山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 44-47.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

未成年人与成年人变应性鼻炎变应原致敏特点

姚聆清1,邱建鹤1,巢长江1,毛建军1,钱俊勇2,薛建荣2,周慧娟2   

  1. 1.常州市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉科, 江苏 常州 213001; 2.常州市第三人民医院耳鼻咽喉科, 江苏 常州 213001
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-06 出版日期:2012-12-16 发布日期:2012-12-16
  • 通讯作者: 邱建鹤,主任医师。 E-mail: QJH658@126.com
  • 作者简介:姚聆清,副主任医师。 E-mail: mingyidf@hotmail.com

Analysis on characteristics of allergic sensitization in childhood and adult patients with allergic rhinitis

YAO Ling-qing1, QIU Jian-he1, CHAO Chang-jiang1, MAO Jian-jun1, QIAN Jun-yong2, XUE Jian-rong2, ZHOU Hui-juan2   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, 1. The First People’s Hospital of Changzhou; 2. The Third People’s Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou 213001, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2012-08-06 Online:2012-12-16 Published:2012-12-16

摘要: 目的 分析江苏省常州市变应性鼻炎(AR)患者16种标准化变应原皮肤点刺试验(SPT)结果,比较本地区未成年人与成年人变应性鼻炎变应原致敏的特点。方法 4383例(3~75岁)临床疑似AR的患者被分为未成年人组(3~17岁)及成年人组(18~75岁),其中未成年人组又细分为三组(3~5岁组,6~14岁组,15~17岁组)后进行SPT结果分析。结果 未成年人组SPT阳性1063例(78.9%),其中男717例(67.5%),女346例(32.5%);成年人组SPT阳性1687例(55.6%),其中男715例(42.4%),女972例(57.6%)。未成年人组与成年人组均以粉尘螨、户尘螨为最主要变应原,阳性率分别为92.9%、90.8%及81.0%、78.9%。主要变应原第3~5位者,未成年人组为猫毛(7.2%)、蟑螂(6.9%)、葎草花粉(5.8%),成年人组为蟑螂(14.2%)、葎草花粉(13.0%)、海虾(6.4%)。经χ2检验,未成年人组与成年人组的SPT阳性率,SPT阳性男女比例,粉尘螨、户尘螨、蟑螂、葎草花粉及猫毛变应原阳性率,单一尘螨阳性率,单一尘螨阳性男女比例,粉尘螨及户尘螨阳性等级中+++及++++构成比与++构成比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经细分的未成年人三组间,除6~14岁组SPT阳性率与3~5岁组和15~17岁组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)外,其余上述各项两两相比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 本地区未成年人与成年人AR患者的主要变应原存在显著差别。未成年人组中,男性SPT阳性率及单一尘螨阳性率明显高于女性。未成年人更适合特异性免疫治疗(SIT)。

关键词: 变应性鼻炎;皮肤试验;变应原;螨类

Abstract: Objective To investigate positive allergens and sex distribution in childhood and adult patients with allergic rhinitis(AR) in Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province. Methods A total of 4383 cases (aged between 3-75 years) with allergic symptoms and signs underwent skin prick test (SPT)with 16 kinds of standardized allergens. The samples were stratified on childhood and adult groups to analysis the distributive characteristics of allergens responsible for each group. The childhood subjects were further stratified on 3 groups (3-5-year-old, 6-14-year-old, 15-17-year-old) for analysis. Results 1063 cases (78.9%) had the positive reaction in the childhood group, including 717 (67.5%) cases of males and 346 (32.5%) cases of females. 1687 cases (55.6%) had the positive reaction in the adult group, including 715 (42.4%) cases of males and 972 (57.6%) cases of females. Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagodies pteronyssinus had the highest positive ratio (92.9%, 90.8% and 81.0%, 78.9%) in both groups, the 3rd to 5th followed were cat hair (7.2%), cockroach (6.9%) and Humulus L.(5.8%) in the childhood group, cockroach (14.2%), Humulus L.(13.0%), and shrimp (6.4%) in the adult group. There were significantly higher sensitivities to positive ratio of SPT, male and female positive ratio of SPT, positive ratio of Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagodies pteronyssinus, cockroach, Humulus L. and cat hair, positive ratio of single dust mite, male and female positive ratio of single dust mite, and the ratio of class +++, ++++ and ++ in the dust mite position between the childhood group and the adult group (P<0.05). And there were no significantly high sensitivities to the three groups in childhood according to the items above expect positive ratio of SPT between the 6-14-year-old group and the 3-5-year-old group (P<0.05), and the 6-14-year-old and 15-17-year-old groups (P<0.05). Conclusion There are significantly high sensitivity to the main allergens between childhood and adult AR patients in the region. In childhood group, the number of male is higher than that of female in the positive ratio of SPT and the single Dust mite. It suggests that the minors would be more suitable for specific immunotherapy.

Key words: Allergic rhinitis; Skin tests; Allergen; Mites

中图分类号: 

  • R765.21
[1] 万文锦,王文,程雷. 尘螨变应性鼻炎皮下免疫治疗与舌下免疫治疗的荟萃分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4): 103-108.
[2] 朱新华. 变应性鼻炎冲击免疫治疗的临床应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 13-17.
[3] 关凯,李丽莎. 鼻腔冲洗在变应性鼻炎防治中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 22-27.
[4] 史丽,赵莉,张红萍. 变应性鼻炎的长期抗炎治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 9-12.
[5] 刘静. 基于整体观念变应性鼻炎的中医辨证论治[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 28-30.
[6] 程雷,钱俊俊,田慧琴. 变应性鼻炎研究的若干进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 1-3.
[7] 许昱,陶泽璋. 重视变应性鼻炎药物治疗的规范化和个体化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 4-8.
[8] 刘英,叶小静,赵春丽,季青,黄谦. 季节性变应性鼻炎预防性治疗观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 37-40.
[9] 薛建荣,马敬,蒋星,胡志邦. 苏南地区儿童变应性鼻结膜炎临床研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 41-46.
[10] 吴中飞,怀德,桂晓钟,赵新,周文成,袁源,田慧琴,陆美萍,程雷. 苏皖健康人群血清免疫球蛋白E水平测定与分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 50-54.
[11] 李莉珠,吴卿,易欣,田理. 变应性鼻炎中医证候动物模型的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 60-63.
[12] 沙骥超,张策,朱冬冬. 变应性鼻炎鼻黏膜上皮细胞免疫活性研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 55-59.
[13] 向南,张勤修. 浅析张勤修教授治疗常年性变应性鼻炎的经验[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3): 100-102.
[14] 章如新. 变应性鼻炎的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 3-6.
[15] 阎艾慧,韩佳利. 变应性鼻炎的临床特点与诊断[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 7-9.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!