山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 56-59.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.054

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

选择低位小切口行甲状腺癌选择性淋巴结清扫

曹磊,贺青卿,庄大勇,郑鲁明,范子义,周鹏,朱见   

  1. 济南军区总医院甲状腺乳腺外科, 济南 250031
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-01 发布日期:2013-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 贺青卿,主任医师,硕士生导师。 Email:heqingqing@yeah.net
  • 作者简介:曹磊,硕士研究生。 Email:caolei0841020027@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    中国博士后科学基金第三批特别资助项目(201003759);济南军区总医院院长基金资助(2011M03)

Low small incision in  total thyroidectomy and selective neck lymphnode dissection

CAO Lei, HE Qing-qing, ZHUANG Da-yong, ZHENG Lu-ming, FAN Zi-yi, ZHOU Peng, ZHU Jian   

  1.  Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Jinan Military General Hospital, Jinan 250031, China
  • Received:2013-03-01 Published:2013-04-16

摘要:

目的   探讨超声刀联合自动拉钩辅助低位领式小切口行甲状腺全切除+选择性淋巴结清扫术的可行性。方法   选择甲状腺癌患者124例,随机分为实验组62例和对照组62例,实验组采用超声刀联合自动拉钩辅助低位领式小切口行甲状腺全切除+选择性淋巴结清扫术;对照组采用低位领式切口行甲状腺全切除+选择性淋巴结清扫术。对两组手术住院时间、肿瘤大小、切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、手术操作者人数、术后引流量、术后引流时间,以及术前、术后甲状旁腺素、血清钙、血清磷、切除淋巴结数量及术后并发症进行比较。结果   实验组手术时间、手术操作者人数、切口长度、术中出血量均少于对照组(P<0.05);其余指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论   超声刀联合自动拉钩辅助低位领式小切口行甲状腺全切除+选择性淋巴结清扫术治疗方法可行,具有术时短、手术操作者人数少、术中出血量少、切口小的优势。

关键词: Frankfurt自动拉钩, 淋巴结清扫术, 甲状腺癌, Harmonic Focus超声刀, 低位小切口

Abstract:

Objective   To explore the feasibility of harmonic focus scalpel combined with Frankfurt automatic retractor auxiliary low collar small incision in total thyroidectomy and selective neck lymphnode dissection. Methods   124 patients with thyroid cancer were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group of 62 patients with harmonic focus scalpel combined with a low collar small incision assisted with a Frankfurt automatic retractor, and the control group of 62 patients with a low collar incision. Two groups were compared by hospitalization time, tumor size, incision length, operative time, blood loss, number of operators, post-operative drainage, post-operative drainage time, pre-operative and post-operative parathyroid hormone, serum calcium, serum phosphorusvalue, the number of resected lymph nodes and post-operative complications. Results   Compared to the control group, it was statistically decreased in operative time, number of operators, incision length and blood loss in the operation in the experimental group (P<0.05). However, other clinical indicators were not significantly different between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion   Utility of Harmonic focus scalpel combined with Frankfurt automatic retractor auxiliary low collar small incision underwent total thyroidectomy and selective neck lymph node dissection is feasible, and it has the advantages of shorter operative time, smaller number of operators, less blood loss  and smaller incision.

Key words: Thyroid cancer, Frankfurt automatic retractor, Low small incision, Neck lymphnode dissection, Harmonic Focus scalpel

中图分类号: 

  • R736.1
[1] 张中华,王辉,王俊鑫,张美玲,张建,张恩东,潘新良. 腋窝入路腔镜手术和传统颈部开放手术治疗T1甲状腺癌的安全性和有效性对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 161-167.
[2] 杨鸣,刘雪霞,张华. m6A识别蛋白IGF2BPs家族在头颈肿瘤中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 153-161.
[3] 王安洋,李超友,薛刚,吴靖芳. 肠道菌群与甲状腺疾病的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(1): 132-139.
[4] 张轶轶,薛刚,金春亭. 外泌体在甲状腺癌的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(2): 131-135.
[5] 潘新良. 加强甲状腺结节及恶性肿瘤的规范治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 1-12.
[6] 陈海兵, 卫亚楠, 许晓泉, 陈曦. 基于XGBoost人工智能结合CT构建甲状腺癌颈部淋巴结转移预测模型[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 40-45.
[7] 邓迪,刘均,李林珂,王吉,刘吉峰,吕丹,王海洋,甘卫刚,王君,李波,陈飞. 皮瓣二期重建策略应用于气管非环周缺损修复重建[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 52-57.
[8] 房忠菊, 张永侠, 赵建东, 纵亮, 翟性友, 李新建, 彭新, 任楠, 陈立伟, 刘明波. 甲状腺癌颈清扫术后乳糜漏的综合治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 64-68.
[9] 吕静荣,陈淳,马衍,谢晋. 儿童分化型甲状腺癌的临床特征及危险因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 88-94.
[10] 冯云,钟志明,陈国庆. 纳米碳在甲状腺乳头状癌隐匿性侧颈转移淋巴结清扫术中的临床应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 101-106.
[11] 马驰,郑桂彬,孙海清,吴国长,郭雅文,孔杨,宋西成,郑海涛. 加速康复外科理念应用于甲状腺癌手术100例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 107-110.
[12] 王佳说,郭星,阎艾慧. 甲状腺乳头状癌颈淋巴结转移形成巨大囊性变的诊断总结[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 111-113.
[13] 高晓倩,姜震,耿琛琛,刘大昱,李荔. 术前超声评估分化型甲状腺癌颈部淋巴结转移[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 135-139.
[14] 魏东敏,李文明,钱晔,刘大昱,雷大鹏,潘新良. 颈侧清扫术[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 115-115.
[15] 邱杰,孙莎莎,孙彦. 美国癌症联合委员会第8版甲状腺癌TNM分期解读[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 5-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!