山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 68-71.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.512

• ·论著· • 上一篇    下一篇

两种人工晶体计算公式预测闭角型青光眼合并白内障患者超声乳化手术后屈光度准确性的比较

高雪,郝琳琳,刘少华,张晗   

  1. 山东大学第二医院眼科, 山东 济南 250033
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-06 出版日期:2018-01-20 发布日期:2018-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 张晗. E-mail:zhanghan0696@139.com

Comparison of two intraocular lens measurement formulas for prediction of postoperative refraction accuracy in patients with angle closure glaucoma and cataract

GAO Xue, HAO Linlin, LIU Shaohua, ZHANG Han   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-12-06 Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-01-20

摘要: 目的 比较闭角型青光眼(ACG)合并白内障患者行白内障超声乳化联合人工晶状体植入术两种人工晶体测算公式预测术后屈光度准确性。 方法 前瞻性系列病例研究。观察2017年1月至2017年8月在行白内障手术的房角关闭≤180°的ACG并白内障患者46 例(46眼)术前、术后3个月的视力,眼压、最佳矫正视力、中央前房深度的变化情况,记录术前SRK-T与Haigis公式各自预测术后屈光度数、术后实际屈光度数,预期术后屈光度数与术后等效球镜差值的绝对值记为绝对屈光误差值(ME),比较两种公式ME。 结果 术后3个月46眼与术前相比视力及最佳矫正视力提高,眼压下降,中央前房深度明显加深,且差异均有统计学意义(t=-3.98~-10.14, P≤0.01)。受检眼术后残余屈光度为-0.79±0.45 D,SRK-T公式术前预期屈光度为-0.89±0.17 D,其ME为0.34±0.27 D;Haigis公式术前预期屈光度为-1.01±1.04 D,其ME为0.65±0.48 D。两组间ME的差异有统计学意义(t=-4.05, P<0.05)。AL与SRK-T 公式ME呈显著负相关性(r=-0.64, P≤0.01),而与Haigis公式ME无显著相关性(r=-0.09, P>0.05)。 结论 对于ACG合并白内障患者行白内障超声乳化联合人工晶状体植入术是安全有效的;对此类患者选择SRK-T人工晶体测算公式术后屈光度准确性可能更高。

关键词: 白内障超声乳化术, 人工晶体测算公式, 屈光误差, 青光眼, 闭角型

Abstract: Objective This study compared the SRK-T and Haigis intraocular lens(IOL)measurement formulas for prediction of accuracy in angle closure glaucoma(ACG)combined with cataract. Methods This prospective study of 46 patients(46 eyes)with ACG was performed between January and August 2017. All patients underwent vision, best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP), and central anterior chamber depth(ACD)testing, with subsequent phacoemulsification and cataract extraction with IOL implantation. We used two IOL measurement formulas for prediction of postoperative refraction accuracy and compared the mean absolute refractive error(ME)of the two formulas. Results The differences in vision, BCVA, IOP, and ACD were statistically significant(all P<0.01). The ME using the SRK-T formula was significantly smaller than the ME using the Haigis formula(P<0.05). The AL was negatively correlated with the ME measured with the SRK-T formula and showed no significant correlation with the ME measured with the Haigis formula. Conclusion Simple phacoemulsification and cataract extraction with IOL implantation is effective for ACG. The SRK-T formula showed greater predictive accuracy in the ACG group.

Key words: Angle closure, Phacoemulsification, Refractive error, Glaucoma, Intraocular lens measurement formula

中图分类号: 

  • R775
[1] Nongpiur ME, He M, Amerasinghe N, et al. Lens vault, thickness, andposition in Chinese subjects with angle closure[J]. Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(3):474-479.
[2] Prager TC, Hardten DR, Fogal BJ. Enhancing intraocular lens outcome precision: an evaluation of axial length determinations, keratometry, and IOL formulas[J]. Ophthalmol Clin North Am, 2006, 19(4):435-448.
[3] Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1993, 19(6):700-712.
[4] Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review[J]. Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 2007, 85(5):472-485.
[5] 黄振平.屈光手术的最新技术及其临床应用[J].医学研究生学报,2007,20(4):337-342.
[6] Binkhorst RD. The optical design of intraocular lens implants[J]. Ophthalmic Surg, 1975, 6(3):17-31.
[7] Aphinives P, Vachirodom D, Thanapaisal C, et al. A comparison of letrozole and anastrozole followed by letrozole in breast cancer patients[J]. Breast Cancer, 2015, 20(7):37-41.
[8] Schroder S, Wagenpfeil S, Leydolt C, et al. Interpretation of the intraocular lens constants for the haigis formula[J]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 2017, 234(8):975-978.
[9] 冯小赛,辛延峰,陈舒,等.人工晶体植入术后前房深度变化的分析[J].浙江临床医学,2007,9(6):807.
[10] 张劲松.白内障超声乳化手术设备的新进展[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2009,27(6):553-555.
[11] Zhao ZF, Duan XX, Song YL. Therapeutic effects study of phacoemulsification and manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2011, 11(8):1407-1408.
[12] Liu XY. The post-operation survival quality comparison between cataract phacoemulsification and small incision extracapsular cataract extraction[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2006, 6(5):1153-1155.
[13] Varma DK, Kletke SN, Rai AS, et al. Proportion of undetected narrow angles or angle closure in cataract surgery referrals[J]. Can J Ophthalmol, 2017, 52(4):366-372.
[14] Stark WJ, Worthen D, Holladay JT, et al. Neodymium: YAG lasers. An FDA report[J]. Ophthalmology, 1985, 92(2):209-212.
[15] Wunder H. Increase A-scan accuracy for improved outcomes[J]. Rev Ophthalmol, 2003, 10(1):36-38.
[16] Joo J, Whang WJ, Oh TH, et al. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle closure glaucoma[J]. Korean J Ophthalmol, 2011, 25(6):375-379.
[17] Mezer E, Rootman DS, Abdolell M, et al. Early postoperative refractive outcomes of pediatric intraocular lens implantation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(3):603-610.
[18] Seitz B, Bebren SA, Langerburcher A. Cornea topography[J]. Curt Opinion Ophthalmol, 1999, 8(2):8-24.
[19] Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, et al. Underestimation of intraoeular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photo refractive kerateotomy[J]. Ophthalmol, 1999, 106(4):693-702.
[20] Haigis W. IOL power calculations[J]. Ophthalmology, 2010, 117(2):400-401.
[21] Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1990, 16(3):333-340.
[1] 王新萌,姬俊雅,于浩南,付鸿臣,王翔,郑泽坤,李艳,钟莹莹. 急性闭角型青光眼超声乳化联合房角分离术后屈光预测准确性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 74-79.
[2] 杨臻,孟素坤,张纯. 单眼小梁消融术后对侧眼的眼压同感反应[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 43-51.
[3] 李洋,马萍,张晗. 不同术式对青光眼术后角膜散光的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 137-143.
[4] 丁晓敏,崔彦. 新型冠状病毒与眼科相关研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 122-127.
[5] 孟素坤,张纯. 小梁消融术治疗开角型青光眼患者的长期视野缺损研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 139-148.
[6] 何梦,唐莉. 远程医疗在青光眼诊疗管理中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 187-195.
[7] 张懿,唐莉. Lowe综合征合并青光眼1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 93-97.
[8] 钟煜, 廖智敏,段宣初. XEN微支架在青光眼手术中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(1): 145-151.
[9] 孙极综述李灿审校. 白内障术后人工晶状体轴向位置预测与稳定性相关影响因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 7-12.
[10] 李彦松综述朱玉广审校. 泪膜稳定性对超声乳化术后视觉质量影响的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 19-25.
[11] 石博影,梁皓,李一洪,唐东永. Blau综合征成年患者抗青光眼手术后并发白内障手术治疗1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 60-65.
[12] 刘乐乐,孔香云综述申家泉审校. 睫状体分泌功能减弱性手术在青光眼治疗中的进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 123-128.
[13] 唐翡然,孔香云申家泉. 相干光层析血管成像术测量视盘旁浅层血管密度在青光眼诊疗中的作用研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 77-82.
[14] 赵颖,张珊许家骏,赵静如. 热休克蛋白72在青光眼视网膜神经节细胞中的保护机制研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(5): 83-87.
[15] 李萱, 黄映湘. 25例虹膜新生血管发生原因探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(4): 41-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!