山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年与中青年突发性聋的疗效比较

童 军,蔡勋华,陈文文   

  1. 上海市第一人民医院分院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科, 上海 200081
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-12-24 发布日期:2007-12-24
  • 通讯作者: 童 军

Terapeutic effects of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in old and young

TONG Jun, CAI Xun-hua, CHEN Wen-wen   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Branch of Shanghai First People′s Hospital,Shanghai 200081, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-12-24 Published:2007-12-24
  • Contact: TONG Jun

摘要: 目的 了解老年与中青年突发性聋患者的不同临床特征和疗效。方法 回顾 分析123例(129耳)突发性聋资料,分成两组:老年组(60≥岁)72例(76耳),中青年组(<60岁)51例(53耳)。所有患者行皮质类固醇激素、能量合剂等治疗,一部分患者加用高压氧和东菱克栓酶辅助治疗,5例上述治疗无效患者行甲强龙鼓室灌注治疗。结果分析用χ2检验和t检验。结果 两组治疗后的总有效率(痊愈、显效、有效之和)分别为59.2%和69.8%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.26,P>0.05),总显效率(痊愈、显效之和)为34.2%和56.6%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.37,P<0.05)。患者发病至就诊时间差异有统计学意义(t=2.14,P<0.05)。治疗前健患侧听力差分别为(28.5±13.9)dB和(42.1±28.2)dB ,差异有统计学意义(t=3.64,P<0.01)。老年组患者合并糖尿病、高血脂症(25/76,48/76)的比例较中青年组(9/53,12/53)高。结论 老年突发性聋患者往往有基础的听力损失,发病呈渐进性和隐匿性,虽然总有效率与中青年患者相似,但显效率较低。类固醇激素鼓室灌注经圆窗渗透对一般治疗无效的部分患者仍有效。

关键词: 聋, 突发性, 老年, 感音听力

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical features of sudden sensorineural hearing loss(SSHL) between old and young wrinkly patients. Methods A retrospective review of 123 cases (129ears)of SSHL was carried out. All patients were classified into two groups: group A(76ears, over 60years old) and group B(53ears, younger than 60years old). All cases were treated with steroids and energy composition. Some were treated with a hyperbaric oxygen chamber and additional Batroxobin. 5 cases which failed these routine therapies were treated with intratympanic steroid therapies. A Partnership t test and Chi square test were used for analysis. Result The total effective rate of the two groups was 59.2% and 69.8% (P>0.05). The total excellence rate of the elder was significant lower than that of the young(34.2% vs 56.6%) (P<0.05). The mean duration before initiation of treatment was significantly different between the two groups(t=2.14,P<0.05). The opposite ear′s hearing threshold level was significantly higher in the elder than in the young. Diabetes and Hyperlipemia was more frequently in the group of elder than in the group of young. Conclusions SSHL in the old gradually and hidingly unobserved initiates and often causes based hearing impairment in both affected and opposite ear.Though the total effective rate is not significantly different between two groups, the excellence rate is significantly lower in the older than in the younger. Intra-tympanic steroid therapy is useful in some patients who fail routine therapy.

Key words: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL), Elder, Sensorineural hearing

中图分类号: 

  • R764.437
[1] 徐娟,崔彪,黄建平,陈以标,施建飞,王燕雯,刘赞华,张剑伟. 电子喉镜评估老年肺部感染患者的吞咽功能[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 74-79.
[2] 王莹,蔡燕文. 以听力减退为主要表现的中枢神经系统表面铁沉积症1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 89-96.
[3] 郑泽皓,魏佳俐,刘嘉涛,周玉麒,孙文婷,李雨轩,白鹏. 特定部位针刺法治疗突发性聋的疗效及安全性评价:一项系统综述和网状Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 114-127.
[4] 李洁,苏维娜,林倩,张奇舒,侯成,杨振娇,相丽丽. 两例耳聋病例中MARVELD2基因变异的遗传学分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 128-134.
[5] 林育珊,卢标清. 巴曲酶个性化用药治疗全频下降型突聋[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 115-121.
[6] 王鑫,原晶晶,郝鹏鹏,闫占峰,刘建华,钟利群,刘思溟,吴薇,赵晓阳,张莹. 中药复方治疗突发性聋的疗效和可能机制:一项结合网络药理学研究的回顾性临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 6-17.
[7] 李辉,赵永强,贺祯,杨惠敏,赵叶,田秀娟,陈剑秋. 下颌提拉平卧位下床旁老年患者经皮扩张气管切开的安全性探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 87-93.
[8] 郭翔,马永强,伊海金. 突发性聋磁共振检查的现状与进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 140-144.
[9] 李培培,卢彦青,侯楠. 机器学习预测模型在突发性聋中的临床应用研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 145-151.
[10] 陈丹萍,何子键,虞幼军,周晓娓. 儿童突发性聋10年住院病例的疗效及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 16-22.
[11] 孙鸿翔,曹娟. 老年白内障患者心理脆弱现状及其与希望水平和述情障碍的相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 89-95.
[12] 李逢将,魏婕,刘红丹,张丽,赵伟超,武娜娜,王磊,吴玮,王瑞娟. 老年肺炎患者胃食管反流病和咽喉反流性疾病25例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 103-107.
[13] 李钰,刘皓,王敏,付小龙,李文. mTOR通路在耳蜗中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 112-118.
[14] 曹影,邱月,陈智斌,费兵,李东,张晓凤,王惠,康欣乐,王海旭,怀德,李秀婷,束明阳. 难治性突聋耳后注射神经节苷脂联合鼓室内注射甲泼尼龙治疗前后言语识别率及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 15-21.
[15] 周静,毕秀丽,肖雨,胡俊,付小龙,于亚峰. 盐酸氯米帕明保护听觉毛细胞免受新霉素诱导的损伤[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 22-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!