山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 72-79.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.419

• 论著 • 上一篇    

气道内金属支架取出术方法学及其影响因素分析

王晓冬1,彭镜园2,安小庆2,江应潇1,徐栗2,王晓平2,曲仪庆1   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医院 呼吸与危重症医学科, 山东 济南 250012;
    2.山东大学附属公共卫生临床中心 呼吸内镜诊疗科, 山东 济南 250013
  • 发布日期:2023-02-06
  • 通讯作者: 曲仪庆. E-mail:quyiqing@sdu.edu.cn; 王晓平. E-mail:jinan5823@126.com

The methodology of tracheobronchial metallic stents removal and influential factors analysis

WANG Xiaodong1, PENG Jingyuan2, AN Xiaoqing2, JIANG Yingxiao1, XU Li2, WANG Xiaoping2, QU Yiqing1   

  1. 1. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Bronchoscope Diagnosis and Treatment, Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250013, Shandong, China
  • Published:2023-02-06

PDF (PC)

85

摘要： 目的 通过统计学处理分析影响气道内金属支架取出术方法学的影响因素,探讨气道内金属支架取出术的方法学。 方法 收集64例气道内金属支架取出术的病历资料,进行病例对照研究。所有患者按照支架取出使用的方法种类数量,分为支架取出方法种类≤3种组(n=40)和支架取出方法种类>3种组(n=24)。比较两组患者的人口学特征、气道内金属支架类型、气道内支架留置时间、支架相关并发症等影响因素。 结果 64例中有40例使用支架取出方法种类≤3种,24例使用支架取出方法种类>3种。两组患者的性别、年龄、置入支架时病因、支架留置体内时间、取出支架时支架结构完整性的差异无统计学意义。取出支架方法种类>3种组的支架覆膜情况、支架移位、支架相关肉芽组织或肿瘤组织形成程度评分、支架相关瘢痕组织形成程度评分,与取出支架方法种类≤3种组相比差异具有统计学意义。多因素分析发现,支架相关瘢痕组织形成程度评分(OR=1.354,95%CI:1.100~1.667,P=0.004)是影响气道内金属支架取出术方法学种类数量的影响因素。 结论 通过研究发现气道内金属支架相关瘢痕组织形成程度是支架取出方法学种类数量的影响因素,且影响关系为正相关。

关键词: 金属支架, 瘢痕组织, 气道, 支架取出影响因素

Abstract: Objective The study aimed to investigate the methodology of tracheobronchial metallic stent removal and to analyze the influencing factors by statistical methods. Methods A total of 64 patients, who underwent tracheobronchial metallic stent removal, were included in this case-control study. The patients were divided into two groups: ≤3 types of stent removal methods(n=40)and >3 types of stent removal methods(n=24). The study aimed to compare the demographic characteristics, type of tracheobronchial metallic stents, duration of stent retention, stent-related complications, and other relevant factors between the two groups. Results There were 40 patients, who underwent at most three types of stent removal methods. Meanwhile, there were 24 patients, who underwent more than three types of stent removal methods. No significant statistical differences were observed between the two groups in terms of gender, age, etiology of stent implantation, duration of stent retention, and structural integrity of the stent. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the coverage of the stent, stent migration, the stent-related granulation tissue or tumor tissue formation score, and the stent-related cicatricial tissue score. Based on the multivariate analysis, the stent-related cicatricial tissue score(OR=1.354, 95%CI:1.100-1.667, P=0.004)significantly influenced the number of tracheobronchial metallic stent removal methods. Conclusion In this study, the stent-related cicatricial tissue score significantly influenced the number of tracheobronchial metallic stent removal methods, and is the positive correlation relationship.

Key words: Metallic stent, Cicatricial tissue, Tracheobronchial, Influential factors of stent removal

中图分类号: 

  • R562
[1] Simonds AK, Irving JD, Clarke SW, et al. Use of expandable metal stents in the treatment of bronchial obstruction[J]. Thorax, 1989, 44(8): 680-681. doi:10.1136/thx.44.8.680
[2] Bi Y, Yu Z, Ren J, et al. Metallic stent insertion and removal for post-tracheotomy and post-intubation tracheal Stenosis[J]. Radiol Med, 2019, 124(3): 191-198. doi:10.1007/s11547-018-0953-9
[3] Wood DE, Liu YH, Vallières E, et al. Airway stenting for malignant and benign tracheobronchial Stenosis[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003, 76(1): 167-72;discussion173. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00033-x
[4] Husain SA, Finch D, Ahmed M, et al. Long-term follow-up of ultraflex metallic stents in benign and malignant central airway obstruction[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007, 83(4): 1251-1256. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.066
[5] Ryu YJ, Kim H, Yu CM, et al. Use of silicone stents for the management of post-tuberculosis tracheobronchial Stenosis[J]. Eur Respir J, 2006, 28(5): 1029-1035. doi:10.1183/09031936.00020906
[6] Karush JM, Seder CW, Raman A, et al. Durability of silicone airway stents in the management of benign central airway obstruction[J]. Lung, 2017, 195(5): 601-606. doi:10.1007/s00408-017-0023-4
[7] 王洪武. 应充分认识气管支架严格掌握其适应证[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2011, 91(36): 2521-2524. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2011.36.001
[8] Dumon J F. A dedicated tracheobronchial stent[J]. Chest, 1990, 97(2):328-332
[9] Chawla RK, Madan A, Singh I, et al. Removal of self expandable metallic airway stent: a rare case report[J]. Lung India, 2013, 30(1): 64-66. doi:10.4103/0970-2113.106177
[10] 金发光, 傅恩清, 谢永宏, 等. 难治性中心气道狭窄的综合介入治疗[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2010, 33(1): 21-24. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2010.01.010 JIN Faguang, FU Enqing, XIE Yonghong, et al. The application of combined interventional procedures for the management of intractable central airway Stenosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 2010, 33(1): 21-24. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2010.01.010
[11] 张杰. 良性中心气道狭窄经支气管镜介入诊治专家共识[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2017(6): 408-418.
[12] 王洪武. 电子支气管镜的临床应用[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020: 207-214.
[13] 王洪武.支气管镜介入治疗[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2012: 85-107.
[14] 毛华东,杜敬东,程杰. 显微支撑喉镜下钬激光治疗喉部肿瘤及喉瘢痕狭窄8例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2013, 27(6): 26-27. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.089 MAO Huadong, DU Jingdong, CHENG Jie. Application of holmium laser in the treatment of laryngeal tumor and cicatricial stenosis( 8 cases report)[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2013, 27(6): 26-27. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.089
[15] 李亚强, 李强, 白冲, 等. 良性中央气道狭窄386例病因分析及腔内介入治疗的疗效评价[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2008, 31(5): 364-368. doi:10.3321/j.issn: 1001-0939.2008.05.011 LI Yaqiang, LI Qiang, BAI Chong, et al. Causes of benign central airway stenoses and the efficacy of interventional treatments through flexible bronchoscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 2008, 31(5): 364-368. doi:10.3321/j.issn: 1001-0939.2008.05.011
[16] Cofer SA, Badaoui JN, Boesch RP, et al. Endotracheal metallic stent removal: a novel ABC(airway balloon collapse)technique[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2021, 140: 110490. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110490
[17] 王洪武, 金发光, 张楠. 气道内金属支架临床应用中国专家共识[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(1): 5-10.
[18] Lunn W, Feller-Kopman D, Wahidi M, et al. Endoscopic removal of metallic airway stents[J]. Chest, 2005, 127(6): 2106-2112. doi:10.1378/chest.127.6.2106
[19] Lee P, Kupeli E, Mehta A C. Airway Stents[J]. Clinics in Chest Medicine, 2010, 31(1): 141-150.doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2009.08.002
[20] Zhou ZQ, Feng JX, Chen Y, et al. Self-expanding covered metallic stents as a transition to silicone stent implantation in management of severe post-tuberculosis bronchial Stenosis[J]. Ther Adv Respir Dis, 2021, 15: 17534666211019564. doi:10.1177/17534666211019564
[21] Chung FT, Chen GY, Chou CL, et al. Remove airway ultraflex stents by flexible bronchoscope[J]. Am J Med Sci, 2012, 343(4): 267-272. doi:10.1097/maj.0b013e31822a6bc3
[22] Ratnovsky A, Regev N, Wald S, et al. Mechanical properties of different airway stents[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2015, 37(4): 408-415. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.02.008
[23] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会.支气管镜诊疗操作相关大出血的预防和救治专家共识[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2016(8): 588-591. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2016.08.007
[24] Majid A, Lunn W, Garland R, et al. Effects of Radiofrequency Energy in Metallic Stent Removal[J]. Journal of Bronchology, 2005, 12(4): 196-199. doi:10.1097/01.lab.0000186677.63739.9f
[25] 王连庆, 张杰, 王娟, 等. 经硬质气管镜气道金属支架取出方法及相关并发症处理措施[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2016, 39(2): 98-104. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2016.02.005 WANG Lianqing, ZHANG Jie, WANG Juan, et al. Airway metal stents removal by rigid bronchoscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 2016, 39(2): 98-104. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2016.02.005
[26] 楚辉, 张杰. 过度动态气道塌陷1例并文献复习[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2021, 20(7): 724-725. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6450.2021.07.018
[27] Aslam A, De Luis Cardenas J, Morrison RJ, et al. Tracheobronchomalacia and excessive dynamic airway collapse: current concepts and future directions[J]. Radiographics, 2022, 42(4): 1012-1027. doi:10.1148/rg.210155
[28] 王继旺, 蒋胜华. 气管支气管软化症与过度动态气道塌陷[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2017, 40(6): 469-472. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2017.06.014
[29] Brichet A, Verkindre C, Dupont J, et al. Multidisciplinary approach to management of postintubation tracheal stenoses[J]. Eur Respir J, 1999, 13(4): 888-893. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13d32.x
[1] 潘健云,莫坤兰综述胡玉丽,李超宇审校. 互联网医疗服务对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者使用CPAP的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 117-122.
[2] 王娜,柴向斌. 前列腺源性ETS因子在哮喘及鼻黏膜炎性疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 136-141.
[3] 曾斌, 吕丹, 任佳, 胡娟娟, 于凌昱, 卢欢, 杨慧. 喉显微外科技术在严重新生儿上气道梗阻中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 95-99.
[4] 师晓丽, 牟鸿. 多学科联合诊治重度儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征并发肺动脉高压1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 116-119.
[5] 杨慕,肖旭平. 儿童舌系带过短和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(3): 100-105.
[6] 杨一帆, 程雷. 儿童鼻窦炎与哮喘:统一气道疾病[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 10-15.
[7] 张丙文,陈荣荣,吴元庆,徐进敬,姜亮,戚建伟. Müller状态下128排螺旋CT三维重建在OSAS患者上气道阻塞平面评估中的价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 90-94.
[8] 朱政,王万钧,胡秋蓉,李靖. 变应原气道激发在变应性鼻炎和哮喘研究中的作用研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 42-48.
[9] 张宇,宋西成. 慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉与哮喘的相关性机制及治疗策略研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 49-52.
[10] 沙莉,刘传合. 生物制剂治疗支气管哮喘的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 53-58.
[11] 金兴,胡大宇,朱丽,邓芙蓉,刘俊秀. PM2.5与变应性鼻炎患者上气道阻力的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 77-80.
[12] 王亚坤,张宇,宋西成. 不伴有下气道疾病的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者肺功能及相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 99-102.
[13] 陈莹,薛明新. 穴位贴敷联合推拿治疗小儿上气道咳嗽综合征的临床随机对照观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 131-134.
[14] 姜晓丹,董庆喆,党志红,李慎玲,苗玉,赵涵,张念凯. 不同剂量外源性白介素17A干预对变应性鼻炎小鼠气道炎症的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 73-78.
[15] 敬尚林. 儿童上气道咳嗽综合征临床诊疗现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 87-91.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发