山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 59-61.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.092

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

青年人不同程度近视24°蓝黄视野检测结果的研究

赵军,陈尧,秦建民   

  1. 青岛市第八人民医院眼科, 山东 青岛 266100
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-28 出版日期:2013-10-16 发布日期:2013-10-16
  • 作者简介:赵军。 Email:qdfox2012@163.com

Blue-on-yellow perimetry in twenty-four degrees of youth with myopia

ZHAO Jun, CHEN Yao, QIN Jian-min   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Qingdao Eighth People′s Hospital, Qingdao 266100, Shandong,  China
  • Received:2013-03-28 Online:2013-10-16 Published:2013-10-16

摘要:

目的    研究青年人不同程度近视24°蓝黄视野检测的表现特征及其相关影响因素。方法    应用Humphery750 II-i计算机自动视野计的中心24-2蓝黄视野检测程序,对109例(160眼)21~30岁的患者行中心24°蓝黄视野检测,分为正视眼,低、中、高度近视四组,就其平均视网膜光敏感度、各象限视网膜光敏感度、各偏心度范围平均视网膜光敏感度、平均视野缺损值(MD)、模式标准偏差(PSD)5个视野指数及其影响因素进行分析。结果    各组间平均视网膜光敏感度、MD、PSD的差异均有统计学意义(F=21.449、13.191、6.854;P=0.000、0.000、0.000),低度近视组与中度近视组视网膜光敏感度、MD、PSD比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.326、0.370、0.268);各组各象限间视网膜光敏感度差异有统计学意义(F=14.803、26.163、15.035、14.276;P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000),各象限低度近视组与中度近视组视网膜光敏感度比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.360、0.192、0.083、0.323),各组各偏心度范围视网膜光敏感度差异有统计学意义(F=9.849、14.460、14.143、13.959;P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000);各偏心度低度近视组与中度近视组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.272、0.262、0.776、0.968)。近视度数与平均视网膜光敏感度呈负相关(r=-0.528,P<0.01),近视度数与平均视野缺损值呈负相关(r =-0.441,P<0.01),近视度数与模式标准偏差呈正相关(r=0.336,P<0.01)。随着近视度数的加深,各偏心度视网膜敏感度下降趋势增大(r=-0.392、-0.461、-0.437、-0.436,P均<0.01)。结论    近视眼中心24°蓝黄视野检测的平均视网膜光敏感度、平均视野缺损值、模式标准偏差(PSD)受近视程度的影响,各象限的平均视网膜光敏感度具有不对称性,且随近视程度增长均呈下降趋势。随着偏心度的增大,中周部平均视网膜光敏感度下降明显并随近视程度增长呈下降趋势,中心平均视网膜光敏度随近视程度增长下降不明显。

关键词: 蓝黄视野, 近视, 锥细胞, 色觉

Abstract:

Objective    To investigate performance characteristics of blue-on-yellow perimetry in 24 degree in young people with different degrees of myopia and to investigate its related factors. Methods    109 21-30 year-old patients (160 eyes) were performed blue and yellow perimetry in 24 degree using automated perimetry application Humphery750 II-i computer center 24-2 blue-yellow perimetry testing procedures. The patients were divided into the emmetropia, low myopia, moderate myopia and high myopia groups. The five blue-on-yellow visual indices were compared and the influencing factors,including mean sensitivity,four quadrant retinal light sensitivity, range of each eccentricity average retinal light sensitivity, mean visual field defect values(MD), and pattern standard deviation(PSD) were analyzed. Results    The differences of  MS, MD and PSD values in central 24 degree of between four groups had statistically significant difference(F=21.449, 13.191, 6.854; with P=0.000, 0.000 and 0.000, respectively), except the low myopia and moderate myopia group (P=0.326, 0.370, 0.268). Each group in each quadrant retinal light sensitivity difference was statistically significant (F=14.803, 26.163, 15.035, 14.276; P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000), except the low myopia and moderate myopia group(P=0.360, 0.192, 0.083, 0.323). Eccentricity range of retinal light sensitivity difference was statistically significant between groups (F=9.849, 14.460, 14.143, 13.959, P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000 ), except the low myopia and moderate myopia group(P=0.272, 0.262, 0.776, 0.968). Myopia degrees with an average retinal light sensitivity and an average visual field defect value was negatively related (r=-0.528, -0.441, P<0.01), myopia and mode standard deviation was positively related (r=0.336, P<0.01). With the deepening of myopia, the various eccentricity retinal sensitivity downward trend increases (-0.392, -0.461, -0.437, -0.436, P<0.01). Conclusion    Retinal light sensitivity values of mean visual field defect, pattern standard deviation (PSD) is influenced by the degree of myopia in each quadrant of the average retinal light sensitivity with asymmetry and with the growth in the degree of myopia showed downward trend by myopia center 24 degree blue and yellow perimetry. With the increasing of eccentricity, the average retinal light sensitivity of the peripheral portion significantly decreases with the degree of myopia growth downward trend.

Key words: Cone cells, Myopia, Blue-yellow perimetry, Color vision

中图分类号: 

  • R770.42
[1] 朱希倩,王佳,孙祖贤,冯建秀,张梦佳,赵颖,王宏,姜敏敏. 上海市杨浦区2022—2024年6~9岁学龄儿童屈光状态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 102-109.
[2] 孙凡敏,张娟美,高杰,赵军. 近视中Shh、PI3K/AKT、MMP-2通路及关联性研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 142-148.
[3] 杜一帆,齐林嵩,李莹. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术对眼高阶像差影响的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 152-161.
[4] 张莉苑,郭颖卓,陈蛟,王华,钟定娟. 650 nm低能量红光联合角膜塑形镜控制近视的临床效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 52-57.
[5] 王东芳,张清雨,宋继科,毕宏生. 基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA清单评价针刺防控儿童青少年近视随机对照试验的报告质量[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 66-79.
[6] 张金木,郭滨,蒋文君,刘冬梅. M受体信号通路在近视发生发展中作用的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 160-164.
[7] 张莉苑,钟定娟,王华. 非手术的近视管理方法与脉络膜的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 149-153.
[8] 李飏,刘鸫,曹文捷. 红光治疗对近视儿童等效球镜度、眼轴长度及脉络膜厚度影响的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 74-81.
[9] 卢松,夏逸帆,李子晔,魏菁. 无视网膜脱离的儿童Stickler综合征1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 97-101.
[10] 胡亚柔,赵欣予,吴桢泉,范梓欣,余震,刘亚玲,陈婷毅,曾键,张国明. 早产儿屈光状态与眼部生物特征的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 144-150.
[11] 吴丽丽,曲毅. OCTA在病理性近视脉络膜新生血管应用及其在人工智能的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 144-149.
[12] 买尔哈巴·玉素甫,克里木江·阿不拉,丁琳,秦艳莉,陈雪艺. 伴发于后巩膜葡萄肿的高度近视性白内障眼底病变相关研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(5): 107-114.
[13] 尤冉,郭笑霄,王薇,陈曦,王艳玲. 高度近视患者黄斑区视网膜劈裂分型与脉络膜特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 83-87.
[14] 孟博,王康,罗丽华,王艳玲,李爽. 基于WOS数据库的高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离研究特征及趋势分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(2): 84-90.
[15] 熊翩翩,王佳琳,孙姣,周卓华,王艳玲. 高度近视豹纹状眼底视网膜脉络膜血流改变及相关性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(2): 114-121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!