山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 70-74.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.502

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

TransPRK与LASEK对薄角膜近视眼术后视力、屈光度及角膜生物力学性能的影响

刘文静   

  1. 广元市万江眼科医院眼科, 四川 广元 628000
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-29 出版日期:2016-12-16 发布日期:2016-12-16
  • 作者简介:刘文静. E-mail:83547459@qq.com

Influence of TransPRK and LASEK on postoperative vision, diopter and corneal biomechanical properties in myopic eyes with thin cornea.

LIU Wenjing   

  1. Guangyuan Ophthalmology Hospital, Guangyuan 628000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2015-11-29 Online:2016-12-16 Published:2016-12-16

摘要: 目的 探讨经角膜上皮准分子激光表层切削术(TransPRK)与准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)对薄角膜近视眼术后视力、屈光度及角膜生物力学性能的影响。 方法 选择118例近视和散光患者为研究对象,纳入右眼数据(118眼)进行分析。61例(61眼)行TransPRK治疗者设为TransPRK组, 57例(57眼)行LASEK治疗者设为LASEK组。比较两组患者术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月裸眼视力(UCVA)、屈光度、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、角膜后表面高度、非球面参数Q值、角膜滞后量(CH)和角膜阻力因子(CRF)以及角膜像差。 结果 术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月时,两组患者术后UCVA达到或超过术前最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的比例无统计学差异(P>0.05);术后1周、1个月时,TransPPK组患者屈光度矫正量达到术前期望矫正量的比例高于LASEK组(P<0.05)。术后,两组后表面高度较术前显著降低(P<0.05),后表面Q值无显著性变化(P>0.05)。两组术后1周、1个月和6个月的CH值和CRF值均显著低于术前(P<0.05),组间比较,彗差、球差和高阶像差显著高于术前(P<0.01),两组术后各个时间点CH值、CRF值,彗差、球差和高阶像差无统计学差异(P>0.05)。 结论 TransPRK作为新兴表层手术方式,治疗薄角膜近视患者疗效确切,屈光度稳定,整个手术过程无需在眼球上操作,对角膜表面形态及生物性能影响小,手术安全性好。

关键词: 角膜, 近视眼, 经角膜上皮准分子激光表层切削术, 准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术, 角膜生物力学, 屈光度

Abstract: Objective To explore the Influence of TransPRK and LASEK on postoperative vision, diopter and corneal biomechanical properties in myopic eyes with thin cornea. Methods Totally 118 patients with myopia and astigmatism were enrolled, in which data of 118 right eyes were selected and analyzed, 61 eyes of 61 patients undergoing TransPRK were designed as TransPRK group, and 57 eyes of 57 patients undergoing LASEK as LASEK group. The uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), diopter, central corneal thickness(CCT), posterior corneal surface height, aspheric parameter Q value, corneal hysteresis(CH), corneal resistance factor(CRF)and corneal aberration between two groups were compared 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation. Results There were no statistical difference between two groups regarding the proportion of postoperative UCVA reaching or exceeding preoperative best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)one week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation. The proportion of patients’ diopter reaching or exceeding preoperative desired diopter correction was higher in TransPPK than LASEK group 1 week and 1 month after operation(P<0.05). Compared with pre-operation, the posterior corneal surface height shifted rearward slightly(P<0.05), but aspheric parameter Q value didnt change significantly(P>0.05)in postoperative 6 months in the two groups. The CH, and CRF value on postoperative 1, 3 and 6 months were significantly lower than pre-operation in two groups(P<0.05). The coma aberration, spherical aberration, and higher order aberration after postoperation were higher than pre-operation(P<0.01), but there was no significant difference between two group regarding CH, CRF, coma aberration, spherical aberration, and higher order aberration at each time point after operation. Conclusion TransPPK, as emerging surface refractive surgery, is effective and safe in treating myopic eyes with thin cornea, with stable diopter, for it is operated not on the eyeball and has little effect on the corneal surface morphology and biomechanical properties.

Key words: Cornea, Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy, Laser epithelial keratomileusis, Corneal biomechanics, Diopter, Myopia

中图分类号: 

  • R762
[1] 黎新,王骞,董诺,等.角膜屈光术不同制瓣方式术后丝状角膜炎研究[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志, 2011, 29(7):663-665. LI Xin, WANG Qian, DONG Nuo, et al. Filamentary keratitis occurring in different flap preparation styles of corneal refractive surgery[J]. Chin J Prac Ophthalmol, 2011, 29(7): 663-665.
[2] Fadlallah A, Fahed D, Khalil K, et al. Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: clinical results[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(10):1852-1857.
[3] 吴东芳, 邓应平,王顺清,等.不同准分子激光角膜屈光手术对近视眼角膜滞后量和角膜阻力因子的影响[J].中华实验眼科杂志,2015,33(6):541-545. WU Dongfang, DENG Yingping, WANG Shunqing, et al. Influence of different types of corneal laser refractive surgeries on corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in myopic eyes[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol, 2015, 33(6):541-545.
[4] Amoils S P, Deist M B, Gous P, et al. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for less than -4.0 to -7.0 diopters of myopia[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2000, 26(7): 967-977.
[5] 侯杰, 雷玉琳, 郑秀云. TransPRK与Epi-LASIK矫治薄角膜近视眼的临床疗效比较[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2015, 33(6):531-536. HOU Jie, LEI Yulin, ZHENG Xiuyun. Comparison of clinical effectiveness between transepithelial prk and epi-lasik for myopia with thin cornea[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol, 2015, 33(6): 531-536.
[6] Lim T, Yang S, Kim M, et al. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006, 141(5): 833-839.
[7] Lee H K, Lee K S, Kim J K, et al. Epithelial healing and clinical outcomes in excimer laser photorefractive surgery following three epithelial removal techniques: mechanical, alcohol, and excimer laser[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2005, 139(1):56-63.
[8] Ghadhfan F, Al-Rajhi A, Wagoner M D. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007, 33(12): 2041-2048.
[9] Qazi M A, Sanderson J P, Mahmoud A M, et al. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(10):1774-1788.
[10] Grzybowski D M, Roberts C J, Mahmoud A M, et al. Model for nonectatic increase in posterior corneal elevation after ablative procedures[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, 31(1): 72-81.
[1] 阳雪,李莹. 干眼对角膜内皮细胞的影响及相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 72-76.
[2] 严槟,周怀胜,皮柳青,段虎成,晏世刚. 斜视患者术后佩戴角膜绷带镜的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 87-90.
[3] 王娟,赵敏,徐梅,张琪,周善璧. 外伤致穿透性角膜移植伤口裂开八例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 95-98.
[4] 张颖,陈红梅,吴欣怡. 糖尿病大鼠角膜上皮创伤愈合中IGF-1的表达[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 74-78.
[5] 王磊, 张晗. 人工晶体屈光力的计算[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 21-28.
[6] 徐静静,郭海科. 有晶体眼后房型人工晶体植入与飞秒激光微小切口角膜基质透镜切除术矫正高度近视对眼表影响分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 18-20.
[7] 许晓. Ex-PRESS引流器植入术治疗青光眼的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 90-93.
[8] 翁碧艳,柳灿. 巩膜隧道切口和透明角膜切口对白内障超声乳化摘除术患者术后泪膜的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 80-83.
[9] 席玲,袁满红,过朵芳,杨华丽. LASIK患者眼压测量的多因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(2): 99-103.
[10] 刘露,梁皓. 中老年白内障人群角膜散光的分布规律[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 75-77.
[11] 生侠,陈惠,邓洪,谢青. 翼状胬肉切除术后配戴角膜绷带镜的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 109-112.
[12] 李冬梅. 长期使用前列腺素药物对青光眼患者睑板腺功能及角膜结构的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(3): 89-92.
[13] 姜洋,李莹,王忠海,金玉梅,刘小伟. 可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 80-83.
[14] 林莉,杨旭. 白内障术后角膜上皮功能障碍治疗的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 84-86.
[15] 王丹,汪锐,张启明,王利文. 三种手术方式治疗翼状胬肉的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 94-97.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!