掩蔽声治疗慢性主观性耳鸣的焦虑抑郁状态分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.291

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探究掩蔽声治疗对慢性主观性耳鸣患者的焦虑抑郁状态的改善情况及影响因素。方法将256例慢性主观性耳鸣患者按照掩蔽声治疗时间分为观察组和对照组。收集两组治疗前后的耳鸣障碍量表(tinnitus handicap inventory, THI)、汉密顿抑郁量表(hamilton depression scale, HAMD)及汉密顿焦虑量表(hamilton anxiety scale, HAMA)评分。比较治疗前后耳鸣程度、焦虑抑郁状态的变化,并分析影响焦虑抑郁状态的因素。结果观察组患者的THI、HAMA和HAMD量表评分等级改善的有效率明显高于对照组(P均<0.001)。多因素二元Logistic回归分析显示观察组患者耳鸣响度(OR=31.57,P=0.003)和治疗前THI等级(OR=0.11,P=0.002)是HAMA量表有效改善的独立因素,残余抑制结果(OR=0.12,P=0.003)和治疗前THI等级(OR=0.20,P=0.016)是HAMD量表有效改善的独立因素。结论本研究发现掩蔽声治疗在降低耳鸣严重程度的同时,也能改善焦虑、抑郁情况。治疗前THI等级、耳鸣响度和残余抑制结果对有效改善慢性主观性耳鸣患者的焦虑、抑郁有明显影响。

关键词: 慢性主观性耳鸣, 掩蔽声治疗, 焦虑, 抑郁

Abstract: Objective To explore the improvement of anxiety and depression status in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus after masked sound therapy and its influencing factors. Methods 256 patients with chronic subjective tinnitus were divided into observation group and control group according to the duration of masked sound therapy. The Tinnitus handicap inventory(THI), Hamilton depression scale(HAMD), and Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA)scores of the two groups were collected before and after treatment. The changes of tinnitus degree, anxiety and depression status before and after treatment were compared, and the factors affecting anxiety and depression status were analysed. Results The efficacy rates of THI, HAMA, and HAMD scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001). In the observation group, multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that tinnitus loudness(OR=31.57, P=0.003)and pre-treatment THI level(OR=0.11, P=0.002)were independent factors for effective improvement of HAMA score, while residual inhibition result(OR=0.12, P=0.003)and pre-treatment THI level(OR=0.20, P=0.016)were independent factors for effective improvement of HAMD score. Conclusion This study found that masked sound therapy can reduce the severity of tinnitus and improve anxiety and depression. Pre-treatment THI level, tinnitus loudness, and residual inhibition results have significant effects on the effective improvement of anxiety and depression in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus.

Key words: Chronic subjective tinnitus, Masking sound therapy, Anxiety, Depression

中图分类号:

R764.45

董雪林,张治军. 掩蔽声治疗慢性主观性耳鸣的焦虑抑郁状态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 18-24.

DONG Xuelin, ZHANG Zhijun. Analysis of anxiety and depression states in the treatment of chronic subjective tinnitus with masking sound therapy[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2025, 39(2): 18-24.

参考文献

[1] Esmaili AA, Renton J. A review of tinnitus[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2018, 47(4): 205-208. doi:10.31128/AJGP-12-17-4420
[2] 韩朝. 耳鸣的发生机制和诊疗概述[J]. 中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 329-331. doi:10.16542/j.cnki.issn.1007-4856.2020.05.004 HAN Zhao. Overview of the mechanism, diagnosis and treatment of tinnitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology in Integrative Medicine, 2020, 28(5): 329-331. doi:10.16542/j.cnki.issn.1007-4856.2020.05.004
[3] 兰家辉, 李明, 张剑宁. 耳鸣中枢机制的基础研究进展[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2018, 16(1): 102-106. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2018.01.023 LAN Jiahui, LI Ming, ZHANG Jianning. Progress in basic research on neuronal mechanisms of tinnitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2018, 16(1): 102-106. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2018.01.023
[4] Tang DM, Li HW, Chen L. Advances in understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of tinnitus[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2019, 1130: 109-128. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6123-4_7
[5] 朱晓月, 罗征, 孙越甲, 等. 主观性耳鸣患者心理人格特征研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2022, 29(5): 301-303, 316. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2022.05.007 ZHU Xiaoyue, LUO Zheng, SUN Yuejia, et al. Study on the psychologic status and personality traits of patients with tinnitus[J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2022, 29(5): 301-303, 316. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2022.05.007
[6] Molnár A, Mavrogeni P, Tamás L, et al. Correlation between tinnitus handicap and depression and anxiety scores[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2022: 1455613221139211. doi:10.1177/01455613221139211
[7] Yu SJ, Yu H, Wang X, et al. The efficacy of acoustic therapy versus oral medication for chronic tinnitus: a meta-analysis[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2021, 42(6): 103116. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103116
[8] 罗伊雯, 肖永涛, 高敏倩, 等. 慢性主观性耳鸣的声治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 13-23. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.108 LUO Yiwen, XIAO Yongtao, GAO Minqian, et al. Progress in acoustic therapy for chronic subjective tinnitus[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 13-23. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.108
[9] 陈倬诣, 郑亿庆, 杨海弟. 慢性主观性耳鸣分类、发生发展机制及治疗新进展 [J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 1-12. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.137 CHEN Zhuoyi, ZHENG Yiqing, YANG Hhaidi. Classification, pathogenesis, and treatment advances of chronic subjective tinnitus [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 1-12. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.137
[10] 冀飞, 何雅琪. 听力损失分级及平均听阈的应用[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2021, 19(3): 227-231. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2021.03.017 JI Fei, HE Yaqi. Hearing loss classification and application of average hearing threshold[J]. Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation, 2021, 19(3): 227-231. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2021.03.017
[11] Henry JA. “measurement” of tinnitus[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2016, 37(8): e276-e285. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001070
[12] Zeman F, Koller M, Figueiredo R, et al. Tinnitus handicap inventory for evaluating treatment effects: which changes are clinically relevant [J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 145(2): 282-287. doi:10.1177/0194599811403882
[13] 张明园. 精神科评定量表手册[M]. 2版. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 1998.
[14] Karaaslan, Kantekin Y, Hac musalar Y, et al. Anxiety sensitivities, anxiety and depression levels, and personality traits of patients with chronic subjective tinnitus: a case-control study[J]. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract, 2020, 24(3): 264-269. doi:10.1080/13651501.2020.1757117
[15] 张红, 李欣. 中枢神经系统活动异常在耳鸣发生中的作用与机制[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 24-29. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.142 ZHANG Hong, LI Xin. The role and mechanism of abnormal central nervous system activity in the occurrence of tinnitus[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(4): 24-29. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.142
[16] Jin IK, Choi SJ, Yoo J, et al. Effects of tinnitus sound therapy determined using subjective measurements[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2021, 32(4): 212-218. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1722984
[17] 王欣怡, 杨文杰, 余文兴, 等. 家庭化个体多元复合声治疗对耳鸣伴听力损失患者的疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 70-76. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.327 WANG Xinyi, YANG Wenjie, YU Wenxing, et al. Effects and influencing factors of family-oriented customized sound therapy on patients with tinnitus and hearing loss[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 70-76. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.327
[18] Wei X, Lv H, Wang ZD, et al. Neuroanatomical alterations in patients with tinnitus before and after sound therapy: a voxel-based morphometry study[J]. Front Neurosci, 2020, 14: 911. doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00911
[19] Lv H, Zeng N, Liu CL, et al. Baseline functional connectivity features of neural network nodes can predict improvement after sound therapy through adjusted narrow band noise in tinnitus patients[J]. Front Neurosci, 2019, 13: 614. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00614
[20] Williams AP, Gourishetti SC, Flaherty MA, et al. Anxiety, depression, and symptom severity in patients with pulsatile and non-pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Laryngoscope, 2023, 133(3): 683-688. doi:10.1002/lary.30238
[21] Koning HM. Psychosocial consequences of the loudness of tinnitus[J]. Int Tinnitus J, 2019, 23(2): 103-107. doi:10.5935/0946-5448.20190018
[22] 仝悦, 蒋雯, 吴扬, 等. 慢性主观性耳鸣精细化检查及多元复合声治疗初探[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2019, 39(6): 1266-1272. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.06.019 TONG Yue, JIANG Wen, WU Yang, et al. Precision tinnitus testing for chronic subjective tinnitus and preliminarily analyses for the effect of multiple complex acoustic therapy[J]. Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research, 2019, 39(6): 1266-1272. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.06.019

相关文章 15

[1]	郭振平,李雪冰. 慢性主观性耳鸣患者心理特征、睡眠质量调查及与临床效果相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 1-7.
[2]	杨波,邱昌余,邹鑫源,殷敏,朱歆洁,程雷,陆美萍. 影响鼻中隔偏曲患者手术效果的预测因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(6): 164-170.
[3]	陈倬诣,郑亿庆,杨海弟. 慢性主观性耳鸣分类、发生发展机制及治疗新进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 1-12.
[4]	董洪松,王春丽,俞艳萍,陈涛,聂国辉. 声音疗法联合药物治疗慢性主观性耳鸣的临床随机对照研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 30-37.
[5]	许海艳,曹卫,范大川. 多元复合声治疗对突聋患者耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 38-45.
[6]	吴波,黄天德,闫斌,陈伊,汤勇. 焦虑抑郁状态与特发性耳鸣预后的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 46-52.
[7]	王菲,刘钰莹,肖麒祎,丁健,高尚,毛薇. 住院医师精神心理因素与变应性鼻炎的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 28-31.
[8]	张凯婷,刘杰,许贞菊,张晓雪,曹松丽,韩敏. 功能性发声障碍患者嗓音及心理状态评估分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(3): 37-41.
[9]	危维,杨晓彤,刘俊其,严波,王振霖,张秋航. 鼻颅底肿瘤患者内镜手术后心理学变化的分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 25-29.
[10]	蒋黎娜,于倩如,于杰,关本岭,鹿玉,于淑东. 前庭性眩晕疾病患者焦虑和抑郁状况研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(6): 1-5.
[11]	李晓, 袁英, 李延忠, 王岩, 杨珂, 孙永强, 于学民, 王宁, 王磊. 焦虑抑郁对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者夜间血压波动的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 68-71.
[12]	姜小兵,杜怡峰. 山东阳谷农村地区老年人睡眠障碍与抑郁状态的关联性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 116-120.
[13]	赵艳,程四华,童巧珍. 强化自我护理对喉镜辅助声带息肉切除术后患者嗓音恢复及心理情绪的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(4): 175-178.
[14]	朱文燕,金新,佘万东,马永驰. 突发性聋30例精神心理状况分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(5): 50-52.
[15]	黄芳,郑智娟,谢磊. 突发性聋患者焦虑、抑郁与病情阶段的关系及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(4): 1-6.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed