咽喉反流伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者的治疗及其咽喉反流体征评分、症状指数特点

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.252

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析咽喉反流病(LPRD)伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者的咽喉反流体征评分(RFS)和咽喉反流症状指数(RSI)特点,探讨临床治疗效果。方法抽取100例LPRD患者,将其中合并有OSAS的患者作为观察组(n=39),其余作为对照组(n=61),观察两组RFS、RSI及呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)、血氧饱和度(SaO₂)、反流总数、总反流时间;比较治疗2个月后RSI、RFS评分。结果观察组RFS和RSI评分总分显著高于对照组,RFS体征差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),咽喉反流伴OSAS患者声门下水肿、喉室消失、杓会厌襞红斑/充血、喉黏膜水肿、后联合肥厚或肿胀评分显著高于单纯的咽喉反流患者(P<0.05),RSI评分中咽喉反流伴OSAS患者呼吸困难、烧心胸痛胃酸反流评分显著高于单纯的咽喉反流患者(P<0.05);治疗后,观察组RSI评分总分高于对照组(P均<0.05),对照组在呼吸困难、烧心胸痛胃酸反流方面明显优于观察组(P<0.05)。治疗前后,两组AHI、SaO₂、反流总数比较均差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组AHI、SaO₂均明显改善,与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组反流总数、总反流时间改善显著,对照组优于观察组(P<0.05)。结论伴OSAS会加重LPRD患者咽喉反流相关症状,可能是LPRD患者治疗效果和症状改善较差的原因。

关键词: 咽喉反流, 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征, 咽喉反流体征评分, 咽喉反流症状指数

Abstract: Objective To analyze the reflux finding score(RFS)and reflux symptom index(RSI)in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD)and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome(OSAS)and to observe the clinical treatment effect. Methods Between January 2016 and December 2017, 100 patients with LPRD were selected. Patients with OSAS were included as the observation group(n=39), and the rest were observed as the control group(n=61). The RFS and RSI were assessed in the two groups. The RSI, RFS, apnea-hypopnea index(AHI), blood oxygen saturation(SaO₂), total reflux, and total reflux time were compared after 2 months of treatment. Results The total RFS and RSI scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The difference in the signs of RFS was statistically significant(P<0.05). Subglottic edema, disappearance of the laryngeal chamber, anaphylactic erythema/congestion, laryngeal mucosal edema, and the posterior combined hypertrophy or swelling score were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05). In the RSI, the dyspnea, heartburn, chest pain, acid reflux, and gastric acid reflux scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05). After treatment, the RSI scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05), but the control group had significantly better dyspnea, heartburn, chest pain, and acid reflux scores than did the observation group(P<0.05). Before and after treatment, the AHI, SaO₂, and total reflux of the two groups were significantly different(P<0.05). The AHI and SaO₂ of the observation group showed a significant improvement after treatment than before treatment(P<0.05). The total reflux and total reflux time showed significant improvements in both the groups, but the improvement was better in the control group than in the observation group(P<0.05). Conclusion Coexisting OSAS may aggravate the symptoms associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with LPRD, which may be the cause of poor treatment outcome and symptom improvement in patients with LPRD.

Key words: Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, Reflux finding score, Reflux symptom index

中图分类号:

R766

胡安,邢艳莉,陈晓平,薛晓成,张燚,胥伟华. 咽喉反流伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者的治疗及其咽喉反流体征评分、症状指数特点[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 86-89.

HU An, XING Yanli, CHEN Xiaoping, XUE Xiaocheng, ZHANG Yi, XU Weihua. Treatment of coexisting obstructive sleep apnea and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and analysis of its characteristic reflux symptom index and reflux finding score[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(2): 86-89.

参考文献

[1] 程鹏,张晓红,周跟东.高血压合并阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者的动脉硬化程度比较[J].安徽医学,2017(3):309-312. CHENG Peng, ZHANG Xiaohong, ZHOU Gendong. Comparative study of atherosclerosis and inflammatory response in patients of hypertension with different levels of obstructive sleep apnea hypopea syndrome[J]. Anhui Med J, 2017(3):309-312.
[2] 梁国良,周志森,杨智学, 等.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征与夜间咽喉反流的相关性研究[J].中国医学创新,2015(29):27-29. LIANG Guoliang, ZHOU Zhisen, YANG Zhixue, et al. Correlation between obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome and nocturnal pharyngeal reflux[J]. Med Innovationof Chin, 2015(29):27-29.
[3] Fridman M, Maley A, Kelley K, et al. Impact of pH monitoring on laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment improved compliance and symptom resolution[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 144(4):558-562.
[4] 柴小花,张宁,许艳芳,等.质子泵抑制剂在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征伴咽喉反流者中的应用[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2012,18(3):179-182. CHAI Xiaohua, ZHANG Ning, XU Yanfang, et al. Application of proton pump inhibitor in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome with reflux[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Skull Base Surger, 2012, 18(3): 179-182.
[5] Eryılmaz A, Erien L, Demir UL, et al. Man-Agement of patients with coexisting obstructive sleep Apnea and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2012, 269(12):2575-2580.
[6] 张帆,彭一纯,冯宇莉.雷贝拉唑对咽喉反流伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者的疗效分析[J].牡丹江医学院学报,2013,34(1):42-44. ZHANF Fan, PENG Yichun, FENG Yuli. Therapeutic effect of rabeprazole on patients with pharyngeal reflux with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome[J]. J Mudanjiang Med Coll, 2013, 34(1):42-44.
[7] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编委会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉科学分会.儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征诊疗指南草案(乌鲁木齐)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,42(2):83-84. Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Otorhinolary.Chinese Otorhinolaryngology of Chinese Medical Ass. Draft of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(Urumqi)[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surg, 2007, 42(2):83-84.
[8] Thomas JP, Zubiaur M. Over-diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflus as the cause of hoarseness[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270(10):995-999.
[9] 刘庆松,闫燕.咽喉反流的客观诊断方法探讨[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2014,28(19):1536-1540. LIU Qingsong, YAN Yan. Exploration of Objective Diagnosis of Throat Reflux[J]. Clin J Otorhinolarynol Head Neck Surg, 2014, 28(19):1536-1540.
[10] 李进让.咽喉反流性疾病规范化诊断和治疗[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉科头颈外科杂志,2015,9(22):435-437. LI Jinrang. Standardized diagnosis and treatment of throat reflux disease[J]. Chin J Otorhinolarynol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 9(22):435-437.
[11] 李进让,Peter C Belafsky,张立红.中国喉科医师应用反流体征评分量表的信度研究[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2012,19(3):388-390. LI Jinrang, Belafsky PC, ZHANG Lihong. Reliability study of Chinese otolaryngologists using the anti-fluid scoring scale[J]. Chin J Otorhinolarynol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 19(3):388-390.
[12] 郑杰元,张立红,李晶兢,等.咽喉反流症状指数量表中文版的信度及效度评价[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2012,47(11):894-898. ZHENG Jieyuan, ZHANG Lihong, LI Jingqi, et al. Throat reflux symptoms refer to the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the quantitative table[J]. Chin J Otorhinolarynol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 47(11):894-898.
[13] 李进让,肖水芳,李湘平,等.咽喉反流性疾病诊断与治疗专家共识(2015年)解读[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2016,51(5):327-332 LI Jinrang, XIAO Shuifang, LI Xiangping, et al. Interpretation of the Experts on Diagnosis and Treatment of Throat Reflux Disease(2015)[J]. Chin J Otorhinolarynol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 51(5):327-332.

相关文章 15

[1]	吴玮,王磊,陈升,李连勇,王刚. 胃食管气道反流性疾病多学科研究及进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 1-14.
[2]	刘莲莲,李进让. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与咽喉反流[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 15-22.
[3]	张利,张梦茹,阿丽米热·艾尔肯,邱忠民. 咽喉反流性疾病在常见呼吸道疾病中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 23-29.
[4]	胡志伟,陈冬,杨栋,吴继敏. 胃食管气道反流性疾病的诊断和治疗:基于2020~2024年相关共识和指南[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 30-38.
[5]	赵佳宁,崔元馨,王丹,赵明. 咽喉反流与复发性呼吸道乳头状瘤病的关系及其机制探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 39-45.
[6]	张杉,陈秋,周方伟,马亦飞. 生物标志物在咽喉反流性疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 46-54.
[7]	周诗侗,杨艳艳,杨玉成,方红雁. 胃蛋白酶与咽喉反流性疾病:从致病机制到咽喉鳞状细胞癌的潜在风险因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 55-60.
[8]	席晓宇,隋昕珂,陈升,李连勇,钟长青. 咽喉反流性疾病的内镜下治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 61-65.
[9]	牛燕燕,顾伟,金晓峰,霍红,杨大海,崔婷婷,王剑. 声带白斑组织中胃蛋白酶的表达分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 66-70.
[10]	王磊,王刚,孙喆喆,刘红丹,韩浩伦,李保卫,张晓丽,吴玮. 咽喉反流与声带良性增生性病变、声带白斑、慢性咽喉炎相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 71-77.
[11]	崔小缓,尹龙龙,张延平,蒋兴旺,李丽娜. 咽喉反流患者唾液菌群与反流症状相关性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 78-84.
[12]	李逗,隋昕珂,杨小慢,郭红媛,王敏,钟长青,李连勇. 单纯咽喉反流患者食管下段黏膜细胞内镜及病理指标变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 85-90.
[13]	孙喆喆,王刚,王磊,李保卫,韩浩伦,刘红丹,张晓丽,吴玮. 咽喉反流性疾病不同体位反流模式的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 91-95.
[14]	魏鑫,邢东升,翟振伟,阎艾慧,刘振宇,曹弘薇. 妊娠期女性咽喉反流症状指数调查及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 96-102.
[15]	李逢将,魏婕,刘红丹,张丽,赵伟超,武娜娜,王磊,吴玮,王瑞娟. 老年肺炎患者胃食管反流病和咽喉反流性疾病25例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 103-107.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed