山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 6-10.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.404

• 论著 • 上一篇    

DPOAE与高刺激率ABR在听力正常耳鸣患者中的应用价值

段新艳1,2,宋忠义2,王宁2,訾希存3, 潘新良1,2   

  1. 青岛)耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 山东 青岛 266035;
    3.山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)门诊单元, 山东 青岛 266035
  • 发布日期:2022-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 潘新良. E-mail:Panxinlent@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)科研启动基金(QDKY2018ZD03)

Application value of distortion product otoacoustic emission and high stimulation rate auditory brainstem response in patients with normal hearing tinnitus

DUAN Xinyan1,2, SONG Zhongyi2, WANG Ning2, ZI Xicun3, PAN Xinliang1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University(Qingdao), Qingdao 266035, Shandong, China;
    3. Outpatient Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University(Qingdao), Qingdao 266035, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-09-20

摘要: 目的 观察分析听力正常的耳鸣患者畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)与高刺激率听性脑干反应(ABR)检测的特征,探讨其在耳鸣评估中的应用价值。 方法 选取耳鼻咽喉科门诊听力正常的青年耳鸣患者31例(46耳)为耳鸣组,另外选取听力结果正常的青年无耳鸣者25例(50耳)为正常对照组,分别进行纯音听阈测定、声导抗测听、DPOAE和高低刺激率ABR的检测,对比两组受试者DPOAE各频检出率和信噪比以及高低刺激率ABR各波潜伏期(PL)、波间期(IPL)、波幅以及两种刺激速率下的潜伏期和波间期差值(△PL和△IPL)。 结果 DPOAE各频检出率两组无显著性差异;信噪比在8 kHz,耳鸣组较对照组降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高低刺激率ABR结果中,不同刺激速率下两组Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波波幅差异均无统计学意义;高刺激速率下,耳鸣组Ⅰ~Ⅴ IPL较对照组延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两种刺激速率下,耳鸣组Ⅰ△PL较对照组缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),耳鸣组Ⅴ△PL、Ⅰ~Ⅴ△IPL较对照组延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 DPOAE与高刺激率ABR可作为诊断耳鸣的一种客观检查方法,其对耳鸣的早期评估有重要的应用价值;增加ABR刺激速率,可提高耳鸣检测的敏感性。

关键词: 耳鸣, 高低刺激率, 听性脑干反应, 畸变产物耳声发射

Abstract: Objective This study aimed to observe and analyze the characteristics of distortion product otoacoustic emission(DPOAE)and high stimulation rate auditory brainstem response(ABR)in tinnitus patients with normal hearing and to explore their application value in tinnitus assessment. Methods Thirty-one(46 ears)young tinnitus patients with normal hearing were selected as the tinnitus group, and 25(50 ears)young people without tinnitus with normal hearing results were selected as the normal control group. Pure tone audiometry, acoustic conductance audiometry, DPOAE, and high and low stimulus rate ABR were detected, and the results in the tinnitus and healthy controls were compared. Results We found no significant difference in the detection rate of DPOAE and ABR wave Ⅰ, Ⅲ, and Ⅴ amplitudes with different stimulation rates between the two groups. The signal-to-noise ratio at 8 kHz in the tinnitus group was significantly lower than that in control group. Further, under a high stimulation rate, the Ⅰ~Ⅴ wave interval of tinnitus group was longer than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). At two stimulus rates,the the wave Ⅰ latency difference was shorter and the wave Ⅴ latency difference was longer in the tinnitus group, indicating that the wave Ⅰ~Ⅴ interval difference was longer in the tinnitus group than in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion DPOAE and high stimulation rate ABR can be used as an objective method to diagnose tinnitus and evaluate early tinnitus. Increasing the stimulation rate of ABR could improve the sensitivity of tinnitus detection.

Key words: Tinnitus, High and low stimulation rate, Auditory brainstem response, Distortion product otoacoustic emission

中图分类号: 

  • R764.45
[1] 刘蓬.如何接诊耳鸣患者[J].中医耳鼻喉科学研究杂志,2011,10(1):23.
[2] 郭焕萍, 杨海弟, 郑亿庆, 等. 2 171例耳鸣患者的临床特征分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2017, 25(4): 378-381. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.04.010. GUO Huanping, YANG Haidi, ZHENG Yiqing, et al. Clinical characteristics of tinnitus: an analysis of 2 171 patients[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2017, 25(4): 378-381. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.04.010.
[3] 周腊梅, 蒋雯, 刘稳, 等. 持续性特发性耳鸣严重程度的相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 70-76. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.009. ZHOU Lamei, JIANG Wen, LIU Wen, et al. Analysis of factors related to the severity of persistent idiopathic tinnitus[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 70-76. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.009.
[4] 杨霞, 高下. 畸变产物耳声发射在听力正常的单侧耳鸣患者中的应用价值[J]. 现代医学, 2015, 43(11): 1399-1402. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7562.2015.11.019. YANG Xia, GAO Xia. Application of distortion product otoacoustic emission in unilateral tinnitus patients with normal hearing capability[J]. Modern Medical Journal, 2015, 43(11): 1399-1402. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7562.2015.11.019.
[5] 李国庆, 吕萍, 王秋菊. 隐性听力损失的发病机制及听力学表现[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2017, 15(2): 185-190. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2017.02.009. LI Guoqing, LÜ Ping, WANG Qiuju. Pathogenesis and audiologic performances in hidden hearing loss[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2017, 15(2): 185-190. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2017.02.009.
[6] Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use[J]. Br Med Bull, 2002, 63: 223-241. doi:10.1093/bmb/63.1.223.
[7] 李兴启, 王秋菊. 听觉诱发反应及应用[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2015: 115.
[8] 邵渊, 安燕, 张少强. 畸变产物耳声发射在听力正常的耳鸣患者中的应用[J]. 山西医科大学学报, 2013, 44(1): 66-68. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1007-6611.2013.01.021. SHAO Yuan, AN Yan, ZHANG Shaoqiang. Application of distort product otoacoustic emission(DPOAE)in the tinnitus patients with normal hearing capability[J]. Basic Medical Education, 2013, 44(1): 66-68. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1007-6611.2013.01.021.
[9] 陈向红, 李佳, 张驰, 等. 不同病程听力正常耳鸣患者畸变产物耳声发射结果分析[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2019, 17(4): 532-535. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.04.017. CHEN Xianghong, LI Jia, ZHANG Chi, et al. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in tinnitus patients with normal hearing[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2019, 17(4): 532-535. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.04.017.
[10] Singh S, Munjal SK, Panda NK. Comparison of auditory electrophysiological responses in normal-hearing patients with and without tinnitus[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2011, 125(7): 668-672. doi:10.1017/S0022215111000569.
[11] Terao K, Cureoglu S, Schachern PA, et al. Cochlear changes in presbycusis with tinnitus[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2011, 32(3): 215-220. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.02.001.
[12] 王铮, 田颖, 姜学钧. 客观听力学测试在纯音听阈正常双侧耳鸣患者中的应用价值[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 30(23): 1846-1849. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.23.003. WANG Zheng, TIAN Ying, JIANG Xuejun. Application of objective audiological tests in bilateral tinnitus patients with normal hearing capability[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2016, 30(23): 1846-1849. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.23.003.
[13] 刘永新, 谷京城. DPOAE异常而听力正常耳鸣患者的临床分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2010, 18(2): 106-107. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2010.02.005.
[14] Zuccotti A, Kuhn S, Johnson SL, et al. Lack of brain-derived neurotrophic factor hampers inner hair cell synapse physiology, but protects against noise-induced hearing loss[J]. J Neurosci, 2012, 32(25): 8545-8553. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1247-12.2012.
[15] Polyakov A, Pratt H. The cumulative effect of high click rate on monaural and binaural processing in the human auditory brainstem[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2003, 114(2): 366-375. doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00372-3.
[16] 钟乃川, 宋江顺, 金晶, 等. 高刺激率听性脑干反应诊断椎基底动脉短暂缺血性眩晕的临床应用[J]. 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 1994, 1(2): 71-74. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.1994.02.002. ZHONG Naichuan, SONG Jiangshun, JIN Jing, et al. Study on the clinical application of auditory brainstem response with high stimulus rates in patients suffering from vertebro-basilar transient ischemic Vertigo[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 1994, 1(2): 71-74. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.1994.02.002.
[17] 钟乃川. 椎基底动脉短暂缺血性眩晕的听性脑干反应与经颅多普勒检查[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 1996, 31(2): 86-88. doi:10.13201/ji.sn. 2096-7993.2020.07.023. ZHONG Naichuan. The correlation of auditory brain stem response and transcranial doppler on the vertebrobasilar transientischemic vertigo[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 1996, 31(2): 86-88. doi:10.13201/ji.sn. 2096-7993.2020.07.023.
[18] 黄丽辉. 隐性听力损失及早期识别[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(7): 668-671. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.07.023. HUANG Lihui. Hidden hearing loss and early identification[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2020, 34(7): 668-671. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.07.023.
[19] 胡鸿, 史波宁. Ⅴ波潜伏期差值与Ⅰ-Ⅴ波间期差值的关系研究[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2016, 14(3): 370-373. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2016.03.011. HU Hong, SHI Boning. Relationship between high/low stimulation rate ABR wave Ⅴ latency differential and Ⅰ-Ⅴ inter-peak latency differential[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2016, 14(3): 370-373. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2016.03.011.
[20] 邱泽恒, 梁象逢, 王培, 等. 青年急性耳鸣高刺激率ABR的检测及临床意义[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2009, 7(3): 191-193. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2009.03.004. QIU Zeheng, LIANG Xiangfeng, WANG Pei, et al. High stimulus rate auditory brainstem responses in young patients with acute tinnitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2009, 7(3): 191-193. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2009.03.004.
[21] 张静,郭英,许轶,等.高刺激率听性脑干反应评估前庭性偏头痛患者听觉脑干传导通路的意义[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2022, 30(2):164-167. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2022.02.013. ZHANG Jing, GUO Ying, XU Yi, et al. The Use of ABRs with High Stimulation Frequency Rates in Patients with Vestibular Migraine[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2022, 30(2):164-167. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2022.02.013.
[1] 倪坤, 孙世冰, 李晓艳. 1 000 Hz声导抗在高危新生儿听力筛查中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 43-47.
[2] 周腊梅, 蒋雯, 刘稳, 乔月华. 持续性特发性耳鸣严重程度的相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 70-76.
[3] 李元超,吴玮,王刚,屈昌北,王磊,芦文俊,李丹,韩浩伦,刘钢. 模拟失重及飞船内稳态噪声对大鼠听功能的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 11-16.
[4] 郑永波, 赵宇, 娄麟, 宋瑶, 董怡君, 任建君, 王晶, 许洋, 雷蕾. 静脉源性搏动性耳鸣手术治疗的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 26-31.
[5] 周星,钱相容,顾黎安,于亚峰. 加入背景音的复合声治疗不同频率失代偿性耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 37-39.
[6] 钟晓声,杨海弟,郑亿庆. 突发性聋伴耳鸣的治疗与转归[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 43-46.
[7] 廖礼兵,刘绮明,宗凌,翟锦明,张建国. 42例耳鸣伴听觉过敏患者特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 31-36.
[8] 侯小兵,任同力,张毅博. 69例梅尼埃病伴耳鸣的发病特点及影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 37-40.
[9] 陈伟,胡中南,童钊君,李湘宇,刘文君. 青中年无眩晕、心脑血管疾病病史的突发性聋患者高刺激率听性脑干反应特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 45-49.
[10] 黄娟,庞宇峰,龚静蓉,董玥辉. 耳鸣声学特征与扩展高频听阈的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 7-10.
[11] 宋峰,甘彬,许安廷,王坚. 长时程低强度噪声暴露对豚鼠内毛细胞带状突触的影响分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 41-44.
[12] 张玉波,岳丽艳,尹晓妍,吕哲,单春光. 耳鸣治疗仪联合银杏叶提取物注射液治疗突聋伴耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(5): 50-53.
[13] 朱江彬,南兵卫,陈涛, 郝宗生. 低中频下降型突发性聋听阈恢复后残留耳鸣治疗体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 5-7.
[14] 狄国华, 刘俊茹, 赵延祥, 高英恺. 利多卡因联合天麻素耳后注射治疗特发性耳鸣[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 5-7.
[15] 钟晓声, 杨海弟, 郑亿庆. 突发性聋伴耳鸣患者耳鸣特征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(4): 15-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!