山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 80-83.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.404

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼疗效观察

姜洋,李莹,王忠海,金玉梅,刘小伟   

  1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医院眼科, 北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-26 出版日期:2016-04-16 发布日期:2016-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 李莹. E-mail:liyingpumch@126.com E-mail:jiangyangpumch@126.co
  • 作者简介:姜洋. E-mail:jiangyangpumch@126.co

Effect of the implantation of lacrimal plug for dry eyes after laser assisted in-situ keratomiLeusis.

JIANG Yang, LI Ying, WANG Zhonghai, JIN Yumei, LIU Xiaowei   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academic of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2015-09-26 Online:2016-04-16 Published:2016-04-16

摘要: 目的 评估可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼的临床效果及安全性。 方法 将2009年7月至2013年12月就诊拟行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(Laser Assisted In-situ KeratomiLeusis,LASIK)且术前伴有轻到中度干眼的患者65例(130眼)纳入研究,手术完成后于当日行术眼下泪小点可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓植入。记录患者术前,术后1周、1个月及3个月干涩感、异物感、烧灼感、畏光感、视疲劳及视力模糊6项症状评分,并于各时间点对患者进行基础泪液分泌试验(Schirmer I test,SIt)、泪膜破裂时间(break-up time,BUT)以及角膜荧光素染色(fluorescein staining,FS)检查。 结果 术后各时间点干涩感、异物感、烧灼感、畏光感、视疲劳及视物模糊6项症状评分均有下降,差异有统计学意义(F=125.64263.16123.229.8076.815105.19,P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.002、0.000、0.000)。术后各时间点SIt值及BUT值均有提高,FS评分均有下降,差异有统计学意义(F=45.9967.8749.01,P=0.000、0.000、0.000)。全部受试者在观察时间内均未发生感染、塞栓溢出或丢失、局部肉芽肿形成等泪道塞栓植入等情况。 结论 应用可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓可安全、有效地增加准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后患者眼表泪液量,改善泪膜稳定性,缓解干眼症状。

关键词: 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术, 泪道塞栓, 干眼

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of the implantation of lacrimal plug for dry eyes after laser assisted in-situ keratomi leusis(LASIK). Methods Patients with mild to moderate dry eye were included in the study before LASIK. The implantation of VisiPlug was conducted immediately after the surgery. The scores of dryness, foreign body sensation, burning sensation, photophobia, visual fatigue and blurred vision were recorded on preoperative and postoperative 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. Schirmer I test(SIt), break-up time(BUT)and corneal fluorescein staining(FS)were also tested on each time points. Results There were 130 eyes of 65 patients included in the study, including 22 males and 43 females with the average age of 28.32±7.24(18-47)years. The scores of dryness, foreign body sensation, burning sensation, photophobia, visual fatigue and blurred vision were significantly decreased on each time points after the implantation of the lacrimal plug(F value: 125.64, 263.16, 123.22, 9.80, 76.815, 105.19; P value: 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.002, 0.000, 0.000). Schirmer I test(SIt), break up time(BUT)and corneal fluorescein staining(FS)were also significantly improved on each time points(F value: 45.99, 67.87, 49.01; P value: 0.000, 0.000, 0.000). There was no infection, plug in the overflow, local granulation, and the effect of corneal flap healing. Conclusion Lacrimal plug could be effective and safe in the management of dry eyes after refractive surgery.

Key words: Dry eye, Lacrimal plug, Laser assisted in-situ keratomileusis

中图分类号: 

  • R777
[1] Solomon K D, Fernández de Castro L E, Sandoval H P, et al. Refractive surgery survey 2003[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(7):1556-1569.
[2] Jabbur N S, Sakatani K, OBrien T P. Survey of complications and recommendations for management in dissatisfied patients seeking a consultation after refractive surgery[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(9):1867-1874.
[3] Albietz J M, Lenton L M, McLennan S G. Chronic dry eye and regression after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(3):675-684.
[4] 杨斌, 王铮, 吴君舒, 等. 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后泪膜的早期改变[J].中华眼科杂志, 2002,2(1):76-84. YANG Bin, WANG Zheng, WU Junshu, et al. The early changes of tear film after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2002, 2(1):76-84.
[5] Kim W S, Kim J S.Change in corneal sensitivity following laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1999, 25(3):368-373.
[6] Linna T U, Vesaluoma M H, Pérez-Santonja J J, et al. Effect of myopic LASIK on corneal sensitivity and morphology of subbasal nerves[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000, 41(2):393-397.
[7] Albietz J, Lenton L, McLennan S. The effect of tear film and ocular surface management on myopic LASIK outcomes[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2002, 506(Pt A):711-717.
[8] 晏晓明.重视对LASIK围手术期干眼的认识和处理[J]. 眼科, 2006,3(2):154-157. YAN Xiaoming. Stress on recognition and perioperative management of dry eye after LASIK[J]. Ophthalmol Chin, 2006, 3(2):154-157.
[9] Albietz J M, Lenton L M. Management of the ocular surface and tear film before, during, and after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Refract Surg, 2004, 20(1):62-71.
[10] Alfawaz A M, Algehedan S, Jastaneiah S S, et al. Efficacy of punctal occlusion in management of dry eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2014, 39(3):257-262.
[11] Yung Y H, Toda I, Sakai C, et al. Punctal plugs for treatment of post-LASIK dry eye[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2012, 56(3):208-213.
[12] Huang B, Mirza M A, Qazi M A, et al. The effect of punctal occlusion on wavefront aberrations in dry eye patients after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004,137(1):52-61.
[13] 刘睿, 周行涛, 于志强, 等. 泪道栓治疗准分子激光角膜屈光术后干眼疗效评价[J]. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志, 2011, 11(1):22-28. LIU Rui, ZHOU Xingtao, YU Zhiqiang, et al. Therapeutic effect of lacrimal plug for dry eyes after refractive surgery[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 11(1):22-28.
[14] 陶爱平, 接英. 可降解泪小管栓塞治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后患者干眼症疗效观察[J]. 安徽医学, 2012, 33(11):1444-1447. TAO Aiping, JIE Ying. Effects of degradable lacrimal plug on treating dry eye after Lasik surgery[J]. Anhui Med, 2012, 33(11):1444-1447.
[15] Kojima T, Matsumoto Y, Ibrahim O M, et al. Evaluation of a thermosensitive atelocollagen punctal plugtreatment for dry eye disease[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 157(2):311-317.e1.
[16] Paparizos S C, Edward D P, Osmanovic S. Plug surface defects as a late complication of silicone punctal plugs[J]. Cornea, 2013, 32(9):1224-1226.
[17] Kaido M, Ishida R, Dogru M, et al. Visual function changes after punctal occlusion with the treatment of short BUT type of dry eye[J]. Cornea, 2012, 31(9):1009-1013.
[1] 阳雪,李莹. 干眼对角膜内皮细胞的影响及相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 72-76.
[2] 胡锦东,刘新泉. 干眼动物模型研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 109-113.
[3] 席玲,袁满红,过朵芳,杨华丽. LASIK患者眼压测量的多因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(2): 99-103.
[4] 王露萍, 吴欣怡. 2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平对干眼症的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 71-73.
[5] 闻华明1,李海祥2. 应用三角函数法估算LASIK术后人工晶状体度数[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(5): 74-76.
[6] 翟长斌1,郝颖娟2,易省平2,杨庆松1,张晶1,周跃华1. 鹰视飞秒FS200与Moria M2110微型角膜板层刀制作的角膜瓣厚度及形态观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 21-25.
[7] 郝颖娟1,杨庆松2,周跃华2,易省平1,翟长斌2. 飞秒激光在薄瓣LASIK手术中制作的角膜瓣厚度形态观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 26-31.
[8] 孙立旺,车呈凯,苏刚,柳光远. 丝裂霉素C在LASIK术后角膜上皮植入治疗中的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 79-80.
[9] 韩时超1,崔传波2,李艳1,郝发香1,申红静1,肖俊杰1 . 共焦显微镜观察飞秒激光和机械刀制瓣LASIK术后角膜神经再生[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(2): 71-74.
[10] 朱伟1,牟国营2. 不同厚度角膜瓣对准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼症的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(5): 1-2.
[11] 赵静静1,杨学秋1,庄文娟2 . 定量检测LASIK手术对视网膜影响的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(3): 79-82.
[12] 信兆亭1,杨莎莎1,2,吴欣怡1. 干眼影响因素的临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(4): 83-86.
[13] 郭丽1,袁方2,李斌1. Smart Plug泪小管塞治疗水液缺乏型干眼症临床初步观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(1): 63-66.
[14] 陈敏,蔡利梅,蔡福旭,吴惠英. 干眼症患者行白内障超声乳化术的预后研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(5): 61-63.
[15] 李 艳,吴玉伟,张佐红,李镜海 . 准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗远视及远视散光的对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(5): 460-463 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张小艳, 王智群, 张阳, 孙旭光. 神经营养性角膜炎1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(6): 89 .
[2] 赵玮1,顾朝辉1,周岩1,胡雁1,何静2. 多平面手术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(3): 4 -6 .
[3] 余鹏举1,许风雷2,江满杰2. 鼻内镜治疗难治性鼻出血121例疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 4 -5 .
[4] 张京京1,韩方菊2 . 玻璃体手术治疗伴脉络膜脱离的孔源性视网膜脱离临床研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(1): 70 -72 .
[5] 蓝云英,阳宇,李鸿. 鳃裂癌一例报告并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 112 -114 .