山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 105-108.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.002

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

玻璃体腔注射康柏西普治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的临床观察

严晓腾,冯军,康欣乐   

  1. 徐州医学院附属淮安医院眼科, 江苏 淮安 223002
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-01 出版日期:2016-08-16 发布日期:2016-08-16
  • 作者简介:严晓腾. E-mail:caoben0429@sina.com

Intravitreal injection of conbercept for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

YAN Xiaoteng, FENG Jun, KANG Xinle   

  1. Deparment of ophthalmology, Affiliated Huaian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, Huaian 223002, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2016-01-01 Online:2016-08-16 Published:2016-08-16

摘要: 目的 探讨玻璃体腔注射康柏西普治疗视网膜静脉阻塞(retinal vein occlusion, RVO)继发黄斑水肿(macular edema, ME)的有效性。 方法 采用前瞻性连续性非对照的临床病例分析。选择2014年9月至2015年2月就诊的RVO继发ME 30例30眼,其中视网膜中央静脉阻塞(central retinal vein occlusion, CRVO)继发的ME 9例9眼,视网膜分支静脉阻塞(branch retinal vein occlusion, BRVO)继发的ME 21例21眼。玻璃体腔注射康柏西普治疗3次,随访6个月,观察最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity, BCVA)、黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度(central macular thickness, CMT)。 结果 BRVO患眼治疗前及治疗后6个月BCVA分别为(0.77±0.24)logMAR、(0.27±0.19)logMAR,CMT分别为(596.8±139.6)μm、(272.6±29.2)μm,差异具有显著统计学意义(t=4.483, P<0.05; t=7.189, P<0.05);CRVO患眼治疗前及治疗后6个月BCVA分别为(0.87±0.55)logMAR、(0.43±0.2)logMAR,CMT分别为(647.3±163.6)μm、(393.1±121.5)μm,差异具有显著统计学意义(t=2.288, P<0.05; t=7.189, P<0.05)。 结论 玻璃体腔注射康柏西普是一种治疗RVO继发ME的有效方式。

关键词: 视网膜静脉阻塞, 黄斑水肿, 康柏西普, 玻璃体腔注射

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of intravitreal injection of conbercept for macular edema(ME)secondary to retinal vein occlusion(RVO). Methods A prospective, continuity and uncontrolled clinical case analysis was used. Thirty cases(30 eyes)with ME secondary to RVO in our hospital from September 2014 to February 2015 were selected, in which 9 cases(9 eyes)were central retinal vein occlusion(CRVO)and 21 cases(21 eyes)were branch retinal vein occlusion(BRVO). All cases were treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept for 3 times and followed up for 6 months. Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and central macular thickness(CMT)were observed. Results In patients with BRVO, mean BCVA before treatment and 6 months after treatment were(0.77±0.24)logMAR,(0.27±0.19)logMAR, and CMT were(596.8±139.6)μm,(272.6±29.2)μm, respectively, the difference has statistical significance(t=4.483, P<0.05; t=7.189, P<0.05). In patients with CRVO, mean BCVA before treatment and 6 months after treatment were(0.87±0.55)logMAR,(0.43±0.2)logMAR, and CMT were(647.3±163.6)μm,(393.1±121.5)μm, respectively, the difference has statistical significance(t=2.288, P<0.05; t=7.189, P<0.05). Conclusion Intravitreal injections of conbercept is effective for ME secondary to RVO.

Key words: Intravitreal injection, Retinal vein occlusion, Macular edema, Conbercept

中图分类号: 

  • R774.5
[1] Klein R, Klein B E, Moss S E, et al. The epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: the Beaver Dam Eye Study[J]. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 2000, 98:133-141.
[2] Finkelstein D. Ischemic macular edema. Recognition and favorable natural history in branch vein occlusion[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1992, 110(10):1427-1434.
[3] 乔森(著), 陈有信(译). 视网膜血管性疾病[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2011: 423.
[4] Klein M L, Finkelstein D. Macular grid photocoagulation for macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1989, 107(9):1297-1302.
[5] Parodi M B, Saviano S, Ravalico G. Grid laser treatment in macular branch retinal vein occlusion[J]. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 1999(12):1024-1027.
[6] Jonas J B, Kreissig I, Kamppeter B, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of intraocular edematous and neovascular diseases[J]. Ophthalmologe, 2004, 101(2):113-120.
[7] Noma H, Minamoto A, Funatsu H, et al. Intravitreal levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 are correlated with macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion[J]. Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2006, 244(3):309-315.
[8] Brown D M, Campochiaro P A, Bhisitkul R B, et al. Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: 12-month outcomes of a phase III study[J]. Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(8):1594-1602.
[9] Campochiaro P A, Brown D M, Awh C C, et al. Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: twelve-month outcomes of a phase III study[J]. Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(10):2041-2049.
[1] 朱明琼,李征,刘茹,田涛,彭婧利,吕倩怡,谭华霞. 基于OCT/OCTA的AI筛查系统在抗VEGF治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者效果评价中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 68-73.
[2] 孙庆祝,沈健,陈星,吴雁冰,曾论. 代谢指标在预测糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者雷珠单抗疗效中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 74-81.
[3] 朱云龙,王平,高萌. 误诊为中浆及视网膜炎的后巩膜炎1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 99-105.
[4] 丁术梁,王超凡,刘建亮. 眼内液检测指导精准治疗急性视网膜坏死1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 114-117.
[5] 沈嘉琪,李潇飒,毕燕龙,张敬法. 人工智能在DME筛查、诊断和预后中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 153-159.
[6] 鲍莹,刘志高,姜鹏飞,崔文轩,郑晓霞,杨梦瑶,司明威,王玉,王红. 康柏西普治疗糖尿病合并CRVO-ME高反射点的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 55-60.
[7] 常威威,焦万珍,崔艳艳,赵杰,刘兆强,赵博军. 糖尿病性黄斑缺血的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 130-136.
[8] 周静琳,李金香,曾琦. 577 nm阈值下微脉冲激光联合抗VEGF药物治疗难治性糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 18-25.
[9] 何静,雷春燕,张美霞. 糖化血红蛋白变异指数与糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 34-40.
[10] 刘天蔚,赵博军. 年轻人群视网膜静脉阻塞研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 128-137.
[11] 唐慧新,李景景,邹红. 阈值下微脉冲激光光凝作用机制及临床应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 143-148.
[12] 顾冉冉,李凤娇,焦万珍,崔艳艳,赵博军. 卵磷脂络和碘胶囊辅助治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的临床疗效研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 46-50.
[13] 王惠, 王俊,孙乙,于腾飞,朱玉广, 朱艳. 玻璃体腔注射HGF-MSCs对糖尿病大鼠视网膜HGF表达的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 72-77.
[14] 韩克阳,于贝贝,赵博军. 短期视网膜静脉阻塞抗VEGF治疗后黄斑区形态结构分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 129-131.
[15] 刘建波,张环. 超声乳化联合玻璃体腔药物注射治疗白内障合并糖尿病性黄斑水肿[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 99-104.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!