山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 62-66.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.430

• • 上一篇    下一篇

超声刀在扁桃体肿瘤切除术中的应用体会

沈倪美,钱茂华,金加欣,秦阳,王军,吴莺,高刚   

  1. 南通大学第二附属医院/南通市第一人民医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 江苏 南通 226001
  • 发布日期:2021-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 高刚. E-mail:ggao200801@163.com

Application of the ultrasonic scalpel in tonsillectomy for biopsy of patients with suspected tonsillar tumor

SHEN Nimei, QIAN Maohua, JIN Jiaxin, QIN Yang, WANG Jun, WU Ying, GAO Gang   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong First People's Hospital, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2021-09-29

摘要: 目的 探讨超声刀在扁桃体肿瘤切除术中的应用体会。 方法 选择70例成人单侧扁桃体形态异常考虑肿瘤的患者,随机分为超声刀组(35例)和电刀组(35例),记录患者的一般情况、手术时间、术中出血、术后咽痛及并发症等情况,将两组患者的资料进行比较。 结果 两组患者男性居多,扁桃体以肥大或增生多见,且多为Ⅱ°大小。两组患者术后病理均以良性病变为多,最常见为慢性炎症,其次为乳头状瘤;恶性病变主要为淋巴瘤。超声刀组在手术时间及术中出血量方面要优于电刀组(P<0.001),而在术后继发性出血、术后感染及住院时间方面并无明显优势。超声刀组无术后原发性出血发生,电刀组有5例患者出现术后原发性出血,但二者间差异并无统计学意义(P=0.054)。术后第1天疼痛VAS评分超声刀组优于电刀组(P=0.009),而在术后第2、5、10天比较,差异无统计学意义。 结论 对于扁桃体肿瘤患者行扁桃体切除术而言,超声刀是一个理想的手术器械。

关键词: 扁桃体, 肿瘤, 超声刀, 电刀, 扁桃体切除术

Abstract: Objective We aimed to explore the application of the ultrasonic scalpel in tonsillar tumor resection. Methods Seventy cases of adult patients with abnormally shaped unilateral tonsils suspected of being tumors were divided into ultrasonic scalpel(35 cases)and electric scalpel(35 cases)groups. The general clinical data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pharyngeal pain and complications of the patients were recorded, and the data of the two groups were compared. Results The postoperative pathologies of the two groups were revealed to be mostly benign lesions, with the most chronic inflammation, followed by papilloma and cysts. Most malignant lesions were lymphoma. The ultrasonic scalpel group was superior to the electrosurgical group in terms of operative time and intraoperative blood loss(P<0.001), although it exhibited no obvious advantages in terms of postoperative secondary bleeding, postoperative infection, and duration of hospitalization. No postoperative primary hemorrhage was observed in the ultrasonic scalpel group and 5 patients in the electrosurgical group; however, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P=0.054). The pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score of the ultrasonic scalpel group on the first day after surgery was superior to that of the electrosurgical group(P=0.009), and the difference was not statistically significant at 2, 5, and 10 days after surgery. Conclusion The ultrasonic scalpel is an ideal surgical instrument for tonsillectomy in patients with suspected tonsillar tumors.

Key words: Tonsil, Tumor, Ultrasonic scalpel, Electric scalpel, Tonsillectomy

中图分类号: 

  • R766
[1] Qin Y, Lu LJ, Lu YW, et al. Hodgkin lymphoma involving the tonsil misdiagnosed as tonsillar carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2018, 97(7): e9761. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000009761.
[2] Iyengar P, Mazloom A, Shihadeh F, et al. Hodgkin lymphoma involving extranodal and nodal head and neck sites: characteristics and outcomes[J]. Cancer, 2010, 116(16): 3825-3829. doi:10.1002/cncr.25138.
[3] 张立庆, 宋圣花, 王愿, 等. 低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的术后两年随访比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017,31(5): 67-71. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.181. ZHANG Liqing, SONG Shenghua, WANG Yuan, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of coblation, ultrasonic knife operation, and conventional tonsillectomy in a 2-year postoperative follow-up[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2017,31(5): 67-71. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.181.
[4] Brkic F, Mujic M, Umihanic S, et al. Haemorrhage rates after two commonly used tonsillectomy methods: a multicenter study[J]. Med Arch, 2017, 71(2): 119-121. doi:10.5455/medarh.2017.71.119-121.
[5] Arbin L, Enlund M, Knutsson J. Post-tonsillectomy pain after using bipolar diathermy scissors or the harmonic scalpel: a randomised blinded study[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2017, 274(5): 2281-2285. doi:10.1007/s00405-017-4451-9.
[6] 张杰, 陈雪梅, 许安廷. 超声刀扁桃体切除术与低温等离子扁桃体切除术的对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017,31(5): 95-100. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.278. ZHANG Jie, CHEN Xuemei, XU Anting. A comparative analysis of harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy and coblation tonsillectomy[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2017,31(5): 95-100. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.278.
[7] Kwek WMJ, Chua SMCA, Xu SH, et al. Randomized controlled study comparing tonsillectomy safety and patient satisfaction outcomes between HARMONIC ACE®+shears and monopolar diathermy in an adult population-A pilot study[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2020, 41(5): 102568. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102568.
[8] Karimi E, Safaee A, Bastaninejad S, et al. A comparison between cold dissection tonsillectomy and harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy[J]. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol, 2017, 29(95): 313-317.
[9] Subasi B, Oghan F, Tasli H, et al. Comparison of three tonsillectomy techniques in children[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2021,(278): 2011-2015. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06299-8.
[10] Basu S, Sengupta A, Dubey AB, et al. Harmonic scalpel versus coblation tonsillectomy A comparative study[J]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019, 71(4): 498-503. doi:10.1007/s12070-019-01679-x.
[11] Sarny S, Ossimitz G, Habermann W, et al. Hemorrhage following tonsil surgery: a multicenter prospective study[J]. Laryngoscope, 2011, 121(12): 2553-2560. doi:10.1002/lary.22347.
[12] O'Leary S, Vorrath J. Postoperative bleeding after diathermy and dissection tonsillectomy[J]. Laryngoscope, 2005, 115(4): 591-594. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000161361.66191.60.
[13] 张华, 冯永, 蒋璐. 以单侧扁桃体肿大为首发症状的非霍奇金淋巴瘤[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2010, 24(19): 903-904. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1781.2010.19.012.
[14] 戚建伟, 樊贤超, 王长宽, 等. 单侧扁桃体肿大与非霍奇金淋巴瘤[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2002,16(9): 469-470. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1781.2002.09.008. QI Jianwei, FAN Xianchao, WANG Changkuan, et al. Unilateral tonsillar enlargement and malignant tonsillar lymphoma[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol, 2002,16(9): 469-470. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1781.2002.09.008.
[15] Waltonen JD, Ozer E, Schuller DE, et al. Tonsillectomy vs. deep tonsil biopsies in detecting occult tonsil tumors[J]. Laryngoscope, 2009, 119(1): 102-106. doi:10.1002/lary.20017.
[16] Koch WM, Bhatti N, Williams MF, et al. Oncologic rationale for bilateral tonsillectomy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary source[J]. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg, 2001, 124(3): 331-333. doi:10.1067/mhn.2001.114309.
[17] Chernock RD, Lewis JS. Approach to metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck: squamous cell carcinoma and beyond[J]. Head Neck Pathol, 2015, 9(1): 6-15. doi:10.1007/s12105-015-0616-2.
[18] Kennel T, Garrel R, Costes V, et al. Head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary[J]. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2019, 136(3): 185-192. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2019.04.002.
[19] Cianchetti M, Mancuso AA, Amdur RJ, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown head and neck primary site[J]. Laryngoscope, 2009, 119(12): 2348-2354. doi:10.1002/lary.20638.
[20] 刘丁丁, 钱晓云, 刘永泽, 等. 84例原发头颈部淋巴瘤临床及病理特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018,32(6): 48-51. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.274. LIU Dingding, QIAN Xiaoyun, LIU Yongze, et al. Analysis of clinical and pathological features of 84 patients with primary head and neck lymphoma[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2018,32(6): 48-51. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.274.
[21] Pynnonen M, Brinkmeier JV, Thorne MC, et al. Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 8: CD004619. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004619.pub3.
[1] 宋晴 宋西成. 安罗替尼联合治疗在肿瘤治疗中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 106-112.
[2] 黄扬周,傅丽华,吴巧莲,黄霞,林隽,叶青. 乳突结节性筋膜炎误诊1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 119-121.
[3] 龚霄阳,李旺,陈曦. 原发性咽旁间隙肿瘤67例回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 60-65.
[4] 张丰珍, 王桂香, 魏沄沄, 张亚梅, 赵靖, 王华, 李宏彬, 李晓丹, 张杰. 合并轻度出血性疾病的扁桃体和(或)腺样体切除术患儿围手术期管理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 66-72.
[5] 张礼俊, 胥然, 罗继芳, 刘国旗, 何千, 李玮, 蒋振华. 头颈肿瘤游离皮瓣修复术后皮瓣坏死及皮瓣相关并发症影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 86-90.
[6] 毛泽凡陈曦,程雷. 喉神经内分泌癌的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 114-119.
[7] 王媚 李志海. 喉癌干细胞:克服多药耐药性的潜在治疗靶点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 120-128.
[8] 陈家宏,王琳,姜彦,于龙刚,张继生,张志勇,孔静文. 原发性鼻腔鼻窦骨外尤文肉瘤/外周原始神经外胚层肿瘤2例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 290-296.
[9] 赵笑冰,张大为,陈仁杰. 中耳间变性大T细胞淋巴瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 7-14.
[10] 金霄雪,韩莹莹,郭瑞祥,倪守洁,邹娟娟,王岩,李延忠. 替牙期扁桃体伴腺样体肥大患儿过敏因素与颌面畸形的相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 45-50.
[11] 姚周周,张革化,常利红. 汉防己甲素调控肿瘤细胞自噬的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 139-143.
[12] 李玲,李聪,孙岩,陈良. 婴儿中耳胚胎型横纹肌肉瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 55-59.
[13] 陈坤,陆慧,黄琦,李磊,孟国珍,杨军,侯东明. 小儿先天性鼻腔鼻窦肿物的临床诊疗观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 81-85.
[14] 师晓丽, 牟鸿. 多学科联合诊治重度儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征并发肺动脉高压1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 116-119.
[15] 赵兴贺,樊明月,窦训武,贾广彪. 儿童原发扁桃体弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 120-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 邓基波,孙奉乾,许安廷 . 大前庭导水管综合征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(2): 116 -118 .
[2] 周子宁,金国威 . 喉气管狭窄的预防和治疗进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(5): 462 -465 .
[3] 周斌,李滨 . 鼻内窥镜下鼻窦鼻息肉手术75例疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 24 -26 .
[4] 徐赛男,杨雷 . 红霉素促进鼻息肉上皮细胞凋亡的实验研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 27 -29 .
[5] 张玉光,韩旭光,张华,王旭,徐湘辉 . 改良穿透性角膜移植术治疗真菌性角膜炎[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 94 -95 .
[6] 刘联合 . 颈深部脓肿37例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(2): 180 -181 .
[7] 谢治年 ,姬长友 . RNA干扰及其在喉鳞癌研究中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 200 -203 .
[8] 乔 艺,倪关森,陈文文 . 改良悬雍垂腭咽成形术联合鼻腔手术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征38例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 206 -208 .
[9] 汪晓锋,林 昶,程金妹 . 不同龄小鼠内耳中ABAD的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 207 -211 .
[10] 凡启军,黄治物,梅 玲,肖伯奎 . 荧光定量PCR测定水杨酸钠作用后大鼠耳蜗基因的表达[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 212 -214 .