突发性聋听力恢复的时间规律[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 15-18.
[11]	江朝勇, 蔡永明, 殷亚磊. 耳后药物注射治疗突发性聋32例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 18-20.
[12]	刘志奇1，2，刘立思1，杨琨3 . 新生儿听力筛查11894例结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(2): 8-12.
[13]	曹效平，王天生，顾东胜，黄爱萍. 正常听力耳鸣患者听尼特TM检测及高刺激率听觉脑干反应结果及分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(4): 6-9.
[14]	吴允刚，李晓瑜，庞太忠，高福平，李珊，王彩华，张永红，张辉，黄萌萌. 鼻内镜下经咽鼓管鼓室内注入地塞米松辅助治疗难治性突发性耳聋[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(1): 29-30.
[15]	刘阳云，江文，毛坤华，陈琼. 突发性聋高压氧治疗方案与疗程的选择[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(1): 70-72.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed