山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 80-86.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2025.278

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

眼局部微压氧对兔角膜上皮细胞损伤后修复及氧化应激的影响

王志远1,2,郝忠凯2,张晨明1,2   

  1. 1.山东第二医科大学 临床医学院, 山东 潍坊 261053;
    2.济南市第二人民医院 眼科, 山东 济南 250021
  • 发布日期:2026-05-22
  • 通讯作者: 张晨明. E-mail:chenming-zhang@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    济南市卫生健康委科技发展计划项目(2025105001);济南高层次人才项目(CYLJ20241901459);济南市临床医学科技创新计划(202225058)

The effect of local micro-pressure oxygen on the repair and oxidative stress of rabbit corneal epithelial cells after injury

WANG Zhiyuan1,2, HAO Zhongkai2, ZHANG Chenming1,2   

  1. 1. Clinical Medical College, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang 261053, Shandong, China2. Department of OphthalmoLogy, Jinan Second People's Hospital, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Published:2026-05-22

摘要: 目的 探讨眼局部微压氧对兔角膜上皮损伤后修复及微观结构变化的影响,并分析其对角膜氧化应激水平的影响。 方法 选取健康成年新西兰大白兔75只(150只眼),建立角膜上皮损伤模型。随机分为A、B、C三组,每组25只(50只眼)。A组给予局部微压氧治疗(5 L/min;浓度:95%;1.5±0.5 kPa),供氧2 h/d;B组给予普通无压力氧气治疗(5 L/min;浓度:95%),供氧2 h/d;C组自然愈合。透射电镜观察各组角膜上皮微观结构变化。使用Image-J软件测量角膜上皮未愈合面积。使用ELISA法检测角膜氧化应激因子丙二醛的浓度变化。 结果 造模后12、24、36 h,三组角膜上皮未愈合面积存在组间与组内的交互作用且组间不同时间点总体比较差异存在统计学意义(F时间=839 828.012, P<0.001;F组别=38 866.823,P<0.001;F时间*组别=7 338.970,P<0.001),三组角膜上皮未愈合面积均为A组F组间=0.172,P=0.843;F时间*组别=1.572,P时间*组别=0.226)。 结论 眼局部微压氧治疗可有效缩短角膜上皮损伤后的修复时间,且角膜的氧化应激水平无明显改变。

关键词: 眼局部微压氧, 角膜上皮细胞, 修复, 氧化应激, 透射电镜

Abstract: Objective To investigate the impact of topical microbaric oxygen therapy on corneal epithelial wound healing and ultrastructural alterations in rabbits, and to elucidate its modulatory effects on corneal oxidative stress levels. Methods A total of 75 healthy adult New Zealand White rabbits(150 eyes)were enrolled to establish a corneal epithelial defect model. Animals were randomly assigned to three groups(n=25 rabbits/50 eyes each). Group A received topical microbaric oxygen therapy for 2h daily; Group B received normobaric oxygen at identical flow and concentration for the same duration; Group C was left to heal spontaneously. Corneal epithelial ultrastructure was evaluated by transmission electron microscopy. Residual epithelial defects were planimetrically quantified with Image-J software. Corneal oxidative stress was assessed by measuring malondialdehyde concentration via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results At 12, 24, and 36 h post-injury, a significant interaction between group and time was detected for the residual corneal epithelial defect area(Ftime=839,828.012, P<0.001; Fgroup=38,866.823, P<0.001; Ftime*group=7,338.970, P<0.001); the defect consistently ranked AFgroup=0.172, P=0.843; Ftime*group=1.572, P=0.226). Conclusion Topical microbaric oxygen therapy significantly accelerates corneal epithelial wound closure without inducing a measurable increase in corneal oxidative stress.

Key words: Topical microbaric oxygen therapy, Corneal epithelial cells, repair, Oxidative stress, Transmission electron microscope

中图分类号: 

  • R772.2
[1] Sridhar MS. Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface[J]. Indian J OphthalmoL, 2018, 66(2): 190-194. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_646_17
[2] van der Putten C, van den Broek D, Kurniawan NA. Myofibroblast transdifferentiation of keratocytes results in slower migration and lower sensitivity to mesoscale curvatures[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2022, 10: 930373. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.930373
[3] An X, Wang G, Jin M, et al. Novel cell culture paradigm prolongs mouse corneal epithelial cell proliferative activity in vitro and in vivo[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2021, 9: 675998. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.675998
[4] Menzel-Severing J, Seiler TG, Streit T, et al. Hyperbaric oxygenation maintains elevated stromal oxygen availability during corneal collagen crosslinking with and without epithelial removal[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2024, 49(11): 1131-1137. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2024.2372787
[5] Hsu HT, Yang YL, Chang WH, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves Parkinson's disease by promoting mitochondrial biogenesis via the SIRT-1/PGC-1α pathway[J]. BiomoLecules, 2022, 12(5): 661. doi: 10.3390/biom12050661
[6] 周春阳,袁正,李依静,等. 美洲大蠊提取液对兔角膜上皮损伤修复影响的实验研究[J]. 中医眼耳鼻喉杂志, 2023, 13(4): 181-184. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9006.2023.04.001
[7] Loo S, Kam A, Tam JP. Hyperstable EGF-like bleogen derived from cactus accelerates corneal healing in rats[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 942168. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.942168
[8] Luo Y, Liu L, Liao Y, et al. Multifunctional baicalin-modified contact lens for preventing infection, regulating the ocular surface microenvironment and promoting corneal repair[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022, 10: 855022. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.855022
[9] Wang Y, Kang H, Jin M, et al. Phenotypic and transcriptomics analyses reveal underlying mechanisms in a mouse model of corneal bee sting[J]. Toxins(Basel), 2022, 14(7): 468. doi: 10.3390/toxins14070468
[10] Li L, Li L, Chen Q, et al. Toxicity evaluation of long-term topical application of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor-2 eye drops on macaca fascicularis[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2021, 12: 740726. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.740726
[11] 王文莹, 冯珺, 邓世靖, 等. 自体血清点眼对神经营养性角膜病变持续角膜上皮缺损的疗效评估[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2024, 42(2): 143-151. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20221213-00584
[12] Wu MF, Peng X, Zhao JL, et al. Mitophagy and mitochondrion-related expression profiles in response to physiological and pathological hypoxia in the corneal epithelium[J]. Genomics, 2023, 115(6): 110739. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2023.110739
[13] Li S, Ding G, Sun Y, et al. Impact of different oxygen supply methods on the healing of corneal epithelial wound and the level of acetylcholine[J]. J OphthalmoL, 2021:4737479. doi: 10.1155/2021/4737479
[14] Haubner F, Muschter D, Pohl F, et al. A co-culture model of fibroblasts and adipose tissue-derived stem cells reveals new insights into impaired wound healing after radiotherapy[J]. International Journal of moLecular Sciences, 2015, 16(11): 25947-25958. doi: 10.3390/ijms161125935
[15] Mcmonnies CW. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and the possibility of ocular complications or contraindications[J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2015, 98(2): 122-125. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12203
[16] 王磊, 王学艺, 田艳娟, et al. 高压氧治疗COVID-19后视神经炎1例及文献分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 100-104. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.277 WANG Lei, WANG Xueyi, TIAN Yanjuan, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for optic neuritis after COVID-19: a case report and literature analysis[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(5): 100-104. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.277
[17] Troitskaya O, Novak D, Nushtaeva A, et al. EGFR transgene stimulates spontaneous formation of MCF7 breast cancer cells spheroids with partly loss of HER3 receptor[J]. Int J moL Sci, 2021, 22(23): 12937. doi: 10.3390/ijms222312937
[18] Loma P, Guzman-Aranguez A, Pérez de Lara MJ, et al. Diadenosine tetraphosphate induces tight junction disassembly thus increasing corneal epithelial permeability[J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2015, 172(4): 1045-1058. doi: 10.1111/bph.12972
[19] 倪梦圆,廖荣丰. 糖尿病大鼠病程不同阶段角膜上皮紧密连接蛋白claudin-1表达的变化[J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2016, 51(7): 961-964
[20] 苏海莹. MUC1调控细胞间紧密连接对糖尿病角膜上皮损伤后修复的影响[D]. 广东:南方医科大学, 2024
[21] Li S, Tian Q, Ding G, et al. The impact of different oxygen delivery methods on corneal epithelial repair after injury[J]. J OphthalmoL, 2022: 3260087. doi: 10.1155/2022/3260087
[22] Smith HL, Bourne JN, Cao G, et al. Mitochondrial support of persistent presynaptic vesicle mobilization with age-dependent synaptic growth after LTP[J]. Elife, 2016, 5: e15275. doi: 10.7554/eLife.15275
[23] Schwarz DS, Blower MD. The endoplasmic reticulum: structure, function and response to cellular signaling[J]. Cell moL Life Sci, 2016, 73(1): 79-94. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-2052-6
[24] Shyu KG, Wang BW, Fang WJ, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen-induced long non-coding RNA MALAT1 exosomes suppress MicroRNA-92a expression in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Cell moL Med, 2020, 24(22): 12945-12954. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15889
[25] 周燕, 雷佳玉, 谢艳. 高压氧对输尿管梗阻大鼠的肾病理组织及氧化应激损伤的作用机制[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2025, 45(1): 107-112. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20230625-00026
[26] Bonilha VL, Bell BA, Rayborn ME, et al. Absence of DJ-1 causes age-related retinal abnormalities in association with increased oxidative stress[J]. Free Radic Biol Med, 2017, 104: 226-237. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.01.018
[27] Lee MJ, Seo HJ, Hwang GS, et al. moLecular mechanism of cinnamomum cassia against gastric damage and identification of active compounds[J]. Biomo Lecules, 2022, 12(4):525. doi: 10.3390/biom12040525
[28] 刘萱, 张婕, 刘小毛, 等. PM2.5对人角膜上皮细胞屏障功能、氧化应激反应以及自噬的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2024, 24(22): 4207-4213. doi:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2024.22.002
[29] Tsikas D. Assessment of lipid peroxidation by measuring malondialdehyde(MDA)and relatives in biological samples: Analytical and biological challenges[J]. Anal Biochem, 2017, 524: 13-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.10.021
[30] Islam MT. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction-linked neurodegenerative disorders[J]. Neurol Res, 39(1): 73-82. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1251711
[1] 段思妤,薛金梅. 组蛋白去乙酰化酶2在慢性气道炎症性疾病糖皮质激素抵抗中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 120-126.
[2] 高琳,何金梅,杨明祎. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者血清Sestrin2和NADPH氧化酶2水平与眼底病变的相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 113-117.
[3] 柯冰冰,陈铭,王洪阳,李春燕,殷善开. CAMK4介导胆红素所致听觉中枢神经元氧化应激损伤[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 1-10.
[4] 陈铭,柯冰冰,崔雅琦,吴翠萍,陈正侬,李春燕,殷善开. NAD+对顺铂所致毛细胞氧化应激损伤的拮抗作用及相关基因表达调控[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 11-18.
[5] 胡君,彭昌福. 重睑术后要求修复单睑患者的心理状况及影响因素调查[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 61-66.
[6] 周颖东,张梦娴,王青玲,康浩然,郭向东. 氧化应激在老年性聋发病机制中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 72-78.
[7] 李宝妃,麦鲁丹·艾尼瓦尔,杨鑫,陈飞. 股前外侧筋膜瓣在头颈部修复的应用研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 87-91.
[8] 邵永良,周鲲鹏,李广盛,张学梅,杨泽垠. 耳后径路取带蒂皮瓣修复外耳道皮肤缺损18例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(5): 1-5.
[9] 索安奇,杨欣欣. 线粒体自噬与头颈部鳞状细胞癌关系的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 111-117.
[10] 王玉冰,郑跃彬,杨羿容,鄢斌成,彭顺林. 颈部转移性Merkel细胞癌1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(2): 51-55.
[11] 李孟婷,何书喜,王华. 炎症因子在圆锥角膜中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(2): 151-158.
[12] 苏杰,杨馥宇,李猛,陈荟茹,蒋利生,王丽香. GLP-1诱导的自噬对糖尿病大鼠视网膜病变的保护作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 30-34.
[13] 张礼俊, 胥然, 罗继芳, 刘国旗, 何千, 李玮, 蒋振华. 头颈肿瘤游离皮瓣修复术后皮瓣坏死及皮瓣相关并发症影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 86-90.
[14] 张依,王文俊,杨安怀. SIRT1激动剂白藜芦醇在眼部疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 151-156.
[15] 金鑫,施磊,金梦园. 脱细胞真皮基质覆盖鼻腔鼻窦良性肿瘤切除术后术腔的临床疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 17-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!