IVR治疗mCNV患者黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.059

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察玻璃体腔内注射雷珠单抗(IVR)治疗病理性近视脉络膜新生血管(mCNV)的有效性与安全性,同时观察患者黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度变化。方法回顾性病例系列研究。将2014年11月至2018年12月诊断为初发活动期mCNV并接受IVR的38例42眼纳入研究。所有患者采取IVR 1针初始治疗联合按需注射(1+PRN)的治疗方案,按照患者随访结束时接受IVR的治疗次数分为单次治疗组与重复治疗组两组。观察两组术前及随访结束时研究对象最佳矫正视力、黄斑中心凹下方脉络膜厚度等方面的差异。结果重复治疗组雷珠单抗注射次数(3.77±1.21)次,单次治疗组基线脉络膜厚度(59.15±10.57)μm,重复治疗组基线脉络膜厚度(49.33±12.76)μm,二者比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.023);重复治疗组重复治疗前脉络膜厚度增加至(55.22±7.63)μm,重复治疗组基线脉络膜厚度与重复治疗前脉络膜厚度无统计学差异(P=0.131)。结论雷珠单抗玻璃体腔内注射1+PRN的治疗方案可有效的治疗病理性近视脉络膜新生血管。基线脉络膜厚度更薄的患者需要重复治疗的可能性更大。

关键词: 病理性近视, 脉络膜新生血管, 脉络膜厚度, 雷珠单抗, 重复治疗

Abstract: Objective To observe the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal injection of ranizumab(IVR)on choroidal neovascularization due to pathological myopia(mCNV), and the changes of subfoveal choroidal thickness. Methods Retrospective case series study. 42 eyes of 38 patients from November 2014 to December 2018 with treatment-naïve active mCNV treatment by IVR were enrolled in the study. All patients were divided into single treatment group and retreatment group according to the injection numbers of IVR. The differences of best corrected visual acuity and subfoveal central choroidal thickness were observed. Results In the repeated treatment group, the injection numbers were 3.77±1.21. The baseline choroidal thickness of the single treatment group was(59.15±10.57)μm, and that of the retreatment group was(49.33±12.76)μm(P=0.023), in which central choroidal thickness(CCT)before retreatment increased to(55.22±7.63)μm(P=0.131). Conclusion 1+PRN regimen of IVR can effectively treat choroidal neovascularization due to pathological myopia. CCT may be a prognostic factor for retreatment.

Key words: pathologic myopia, choroidal neovascularization, subfoveal choroidal thickness, ranibizumab, retreatment

中图分类号:

R774.5

张陶然,王薇,李明铭,黄映湘. IVR治疗mCNV患者黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 68-71.

ZHANG Taoran, WANG Wei, LI Mingming, HUANG Yingxiang. Subfoveal choroidal thickness changes following intravitreal ranibizumab treatment in choroidal neovascularization due to pathological myopia[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(2): 68-71.

参考文献

[1] Xie SQ, Fang YX, Du R, et al. Role of dilated subfoveal choroidal veins in eyes with myopic macular neovascularization[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(5): 1063-1070. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002970.
[2] Coco-Martin RM, Belani-Raju M, de la Fuente-Gomez D, et al. Progression of myopic maculopathy in a Caucasian cohort of highly myopic patients with long follow-up: a multistate analysis[J]. GraefesArch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2021, 259(1): 81-92. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04795-5.
[3] Ohno-Matsui K, Ikuno Y, Lai TYY, et al. Diagnosis and treatment guideline for myopic choroidal neovascularization due to pathologic myopia[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018, 63: 92-106.doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.10.005.
[4] Kasahara K, Moriyama M, Morohoshi K, et al. Six-year outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization in patients with pathologic myopia[J]. Retina, 2017, 37(6): 1055-1064.doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001313.
[5] Toto L, di Antonio L, Costantino O, et al. Anti-VEGF therapy in myopic CNV[J]. Curr Drug Targets, 2021, 22(9): 1054-1063. doi:10.2174/1389450122999210128180725.
[6] Karagiannis D, Kontadakis G, Kaprinis K, et al. Treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization with intravitreal ranibizumab injections: the role of age[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2017, 11: 1197-1201. doi:10.2147/opth.s135174.
[7] Wang HY, Tao MZ, Wang XX, et al. Baseline characteristics of myopic choroidal neovascularization in patients above 50 years old and prognostic factors after intravitreal conbercept treatment[J]. SciRep, 2021, 11(1): 7337. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86835-6.
[8] Cohen SY, Tabary S, El Ameen A, et al. Vascular remodeling of choroidal neovascularization in older myopic patients treated with ranibizumab[J]. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Fur Klinische Und ExpOphthalmol, 2019, 257(3): 485-493. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-04205-x.
[9] Borrelli E, Battista M, Vella G, et al. Three-year OCT predictive factors of disease recurrence in eyes with successfully treated myopic choroidal neovascularisation[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2021: bjophthalmol-bjophtha2020-318440. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318440.
[10] Coelho J, Ferreira A, Abreu AC, et al. Choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia—macular Bruch membrane defects as prognostic factor to anti-VEGF treatment[J]. Graefes ArchClin Exp Ophthalmol, 2021. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05142-y.
[11] Ahn SJ, Park KH, Woo SJ. Subfoveal choroidal thickness changes following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in myopic choroidal neovascularization[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2015,56(10): 5794-5800. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-16006.
[12] Xie JM, Chen QY, Yu JY, et al. Morphologic features of myopic choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia on swept-source optical coherence tomography[J]. Front Med(Lausanne), 2020, 7: 615902. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.615902.
[13] Melzer C, Ziemssen F, Eter N,. Design and baseline characteristics of the help study: an extended and long-term observation of pathological myopia in caucasians[J]. Ophthalmologica, 2018, 240(3): 167-178. doi: 10.1159/000489180.
[14] Wang Y, Hu ZL, Zhu TP, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography-based quantitative assessment of morphologic changes in active myopic choroidal neovascularization during anti-vascularendothelial growth factor therapy[J]. Front Med(Lausanne), 2021, 8: 657772. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.657772.
[15] Ahn SJ, Woo SJ, Kim KE, et al. Association between choroidal morphology and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment outcome in myopic choroidal neovascularization[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013, 54(3): 2115-2122. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11542.
[16] Ikuno Y, Ohno-Matsui K, Wong TY, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept injection in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization: the MYRROR study[J]. Ophthalmology, 2015, 122(6): 1220-1227.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.01.025.
[17] 刘志高, 王淑雅, 韩旭光, 等. 增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变术前玻璃体腔应用阿柏西普的时机及其疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 99-103. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.250. LIU Zhigao, WANG Shuya, HAN Xuguang, et al. Preoperative timing and the effect of intravitreal aflibercept injection for proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(1): 99-103. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.250.
[18] Tan NW, Ohno-Matsui K, Koh HJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of ranibizumab treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization in east-Asian patients from the radiance study[J]. Retina, 2018, 38(11): 2228-2238. doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000001858.
[19] Tufail A, Narendran N, Patel PJ, et al. Ranibizumab in myopic choroidal neovascularization: the 12-month results from the REPAIR study[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(9): 1944-5.e1.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.010.
[20] Gabrielle PH, Nguyen V, Creuzot-Garcher C, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors for predominantly Caucasian myopic choroidal neovascularization: 2-year treatment outcomes in clinical practice: data from the Fight Retinal Blindness Registry[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2021. doi:10.1111/aos.14893.
[21] Wolf S, Balciuniene VJ, Laganovska G, et al. RADIANCE: a randomized controlled study of ranibizumab in patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia[J]. Ophthalmology, 2014, 121(3): 682-692.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.023.
[22] Chen YX, Sharma T, Li XR, et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy in Asian patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization[J]. Retina, 2019, 39(10): 1985-1994. doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000002292.
[23] Xiao H, Zhao XJ, Li SS, et al. Risk factors for subretinal fibrosis after anti-VEGF treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularisation[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2021, 105(1): 103-108. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315763.

相关文章 15

[1]	赵娟,焦万珍,赵博军. UWFSS-OCTA检测糖尿病视网膜病变微循环的变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 80-86.
[2]	孙庆祝,沈健,陈星,吴雁冰,曾论. 代谢指标在预测糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者雷珠单抗疗效中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 74-81.
[3]	毛一恒,冯洁,何润田. 高血脂对视网膜损害与脉络膜厚度关系研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 162-167.
[4]	张莉苑,郭颖卓,陈蛟,王华,钟定娟. 650 nm低能量红光联合角膜塑形镜控制近视的临床效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 52-57.
[5]	张莉苑,钟定娟,王华. 非手术的近视管理方法与脉络膜的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 149-153.
[6]	李飏,刘鸫,曹文捷. 红光治疗对近视儿童等效球镜度、眼轴长度及脉络膜厚度影响的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 74-81.
[7]	吴丽丽,曲毅. OCTA在病理性近视脉络膜新生血管应用及其在人工智能的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 144-149.
[8]	赵露,田慧文,孟博,王薇,王艳玲. 颈内动脉闭塞患者黄斑区视网膜脉络膜厚度变化分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 72-76.
[9]	初宝睿,曲毅. 载siIKKβ脂质纳米粒的制备及其对巨噬细胞再极化的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(2): 91-97.
[10]	顾冉冉,李凤娇,焦万珍,崔艳艳,赵博军. 卵磷脂络和碘胶囊辅助治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的临床疗效研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 46-50.
[11]	任雨馨,赵博军. 病理性近视脉络膜新生血管的诊断与治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 157-162.
[12]	傅强,王红星. 眼缺血综合征患者脉络膜厚度的分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 60-63.
[13]	周学义,李一鸣,王美菊,张苑苑,张历浊. 25+微创玻璃体视网膜手术联合玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗增生型糖尿病视网膜病变的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 87-89.
[14]	靳琳,潘庆敏,胡磊. 玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗CSME及NCSME的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(2): 96-98.
[15]	严槟,尹小芳,叶祖科,卢彦,洪剑威. 玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合GLP治疗BRVO-ME的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(1): 110-113.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed