低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的比较

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.123

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨运用低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统手术方式行扁桃体切除术的优、缺点,并对三种术式特点和应用价值进行评价。方法需行扁桃体切除术的患者117例,分为低温等离子刀组、超声刀组及传统组,每组各39例,记录双侧扁桃体切除术的手术时间和术中出血量、术后咽部疼痛、术后原发性及继发性出血等。结果等离子刀组、超声刀组的手术时间及术中出血量均较传统组降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);等离子刀组手术时间［(9.92±4.04)min］较超声刀组手术时间［(15.86±1.36)min］短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。等离子刀组、超声刀组分别与传统组在术后前3天的疼痛评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),此后三组疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);等离子刀组较超声刀组术后疼痛轻,但是两者疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。等离子刀组与传统组各出现1例术后原发性出血的病例。等离子刀组1例、超声刀组1例、传统组2例出现继发性出血。三组伪膜开始脱落时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组术后24 h咽部水肿评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),等离子刀组及超声刀组咽部水肿轻于传统组,但等离子刀组与传统组咽部水肿差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论低温等离子刀切除扁桃体是较为安全、有效的手术方法,但其费用相对较高。对于慢性扁桃体炎病程长且瘢痕粘连较重的患者,建议选用超声刀切除扁桃体。

关键词: 扁桃体切除术, 低温等离子刀, 超声刀

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of coblation, ultrasonic knife and conventional approach in tonsillectomy. Methods A total of 117 cases in need of tonsillectomy were collected and divided into 3 groups: coblation tonsillectomy group(group A, n=39), ultrasound knife tonsillectomy group(group B, n=39)and the traditional tonsillectomy group(group C, n=39). The operation time, blood loss, postoperative sore throat situation, postoperative primary and secondary bleeding and so on were recorded and compared. Results The operation time was shorter, and intraoperative blood loss was less in group A and B than in group C(P<0.05). The operation time in group A ［(9.92±4.04)min］ was shorter than that ［(15.86±1.36)min］ in group B,(P<0.05). There was no difference in intraoperative blood loss between group A and B(P>0.05). The degree of the pain in the first three days after surgery in group A and in group B was significantly lower than that in group C(P<0.05), but no statistically significant differences were observed after three days(P>0.05). Postoperative throat pain in group A was lighter than that in group B, but there was no significant difference(P>0.05). Postoperative primary hemorrhage occurred in 1 case in group A and C, while secondary hemorrhage occurred in 1, 1 and 2 cases in group A, B and C, respectively. There was no significant difference in the time of pseudo-membrane defulvium among the three groups(P>0.05). Pharyngeal edema score 24 hours after operation in group A and group B was significantly lower than in group C(P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between group A and group B(P>0.05). Conclusion Coblation tonsillectomy is the more safe and effective method, but its cost is relatively high. It is suitable for patients with good economic conditions and high quality of life. Ultrasonic knife tonsillectomy is suggested to be appropriate for patients with adhesive tonsillitis of long duration.

Key words: Tonsillectomy, Sonication, Coblation

中图分类号:

R766.7

张立庆,杨翠方,周华群,陆美萍,董伟达. 低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(3): 56-60.

ZHANG Liqing, YANG Cuifang, ZHOU Huaqun, LU Meiping, DONG Weida. Comparison of coblation, ultrasonic knife and conventional approach in tonsillectomy.[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2016, 30(3): 56-60.

参考文献

[1] 庹华为, 黄志纯, 王丽芬. 扁桃体手术的演变和进展[J]. 国际耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 39(2):112-115. TUO Huawei, HUANG Zhichun, WANG Lifen. The evolution and progress of tonsil surgery[J]. Inter J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery, 2015, 39(2):112-115.
[2] 磨宾宇, 戴文斌, 周永, 等. 低功率单极电刀凝切术与低温等离子刀和传统剥离术对成人扁桃体切除术的效果对比分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2012, 15(29):3416-3418. MO Bingyu, DAI Wenbin, ZHOU Yong, et al. Roles of monopole electrocoagulation, coblation, and conventional tonsillectomy in the surgial removal of the tonsils among adult patients[J]. Chin Gen Prac, 2012, 15(29):3416-3418.
[3] 王志斌.扁桃体切除术简史[J]. 中华医史杂志, 2003, 33(4):239-241. WANG Zhibin. A brief history of tonsillectomy[J]. Chin J Med History, 2003, 33(4):239-241.
[4] Owaki T, Nakano S, Arimura K, et al. The ultrasonic coagulating and cutting system injures nerve function[J]. Endoscopy, 2002, 34(7):575-579.
[5] 吴建, 范静平, 朱秋蓓. 超声刀在鼻咽喉-头颈外科手术中的应用价值[J]. 上海医学, 2013, 36(1):67-69. WU Jian, FAN Jingping, ZHU Qiubei. Application ofUltrasonicActivated Shears in Otolaryngology-head and Neck Surgeries[J]. Shanghai Med J, 2013, 36(1):67-69.
[6] Izny H Z, Rosdan S, Mohd K M. Coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy: a comparison of intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss and post-operative pain[J]. Med J Malaysia, 2014, 69(2):74-78.
[7] Timms M S, Temple R H. Coblation tonsillectomy: a double blind randomized controlled study[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2002, 116(6):450-452.
[8] 陈曦. 甲状腺手术中热损伤预防[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2012, 32(5):369-372. CHEN Xi. The prevention of thermal injury in thyroidectomy[J]. Chin J Pract Surg, 2012, 32(5):369-372.
[9] Ozkiris M, Kapusuz Z, Saydam L. Comparison of three techniques in adult tonsillectomy[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270(3):1143-1147.
[10] 庹华为, 黄志纯, 冯旭, 等. 超声刀扁桃体切除术的临床病理研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2015, 22(5):261-264. TUO Huawei, HUANG Zhichun, FENG Xu, et al. The clinical pathological study of ultrasonic knife tonsillectomy[J]. Chin Otolaryngol Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 22(5):261-264.
[11] Roje Z, Racic G, Dogas Z, et al. Postoperative morbidity and histopathologic characteristics of tonsillar tissue following coblation tonsillectomy in children: a prospective randomized single-blind study[J]. Coll Antropol, 2009, 33(1):293-298.
[12] 刘大波, 谭宗瑜, 钟建文, 等. 儿童扁桃体腺样体低温等离子手术迟发性出血的初步研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2010, 45(5):373-376. LIU Dabo, TAN Zongyu, ZHONG Jianwen, et al. A prelminary study of the secondary postoperative haemorrhage in pediatric coblation adenotonsillectomy[J]. Chin J Otorhinolarynol Head Neck Surg, 2010, 45(5):373-376.
[13] 宋晓环. 病理学[M]. 长春: 吉林大学出版社, 2012.

相关文章 15

[1]	李延忠,张泰. 关于儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征我们面临的问题[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 1-5.
[2]	许志飞,倪鑫. 重视阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征儿童腺样体[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 9-13.
[3]	张立庆,宋圣花,王愿,刘晓静,董伟达,周涵. 低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的术后两年随访比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 67-71.
[4]	张杰,陈雪梅,许安廷. 超声刀扁桃体切除术与低温等离子扁桃体切除术的对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 95-100.
[5]	刘俊茹,高英恺,杨杨,王俊菊,刘存军. 低温等离子刀切除舌根增生性肿物40例报告[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(2): 83-84.
[6]	徐磊,朱鹃芬,程雷. 成年人扁桃体切除术三种手术方式的临床比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 49-52.
[7]	胡廷保,梁健刚. 舌根腺样囊性癌大出血救治1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 106-108.
[8]	龚明杰,刘侃,张磊,闫飚,邹嘉平,李伟忠. 三种不同扁桃体切除术疗效比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(1): 70-73.
[9]	董世亮, 战明明. “预防性缝扎法”在扁桃体切除术中的止血效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 90-91.
[10]	李军政, 高翔, 吴盖珍, 陈莎, 王洁, 田文栋, 李湘平. 超声刀在治疗儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 1-4.
[11]	苏跃, 王中亮, 曾珍. 三种手术方式在改良悬雍垂腭咽成形术中的疗效对比[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 5-7.
[12]	张杰, 李进让, 刘涛. 吞咽表面肌电图评估扁桃体切除术后患者疼痛程度的可能性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(6): 57-60.
[13]	吴允刚1，刘黎明2，宋健梅3，庞太忠1，李晓瑜1，张辉1，杨欣欣1, 丁德涛1，张永红1，孙聚兴1，赵玉凤1. 全麻下单极电刀切除扁桃体90例疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(6): 74-76.
[14]	贺青卿,赵国伟,庄大勇,郑鲁明,范子义,朱见,周鹏,侯蕾,于芳,李燕宁 . 甲状腺/甲状旁腺术中Focus超声刀规范化应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(6): 1-5.
[15]	罗惠秀，范春涛，邓延华. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患儿扁桃体腺样体切除术临床疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4): 17-20.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed