山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 69-76.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2024.376

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于影像学对咽旁颈内动脉走行的观察与分析

姜知临1,朱瑞楷1,2,邱前辉1   

  1. 广东省医学科学院)耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 广东 广州510080 ;
    2.珠海市中西医结合医院 耳鼻喉科, 广东 珠海 519000
  • 出版日期:2025-07-20 发布日期:2025-08-11
  • 通讯作者: 邱前辉. E-mail:qiuqianhui@gdph.org.cn
  • 基金资助:
    2025年度广州市校(院)企联合资助项目(2025A03J4502)

Imaging-based observation and analysis of the pharyngeal internal carotid artery trajectory

JIANG Zhilin1, ZHU Ruikai1,2, QIU Qianhui1   

  1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Zhuhai Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong, China
  • Online:2025-07-20 Published:2025-08-11

摘要: 目的 研究旨在通过影像学方法观察和分析咽旁段颈内动脉的走行特征,以期为经鼻内镜手术中避免颈内动脉损伤提供指导和参考。 方法 回顾性分析患者的MRI和CTA影像数据,根据动脉的拐点对其进行形态分类,并在多个维度上测量了颈内动脉与关键解剖标志(如中线、颅底平面、咽壁等)之间的距离和角度,以揭示其规律性。 结果 在评估的124侧咽旁段颈内动脉中,9侧显示出具有多个拐点的复杂走行。常规走行的颈内动脉普遍具有向内走行趋势,其在冠状位MRI上距离中线的距离为(21.85±3.26)mm,入颅角度为(76.32 ±15.53)°,而在矢状位MRI上,颈内动脉入颅角度为(71.84±11.55)°。在CTA冠状位上观察动脉入颅的危险角度为60°。 结论 颈内动脉变异会造成手术通道的狭窄以及解剖标志相对关系的改变,因此术前应重视咽旁段颈内动脉变异,并在影像学下充分评估,必要时做好术前预处理。

关键词: 经鼻内镜颅底手术, 颈内动脉损伤, 颈内动脉走行, 解剖, 影像, 术前评估

Abstract: Objective The objective of this study was to delineate the course of the pharyngeal segment of the internal carotid artery(ICA)through imaging analysis, with the aim of providing guidance to prevent ICA injury during endonasal endoscopic surgeries. Methods A retrospective analysis of MRI and CTA imaging data from patients' ICAs was conducted, with arterial morphologies being classified based on inflection points. The distances and angles between the ICA and key anatomical landmarks(midline, intracranial entry plane, pharyngeal wall)were measured in multiple dimensions to identify any patterns that could inform surgical approaches. Results In the course of the evaluation of 124 ICA sides, it was found that nine of these exhibited complex trajectories with multiple inflection points. The conventional ICA course exhibited a medial trend, with a mean coronal distance from the midline of(21.85±3.26)mm, an intracranial entry angle of(76.32±15.53)°, and a mean sagittal entry angle of(71.84±11.55)°. It is noteworthy that a critical intracranial entry angle of 60° was identified in the coronal view of CTA scans, suggesting a threshold for surgical risk. Conclusion Variations in the ICA have the potential to result in surgical channel stenosis and alterations in anatomical landmark relationships, which are of critical importance for the purpose of planning. Comprehensive imaging assessments are essential for identifying pharyngeal ICA anomalies, and preoperative interventions should be considered when indicated to mitigate surgical risks.

Key words: Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery, Internal carotid artery injury, Course of internal carotid artery, Anatomy, Imaging, Preoperative assessment

中图分类号: 

  • R574
[1] Wang EW, Zanation AM, Gardner PA, et al. ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2019, 9(S3): S145-S365. doi:10.1002/alr.22326
[2] van Furth WR, de Vries F, Lobatto DJ, et al. Endoscopic surgery for pituitary tumors[J]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2020, 49(3): 487-503. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2020.05.011
[3] Porras JL, Rowan NR, Mukherjee D. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery complication avoidance: a contemporary review[J]. Brain Sci, 2022, 12(12): 1685. doi:10.3390/brainsci12121685
[4] Chin OY, Ghosh R, Fang CH, et al. Internal carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: a systematic review[J]. Laryngoscope, 2016, 126(3): 582-590. doi:10.1002/lary.25748
[5] Rowan NR, Turner MT, Valappil B, et al. Injury of the carotid artery during endoscopic endonasal surgery: surveys of skull base surgeons[J]. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base, 2018, 79(3): 302-308. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1607314
[6] Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H, et al. Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013, 73(2 Suppl Operative): ons261-9; discussionons269-70. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000430821.71267.f2
[7] AlQahtani A, London NR Jr, Castelnuovo P, et al. Assessment of factors associated with internal carotid injury in expanded endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2020, 146(4): 364-372. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4864
[8] Labib MA, Prevedello DM, Carrau R, et al. A road map to the internal carotid artery in expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches to the ventral cranial base[J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 10(Suppl 3): 448-471;discussion471. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000362
[9] 丁樾, 孟庆国. 内镜经鼻入路咽旁段颈内动脉临床解剖研究进展[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(4): 354-358. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.04.018 DING Yue, MENG Qingguo. Advances in clinical anatomy of the transnasal approaches to the parapharyngeal segment of the internal carotid artery[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2024, 38(4): 354-358. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.04.018
[10] Hosseini SMS, McLaughlin N, Carrau RL, et al. Endoscopic transpterygoid nasopharyngectomy: correlation of surgical anatomy with multiplanar CT[J]. Head Neck, 2013, 35(5): 704-714. doi:10.1002/hed.23020
[11] Fang XY, Di GF, Zhou W, et al. The anatomy of the parapharyngeal segment of the internal carotid artery for endoscopic endonasal approach[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2020, 43(5): 1391-1401. doi:10.1007/s10143-019-01176-3
[12] Weibel J, Fields WS. Tortuosity, coiling, and kinking of the internal carotid artery. i. etiology and radiographic anatomy[J]. Neurology, 1965, 15: 7-18. doi:10.1212/wnl.15.1.7
[13] Paulsen F, Tillmann B, Christofides C, et al. Curving and looping of the internal carotid artery in relation to the pharynx: frequency, embryology and clinical implications[J]. J Anat, 2000, 197(Pt 3): 373-381. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19730373.x
[14] 何蕊,文译辉,文卫平. 颈内动脉颅底段的CT测量及三维重建[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2024,30(5):48-54. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.202423352.
[15] 李冰蓉. 内镜下腹侧颅底颈内动脉分段应用解剖及变异[D]. 深圳: 深圳大学, 2022
[16] 刘娟, 刘全, 王欢, 等. 内镜下经口入路咽旁间隙的解剖标志及毗邻关系[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2022, 31(4): 279-283. doi:10.11659/jjssx.07E021119 LIU Juan, LIU Quan, WANG Huan, et al. Anatomical signs and adjacent relationship of parapharyngeal space through endoscopic transoral approach[J]. Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery, 2022, 31(4): 279-283. doi:10.11659/jjssx.07E021119
[17] 刘卓航, 王刚, 姜卫国, 等. 以咽部异物感及口齿不清为首发症状的颈内动脉畸形一例[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(2): 140-141. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.02.019
[18] Pfeiffer J, Ridder GJ. A clinical classification system for aberrant internal carotid arteries[J]. Laryngoscope, 2008, 118(11): 1931-1936. doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e318180213b
[19] Pfeiffer J, Becker C, Ridder GJ. Aberrant extracranial internal carotid arteries: New insights, implications, and demand for a clinical grading system[J]. Head Neck, 2016, 38(Suppl 1): E687-E693. doi:10.1002/hed.24071
[20] Padhye V, Valentine R, Wormald PJ. Management of carotid artery injury in endonasal surgery[J]. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 18(Suppl 2): S173-S178. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1395266
[21] Porras JL, Rowan NR, Mukherjee D. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery complication avoidance: a contemporary review[J]. Brain Sci, 2022, 12(12): 1685. doi:10.3390/brainsci12121685
[22] Nair S, Srivastava N, Brijith KR, et al. Surgical landmarks for parapharyngeal internal carotid artery during extended endoscopic surgery of nasopharynx: a cadaveric and radiological study[J]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 74(Suppl 3): 4525-4532. doi:10.1007/s12070-021-02508-w
[23] Ho B, Jang DW, Van Rompaey J, et al. Landmarks for endoscopic approach to the parapharyngeal internal carotid artery: a radiographic and cadaveric study[J]. Laryngoscope, 2014, 124(9): 1995-2001. doi:10.1002/lary.24601
[24] Liu J, Sun XC, Liu Q, et al. Eustachian tube as a landmark to the internal carotid artery in endoscopic skull base surgery[J]. Otolaryngol - head Neck Surg, 2016, 154(2): 377-382. doi:10.1177/0194599815616799
[25] Ekici F, Tekbas G, Onder H, et al. Course anomalies of extracranial internal carotid artery and their relationship with pharyngeal wall: an evaluation with multislice CT[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2012, 34(7): 625-631. doi:10.1007/s00276-012-0958-3
[26] Jun BC, Jeon EJ, Kim DH, et al. Risk factors for decreased distance between internal carotid artery and pharyngeal wall[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2012, 39(6): 615-619. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2011.10.018
[27] Umehara T, Taniguchi M, Akutsu N, et al. Anatomical variation of the internal carotid artery and its implication to the endoscopic endonasal translacerum approach[J]. Head Neck, 2021, 43(5): 1535-1544. doi:10.1002/hed.26618
[28] Jayashankar N, Patangrao H. Magnetic resonance angiographic study of variations in course of paraclival and parasellar internal carotid artery in relation to expanded endonasal endoscopic approaches[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2022, 279(7): 3459-3465. doi:10.1007/s00405-021-07123-7
[29] 蒋卫红, 肖健云. 经鼻内镜颅底外科进展[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2015, 21(5): 351-353. doi:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201505001
[30] Sharma RK, Irace AL, Overdevest JB, et al. Carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: Risk factors, prevention, and management[J]. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 8(1): 54-60. doi:10.1002/wjo2.7
[31] Lien CF, Weng HH, Lin BS, et al. Effect of carotid artery aberrancy on the distance between the vessel and nasopharyngeal subsites[J]. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: JCMA, 2014, 77(5): 253-257. doi:10.1016/j.jcma.2014.02.004
[32] Xu X, Ong Y K. An endoscopic anatomical study of the levator veli palatini and its relationship to the parapharyngeal internal carotid artery[J]. Head & Neck, 2020, 42(8): 1829-1836. doi:10.1002/hed.26101
[33] 梁九思, 王小路. 经上颌窦入路咽旁段颈内动脉解剖标志个体化影像分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2021, 35(9): 769-773. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.09.001 LIANG Jiusi, WANG Xiaolu. Individualized imaging analysis of anatomic landmarks of parapharyngeal internal carotid artery via maxillary sinus approach[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2021, 35(9): 769-773. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.09.001
[34] Liu CL, Hsu NI, Shen PH. Endoscopic endonasal nasopharyngectomy: tensor veli palatine muscle as a landmark for the parapharyngeal internal carotid artery[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2017, 7(6): 624-628. doi:10.1002/alr.21921
[35] Battaglia P, Eesa M, Pietrobon G, et al. Practical guide for identification of internal carotid artery during endoscopic nasopharyngectomy[J]. Laryngoscope, 2021, 131(3): E755-E758. doi:10.1002/lary.28778
[36] Valentine R, Wormald PJ. Carotid artery injury after endonasal surgery[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2011, 44(5): 1059-1079. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2011.06.009
[1] 马莉,高瞻,李鹏起,倪前伟. 鼻眶筛并发颧骨骨折伴发症解剖研究现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 126-130.
[2] 沈嘉琪,李潇飒,毕燕龙,张敬法. 人工智能在DME筛查、诊断和预后中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 153-159.
[3] 杨影,魏崴,杨军. 锥形束CT在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 109-115.
[4] 柴丽娜,雷春燕,高昇,张美霞. 孤立先天性视网膜动静脉畸形合并玻璃体出血和内界膜下出血1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(2): 67-70.
[5] 李丹凤,陈福权,石力,王剑,许敏. 三维影像处理结合影像导航技术在进修医生鼻科围手术期教学中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 113-118.
[6] 龚霄阳,李旺,陈曦. 原发性咽旁间隙肿瘤67例回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 60-65.
[7] 胡春燕, 党攀红, 张睿, 樊孟耘. 儿童单侧感音性听力损失的听力学及影像学特征149例分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 31-36.
[8] 李静静,武欣欣,毛宁,郑桂彬,牟亚魁,初同朋,贾传亮,郑海涛,米佳,宋西成. 基于CT影像组学诺模图术前预测甲状腺乳头状癌颈部中央区淋巴结转移的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 51-59.
[9] 武欣欣,李静静,毛宁,郑桂彬,郑海涛,崔景景,贾传亮,初同朋,牟亚魁,宋西成. 基于CT影像组学诺模图预测微小甲状腺结节良恶性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 32-39.
[10] 万博,李东辉,罗岩,李莹. 中心孔型有晶状体眼后房型人工晶体植入术后拱高变化及相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 36-41.
[11] 卢飞燕,卢永田,周俊伟,刘渊. 内镜下经外耳道耳蜗下径路切除岩尖病变的应用解剖学研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 62-68.
[12] 韩阳,杨小健,唐力行,王蓬鹏,张杰,葛文彤. 鼻腔鼻窦青少年型骨化纤维瘤六例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 79-83.
[13] 白永,尹迎春,韩学锋,尹兆富,李学忠. 头颈部低度恶性肌纤维母细胞肉瘤二例分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 58-61.
[14] 周鹏,苏开明. 功能性鼻整形解剖学基础及进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 37-41.
[15] 王启荣, 于淑东, 古林涛. 人工耳蜗植入术前评估[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 16-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 林彬,王挥戈 . 功能性内镜鼻窦手术后鼻黏膜纤毛转归的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(6): 481 -487 .
[2] 公 蕾,孙 洁,薛子超,李敬华,薛卫国 . 鼻腔鼻窦恶性肿瘤细胞周期的DNA分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 193 -195 .
[3] 栾建刚,梁传余,文艳君,李炯 . 抑制表皮生长因子受体基因表达的pSIREN-ShuttleRNAi表达载体的构建[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 4 -8 .
[4] 郑鹏凌,陈卫国,易笃友,黄清秀,卢 俊 . 耳内镜下吸引清除耳道耵聍55例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 223 -226 .
[5] 崔哲洙,严永峰,崔春莲,金顺吉 . 嗜酸性粒细胞在变应性鼻炎合并慢性鼻窦炎的分布特点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 250 -252 .
[6] 杨志强,王改霞 . 新型弹性开放袢前房型人工晶状体植入术27例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 269 -270 .
[7] 王 旭,张 华,吕丽萍,崔 磊,李 淼 . 济南市上网青少年泪膜质量调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 265 -268 .
[8] 楼正才,楼放毅,金忠海 . 咽异感症405例病因分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 271 -275 .
[9] 卢爱东,刘晓玲,高 洁,陈 芳,梁仲琪 . 曲安奈德联合微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(4): 366 -368 .
[10] 吴昌龙 ,王 玉 .

糖尿病黄斑水肿的治疗

[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(4): 369 -372 .