山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 1-5.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.444

• 论著 •    下一篇

前庭性眩晕疾病患者焦虑和抑郁状况研究

蒋黎娜1,于倩如1,于杰1,关本岭2,鹿玉2,于淑东3   

  1. 1. 山东大学, 山东 济南 250100;
    2. 山东中医药大学, 山东 济南 250355;
    3. 山东大学附属山东省立医院 耳鼻喉科, 山东 济南 250021
  • 发布日期:2021-01-11
  • 通讯作者: 于淑东. E-mail:yushudong@126.com

Anxiety and depression in patients with common types of vertigo

JIANG Lina1, YU Qianru1, YU Jie1, GUAN Benling2, LU Yu2, YU Shudong3   

  1. 1. Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China;
    2. Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong, China:3. Department of Otolaryngology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-01-11

PDF (PC)

171

摘要： 目的 研究临床上常见的四种前庭性眩晕患者的焦虑/抑郁状况及其眩晕残障程度等相关因素并进行分析,为临床诊治四种前庭性眩晕提供依据。 方法 搜集确诊为前庭性眩晕的患者,分别为良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)、前庭性偏头痛(VM)、梅尼埃病(MD)及前庭神经炎(VN)四种疾病,记录患者的病程、持续时间等一般资料,完善耳科学检查并进行医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)、眩晕残障量表(DHI)测定。 结果 纳入前庭性眩晕患者121例,其中BPPV47例,VM31例,MD29例,VN14例,四组患者焦虑/抑郁阳性率分别为BPPV 31.9%、VM 71.0%、MD 75.9%、VN 42.9%;轻度、中度及重度眩晕残障程度分别为BPPV 58.9%、19.8%、21.3%,VM 19.4%、25.8%、54.8%,MD 6.9%、24.1%、69.0%,VN 38.6%、21.4%、40.0%。焦虑与抑郁评分之间线性相关(r=0.570,P<0.05);DHI与HAD评分之间线性相关(r=0.804;P<0.05)。 结论 前庭性眩晕患者存在不同程度的焦虑/抑郁,且焦虑和抑郁有一定的相关性;VM和MD患者焦虑/抑郁的发生率较高;VM、MD及VN患者眩晕残障程度高于BPPV患者。因此在临床上诊治前庭性眩晕疾病的时候要重视患者的焦虑/抑郁状态,特别是VM、MD患者,以便更好的治疗前庭性眩晕。

关键词: 前庭性眩晕, 焦虑, 抑郁, 眩晕残障程度

Abstract: Objective To evaluate anxiety, depression, and disability in patients with vertigo and their underlying factors to provide a basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment of the four common types of vertigo. Methods Patients diagnosed with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo(BPPV), vestibular migraine(VM), Meniere's disease(MD), and vestibular neuritis(VN)were included in the study. Each patient's disease course, duration, relevant general information, and improvements in otological examination findings were evaluated. Anxiety, depression, and disability were also evaluated using the hospital anxiety and depression scale(HAD)and the dizziness disability scale(DHI). Results One hundred and twenty-one patients with vertigo were included; 47 had BPPV, 31 had VM, 29 had MD, and 14 had VN. The positive rates of anxiety and depression among patients with BPPV, VM, MD, and VN were 31.9%, 71.0%, 75.9%, and 42.9%, respectively. The proportions of mild, moderate, and severe cases of vertigo disability were: 58.9%, 19.8%, and 21.3%, respectively, for BPPV; 19.4%, 25.8%, and 54.8%, respectively, for VM; 6.9%, 24.1%, and 69.0% for, respectively, for MD; 38.6%, 21.4%, and 40.0%, respectively, for VN. There was a correlation between anxiety and depression scores(r=0.570, P<0.05)as well as DHI and HAD scores(r=0.804; P<0.05). Conclusion Anxiety and depression were manifested to varying degrees among the vertigo patients, but there was a correlation between them. VM and MD patients had a higher incidence of anxiety and depression, while VM, MD, and VN patients had more severe vertigo and disability than BPPV patients. Therefore, anxiety and depression should be considered during the diagnosis and treatment of vertigo, especially in patients with VM and MD, to facilitate diagnostic accuracy and effective treatment.

Key words: Vestibular vertigo, Anxiety, Depression, Degree of Dizzy disability

中图分类号: 

  • R764
[1] 杨旭. 国内神经科眩晕诊断现况及对策[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2015(5):373-381. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2015.05.002.
[2] 张清.眩晕患者的情绪分析及心理护理干预[J].中国医药指南,2019,17(8):250-251.doi: 10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2019.08.210.
[3] Von Brevern M, Bercholon P, Brandt T, et al. Bejnign paroxysmal positional vertigo: diagonostic criteria [J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2017, 25(5): 450-454. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.05.003.
[4] Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society(IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders[M]. 3rd edition. 2018, 38(1):1-211. [5] Lopez-Escamez JA, Carey J, Chung WH, et al. Diagnostic criteria for Menière's disease according to the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society[J]. HNO, 2017, 65:887-893. doi:10.1007/s00106-017-0387-z.
[6] 李远军, 徐先荣. 前庭神经炎的研究进展[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2016,14(4):515-520. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2016.04.017. LI Yuanjun, XU Xianrong. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of vestibular neuritis [J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2016, 14(4):515-520. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2016.04.017.
[7] 杨川, 张素素, 赵菊梅, 等. 医院焦虑抑郁量表在耳鼻咽喉科患者中的应用分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2017,24(8):413-416. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2017.08.010. YANG Chuan, ZHANG Susu, ZHAO Jumei, et al. Application of the hospital anxiety and depression scale among the inpatients of otolaryngology [J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2017, 24(8): 413-416. doi: 10.16066/j.1672-7002.2017.08.010.
[8] 李传硕, 李永团, 曹海南, 等. 眩晕患者的行为类型量化分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019,33(5):32-36. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.030. LI Chuanshuo, LI Yongtuan, CAO Hainan, et al. Quantitative analysis of behavior pattern in vertiginous patients [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019,33(5): 32-36. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.030.
[9] 袁庆, 史冬梅, 余力生, 等. 不同周围性眩晕疾病患者焦虑/抑郁状态的比较[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015,29(8):729-732. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.08.016. YUAN Qing, SHI Dongmei, YU Lisheng, et al. Comparison of anxiety and depression state among patients with different type of vestibular peripheral vertigo[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2015, 29(8): 729-732. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.08.016.
[10] 吴春芳. 头晕患者的情绪障碍因素分析[J]. 当代医学, 2014,20(33):33. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2014.33.022.
[11] 李非田, 戴春富. 外周性眩晕并发焦虑的神经生物学机制[J]. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志, 2018,18(2):134-136,141. doi:10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2018.02.018. LI Feitian, DAI Chunfu. Progress in the neurological research on vestibular vertigo combined with anxiety [J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology and otorhinolaryngology, 2018, 18(2): 134-136,141. doi:10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2018.02.018.
[12] 陈太生, 王巍, 徐开旭, 等. 良性阵发性位置性眩晕及其诊断治疗的思考[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2019,33(5):1-5. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.053. CHEN Taisheng, WANG Wei, XU Kaixu, et al. Thoughts on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and its diagnosis and treatment [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019,33(5): 1-5. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.053.
[13] 李晓璐. 前庭性偏头痛与几种常见周围性眩晕的鉴别诊断[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019,33(3):23-26. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.003. LI Xiaolu. Differential diagnosis of vestibular migraines and several common types of peripheral vertigo [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019,33(3): 23-26. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.003.
[14] 黄巧, 尹时华. 内耳上皮钠通道、水通道蛋白与内淋巴代谢相关性的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019,33(4):145-148. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.301. HUANG Qiao, YIN Shihua. Correlation between endolymphatic hydrops and inner ear epithelial sodium channels and aquaporins [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019,33(4): 145-148. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.301.
[15] 张耕, 周婧, 倪长宝, 等. 前庭神经元炎诊治的研究进展[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2019,27(6):681-685. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2019.06.024.
[16] 孙振晓, 刘化学, 焦林瑛, 等. 医院焦虑抑郁量表的信度及效度研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017,11(2):198-201. doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.02.005. SUN Zhenxiao, LIU Huaxue, JIAO Linying, et al. Reliability and validity of hospital anxiety and depression scale [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(2): 198-201. doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.02.005.
[1] 王菲,刘钰莹,肖麒祎,丁健,高尚,毛薇. 住院医师精神心理因素与变应性鼻炎的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 28-31.
[2] 张凯婷,刘杰,许贞菊,张晓雪,曹松丽,韩敏. 功能性发声障碍患者嗓音及心理状态评估分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(3): 37-41.
[3] 危维,杨晓彤,刘俊其,严波,王振霖,张秋航. 鼻颅底肿瘤患者内镜手术后心理学变化的分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 25-29.
[4] 李晓, 袁英, 李延忠, 王岩, 杨珂, 孙永强, 于学民, 王宁, 王磊. 焦虑抑郁对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者夜间血压波动的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 68-71.
[5] 姜小兵,杜怡峰. 山东阳谷农村地区老年人睡眠障碍与抑郁状态的关联性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 116-120.
[6] 赵艳,程四华,童巧珍. 强化自我护理对喉镜辅助声带息肉切除术后患者嗓音恢复及心理情绪的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 175-178.
[7] 朱文燕,金新,佘万东,马永驰. 突发性聋30例精神心理状况分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 50-52.
[8] 黄芳,郑智娟,谢磊. 突发性聋患者焦虑、抑郁与病情阶段的关系及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 1-6.
[9] 陈望兴,赵雪,刘岩,刘悦,金春顺. 鼻中隔偏曲及慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者的精神心理状态调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 24-27.
[10] 夏春鹏1，林燕辉2，李岩1，李克义1，张彬2. 口腔矫治器治疗对OSAHS患者焦虑抑郁及心理状态影响的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(2): 29-32.
[11] 薄明香1，张影影2，张立贵2. 心理干预对肉毒杆菌毒素治疗眼睑-面肌痉挛的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(2): 69-70.
[12] 王艳红. 56例Bell′s面瘫患者焦虑症状分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(5): 28-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张晗,黄一飞 . 抗角膜移植排斥的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 84 -87 .
[2] 牛善利,柴茂文,李振秀 . 鼻内镜下鼻甲成形术治疗慢性肥厚性鼻炎60例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 16 -18 .
[3] 孟庆国,卢永田,范献良 . 杀伤细胞免疫球蛋白样受体基因多态性与鼻咽癌的关联性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 196 -199 .
[4] 马玉起,孔祥春 . 先天性双侧下唇窦道1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 199 -199 .
[5] 万俐佳,鲁海涛,姜义道,刘 辉,李 琴,佘腊枝 . 改良腭咽成形术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征41例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 204 -205 .
[6] 于青青 ,王跃建 . 硬质耳内镜的临床应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 222 -224 .
[7] 吉晓滨,邓家德,臧林泉,王 磊,谢 军 . 豚鼠变应性鼻炎模型血清组胺的测定[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 228 -230 .
[8] 向登,卢永田,孙焕吉 . 鼻内镜下修补脑脊液鼻漏19例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 234 -236 .
[9] 邱恩惠,李志春,方文旭 . 嗅觉障碍的中西医治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 253 -257 .
[10] 殷国华,钟 笑 . 激光减容术治疗舌扁桃体肥大的远期疗效[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 280 -282 .
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发