抗VEGF药物(雷珠单抗)治疗不同病程湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性62例

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2014.075

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察抗VEGF药物(雷珠单抗)治疗不同病程湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性的临床疗效。方法临床诊断为湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者62例(62眼)纳入研究，分为A、B两组，A组：32眼，病程在6个月内；B组：病程在6～12个月，30眼。所有患者确诊后，每月行玻璃体腔内注入雷珠单抗0.5 mg，连续注药3次，以后根据每月复查情况决定是否需要再次注射。治疗后随访12个月。复查记录患者视力、眼压、眼底及OCT检查，每3个月做一次荧光素眼底血管造影(FFA)检查。A组患者ETDRS视力表平均字母数为(52.36±8.62)个,平均CRT为(334.62±50.26)μm。B组患者ETDRS视力表平均字母数为(36.41±6.73)个，平均CRT为(368.37±40.52)μm。观察两组患者治疗前后视力增加字母数、黄斑中心视网膜厚度(CRT)减少量及两组注药次数比较。结果患者首次注射后3、6、12个月，A组ETDRS视力表提高字母数分别为(16.82±3.56、17.33±3.47、15.72±4.38)个，B组提高字母数分别为(9.23±2.51、10.22±3.46、8.34±3.51)个，A组首次注射后3、6、12个月提高的字母数分别多于B组提高的字母数，差异有统计学意义(t=9.643,8.074,7.290； P<0.05)。A组首次注射后3、6、12个月CRT减少量分别为(175.86±55.23、168.75±46.38、173.58±35.63)μm，B组CRT减少量分别为(102.34±32.31,93.76±28.73,89.65±27.82)μm，A组首次注射后3、6、12个月CRT减少量分别多于B组减少量，差异有统计学意义(t=6.342,7.593,10.291； P<0.05)。随访至12月时，A组平均注射(4.6±1.7)次，B组平均注射(6.8±2.2)次，差异有统计学意义(t=4.422， P<0.05)。结论雷珠单抗对病程小于6个月湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的视力提高、黄斑水肿的疗效优于病程6～12月者。早期治疗可减少治疗次数，从而降低治疗成本。

关键词: 黄斑变性/治疗, 雷珠单抗, 抗体, 脉络膜新生血管

Abstract: Objective To observe the effectiveness of lucentise, an anti- VEGF drug, in the treatment of different courses of wet age-related macular degeneration. Methods 62 cases of wet age-related macular degeneration, including 62 eyes, enrolled into the study. According to the courses of disease, 32 eyes were divided into group A (<6 months) and the other 30 eyes in group B (6-12 months). All the patients received intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (0.5 mg)once a month for 3 consecutive months. At the end of each month, assessment were made to determine whether the next injection was necessary. In a 12-month follow-up,FFA examination was performed every three months. For group A, the average number of letters on ETDRS visual acuity chart was (52.36±8.62), and the average CRT was (334.62±50.26) μm. The corresponding results for Group B were (36.41±6.73) and (368.37±40.52) μm. Visual acuity before and after treatment were observed. The number of letters, macular retinal thickness (CRT) and the injection times between the two groups were compared. Results In group A, 3,6,12 months after the first injection,the improvements of the number of letters in ETDRS eye chart were 16.82 ± 3.56,17.33±3.47 and 15.72±4.38, respectively, compared to 9.23±2.51,10.22±3.46 and 8.34±3.51 in group B (t=9.643,8.074,7.290; P<0.05). The decrease of CRT at 3, 6, 12 months after the first injection were 175.86±55.23 μm, 168.75±46.38 μm and 173.58±35.63 μm in group A,compared to 102.34±32.31 μm, 93.76±28.73 μm and 89.65±27.82 μm in group B (t=6.342,7.593,10.291; P<0.05). In the first year of follow-up, the patients in group A were injected 4.6±1.7 times on average, while the number in group B were 6.8±2.2 times (t=4.422, P<0.05). Conclusion Anti-VEGF drugs (lucentise) demonstrates better clinical results on visual acuity improvement and decrease of CRT thickness for wet age-related macular degeneration patients with duration less than six months than those with duration between six to twelve months. Early application of lucentise injection can reduce the injection times and cost for the treatment.

Key words: Macular degeneration/treatment, Choroidal neovascularization, Antibody, Lucentis

中图分类号:

R774.5

龚斌, 范传峰, 王玉. 抗VEGF药物(雷珠单抗)治疗不同病程湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性62例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(5): 58-61.

GONG Bin, FAN Chuan-feng, WANG Yu. Anti VEGF drugs(lucentis) to treat different courses of wet age-related maculardegeneration (62 cases report)[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY), 2014, 28(5): 58-61.

参考文献

[1] Nowak J Z.Age-related macular degeneration (AMD): pathogenesis and therapy[J]. Pharmacol Rep, 2006, 58(3):353-363.
[2] 刘家琦,李凤鸣.实用眼科学[M].北京：人民卫生出版社,2010：445-447.
[3] Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress[J]. EndocrRev, 2004, 25(4):581-611.
[4] Lalwani G A, Rosenfeld P J, Fung A E, et al. A variable-dosing regimen with intravitreal rannibizumab for nevovascular age-related macular degeneration:year 2 of the PrONTO Study[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009, 148(1):43-58.
[5] Li X X, Hu Y H, Sun X, et al. Bevacizumab for neovascular age related macular degeneration in China[J]. Ophthalmology, 2012, 119(10):2087-2093.
[6] Machalińska A, Karczewicz D. Role of complement system in the pathogenesis of AMD[J]. Klin Oczna, 2009, 111(10-12):384-387.
[7] Potter M J, Szabo S M. One-year outcomes after photodynamic therapy in patients with age-related macular degeneration with poor baseline visual acuity[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2006, 244(8)：1026-1028.
[8] 戴虹,喻晓兵,龙力,等.抗血管内皮生长因子单克隆抗体ranibizumab治疗渗出型老年性黄斑变性方案的探讨[J].中华眼底病杂志,2010,26(1)：9-12. DAI Hong, YU Xiaobing, LONG Li, et al. Intravitreal Ranibizumab regimens for exudative aged-related macular degeneration[J]. Chin J Ocular Fundus Dis, 2010, 26(1):9-12.
[9] 李晓陵,何守志,王炜,等.抗血管内皮生长因子单克隆抗体ranibizumab治疗渗出型老年性黄斑变性的一年疗效观察[J].中华眼底病杂志,2011,27(6):515-519. LI Xiaoling, HE Shouzhi, WANG Wei, et al. Clinical observation of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for 12 consecutive months treating exudative agerelated macular degeneration[J]. Chin J Ocular Fundus Dis, 2011,27 (6): 515-519.

相关文章 15

[1]	孙庆祝,沈健,陈星,吴雁冰,曾论. 代谢指标在预测糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者雷珠单抗疗效中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 74-81.
[2]	陈兴雪,张广玲,武天义,王卫卫,孙占伟,李世超,王广科. 抗IL-4Rα单克隆抗体与鼻内镜手术治疗嗜酸性粒细胞型慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 43-54.
[3]	吴丽丽,曲毅. OCTA在病理性近视脉络膜新生血管应用及其在人工智能的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 144-149.
[4]	李婉玉,古学军. 抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎并发巩膜炎及白内障1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 149-152.
[5]	初宝睿,曲毅. 载siIKKβ脂质纳米粒的制备及其对巨噬细胞再极化的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(2): 91-97.
[6]	钟佳珂,王柏杨,伊海金. 以耳部症状首发、合并鼻咽占位的肉芽肿性多血管炎1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(1): 6-14.
[7]	顾冉冉,李凤娇,焦万珍,崔艳艳,赵博军. 卵磷脂络和碘胶囊辅助治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的临床疗效研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 46-50.
[8]	张陶然,王薇,李明铭,黄映湘. IVR治疗mCNV患者黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 68-71.
[9]	任雨馨,赵博军. 病理性近视脉络膜新生血管的诊断与治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 157-162.
[10]	刘建波,张环. 超声乳化联合玻璃体腔药物注射治疗白内障合并糖尿病性黄斑水肿[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 99-104.
[11]	周学义,李一鸣,王美菊,张苑苑,张历浊. 25+微创玻璃体视网膜手术联合玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗增生型糖尿病视网膜病变的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 87-89.
[12]	靳琳,潘庆敏,胡磊. 玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗CSME及NCSME的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(2): 96-98.
[13]	严槟,尹小芳,叶祖科,卢彦,洪剑威. 玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合GLP治疗BRVO-ME的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(1): 110-113.
[14]	赵露,谢国丽,王艳玲. 玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗对湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者眼血流动力学的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 101-104.
[15]	柴雪荣, 张士玺, 陶钰, 申家泉. 玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合小梁切除术及全视网膜光凝治疗新生血管性青光眼的效果评价[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(3): 72-75.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed