山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 38-41.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.181

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

听力筛查未通过婴幼儿的客观听力评估

余崇仙,杨克林,张晓敏,汪平   

  1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 合肥  230022
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-14 发布日期:2013-12-16
  • 作者简介:余崇仙。 Email:Wendy0091@126.com

Objective hearing evaluation of infants failed in hearing screening

YU Chong-xian, YANG Ke-lin, ZHANG Xiao-min, WANG Ping   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,  Hefei 230022,  China
  • Received:2013-04-14 Published:2013-12-16

摘要:

目的    分析听力筛查未通过婴幼儿的客观听力学特征,为早期干预提供科学依据。方法    对听力筛查未通过患儿286例进行听力诊断性检查。采用听性脑干反应(ABR)、40Hz听觉相关电位(40Hz-AERP)、畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)、声导抗进行评估。结果    286例婴幼儿中双耳听力正常95例(33.22%);听力损失者191例(66.78%),其中单耳听力损失70例(24.47%),双耳听力损失121(42.31%);传导性听力损失59例(20.63%),感音神经性听力损失132例(46.15%);轻度听力损失91例(31.82%),中度43例(15.03%),重度20例(6.99%),极重度37例(12.94%)。191例听力异常者只有16例复查,占8.38%,复查结果:听力正常2例,双耳听力损失10例,单耳听力损失4例。结论    部分听力筛查未通过婴幼儿的听力可随着听觉神经系统发育的完善恢复正常;同时中耳病变也是部分婴幼儿听力筛查未通过的影响因素;客观听力学组合测试可有效评估听力筛查未通过患儿的听力特征,为听力损失的早期诊断、早期干预提供科学依据;听力异常患儿的复查率低和失访率高仍是目前亟需解决的问题。

关键词: 听力筛查, 听觉诱发电位, 声导抗, 婴幼儿

Abstract:

Objective    To analyze the audiological characteristics in infants failed in hearing screening and provide useful information for early intervention in this population. Methods    Between January 2011 and December 2012, 286 infants who failed hearing screening in one or two ears received a full audiological test battery consisted of auditory brainstem responses(ABRs), 40Hz auditory event related potential(40Hz—AERP), distortion product otoacoustic emissions(DPOAEs)and tympanometry. Results    95(33.22%) infants were normal hearing subjects and 191(66.78%)showed hearing loss, which was either unilateral(n=70, 24.47%) or bilateral(n=121, 42.31%), including 59 cases(20.63%) of conductive hearing loss and 132 cases(46.15%) of sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing loss ranged from mild(n=91, 31.82%), moderate(n=43, 15.03%), severe(n=20, 6.99%) to profound(n=37, 12.94%). Testing  was repeated in 16(8.38%) of these 191 infants with hearing loss. The results turned out that 2 of them became normal, while 10 were bilateral loss and  4  were unilateral loss. Conclusion    The hearing level in some infants who failed hearing screening can turn into normal owing to the development of auditory system. Middle ear function may be a confusing factor in hearing screening. The audiological characteristics in infants failed in hearing screening can be evaluated by audiological test battery, which provides useful information for early identification and intervention in this population. The results of hearing screening should be interpreted appropriately. However, poor follow-up compliance is still a big problem in such efforts.

Key words: Infant, Hearing screening, Auditory evoked potentials, Tympanometry

中图分类号: 

  • R764.04
[1] 陈婷毅,龚慧,陈亮,梁平,王鲜,刘亚玲,胡亚柔,张国明. 影响婴幼儿定量视力评估检出的相关因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 118-125.
[2] 张晓,刘海红,刘薇,李颖,陈敏,刘冰,白杰,张杰,郑军,杨扬. 先天性单侧聋患儿112例临床资料分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 96-196.
[3] 李为,赵毅,葛玥铭,付洪涛,王进东,张晓龙,董洁,程钰翔. 双卵双胎和单卵双胎新生儿听力筛查结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(2): 1-6.
[4] 王娟,宋英鸾,耿江桥,温鑫,史雅楠. 婴幼儿急性上颌骨骨髓炎合并鼻中隔脓肿1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 91-96.
[5] 盘琳琳, 方旭华, 翟丰, 桂一丁, 边洲亮, 陈洁. 新生儿动脉血血气分析与听力筛查结果相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 20-24.
[6] 倪坤, 孙世冰, 李晓艳. 1 000 Hz声导抗在高危新生儿听力筛查中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 43-47.
[7] 黄桂亮,孙昌志,罗仁忠,陈彦球,刘少锋,许家健. 内镜在婴幼儿舌根囊肿手术中的临床应用分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 100-105.
[8] 盘琳琳, 孔令漪, 翟丰, 陈洁. 新生儿听力障碍常见危险因素及听力筛查方法研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 131-137.
[9] 陈坤,李磊,孟国珍,杨军,侯东明. 婴幼儿先天性基底型脑膜脑膨出的诊断及鼻内镜手术治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 77-81.
[10] 孙夏雨,陈建勇, 段茂利,杨军. 新生儿婴幼儿前庭功能发育和评估的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 82-88.
[11] 邢宇轩,蒋雯,仝悦,吴扬,刘稳,乔月华. 听力正常青年人宽频声导抗能量吸收率的初步研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(1): 38-41.
[12] 周佳蕾,孙世冰,李晓艳. 婴幼儿宽频声导抗测试[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 91-94.
[13] 周佳蕾,孙世冰,李静雨,陈芳,李晓艳. 婴幼儿自动听性脑干诱发电位不同测试时间的比较及意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(2): 66-69.
[14] 王海,苟栋明,陈伟. 经口吹气治疗幼儿鼻腔异物45例疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(1): 61-63.
[15] 苗刚勇, 肖旭平, 谭志强. 低温等离子射频技术在婴幼儿甲状舌管囊肿手术中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 52-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!