25G玻璃体切除治疗上方孔源性视网膜脱离的疗效

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.220

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究25G玻璃体切除联合空气填充治疗上方孔源性视网膜脱离的临床治疗效果及安全性。方法回顾性分析2018年12月至2020年3月行25G玻璃体切除联合空气填充的上方孔源性视网膜脱离的患者32例32眼。观察术前及术后1周、末次随访时间的最佳矫正视力(LogMAR)、眼压、视网膜复位情况及并发症。结果术前视力(BCVA, LogMAR)1.4(0.2-1.7),术后1周平均视力0.83±0.35,末次随访平均视力0.52±0.34,术前与术后视力差异有统计学意义(Mann Whitney U 检验,P<0.05),术后视力明显提高。术前平均眼压(15.15±3.04)mmHg,术后1周平均眼压(17.75±2.75)mmHg,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后一周眼压较术前眼压升高。末次随访平均眼压15.20±1.81 mmHg,与术前比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。末次随访时32例患者视网膜全部复位,复位率100%。3例患者发生术后一过性眼压升高,2例患者晶体发生羽毛状混浊,均恢复正常。结论玻璃体切除联合空气填充治疗上方孔源性视网膜脱离安全有效,并发症少,成功率高,可以作为治疗上方孔源性视网膜脱离的一种有效手术方式。

关键词: 玻璃体切除手术, 空气填充术, 上方孔源性视网膜脱离

Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical treatment outcomes and safety of 25-gauge vitrectomy with air tamponade for superior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods Retrospective analysis 32 eyes with superior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment from 32 patients who received 25-gauge vitrectomy with air tamponade from December 2018 to March 2020. Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)(LogMAR)and intraocular pressor(IOP)were test before surgery, 1 week, and the last follow-up time after surgery. Retinal reattachment condition and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results The mean BCVA was significantly different among before surgery,1 week and the last follow-up time after surgery,and the BCVA at 1 week and the last follow-up time after surgery was evidently improved in comparison with before surgery(1.4(0.2-1.7), 0.83±0.35, 0.52±0.34, Mann Whitney U text, P<0.05).The mean IOP was(15.15±3.04 mmHg)before surgery and(17.75±2.75 mmHg)1 week after surgery, showing a significant difference among them(t text, P<0.05), the IOP 1 week after surgery was evidently higher than that before surgery.The mean IOP was(15.20±1.81 mmHg)at the last follow-up time, have not difference between the mean IOP before the surgery(t text, P>0.05). The retinal reattachment rate following a single procedure was 100%. Conclusion 25-Gauge vitrectomy and air tamponade for superior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is an effective and safe approach, and fewer complications and higher success rates.

Key words: Vitrectomy, Air tamponade, Superior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

中图分类号:

R774

鹿文瑞,严端,许诺. 25G玻璃体切除治疗上方孔源性视网膜脱离的疗效[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 89-91.

LU Wenrui, YAN Duan, XU Nuo. Surgical clinical treatment outcomes of 25 gauge vitrectomy for superior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 89-91.

参考文献

[1] 陆颖丽,周用谋. 23 G与25 G+玻璃体切割手术治疗视网膜脱离的对比分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2016, 16(6): 1110-1112. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.6.27. LU Yingli, ZHOU Yongmou. Analysis of 23 G and 25 G+vitrectomy for retinal detachment[J]. International Eye Science, 2016, 16(6): 1110-1112. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.6.27.
[2] Liu BQ, Chen SD, Li YH, et al. Comparison of macular buckling and vitrectomy for the treatment of macular schisis and associated macular detachment in high myopia: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2020, 98(3): e266-e272. doi:10.1111/aos.14260.
[3] Tabandeh H, Flaxel C, Sullivan PM, et al. Scleral rupture during retinal detachment surgery: risk factors, management options, and outcomes[J]. Ophthalmology, 2000, 107(5): 848-852. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00033-6.
[4] Wirostko WJ, Covert DJ, Han DP, et al. Microbiological spectrum of organisms isolated from explanted scleral buckles[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina, 2009, 40(2): 201-202. doi:10.3928/15428877-20090301-22.
[5] Romano MR, Groenwald C, Das R, et al. Removal of Densiron-68 with a 23-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy system[J]. Eye(Lond), 2009, 23(3): 715-717. doi:10.1038/eye.2008.396.
[6] 田涛, 刘茹, 彭婧利, 等. 多波长激光治疗DR合并视网膜中央静脉阻塞[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2014, 14(7): 1260-1262. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.07.23. TIAN Tao, LIU Ru, PENG Jingli, et al. Efficacy observation on multiple wave length laser for diabetic retinopathy and central retinal vein occlusion[J]. International Eye Science, 2014, 14(7): 1260-1262. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.07.23.
[7] Bamonte G, Mura M, Tan HS. Hypotony after 25-gauge vitrectomy[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2011, 151(1): 156-160. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.042.
[8] Oshima Y, Wakabayashi T, Sato T, et al. A 27-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless microincision vitrectomy surgery[J]. Ophthalmology, 2010, 117(1): 93-102.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.043.
[9] von Fricken MA, Kunjukunju N, Weber C, et al. 25-gauge sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Retina, 2009, 29(4): 444-450. doi:10.1097/iae.0b013e318196b19c.

相关文章 15

[1]	朱明琼,李征,刘茹,田涛,彭婧利,吕倩怡,谭华霞. 基于OCT/OCTA的AI筛查系统在抗VEGF治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者效果评价中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 68-73.
[2]	王焕霞,王淑雅,王影,孙璇,黄杰,王兴荣. 孔源性视网膜脱离玻璃体切除术后继发黄斑前膜的危险因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 181-185.
[3]	周静琳,李金香,曾琦. 577 nm阈值下微脉冲激光联合抗VEGF药物治疗难治性糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 18-25.
[4]	何静,雷春燕,张美霞. 糖化血红蛋白变异指数与糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 34-40.
[5]	叶强,洛松巴宗,王浩,刘晓燕,马进海,南苏亭,王晶,杨义,律鹏,王德贵,张文芳. 视觉倒置的临床和解剖特征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 137-143.
[6]	吴丽丽,曲毅. OCTA在病理性近视脉络膜新生血管应用及其在人工智能的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 144-149.
[7]	邓宇,王建伟,刘自强,李媛媛,侯小玉,接传红. 中心视力下降患者优选注视点应用的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 150-155.
[8]	王新钰,高丽芬,路晖,宋文琦,杨钰. 帕金森疾病的相关视网膜表现[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 156-162.
[9]	伦英俊,陈晨,高宏程,范清琳,邰仁清. TLR4/NF-κB通道在糖尿病视网膜病变中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 163-168.
[10]	陈曦, 李珊珊, 赵露, 尤冉, 王艳玲. 动脉溶栓治疗视网膜中央动脉阻塞Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 28-34.
[11]	孟博, 黄映湘, 王康, 赵露, 王艳玲. 眼缺血综合征国内外文献特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 35-40.
[12]	郭欣璐, 高健生, 接传红. 中医药联合激光及手术治疗眼缺血综合征一例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 48-52.
[13]	冯雪,王海伟,李闻思,杨新同,孙存,赵媛,赵朋波,张建强. 基于SD-OCT分析高血压类型与视网膜血管管径的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 64-68.
[14]	徐婧,瞿远珍,梁小芳,杨柳,汤洋. 视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病患者黄斑区及视盘周围视网膜血管参数变化特征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 69-74.
[15]	杨秀芬,尤冉,马秀梅,王康,王艳玲. 以医院为基础的中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变流行病学调查及危险因素的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 75-79.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed