成年人扁桃体切除术三种手术方式的临床比较

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.401

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较分析成年人3种扁桃体切除术的临床应用价值。方法将90例行扁桃体切除术的患者分为等离子扁桃体切除术组(等离子组)、电刀扁桃体切除术组(电刀组)、常规扁桃体剥离术组(剥离组),各30例,记录各组手术时间、术中及术后出血量、术后咽痛程度、住院医疗费用等。结果 3组手术时间、术中出血量、术后1~4 d咽痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),其中等离子组和电刀组手术时间、术中出血量及VAS评分明显少于剥离组(P<0.001),而等离子组与电刀组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。剥离组术后见原发性出血1例,等离子组及电刀组未见术后出血发生。3组护理及检疗费、术后用药费比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);电刀组及剥离组住院总费用明显低于等离子组(P<0.001),而电刀组与剥离组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论成年人扁桃体切除术各有优势及不足,临床应根据疾病特点、患者意愿和经济能力、手术者技术水平以及医疗器械等因素选择最恰当的,从而达到最佳治疗效果。

关键词: 消融技术, 出血, 术后疼痛, 扁桃体切除术, 住院费用

Abstract: Objective To compare and analyze the clinical application value of three surgical methods in adult patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Methods Ninety patients who received tonsillectomy were divided into coblation tonsillectomy(coblation group, n=30), electrocautery tonsillectomy(electrocautery group, n=30), and conventional tonsillectomy(conventional group, n=30). The duration of the entire operation, amount of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, postoperative sore throat assessed using a visual analogue scale(VAS), and hospital costs were all recorded in three groups. Results Significant difference was shown among three groups by comparison to the operation time, amount of blood loss and the VAS scores of postoperative pain 1-4 d after surgery(P<0.001), in which the above indexes of coblation group and electrocautery group were all superior to those of conventional group(P<0.001), but there was no statistical significance between coblation group and electrocautery group(P>0.05). One patient encountered primary hemorrhage after surgery in conventional group, whereas no postoperative hemorrhage in coblation group and electrocautery group. There was no statistical significance among three groups by comparison to the nursing and examination/treatment expenses as well as postoperative charges for medicine(P>0.05). The total hospital cost in electrocautery group and conventional group was obviously lower than that in coblation group(P<0.001), but no significant difference was shown between electrocautery group and conventional group(P>0.05). Conclusion Each of the three surgical methods in adult tonsillectomy has its own advantages and disadvantages. In the clinical practice, the most appropriate surgical method should be selected so as to achieve the optimal therapeutic effect based on the disease characteristics, willingness and economic capability of patients, technical level of surgeons and medical instruments.

Key words: Tonsillectomy, Ablation techniques, Hemorrhage, Postoperative pain, Hospital costs

中图分类号:

R766.9

徐磊,朱鹃芬,程雷. 成年人扁桃体切除术三种手术方式的临床比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(6): 49-52.

XU Lei, ZHU Juanfen, CHENG Lei. Comparison of three surgical methods in adult patients undergoing tonsillectomy.[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2016, 30(6): 49-52.

参考文献

[1] 郭任重, 苏纪平, 陈平. 扁桃体切除术患者住院费用影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2014, 21(6):30-32. GUO Renzhong, SU Jiping, CHEN Ping. Analysis of influencing factors on hospitalization costs of tonsillectomy patients[J]. Chin Health Qual Manag, 2014, 21(6):30-32.
[2] Stucken E Z, Grunstein E, Haddad J Jr, et al. Factors contributing to cost in partial versus total tonsillectomy[J]. Laryngoscope, 2013, 123(11):2868-2872.
[3] Windfuhr J P, Toepfner N, Steffen G. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis II. Surgical management[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2016, 273(4):989-1009.
[4] 吕晨, 邹建玲, 沈淑华, 等. 视觉模拟量表和语言评价量表用于术后疼痛评估的比较[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2004, 2(4):214-215, 219. LÜ Chen, ZOU Jianling, SHEN Shuhua, et al. A comparison of the verbal rating scale and the visual analog scale for pain assessment in postoperative patients[J]. Clin Edu Gen Prac, 2004, 2(4):214-215, 219.
[5] de Tovar C, von Baeyer C L, Wood C, et al. Postoperative self-report of pain in children: interscale agreement, response to analgesic, and preference for a faces scale and a visual analogue scale[J]. Pain Res Manag, 2010, 15(3):163-168.
[6] 庹华为, 黄志纯, 冯旭, 等. 超声刀扁桃体切除术的临床病理研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2015, 22(5):261-264. TUO Huawei, HUANG Zhichun, FENG Xu, et al. Clinical research about harmonic scalpel for tonsillectomy[J]. Chin Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 22(5):261-264.
[7] Georgalas C C, Tolley N S, Narula A. Tonsillitis[J]. BMJ Clin Evid, 2009, 2009.pii:0503.
[8] Noordzij J P, Affleck B D. Coblation versus unipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patients[J]. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116(8):1303-1309.
[9] 项光早, 胡建文, 陈伟军. 低温等离子辅助扁桃体切除术与传统手术疗效的比较[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2013, 20(12):653-654.
[10] 张立庆, 杨翠方, 周华群, 等. 低温等离子刀、超声刀及传统方式行扁桃体切除术的比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(3):56-60. ZHANG Liqing, YANG Cuifang, ZHOU Huaqun, et al. Comparison of coblation, ultrasonic knife and conventional approach in tonsillectomy[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2016, 30(3):56-60.
[11] Weimert T A, Babyak J W, Richter H J. Electrodissection tonsillectomy[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1990, 116(2):186-188.
[12] Cardozo A A, Hallikeri C, Lawrence H, et al. Teenage and adult tonsillectomy: dose-response relationship between diathermy energy used and morbidity[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2007, 32(5):366-371.
[13] Ozkiri??塂 M, Kapusuz Z, Saydam L. Comparison of three techniques in adult tonsillectomy[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270(3):1143-1147.
[14] Hong S M, Cho J G, Chae S W, et al. Coblation vs. electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective randomized study comparing clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults[J]. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 6(2):90-93.
[15] Modi V K, Monforte H, Geller K A, et al. Histologic assessment of thermal injury to tonsillectomy specimens: a comparison of electrocautery, coblation, harmonic scalpel, and tonsillotome[J]. Laryngoscope, 2009, 119(11):2248-2251.
[16] García Callejo F J, Rincón Piedrahita I, Monzó Gandía R, et al. Factors related to post-tonsillectomy pain in adults[J]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 2016, 67(1):23-32.
[17] Ragab S M. Six years of evidence-based adult dissection tonsillectomy with ultrasonic scalpel, bipolar electrocautery, bipolar radiofrequency or ‘cold steel’ dissection[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2012, 126(10):1056-1062.
[18] Sarny S, Ossimitz G, Habermann W, et al. Hemorrhage following tonsil surgery: a multicenter prospective study[J]. Laryngoscope, 2011, 121(12):2553-2560.
[19] Neumann C, Street I, Lowe D, et al. Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy: a systematic review of evidence for postoperative hemorrhage[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2007, 137(3):378-384.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘迪,谢应恒,朱斌,马霖,关兵,王莹,曹清,焦成,严齐,孙海勇,马伟. 不同性别未成年人鼻出血与环境气象因素相关性及滞后效应[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 47-54.
[2]	曾琪璎,朱华明,关建,吴红敏,叶海波,易红良. 双极电凝镊应用于治疗Shamblin Ⅲ 型颈动脉体瘤6例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 70-76.
[3]	王尧,陈静怡,杨颖超,苏开明. 先天性纤维蛋白原缺乏症儿童的扁桃体腺样体切除病例分析1例及文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 77-80.
[4]	郭翔,马永强,伊海金. 突发性聋磁共振检查的现状与进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 140-144.
[5]	常换换,党攀红,胡春燕,王洁. 儿童腺样体切除术后寰枢椎半脱位6例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 110-116.
[6]	肖哲,张胜娟,赵子琦,兴辰,李成泉,刘志强. Ultra Q:YAG激光治疗黄斑部视网膜前出血17例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 130-135.
[7]	罗露,周恩,肖旭平,林志强,方志杰,吕晓虹. 等离子点状激发技术在儿童OSA扁桃体腺样体切除术联合围手术期快速康复中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 26-30.
[8]	郑露,程杰,欧阳虹,池花明,杜敬东. A型血友病致难治性鼻出血1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 86-90.
[9]	朱慧涛,陈丽倩,陶艳丽. 扁桃体术后口干发生机制及防治研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 131-135.
[10]	付庆毓,刘添添,王平平,刘陇黔. 4 526例开放性眼外伤流行病学特点及预后因素影响分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 26-33.
[11]	冯琰琰,张丹旭,张康大,王林雨,王焕亮. 耳大神经阻滞对人工耳蜗植入术后患儿苏醒期谵妄的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(1): 15-19.
[12]	马志强,宋惠芸,于海玲. 扁桃体、腺样体切除术对语音及嗓音影响研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(1): 120-123.
[13]	张丰珍, 王桂香, 魏沄沄, 张亚梅, 赵靖, 王华, 李宏彬, 李晓丹, 张杰. 合并轻度出血性疾病的扁桃体和(或)腺样体切除术患儿围手术期管理[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 66-72.
[14]	师晓丽, 牟鸿. 多学科联合诊治重度儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征并发肺动脉高压1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 116-119.
[15]	沈倪美,钱茂华,金加欣,秦阳,王军,吴莺,高刚. 超声刀在扁桃体肿瘤切除术中的应用体会[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 62-66.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed