山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 78-82.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.238

• • 上一篇    下一篇

可吸收泪小管塞栓联合人工泪液治疗中重度干眼的有效性及对视觉相关生存质量的影响

白伶伶,王红星,王立春   

  1. 北京市垂杨柳医院/清华大学附属垂杨柳医院 眼科, 北京 100022
  • 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 王红星. E-mail:whxjsei@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都临床特色应用研究(Z181100001718133)

Effect of absorbable lacrimal plug combined with artificial tears on the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye and its impact on vision-related quality of life

BAI Lingling, WANG Hongxing, WANG Lichun   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Chui Yang Liu Hospital affiliated of Tsinghua University / Beijing Chuiyangliu Hospital, Beijing 100022, China
  • Published:2022-04-15

摘要: 目的 评估可吸收泪小管塞栓联合人工泪液治疗中重度干眼的有效性及对视觉相关生存质量的影响。 方法 选择干眼患者32例(64眼),所有患者分为两组,使用人工泪液治疗16例患者为对照组,使用泪小管塞栓联合人工泪液治疗16例患者为试验组,对比评价两组治疗前以及治疗后1个月、3个月和5个月的泪膜破裂时间、泪液分泌试验、角膜荧光染色评分、主观症状评分及视觉相关生存质量(VRQOL)评分。 结果 治疗前泪膜破裂时间(P=0.803)、泪液分泌试验(P=0.758)、角膜荧光染色评分(P=0.735)、主观症状评分(P=0.385)及视觉相关生存质量(VRQOL)评分(P=0.883),两组各项指标差异均无统计学意义;而在治疗后五项指标1个月(P<0.001)、3个月(P<0.001)及5个月(P<0.001),两组间各项指标较治疗前差异均有统计学意义,且试验组的指标改善较对照组更为明显,除治疗后5个月的泪液分泌试验(P=0.141)无统计学意义,其他指标治疗后1个月(P<0.001)(<0.001)(<0.001)(0.014)(<0.001)、3个月(P<0.001)(0.007)(<0.001)(<0.001)(<0.001)、5个月(P<0.001)(0.141)(<0.001)(<0.001)(<0.001)指标差异均有统计学意义 结论 可吸收泪小管塞栓联合人工泪液治疗可以明显改善中重度干眼患者的临床症状,提高患者视觉相关生存质量。

关键词: 干眼, 泪小管塞栓, 人工泪液, 视觉相关生存质量评分, 泪液分泌试验

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of absorbable lacrimal plugs combined with artificial tears on the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye and assess its impact on vision-related quality of life. Methods In total, 32 patients(64 eyes)diagnosed as having moderate to severe dry eye were enrolled. All patients were randomly divided into two groups; one group received absorbable lacrimal plugs combined with artificial tears, whereas the other one received only artificial tears for routine treatment. Schirmer's test results, tear film break-up time, corneal fluorescein staining, personal symptom and vision-related quality of life scores before and at 1, 3, and 5 months after treatment were analyzed and compared between the groups. Results There were no significant between-group differences in tear film break-up time(P=0.803), Schirmer's test results(P=0.758), corneal fluorescein staining(P=0.735), personal symptom(P=0.385)and vision-related quality of life scores(P=0.883)before treatment. Both groups exhibited significant improvements in all the observed parameters at 1 month(P<0.001), 3 month(P<0.001), and 5 month(P<0.001)after treatment. However, the experimental group exhibited significantly better improvement than the control group in all parameters, except for the Schirmer's test results at 5 months after treatment(P=0.141),the other parameters at 1 month(P<0.001)(<0.001)(<0.001)(0.014)<0.001), 3 month(P<0.001)(0.007)(<0.001)(<0.001)(<0.001), and 5 month(P<0.001)(0.141)(<0.001)(<0.001)(<0.001)were significant differences. Conclusion Treatment with absorbable lacrimal plugs combined with the application of artificial tears evidently alleviated symptoms and improved vision-related quality of life in patients with moderate to severe dry eye.

Key words: Dry eye, Lacrimal plug, Artificial tears, Vision-related quality of life, Schirmer's test

中图分类号: 

  • R777.21
[1] 唐颖, 田甜, 葛红岩. 干眼症发病机制与发病因素的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2019, 25(11): 2196-2201. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2019.11.022. TANG Ying, TIAN Tian, GE Hongyan. Research development of pathogenesis and influence factors in xerophthalmia[J]. Med Recapitul, 2019, 25(11): 2196-2201. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2019.11.022.
[2] 黎颖莉, 刘祖国, 邓应平, 等. 干眼临床诊疗的新认识及研究的新方向[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2020(3):161-164. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2020.03.001. LI Yingli, LIU Zuguo, DENG Yingping, et al. New understanding and trends in the diagnosis and management of dry eye[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol, 2020(3):161-164. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2020.03.001.
[3] Rouen PA, White ML. Dry eye disease: prevalence, assessment, and management[J]. Home Healthc Now, 2018, 36(2): 74-83. doi:10.1097/NHH.0000000000000652.
[4] Marshall LL, Roach JM. Treatment of dry eye disease[J]. The Consultant Pharmacist, 2016, 31(2):96-106. doi:10.4140/TCP.n.2016.96.
[5] Messmer EM. The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2015, 112(5): 71-81. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2015.0071.
[6] 黄江, 刘晓玲. 中文视功能相关生存质量量表-25的初步应用评价[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2016, 18(11): 660 -664. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2016.11.005. HUANG Jiang, LIU Xiaoling. Development and evaluation of Chinese version vision-related quality of life questionaire-25[J]. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016, 18(11):660 -664. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2016.11.005.
[7] 中华医学会眼科学分会角膜病学组. 干眼临床诊疗专家共识(2013年)[J].中华眼科杂志,2013,49(1):73-75. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2013.01.020
[8] Abe RY, Medeiros FA, Davi M A, et al. Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the national eye institute visual function questionnaire-25[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(12): e0226086. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226086.
[9] Nickels S, Schuster AK, Singer S, et al. The national eye institute 25-item visual function questionnaire(NEI VFQ-25)-reference data from the German population-based Gutenberg health study(GHS)[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2017, 15(1): 156. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0732-7.
[10] 马佰凯, 刘容均, 齐虹. 基于国际干眼新共识的干眼研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 8(1): 36-43. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2018.01.006. MA Baikai, LIU Rongjun, QI Hong. Development of dry eye research based on international dry eye new consensus[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol Med Electron Ed, 2018, 8(1): 36-43. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2018.01.006.
[11] Marcet MM, Shtein RM, Bradley EA, et al. Safety and efficacy of lacrimal drainage system plugs for dry eye syndrome: a report by the American academy of ophthalmology[J]. Ophthalmology, 2015, 122(8): 1681-1687. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.034.
[12] Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, et al. TFOS DEWS II management and therapy report[J]. Ocul Surf, 2017, 15(3): 575-628. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006.
[13] 亚洲干眼协会中国分会, 海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会眼科学专业委员会眼表与泪液病学组, 中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼表与干眼学组. 中国干眼专家共识:治疗(2020年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2020, 56(12):907-913. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200925-00618.
[14] Best AL, Labetoulle M, Legrand M, et al. Punctal and canalicular plugs: Indications, efficacy and safety[J]. Journal Français d'Ophtalmologie, 2019, 42(3): e95-e104. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2018.12.003.
[15] Magro L, Gauthier J, Richet M, et al. Scleral lenses for severe chronic GvHD-related keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a retrospective study by the SFGM-TC[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2017, 52(6): 878-882. doi:10.1038/bmt.2017.9.
[16] Shih KC, Lun CN, Jhanji V, et al. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials in the treatment of dry eye disease in Sjogren syndrome[J]. J Inflamm(Lond), 2017, 14(1): 26. doi:10.1186/s12950-017-0174-3.
[17] 姜洋, 李莹, 王忠海, 等. 可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 80-83. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.404. JIANG Yang, LI Ying, WANG Zhonghai, et al. Effect of the implantation of lacrimal plug for dry eyes after laser assisted in situ keratomi Leusis[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2016, 30(2): 80-83. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.404.
[18] 崔歌, 姜洋, 李莹. 准分子激光表层切削手术的疗效及其现存问题[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020,34(2): 67-71. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.010. CUI Ge, JIANG Yang, LI Ying. The efficacy and disadvantages of three excimer laser surface cutting surgeries[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2020,34(2): 67-71. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.010.
[19] Moon SW, Hwang JH, Chung SH, et al. The impact of artificial tears containing hydroxypropyl guar on mucous layer[J]. Cornea, 2010, 29(12): 1430-1435. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ca636b.
[20] Ervin AM, Law A, Pucker AD. Punctal occlusion for dry eye syndrome: summary of a Cochrane systematic review[J]. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2019, 103(3): 301-306. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313267.
[21] Tong L, Beuerman R, Simonyi S, et al. Effects of punctal occlusion on clinical signs and symptoms and on tear cytokine levels in patients with dry eye[J]. Ocul Surf, 2016, 14(2): 233-241. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2015.12.004.
[22] Tong L, Zhou L, Beuerman R, et al. Effects of punctal occlusion on global tear proteins in patients with dry eye[J]. The Ocular Surface, 2017, 15(4): 736-741. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.04.002.
[23] 李娟, 周颖, 李康寯, 等. 角膜基质透镜泪道栓治疗兔干眼的实验研究[J]. 眼科新进展, 2019,39(11): 1014-1018. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0232. LI Juan, ZHOU Ying, LI Kangjun, et al. Corneal stromal lenticule punctal plug for the treatment of dry eye in rabbits[J]. Recent Adv Ophthalmol, 2019, 39(11): 1014-1018. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0232.
[24] Song JS, Woo IH, Eom Y, et al. Five misconceptions related to punctal plugs in dry eye management[J]. Cornea, 2018, 37(1): S58-S61. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001734.
[1] 狄宇,李莹. 干眼炎症反应机制及抗炎治疗的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 144-150.
[2] 黄天泽,陈迪李莹. 机器学习在眼表疾病诊断及角膜手术中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 13-19.
[3] 肖西立,聂渝晓,陈婕. 国内近10年干眼相关研究——基于Citespace的可视化分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(2): 86-97.
[4] 孙子雯,崔洪玮,孙喜灵,陈晨,张璐,胡竹林. 干眼病的病因、发病机制及治疗进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 159-166.
[5] 涂雪峰. 重组牛碱性成纤维细胞生长因子联合玻璃酸钠治疗干眼症的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 84-87.
[6] 阳雪,李莹. 干眼对角膜内皮细胞的影响及相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 72-76.
[7] 胡锦东,刘新泉. 干眼动物模型研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 109-113.
[8] 姜洋,李莹,王忠海,金玉梅,刘小伟. 可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(2): 80-83.
[9] 王露萍, 吴欣怡. 2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平对干眼症的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 71-73.
[10] 张菊, 吴欣怡. 0.1%环孢素滴眼液联合玻璃酸钠滴眼液治疗眼干燥症[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(1): 49-51.
[11] 朱伟1,牟国营2. 不同厚度角膜瓣对准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼症的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(5): 1-2.
[12] 信兆亭1,杨莎莎1,2,吴欣怡1. 干眼影响因素的临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(4): 83-86.
[13] 郭丽1,袁方2,李斌1. Smart Plug泪小管塞治疗水液缺乏型干眼症临床初步观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2011, 25(1): 63-66.
[14] 陈敏,蔡利梅,蔡福旭,吴惠英. 干眼症患者行白内障超声乳化术的预后研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(5): 61-63.
[15] 王 旭,张 华,吕丽萍,崔 磊,李 淼 . 济南市上网青少年泪膜质量调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 265-268 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 和守盰,陈 斌,殷善开,苏开明,姜 晓 . OSAHS患者UPPP手术前后上气道形态学变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(5): 385 -388 .
[2] 宋西成,张庆泉,夏永宏,刘鲁沂,于鲁欣,王 郜,姜秀良 . 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者的术后ICU监护[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(5): 389 -392 .
[3] 薛卫国,孙洁,金铮,石文斌,辛露,林国经,李加耘 . 盐酸左氧氟沙星滴耳液治疗中耳炎的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(4): 300 -303 .
[4] 张庆泉,李新民,王 强,王有福 . 鼻内镜下犬齿窝径路治疗上颌窦病变[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(1): 38 -39 .
[5] 董 频,李晓艳,屠理强,孟晴虹,王 桑,谢 晋,姜 彦 . 晚期下咽癌、喉复发癌术后颈部缺损整复组织的选择[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(5): 385 -387 .
[6] 姜绍红,朱宇宏,王 强,宋西成 . 难治性原发性鼻出血101例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2007, 21(6): 542 -544 .
[7] 王昭迪,时光刚 . 虚拟现实技术在鼻外科的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(1): 74 -77 .
[8] 雷迅1 ,刘强和1 ,孔中雨1 ,向秋2 ,耿宛平1 ,黄辉3 ,董译元1 ,刘芳贤1
. EGCG对鼻咽癌细胞株裸鼠移植瘤的放疗增敏作用以及对Survivin表达的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(1): 6 -9 .
[9] 吴世普
. 鼻内镜下联合下鼻道开窗治疗上颌窦真菌球15例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2009, 23(2): 73 -74 .
[10] 刘伟,殷团芳,任基浩. 中耳胆脂瘤的发生及其与细胞凋亡的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2010, 24(01): 29 -33 .