窄带成像技术在咽喉反流诊断中的优势应用

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.108

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨窄带成像技术(NBI)在咽喉反流(LPR)诊断中的作用。方法根据我国2015年咽喉反流性疾病诊断与治疗专家共识的标准招募39例咽喉反流阳性患者(LPR组)和19例阴性对照,参与者均完成反流症状指数评分量表(RSI)和反流体征评分量表(RFS)评分及NBI下的电子喉镜检查。结果 39例LPR患者中2例失访。与共识的标准比较,NBI技术灵敏度是94.6%,特异性是78.9%( Kappa=0.755,P<0.001)。治疗前:LPR组NBI阳性率为94.6%,RFS的阳性率为94.6%,对照组NBI阳性率为21.1%,RSI的阳性率为24.3%。LPR组NBI阳性率与RFS阳性率一致且有统计学意义(P=0.003),与RSI阳性率存在差异,且二者结论一致性较差(P=0.040)。LPR组与对照组阳性率不同,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。治疗后:仅21例LPR患者参与复查。NBI下的阳性率为71.4%,RSI阳性率为9.5%,二者结论一致性较差(P<0.001)。RFS阳性率为61.9%,与NBI相对比一致性好(Kappa=0.576,P=0.007)。21例随访患者治疗前后阳性率由90.5%下降为71.4%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.119)。结论 NBI技术具有较好的诊断咽喉反流的价值。

关键词: 咽喉反流, 窄带成像, 诊断, 微血管成像, 反流症状指数评分量表, 反流体征评分量表

Abstract: Objective To explore the possible role of narrow band imaging(NBI)in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR). Methods According to the Chinese domestic expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR), we recruited 39 LPR patients who visited our outpatient department. All patients were assessed using the reflux symptom index(RSI)and questionnaires on the reflux finding score(RFS)and NBI endoscopy before and after treatment. At the same time, we selected 19 symptom-negative controls and completed the above examinations. Results Initially, we recruited 39 LPR-positive patients, although two were lost. Compared with the consensus standard, the sensitivity of NBI was 94.6%, its specificity was 78.9%,(Kappa=0.755, P<0.001). Before treatment: According to NBI, the positivity rate was 94.6%. In the control group, the positivity rate was 21.1%. The positivity rates based on RSI and RFS were 24.3% and 94.6%, respectively. The results showed that NBI was as effective as RFS(P=0.003), and the consistency between NBI and RSI was poor(P=0.040). The positivity rate of the study group was significantly different from that of the control group(P<0.001). After treatment, only 21 patients with LPR agreed to undergo post-treatment. The positivity rate of NBI was 71.4%, while that of RSI was 9.5%, indicating poor consistency(P<0.001). The positivity rate of RFS was 61.9%, which was relatively better than that of NBI(Kappa=0.576, P=0.007), showing statistical significance. Compared with the pre-study, the positive rate dropped from 90.5% to 71.4%, although the difference was not statistically significant(P=0.119). Conclusion NBI is valuable for LPR diagnosis.

Key words: Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Narrowband imaging, Diagnosis, Microvessel images, Reflux symptom Index, Reflux finding score

中图分类号:

R766.5

吴迪盼盼,崔新华,郭颖,耿博,高芳芳,梁辉. 窄带成像技术在咽喉反流诊断中的优势应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(3): 31-36.

WU Dipanpan, CUI Xinhua, GUO Ying, GENG Bo, GAO Fangfang, LIANG Hui. Narrow band imaging might contribute to the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(3): 31-36.

参考文献

[1] Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002, 127(1): 32-35. doi:10.1067/mhn.2002.125760.
[2] Sen P, Georgalas C, Bhattacharyya AK. A systematic review of the role of proton pump inhibitors for symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2006, 31(1): 20-24;discussion24. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01134.x.
[3] Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index(RSI)[J]. J Voice, 2002, 16(2): 274-277. doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00097-8.
[4] Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score(RFS)[J]. Laryngoscope, 2001, 111(8): 1313-1317. doi:10.1097/00005537-200108000-00001.
[5] Merati AL, Ulualp SO, Lim HJ, et al. Meta-analysis of upper probe measurements in normal subjects and patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2005, 114(3): 177-182. doi:10.1177/000348940511400302.
[6] Altman KW, Prufer N, Vaezi MF. The challenge of protocols for reflux disease: a review and development of a critical pathway[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 145(1): 7-14. doi:10.1177/0194599811403885.
[7] Irjala H, Matar N, Remacle M, et al. Pharyngo-laryngeal examination with the narrow band imaging technology: early experience[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 268(6): 801-806. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1516-z.
[8] He CD, Yu JC, Huang F, et al. The utility of narrow band imaging in endoscopic diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2019, 40(5): 715-719. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.06.009.
[9] 何宁, 司勇锋, 杨涌, 等. 窄带成像高清电子鼻咽喉镜对咽喉反流病的诊疗价值[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012,26(18): 776-778. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2012.18.011. HE Ning, SI Yongfeng, YANG Yong, et al. The value of narrow band imaging laryngoscope for laryngopharyngeal reflux desease[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 26(18): 776-778. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2012.18.011.
[10] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会咽喉组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会咽喉学组. 咽喉反流性疾病诊断与治疗专家共识(2015年)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(5): 324-326. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.05.002. Subspecialty Group of Laryngopharyngology, Editori, Subspecialty Group of Laryngopharyngology, Society. Experts consensus on diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(2015)[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 51(5): 324-326. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.05.002.
[11] Lechien JR, Schindler A, Hamdan AL, et al. The development of new clinical instruments in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: The international project of young otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies[J]. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2018, 135(5s): S85-S91. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2018.05.013.
[12] Formánek M, Jancatová D, Komínek P, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux and Herpes simplex virus type 2 are possible risk factors for adult-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis(prospective case-control study)[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2017, 42(3): 597-601. doi:10.1111/coa.12779.
[13] Ren JJ, Zhao Y, Wang J, et al. PepsinA as a marker of laryngopharyngeal reflux detected in chronic rhinosinusitis patients[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 156(5): 893-900. doi:10.1177/0194599817697055.
[14] Barry DW, Vaezi MF. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: More questions than answers[J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2010, 77(5): 327-334. doi:10.3949/ccjm.77a.09121.
[15] Vaezi MF, Hicks DM, Abelson TI, et al. Laryngeal signs and symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD): a critical assessment of cause and effect association[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2003, 1(5): 333-344. doi:10.1053/s1542-3565(03)00177-0.
[16] Gupta R, Sataloff RT. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: current concepts and questions[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2009, 17(3): 143-148. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832b2581.
[17] Maldonado A, Diederich L, Castell DO, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux identified using a new catheter design: defining normal values and excluding artifacts[J]. Laryngoscope, 2003, 113(2): 349-355. doi:10.1097/00005537-200302000-00027.
[18] Harrell SP, Koopman J, Woosley S, et al. Exclusion of pH artifacts is essential for hypopharyngeal pH monitoring[J]. Laryngoscope, 2007, 117(3): 470-474. doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802d344c.
[19] Mazzoleni G, Vailati C, Lisma DG, et al. Correlation between oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with suspected GERD-related extra-esophageal symptoms[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2014, 26(11): 1557-1564. doi:10.1111/nmo.12422.
[20] Kim SI, Kwon OE, Na SY, et al. Association between 24-hour combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and symptoms or quality of life in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2017, 42(3): 584-591. doi:10.1111/coa.12817.
[21] Golub JS, Johns MM III, Lim JH, et al. Comparison of an oropharyngeal pH probe and a standard dual pH probe for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2009, 118(1): 1-5. doi:10.1177/000348940911800101.
[22] Park KH, Choi SM, Kwon SU, et al. Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux among globus patients[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 134(1): 81-85. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.025.
[23] Lechien JR, Saussez S, Schindler A, et al. Clinical outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Laryngoscope, 2019, 129(5): 1174-1187. doi:10.1002/lary.27591.
[24] Lechien JR, Finck C, Khalife M, et al. Change of signs, symptoms and voice quality evaluations throughout a 3- to 6-month empirical treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2018, 43(5): 1273-1282. doi:10.1111/coa.13140.
[25] Lee YS, Choi SH, Son YI, et al. Prospective, observational study using rabeprazole in 455 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 268(6): 863-869. doi:10.1007/s00405-010-1475-9.
[26] Habermann W, Schmid C, Neumann K, et al. Reflux symptom index and reflux finding score in otolaryngologic practice[J]. J Voice, 2012, 26(3): e123-e127. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.02.004.
[27] Mahieu HF, Smit CF. Diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 14(3): 133-137. doi:10.1097/01.moo.0000193192.01978.a5.
[28] Larghi A, Lecca PG, Costamagna G. High-resolution narrow band imaging endoscopy[J]. Gut, 2008, 57(7): 976-986. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.127845.
[29] Wen YH. Narrow-band ImagingA novel screening tool for early nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 138(2): 183. doi:10.1001/archoto.2011.1111.
[30] Piazza C, Dessouky O, Peretti G, et al. Narrow-band imaging: a new tool for evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Review of the literature[J]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2008, 28(2): 49-54.
[31] Kraft M, Fostiropoulos K, Gürtler N, et al. Value of narrow band imaging in the early diagnosis of laryngeal cancer[J]. Head Neck, 2016, 38(1): 15-20. doi:10.1002/hed.23838.
[32] Wang WH, Tsai KY. Narrow-band imaging of laryngeal images and endoscopically proven reflux esophagitis[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 152(5): 874-880. doi:10.1177/0194599814568285.
[33] Galli J, Settimi S, Salonna G, et al. Narrow Band Imaging for lingual tonsil hypertrophy and inflammation, in laryngo-pharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 277(3): 819-825. doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05765-2.
[34] Galli J, Meucci D, Salonna G, et al. Use OF NBI for the assessment of clinical signs of rhino-pharyngo-laryngeal reflux in pediatric age: preliminary results[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 128: 109733. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109733.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed