山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 75-79.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.138

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者夜间碱反流初步研究

王磊1,李保卫1,王刚1,2,刘红丹1,韩浩伦1,张晓丽1,吴玮1,2   

  1. 1. 中国人民解放军战略支援部队特色医学中心 耳鼻喉科, 北京 100101;
    2. 中国人民解放军战略支援部队特色医学中心 国家环境保护环境感官应激与健康重点实验室, 北京 100101
  • 发布日期:2023-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 吴玮. E-mail:ent306ww@126.com
  • 作者简介:王磊、李保卫为共同第一作者
  • 基金资助:
    战略支援部队特色医学中心中心级课题项目(19ZX48)

A preliminary study on nocturnal alkali reflux in OSAHS patients

WANG Lei1, LI Baowei1, WANG Gang1,2, LIU Hongdan1, HAN Haolun1, ZHANG Xiaoli1, WU Wei1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Chinese PLA Strategic Support Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Sense Organ Stress and Health, Chinese PLA Strategic Support Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China
  • Published:2023-12-15

摘要: 目的 咽喉反流与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome, OSAHS)往往存在较高的伴发率,探讨OSAHS患者夜间碱反流特点。 方法 回顾性分析98例鼾症患者夜间睡眠时口咽pH值监测并同步多导睡眠监测结果,分析pH值>7.5异常高pH值事件与鼾症严重程度相关性,并留取晨起唾液使用酶联免疫法进行胰蛋白酶检测。 结果 根据口咽pH值监测结果,存在夜间睡眠pH值>7.5高pH值事件33例。OSAHS组出现高pH值事件39.0%(32/82),高于单纯鼾症组6.3%(1/16),经比较显示差异有统计学意义(P=0.011),两组间高pH值事件百分比时间及最高pH值比较显示差异有统计学意义(P=0.020,0.020)。晨起胰蛋白酶检测结果27.42~401.44 μg/L,其中17例异常增高(275.28±59.13)μg/L,OSAHS组与单纯鼾症组比较差异无统计学意义,但存在高pH值事件的32例OSAHS患者,按打鼾程度分组,组间胰蛋白酶含量比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.048)。 结论 口咽pH值监测发现OSAHS患者夜间睡眠时更易出现异常的高pH值事件,晨起唾液亦可检出异常增高的胰蛋白酶,提示发生碱性反流可能,但发生机制还需进一步研究。

关键词: 咽喉反流, 碱反流, 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征, 口咽pH值监测, 胰蛋白酶

Abstract: Objective Patients with obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS)often have a high incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux, the purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of nocturnal alkali reflux in OSAHS patients. Methods The results of oropharyngeal pH monitoring and simultaneous polysomnography in 98 patients with snoring were analyzed retrospectively. The correlation between abnormally high pH events with pH >7.5 and severity of sleep ventilation disorders was analyzed. Saliva samples were reserved in the morning for trypsin detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results Oropharyngeal pH monitoring results found 33 cases with high pH events(pH >7.5)during nocturnal sleep. The occurrence of high pH events in the OSAHS group was 39.0%(32/82), which was significantly higher than the pure snoring group(6.3%, 1/16)(P=0.011), and similar results were seen with the percentage time of high pH events and the highest pH values(P=0.020, 0.020). Mean salivary trypsin levels were 27.42-401.44 μg/L, of which 17 cases were abnormally increased(275.28±59.13)μg/L. There was no significant difference between the OSAHS and pure snoring groups in trypsin content, but the trypsin content in the 32 OSAHS patients with high pH events differed statistically based on the degree of snoring(P=0.048). Conclusion OSAHS patients were prone to nocturnal high pH events, as revealed through oropharyngeal pH monitoring and abnormally increased saliva trypsin contents in the morning, suggesting that alkaline reflux may occur. However, the mechanisms of alkaline reflux need to be further studied.

Key words: Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Alkali reflux, Obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome, Dx-pH monitoring, Trypsin

中图分类号: 

  • R766.5
[1] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会咽喉组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会咽喉学组. 咽喉反流性疾病诊断与治疗专家共识(2015年)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(5):324-326. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.05.003
[2] Wang L, Han HL, Wang G, et al. Relationship between reflux diseases and obstructive sleep apnea together with continuous positive airway pressure treatment efficiency analysis[J]. Sleep Med, 2020, 151-155. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2020.07.024
[3] 肖水芳, 张俊波. 咽喉反流性疾病与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征[J]. 中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学), 2018, 33(1): 11-13. doi:10.19617/j.issn1001-1307.2018.01.011 XIAO Shuifang, ZHANG Junbo. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and OSAHS[J]. Chinese Medical Digest(Otorhinolaryngology), 2018, 33(1): 11-13. doi:10.19617/j.issn1001-1307.2018.01.011
[4] 孙娜, 陈晓平. 咽喉反流与耳鼻咽喉科疾病[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 85-89. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673 3770.0.2016.213 SUN Na, CHEN Xiaoping. Laryngopharyngeal reflux and otorhinolaryngology diseases[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2016, 30(6): 85-89. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.213
[5] 韩浩伦, 王磊, 王刚, 等. 中重度OSA患者48 h口咽及食管Dx-pH检测并同步无创正压机械通气疗效分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(12): 1083-1087. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.12.007 HAN Haolun, WANG Lei, WANG Gang, et al. Analysis of the effect of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation with simultaneous detection of Dx-pH monitoring in oropharynx and esophagus for 48 hours in patients with moderate and severe OSA[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2020, 34(12): 1083-1087. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.12.007
[6] 中华医学会, 中华医学会杂志社, 中华医学会全科医学分会, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病基层诊疗指南(2018年)[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2018, 17(11): 856-870. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2018.11.002
[7] 吴玮, 王刚, 王磊, 等. Ryan指数在诊断咽喉反流性疾病中的探讨[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 52(12): 885-889. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.12.002 WU Wei, WANG Gang, WANG Lei, et al. Ryan index for detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2017, 52(12): 885-889. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.12.002
[8] Lechien JR, Akst LM, Hamdan AL, et al. Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: state of the art review[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019, 160(5): 762-782. doi:10.1177/0194599819827488
[9] Lechien JR, Bock JM, Carroll TL, et al. Is empirical treatment a reasonable strategy for laryngopharyngeal reflux A contemporary review[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2020, 45(4): 450-458. doi:10.1111/coa.13518
[10] Li JR, Wang JS, Wu MK, et al. The role of nonacid reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 277(10): 2813-2819. doi:10.1007/s00405-020-06015-6
[11] Trudgill NJ, Sifrim D, Sweis R, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring[J]. Gut, 2019, 68(10): 1731-1750. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318115
[12] Johnston N, Knight J, Dettmar PW, et al. Pepsin and carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme III as diagnostic markers for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114(12): 2129-2134. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000149445.07146.03
[13] Golub JS, Johns MM 3rd, Lim JH, et al. Comparison of an oropharyngeal pH probe and a standard dual pH probe for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2009, 118(1): 1-5. doi:10.1177/000348940911800101
[14] Lee JS, Jung AR, Park JM, et al. Comparison of characteristics according to reflux type in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2018, 11(2): 141-145. doi:10.21053/ceo.2017.00577
[15] Patterson N, Mainie I, Rafferty G, et al. Nonacid reflux episodes reaching the pharynx are important factors associated with cough[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2009, 43(5): 414-419. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e31818859a3
[16] Elhennawi DM, Ahmed MR, Abou-Halawa AS. Correlation of obstructive sleep apnoea and laryngopharyngeal reflux: phmetry study[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2016, 41(6): 758-761. doi:10.1111/coa.12640
[17] Aldhahrani A, Powell J, Ladak S, et al. The potential role of bile acids in acquired laryngotracheal Stenosis[J]. Laryngoscope, 2018, 128(9): 2029-2033. doi:10.1002/lary.27105
[18] de Corso E, Baroni S, Salonna G, et al. Impact of bile acids on the severity of laryngo-pharyngeal reflux[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2021, 46(1): 189-195. doi:10.1111/coa.13643
[19] Li YD, Xu GF, Zhou BD, et al. Effects of acids, pepsin, bile acids, and trypsin on laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases: physiopathology and therapeutic targets[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2022, 279(6): 2743-2752. doi:10.1007/s00405-021-07201-w
[1] 吴玮,王磊,陈升,李连勇,王刚. 胃食管气道反流性疾病多学科研究及进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 1-14.
[2] 刘莲莲,李进让. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与咽喉反流[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 15-22.
[3] 张利,张梦茹,阿丽米热·艾尔肯,邱忠民. 咽喉反流性疾病在常见呼吸道疾病中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 23-29.
[4] 胡志伟,陈冬,杨栋,吴继敏. 胃食管气道反流性疾病的诊断和治疗:基于2020~2024年相关共识和指南[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 30-38.
[5] 赵佳宁,崔元馨,王丹,赵明. 咽喉反流与复发性呼吸道乳头状瘤病的关系及其机制探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 39-45.
[6] 张杉,陈秋,周方伟,马亦飞. 生物标志物在咽喉反流性疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 46-54.
[7] 周诗侗,杨艳艳,杨玉成,方红雁. 胃蛋白酶与咽喉反流性疾病:从致病机制到咽喉鳞状细胞癌的潜在风险因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 55-60.
[8] 席晓宇,隋昕珂,陈升,李连勇,钟长青. 咽喉反流性疾病的内镜下治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 61-65.
[9] 牛燕燕,顾伟,金晓峰,霍红,杨大海,崔婷婷,王剑. 声带白斑组织中胃蛋白酶的表达分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 66-70.
[10] 王磊,王刚,孙喆喆,刘红丹,韩浩伦,李保卫,张晓丽,吴玮. 咽喉反流与声带良性增生性病变、声带白斑、慢性咽喉炎相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 71-77.
[11] 崔小缓,尹龙龙,张延平,蒋兴旺,李丽娜. 咽喉反流患者唾液菌群与反流症状相关性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 78-84.
[12] 李逗,隋昕珂,杨小慢,郭红媛,王敏,钟长青,李连勇. 单纯咽喉反流患者食管下段黏膜细胞内镜及病理指标变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 85-90.
[13] 孙喆喆,王刚,王磊,李保卫,韩浩伦,刘红丹,张晓丽,吴玮. 咽喉反流性疾病不同体位反流模式的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 91-95.
[14] 魏鑫,邢东升,翟振伟,阎艾慧,刘振宇,曹弘薇. 妊娠期女性咽喉反流症状指数调查及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 96-102.
[15] 李逢将,魏婕,刘红丹,张丽,赵伟超,武娜娜,王磊,吴玮,王瑞娟. 老年肺炎患者胃食管反流病和咽喉反流性疾病25例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 103-107.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!