山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 5-8.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.308

• 加速康复外科在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科的应用论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

QoR-15在加速康复外科改善慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉围手术期生活质量评估中的应用

吴喜福,孔维封,王玮豪,徐惠清,戚敏,杨钦泰   

  1. 81670912);
    广州市产学研协同创新重大专项(201704030046)第一作者:吴喜福。 E-mail:wuxifuent@163.com通讯作者:杨钦泰。 E-mail:yang.qt@163.comDOI:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.308加速康复外科在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科的应用论著QoR-15在加速康复外科改善慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉围手术期生活质量评估中的应用吴喜福, 孔维封, 王玮豪, 徐惠清, 戚敏, 杨钦泰(中山大学附属第三医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 广东 广州 510630
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-28 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2018-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 杨钦泰. E-mail:yang.qt@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81670912);广州市产学研协同创新重大专项(201704030046)

Perioperative quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps under enhanced recovery after surgery using QoR-15

WU Xifu, KONG Weifeng, WANG Weihao, XU Huiqing, QI Min, YANG Qintai   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2018-06-28 Online:2018-09-20 Published:2018-09-20

HTML

PDF (PC)

677

摘要： 目的 探讨15项恢复质量量表(QoR-15)在加速康复外科(ERAS)改善慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)围手术期生活质量评估中的应用效果。 方法 将74例CRSwNP患者随机分为ERAS组36例和对照组38例。ERAS组围手术期实施优化的治疗方案,对照组围手术期按照传统方案进行。采用QoR-15对两组患者术前,术后24、48 h生活质量进行评估。 结果 ERAS组、对照组术前Lund-Mackay鼻窦CT评分分别为(9.13±1.88)、(9.60±1.86)分,Lund-Kennedy内镜评分分别为(2.69±0.78)、(2.57±0.72)分,两组比较,P均>0.05。ERAS组、对照组的手术时间分别为(1.69±0.60)、(1.77±0.65)h, 术中出血量分别为(191.67±60.35)、(202.63±60.34)mL,两组比较,P均>0.05。ERAS组、对照组手术后出现恶心呕吐率分别为11.11%(4/36)、7.89%(3/38),两组比较,P均>0.05。手术前ERAS组和对照组QoR-15总计分分别为(139.19±4.21)、(140.07±5.96)分,两组比较,P>0.05;术后24 h ERAS组和对照组总计分分别为(102.75±10.83)、(83.14±5.43)分,两组比较,P<0.05;术后48 h ERAS组和对照组总计分分别为(115.31±10.14)、(109.65±9.52)分,P>0.05。 结论 QoR-15可作为患者结局报告量表对ERAS在CRSwNP围手术期生活质量的效果进行评估。

关键词: 鼻-鼻窦炎, 加速康复外科, 围手术期, 生活质量, 15项恢复质量量表

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the perioperative quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps(CRSwNP)patients under enhanced recovery after surgery using the quality of recovery-15 scale(QoR-15). Methods Seventy-four patients with CRSwNP were randomly divided into an ERAS group and a control group. The ERAS group performed the ERAS protocols during the perioperative period, while the control group followed the traditional plan. Outcomes of QoR-15 were compared preoperatively and postoperatively, at 24 hours and 48 hours. Results Scores of Lund-Mackay between ERAS group and control group were(9.13±1.88)and(9.60±1.86), while Lund-Kennedy scores between ERAS group and control group were(2.69±0.78)and(2.57±0.72),(P>0.05). The operating time and bleeding volume between ERAS group and control group were(1.69±0.60)and(1.77±0.65)h, and(191.67±60.35)and(202.63±60.34)mL, respectively(P>0.05). The rate of Nausea/Emesis between ERAS group and control group was 11.11%(4/36)and 7.89%(3/38), respectively(P>0.05). Preoperative scores of QoR-15 were(139.19±4.21)and(140.07±5.96)in the ERAS group and control group(P>0.05). However, the postoperative scores were ［(102.75±10.83)vs(83.14±5.43), P<0.05］ ［(115.31±10.14)vs(109.65±9.52), P>0.05］ in ERAS group and control group, at 24 hours and 48 hours. Conclusion Thus, this study shows that the QoR-15 can be used for ERAS evaluation of perioperative quality of life in CRSwNP patients.

Key words: Rhinosinusitis, Enhanced recovery after surgery, Perioperative period, Quality of life, QoR-15

中图分类号: 

  • R765.41
[1] Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012[J]. Rhinol Suppl, 2012, 23(3):1-298.
[2] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎诊断和治疗指南(2012年,昆明)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013,48(2):92-94. Subspecialty Group of Rhinology, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; Subspecialty Group of Rhinology, Society of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis(2012, Kunming)[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2013,48(2):92-94.
[3] Bachert C, Zhang L, Gevaert P. Current and future treatment options for adult chronic rhinosinusitis: focus on nasal polyposis[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2015, 136(6):1431-1440.
[4] Shi JB, Fu QL, Zhang H, et al. Epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: results from a cross-sectional survey in seven Chinese cities[J]. Allergy, 2015, 70(5):533-539.
[5] Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Postoperative Quality of Recovery ScoreThe QoR-15[J]. Anesthesiology, 2013, 118(6):1332-1340.
[6] Bu XS, Zhang J, Zuo YX. Validation of the Chinese version of the quality of recovery-15 score and its comparison with the post-operative quality recovery scale[J]. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2016, 9(3):251-259.
[7] Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, et al. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2000, 84(1):11-15.
[8] 左可军,方积乾,Piccirillo JF, 等.鼻腔鼻窦结局测试-20(SNOT-20)量表中文版的研制[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008,43(10):751-756. ZUO Kejun, FANG Jiqian, Piccirillo JF, et al. Development of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 Chinese version(SNOT-20 CV)[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2008, 43(10):751-756.
[9] 左可军,许庚,徐睿,等.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎鼻息肉内镜鼻窦手术后生存质量的转归及影响因素[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008,43(3):192-197. ZUO Kejun, XU Geng, XU Rui, et al. Quality of life outcome of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis after endoscopic sinus surgery and its influencing factors[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2008, 43(3):192-197.
[10] 迪丽达尔,王德辉,史丽,等.加强药物治疗与功能性内镜鼻窦手术+围手术期综合治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎疗效的多中心对照研究[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013,48(9):734-740. Dilidaer, WANG Dehui, SHI Li, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of medical and surgical treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2013, 48(9):734-740.
[11] Le PT, Soler ZM, Jones R, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of SNOT-22 outcomes after surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0194599818773065. [Epub ahead of print].
[12] 陈晓栋,石照辉,李晓媛,等.经鼻内镜鼻窦手术后鼻腔填塞或不填塞膨胀海绵的比较研究[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2015,50(10):854-857. CHEN Xiaodong, SHI Zhaohui, LI Xiaoyuan, et al. Comparative study on packing with or without Merocel after endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 50(10):854-857.
[13] 中华医学会外科学分会,中华医学会麻醉学分会.加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南(2018版)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2018,38(1):1-20.
[14] Aarts MA, Okrainec A, Glicksman A, et al. Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(2):442-450.
[15] Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS)for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2016, 60(3):289-334.
[16] Cabellos Olivares M, Labalde Martinez M, Torralba M, et al. C-reactive protein as a marker of the surgical stress reduction within an ERAS protocol(enhanced recovery after surgery)in colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2018, 22(1):1-8.
[17] Coyle MJ, Main B, Hughes C, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)for head and neck oncology patients[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2016, 41(2):118-126.
[18] 吴喜福,孔维封,王玮豪,等.加速康复外科在鼻中隔偏曲矫正术中的应用研究[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2018,25(5):247-251. WU Xifu, KONG Weifeng, WANG Weihao, et al. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in patients after endoscopic septoplasty[J]. Chin Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018, 25(5):247-251.
[19] Dai S, Wakamatsu K, Tanaka Y, et al. The postoperative patient-reported quality of recovery in colorectal cancer patients under enhanced recovery after surgery using QoR-40[J]. Bmc Cancer, 2015, 15(1):799.
[20] Chazapis M, Walker EMK, Rooms MA, et al. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2016, 116(2):241-248.
[21] Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, et al. Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales[J]. Anesthesiology, 2016, 125(1):39.
[22] Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, et al. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient-reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2018, 120(1):28.
[1] 宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在头颈肿瘤手术的应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 1-4.
[2] 戚敏, 李红, 王倩, 涂翠芳, 杨钦泰, 徐惠清. 加速康复外科理念在功能性内镜鼻窦手术围手术期护理的初步应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 13-18.
[3] 刘大炜,张宇,李成林,陈秀梅,宋西成. 加速康复外科在儿童OSAS围手术期中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 19-22.
[4] 宋晓宇, 张宇, 李成林, 宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉手术治疗中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 9-12.
[5] 王丽,张宇,张华,刘雪艳,宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在鼻窦外科手术的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 23-26.
[6] 吕旭琴,万文锦. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征合并高血糖患者的围手术期血糖管理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 100-104.
[7] 娄鸿飞,王成硕. 慢性鼻窦炎分型研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 10-13.
[8] 李华斌, 赖玉婷. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的发病机制及诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 4-9.
[9] 张桂敏,林鹏. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的内在型:从基础到临床[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 14-17.
[10] 张劼,龚齐. 不同分型慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者外周血嗜酸性粒细胞与中性粒细胞百分比及变态反应临床差异性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 54-57.
[11] 甘彬,张永举,许安廷. BRF2在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉发病过程中的作用研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 47-53.
[12] 郑雅霓, 刘鹤, 马亮, 张明生, 孙中武. 布地奈德联合生理盐水鼻腔冲洗对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效及对鼻腔分泌物IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 58-62.
[13] 曲中源,曲汝鹏,王爱平,冷辉,石磊,孙海波. 孙海波教授治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎经验[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 105-107.
[14] 龚齐,张劼,赵屏屏. 鼻腔扩容术对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴睡眠呼吸暂停[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 52-55.
[15] 王钟颖,王珮华. 上颌骨Le Fort I型截骨手术后鼻腔通气质量调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 26-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宋晓宇, 张宇, 李成林, 宋西成. 加速康复外科理念在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉手术治疗中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 9 -12 .
[2] 戚敏, 李红, 王倩, 涂翠芳, 杨钦泰, 徐惠清. 加速康复外科理念在功能性内镜鼻窦手术围手术期护理的初步应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 13 -18 .
[3] 刘大炜,张宇,李成林,陈秀梅,宋西成. 加速康复外科在儿童OSAS围手术期中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 19 -22 .
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发