未成年人与成年人变应性鼻炎变应原致敏特点

山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 44-47.

未成年人与成年人变应性鼻炎变应原致敏特点

姚聆清1，邱建鹤1，巢长江1，毛建军1，钱俊勇2，薛建荣2，周慧娟2

1.常州市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉科，江苏常州 213001； 2.常州市第三人民医院耳鼻咽喉科，江苏常州 213001

收稿日期:2012-08-06 出版日期:2012-12-16 发布日期:2012-12-16
通讯作者: 邱建鹤，主任医师。 E-mail: QJH658@126.com
作者简介:姚聆清，副主任医师。 E-mail: mingyidf@hotmail.com

Analysis on characteristics of allergic sensitization in childhood and adult patients with allergic rhinitis

YAO Ling-qing1, QIU Jian-he1, CHAO Chang-jiang1, MAO Jian-jun1, QIAN Jun-yong2, XUE Jian-rong2, ZHOU Hui-juan2

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, 1. The First People’s Hospital of Changzhou； 2. The Third People’s Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou 213001, Jiangsu, China

Received:2012-08-06 Online:2012-12-16 Published:2012-12-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析江苏省常州市变应性鼻炎(AR)患者16种标准化变应原皮肤点刺试验(SPT)结果，比较本地区未成年人与成年人变应性鼻炎变应原致敏的特点。方法 4383例(3~75岁)临床疑似AR的患者被分为未成年人组(3~17岁)及成年人组(18~75岁)，其中未成年人组又细分为三组(3~5岁组，6~14岁组，15~17岁组)后进行SPT结果分析。结果未成年人组SPT阳性1063例(78.9%)，其中男717例(67.5%)，女346例(32.5%)；成年人组SPT阳性1687例(55.6%)，其中男715例(42.4%)，女972例(57.6%)。未成年人组与成年人组均以粉尘螨、户尘螨为最主要变应原，阳性率分别为92.9%、90.8%及81.0%、78.9%。主要变应原第3~5位者，未成年人组为猫毛(7.2%)、蟑螂(6.9%)、葎草花粉(5.8%)，成年人组为蟑螂(14.2%)、葎草花粉(13.0%)、海虾(6.4%)。经χ2检验，未成年人组与成年人组的SPT阳性率，SPT阳性男女比例，粉尘螨、户尘螨、蟑螂、葎草花粉及猫毛变应原阳性率，单一尘螨阳性率，单一尘螨阳性男女比例，粉尘螨及户尘螨阳性等级中+++及++++构成比与++构成比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经细分的未成年人三组间，除6~14岁组SPT阳性率与3～5岁组和15～17岁组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)外，其余上述各项两两相比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论本地区未成年人与成年人AR患者的主要变应原存在显著差别。未成年人组中，男性SPT阳性率及单一尘螨阳性率明显高于女性。未成年人更适合特异性免疫治疗(SIT)。

关键词: 变应性鼻炎；皮肤试验；变应原；螨类

Abstract: Objective To investigate positive allergens and sex distribution in childhood and adult patients with allergic rhinitis(AR) in Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province. Methods A total of 4383 cases (aged between 3-75 years) with allergic symptoms and signs underwent skin prick test (SPT)with 16 kinds of standardized allergens. The samples were stratified on childhood and adult groups to analysis the distributive characteristics of allergens responsible for each group. The childhood subjects were further stratified on 3 groups (3-5-year-old, 6-14-year-old, 15-17-year-old) for analysis. Results 1063 cases (78.9%) had the positive reaction in the childhood group, including 717 (67.5%) cases of males and 346 (32.5%) cases of females. 1687 cases (55.6%) had the positive reaction in the adult group, including 715 (42.4%) cases of males and 972 (57.6%) cases of females. Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagodies pteronyssinus had the highest positive ratio (92.9%, 90.8% and 81.0%, 78.9%) in both groups, the 3rd to 5th followed were cat hair (7.2%), cockroach (6.9%) and Humulus L.(5.8%) in the childhood group, cockroach (14.2%), Humulus L.(13.0%), and shrimp (6.4%) in the adult group. There were significantly higher sensitivities to positive ratio of SPT, male and female positive ratio of SPT, positive ratio of Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagodies pteronyssinus, cockroach, Humulus L. and cat hair, positive ratio of single dust mite, male and female positive ratio of single dust mite, and the ratio of class +++, ++++ and ++ in the dust mite position between the childhood group and the adult group (P<0.05). And there were no significantly high sensitivities to the three groups in childhood according to the items above expect positive ratio of SPT between the 6-14-year-old group and the 3-5-year-old group (P<0.05), and the 6-14-year-old and 15-17-year-old groups (P<0.05). Conclusion There are significantly high sensitivity to the main allergens between childhood and adult AR patients in the region. In childhood group, the number of male is higher than that of female in the positive ratio of SPT and the single Dust mite. It suggests that the minors would be more suitable for specific immunotherapy.

Key words: Allergic rhinitis; Skin tests; Allergen; Mites

中图分类号:

R765.21

姚聆清1，邱建鹤1，巢长江1，毛建军1，钱俊勇2，薛建荣2，周慧娟2. 未成年人与成年人变应性鼻炎变应原致敏特点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2012, 26(6): 44-47.

YAO Ling-qing1, QIU Jian-he1, CHAO Chang-jiang1, MAO Jian-jun1, QIAN Jun-yong2, XUE Jian-rong2, ZHOU Hui-juan2. Analysis on characteristics of allergic sensitization in childhood and adult patients with allergic rhinitis[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2012, 26(6): 44-47.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	苏日古格,李花,乌日柴夫,韩额尔德木图,孟永梅. 基于网络药理学及动物实验探讨蒙药胡日查-6治疗变应性鼻炎的作用机制研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 41-51.
[2]	刘博, 肖旭平, 李云秋, 周恩, 郭仁彬. 双侧耳郭软骨骨化1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 12-16.
[3]	袁晨阳, 刘燕, 房振胜. 儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征对肺功能的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 143-148.
[4]	杨明魏文斌. 溶栓治疗在视网膜动脉阻塞中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 5-10.
[5]	秦书琪,王露萍,姜彬,王艳玲. 眼缺血综合征并发新生血管性青光眼一例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 53-55.
[6]	孙铭宏,高娴,赵婷,刘文君. 鼻腔盥洗及联合鼻用糖皮质激素治疗变应性鼻炎及血管运动性鼻炎效果观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 73-78.
[7]	刘小涵,张小兵. PU.1转录因子和辅助性Th9细胞与变应性鼻炎[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 139-143.
[8]	张贵阳,黄河,冼志,张汉文,谢桂彩. 粉尘螨滴剂舌下含服免疫治疗对不同年龄段变应性鼻炎患者的临床效果评估[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 60-65.
[9]	陈若希,张清照,陆美萍,朱歆洁,程雷. TLR通路基因多态性与变应性鼻炎的关联研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3): 79-87.
[10]	杨钦泰. 重视儿童“侧呼吸道”过敏性炎症[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 59-62.
[11]	洪海裕, 许光福, 杨烁伟,苏荣飞,黄伊厘,池梦诗,王玮豪,杨钦泰. 探究广东地区变应性鼻炎合并支气管哮喘的危险因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 94-98.
[12]	曹成,许昱. 变应性鼻炎患者舌下免疫治疗的临床依从性192例分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 114-118.
[13]	洪冬冬,刘元献,邹练强,翁镌凌,邓文娴. 变应性鼻炎患者粉尘螨皮肤点刺试验阳性764例结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 119-123.
[14]	杜经纬,冯俊,马鹏,李志勇,李红光. 鼻腔冲洗联合鼻用糖皮质激素对AR患者FeNO、肺功能及生活质量的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 124-127.
[15]	万文锦,王文,程雷. 尘螨变应性鼻炎皮下免疫治疗与舌下免疫治疗的荟萃分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 103-108.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed