山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 73-78.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.180

• • 上一篇    

不同睡眠分期血氧饱和度差值对悬雍垂腭咽成形术手术预后评估价值

韩继波,董洁,明伟,王燕,罗志宏   

  1. 武汉大学人民医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 湖北 武汉 430060
  • 发布日期:2022-07-11
  • 通讯作者: 韩继波. E-mail: hjbjy7758521@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫生健康委科研面上项目(WJ2021M140)

The utility of different values of average oxygen saturation and minimum oxygen saturation between different sleep stages for predicting the uvulopalatopharyngoplastysurgery effect

HAN Jibo, DONG Jie, MING Wei, WANG Yan, LUO Zhihong   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, China
  • Published:2022-07-11

摘要: 目的 探讨多导睡眠监测数据中不同睡眠分期平均血氧饱和度及最低血氧饱和度差值对改良UPPP手术效果的预测。 方法 回顾分析117例UPPP手术患者术前及术后一年PSG数据,计算患者术前快速动眼睡眠期(REM)与非快速动眼睡眠期(NREM)平均血氧饱和度差值(ΔAvSaO2)、最低血氧饱和度差值(ΔLSaO2)以及术后睡眠呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)下降比率(ΔAHI%),对ΔAvSaO2、ΔLSaO2和ΔAHI%进行直线相关分析;并以ΔAHI%≥50%为手术有效,绘制二者受试者工作特征曲线,计算截断(Cutoff)值,确定预测手术效果的最佳临界值,并对预测指标进行非条件Logistic回归分析。 结果 患者术前REM与NREM期平均血氧饱和度差值(ΔAvSaO2)、最低血氧饱和度差值(ΔLSaO2)与OSA患者UPPP术后AHI下降比率ΔAHI%均呈负相关,Pearson相关系数分别为r=-0.881和-0.849(P<0.001)。对预测UPPP手术效果指标的ROC曲线分析,ΔAvSaO2曲线下面积为0.888,95%CI:0.830~0.945(P<0.001),且Cutoff值ΔAvSaO2=3.25是预测UPPP手术有效的最佳临界值,其敏感性为0.836,特异性为0.804,阳性预测值0.822,阴性预测值0.818;ΔLSaO2曲线下面积为0.931,95%CI:0.889~0.973(P<0.001),且Cutoff值ΔLSaO2=8.75是预测UPPP手术有效的最佳临界值,其敏感性为0.836,特异性为0.875,阳性预测值0.879,阴性预测值0.831。经过二元Logistic回归分析,术前具有较小的不同睡眠分期血氧饱和度差值的OSA患者UPPP手术可能更有效,二者联合对UPPP手术有效性预测的准确度为84.6%。 结论 OSA患者REM期与NREM期血氧饱和度差值可以作为预测UPPP手术效果的较好指标。

关键词: 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停, 睡眠分期, 平均血氧饱和度, 最低血氧饱和度, 改良悬雍垂腭咽成形术

Abstract: Objective The objective of this study was to explore whether the difference in average blood oxygen saturation and lowest oxygen saturation between different sleep stages could predict the effect of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty(UPPP)surgery. Methods Preoperative and postoperative PSG data from 117 patients(113 men and 4 women)with OSA admitted to our hospital between May 2015 and June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. After computing the average oxygen saturation difference value(ΔAvSaO2)and the lowest oxygen saturation difference value(ΔLSaO2)between the REM and NREM sleep stages in preoperative patients, a linear correlation analysis was conducted with the postoperative AHI drop ratio(ΔAHI%). Using ΔAHI %≥50% as an effective operation, we drew the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves for ΔAvSaO2 and ΔLSaO2.We then calculated the cutoff value to determine the optimal threshold for predicting the operation effect, and also conducted further unconditionallogistic regression analyses on the predictors. Results The preoperative ΔAvSaO2、ΔLSaO2 between REM and NREM sleep stages were negatively correlated with ΔAHI% and had Pearson correlation coefficients of r=0.881 and 0.849, respectively(P<0.001), indicating the possibility of that both as the prediction index for the effect of UPPP surgery. The ΔAvSaO2 area under the curve was 0.888, 95% CI: 0.830-0.945(P<0.001), and ΔAvSaO2=3.25 was the best threshold for predicting the UPPP surgery effect. Its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.836, 0.804, 0.822, and 0.818, respectively. The ΔLSaO2 area under the curve was 0.931, 95% CI:0.889-0.973(P<0.001), and ΔLSaO2=8.75 was the best threshold for predicting the UPPP surgery effect. Its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 0.836, 0.875, 0.879, and0.831, respectively. Unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that patients with OSA with smaller preoperative oxygen saturation difference values between REM and NREM sleep stages may have more effective outcomes with UPPP surgery. The prediction accuracy was 84.6% for a combination of both predictors for the UPPP surgery effect. Conclusion The difference in oxygen saturation between REM and NREM in patients with OSA can be used as a good index to predict the outcome of UPPP surgery.

Key words: Obstructive sleep apnea, Sleep stages, Average oxygen saturation, Lowest oxygen saturation, Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

中图分类号: 

  • R766.9
[1] 陈雄, 孔维佳. 努力提高OSAHS外科手术技术[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015,29(6): 495-498. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.06.005. CHEN Xiong, KONG Weijia. Improving the surgical technology in treatment of OSAHS[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015,29(6): 495-498. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.06.005.
[2] 中国医师协会睡眠医学专业委员会. 成人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停多学科诊疗指南[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(24): 1902-1914. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.24.003.
[3] 黄婷, 陈金辉, 陶泽璋. 悬雍垂腭咽成形术疗效术前预测因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020,34(5): 145-151. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.586. HUANG Ting, CHEN Jinhui, TAO Zezhang. Analysis of the preoperative predictive factors of Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty[J]. J OtolaryngolOphthalmol Shandong Univ, 2020, 34(5): 145-151. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.586.
[4] Cori JM, O'Donoghue FJ, Jordan AS. Sleeping tongue: current perspectives of genioglossus control in healthy individuals and patients with obstructive sleep apnea[J]. Nat Sci Sleep, 2018, 10: 169-179. doi:10.2147/NSS.S143296.
[5] Kim R, Dedhia RC, Kapur VK. Does surgery for obstructive sleep apnea provide value?[J]. J Clin Sleep Med, 2015, 11(5): 509-510. doi:10.5664/jcsm.4688.
[6] Lee HM, Kim HY, Suh JD, et al. Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty reduces the incidence of cardiovascular complications caused by obstructive sleep apnea: results from the national insurance service survey 2007-2014[J]. Sleep Med, 2018, 45: 11-16. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2017.12.019.
[7] 肖水芳, 张俊波. 重新认识OSAHS外科手术治疗的有效率[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015,29(6): 492-494. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.06.004. XIAO Shuifang, ZHANG Junbo. Redefine the efficacy of surgical treatments for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015,29(6): 492-494. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.06.004.
[8] Rosvall BR, Chin CJ. Is uvulopalatopharyngoplasty effective in obstructive sleep apnea?[J]. Laryngoscope, 2017, 127(10): 2201-2202. doi:10.1002/lary.26631.
[9] Choi JH, Cho SH, Kim SN, et al. Predicting outcomes after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for adult obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 155(6): 904-913. doi:10.1177/0194599816661481.
[10] Friedman M, Vidyasagar R, Bliznikas D, et al. Does severity of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome predict uvulopalatopharyngoplastyoutcome?[J]. Laryngoscope, 2005, 115(12): 2109-2113. doi:10.1097/01.MLG.0000181505.11902.F7.
[11] Siddiqui F, Walters AS, Goldstein D, et al. Half of patients with obstructive sleep apnea have a higher NREM AHI than REM AHI[J]. Sleep Med, 2006, 7(3): 281-285. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2005.10.006.
[12] Eun YG, Kwon KH, Shin SY, et al. Multilevel surgery in patients with rapid eye movement-related obstructive sleep apnea[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2009, 140(4): 536-541. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.006.
[13] He M, Yin GP, Zhan SY, et al. Long-term efficacy of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty among adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019, 161(3): 401-411. doi:10.1177/0194599819840356.
[14] Kim SH, Yang CJ, Baek JT, et al. Does rapid eye movement sleep aggravate obstructive sleep apnea?[J]. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2019, 12(2): 190-195. doi:10.21053/ceo.2018.00934.
[15] Oliven R, Cohen G, Somri M, et al. Relationship between the activity of the genioglossus, other peri-pharyngeal muscles and flow mechanics during wakefulness and sleep in patients with OSA and healthy subjects[J]. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2020, 274: 103362. doi:10.1016/j.resp.2019.103362.
[16] 赵迪, 李彦如, 曲玥,等. 颏舌肌活性对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者腭咽部手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019,54(6):421-426. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2019.06.005. ZHAO Di, LI Yanru, QU Yue, et al. The effect of genioglossus activity to velopharyngeal surgery in patient with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2019,54(6):421-426. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2019.06.005.
[1] 金霄雪,韩莹莹,郭瑞祥,倪守洁,邹娟娟,王岩,李延忠. 替牙期扁桃体伴腺样体肥大患儿过敏因素与颌面畸形的相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 45-50.
[2] 韩莹莹综述李延忠审校. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征与亚临床动脉粥样硬化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 126-132.
[3] 师晓丽, 牟鸿. 多学科联合诊治重度儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征并发肺动脉高压1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 116-119.
[4] 季迪,邓安春. 外科干预对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者血压影响的系统评价[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(6): 92-98.
[5] 黄婷,陈金辉综述陶泽璋审校. 悬雍垂腭咽成形术疗效术前预测因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 145-151.
[6] 聂帅,崔宇杰综述刘岩,文连姬审校. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与肿瘤相关性进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 152-156.
[7] 王宏艳,王三春综述滕博,葛敏审校. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征与咽喉反流性疾病相关研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 134-138.
[8] 李晓, 袁英, 李延忠, 王岩, 杨珂, 孙永强, 于学民, 王宁, 王磊. 焦虑抑郁对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者夜间血压波动的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 68-71.
[9] 吴兆坤,朱新华. 腺样体扁桃体切除术治愈儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的偏误研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 148-152.
[10] 宋凡,黄炜峻,许华俊,关建,易红良. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者颈动脉弹性与氧化应激反应的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 99-104.
[11] 季迪, 陈祥, 余林. 软腭平面手术联合舌骨悬吊术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征效果的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 124-130.
[12] 刘燕,魏萍,寇巍,胡思洁,武小芳,刘萌雅,陈成,姚红兵. 儿童腺样体肥大与耳鼻咽喉科常见疾病关系的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 149-154.
[13] 闫志刚,张慧慧,于丹,刘岩,文连姬,王迪. 成人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者认知功能障碍的诊断及治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 155-161.
[14] 殷敏,程雷. 鼾症命名之我见[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3): 19-22.
[15] 胡安,邢艳莉,陈晓平,薛晓成,张燚,胥伟华. 咽喉反流伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者的治疗及其咽喉反流体征评分、症状指数特点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 86-89.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!