山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 26-31.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.049

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

静脉源性搏动性耳鸣手术治疗的疗效分析

郑永波,赵宇(),娄麟,宋瑶,董怡君,任建君,王晶,许洋,雷蕾   

  1. 四川大学华西医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-25 修回日期:2019-07-29 出版日期:2019-09-20 发布日期:2019-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 赵宇 E-mail:yutzhao@163.com

Effects of surgery in patients with venous pulsatile tinnitus

Yongbo ZHENG,Yu ZHAO(),Lin LOU,Yao SONG,Yijun DONG,Jianjun REN,Jing WANG,Yang XU,Lei LEI   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2019-07-25 Revised:2019-07-29 Online:2019-09-20 Published:2019-10-15
  • Contact: Yu ZHAO E-mail:yutzhao@163.com

摘要: 目的

对静脉源性搏动性耳鸣患者的发病特征进行总结,为该疾病的临床诊疗提供参考。

方法

收集分析25例静脉源性搏动性耳鸣行手术治疗患者的临床资料。手术主要采用局麻下耳后小切口行乳突探查加乙状窦缩窄术或乙状窦回纳术。对患者术前及术后1个月、3个月及6个月的耳鸣情况采用耳鸣评价量表(TEQ)进行评分,量化评估患者术后耳鸣的改善效果。同时比较患者术前与术后1个月的听力检查结果,评估手术是否对听力产生不良影响。

结果

根据患者主诉,21例患者术后随访期内搏动性耳鸣消失,4例患者在术后第6个月随访时仍有轻微搏动性耳鸣,但患者自觉耳鸣对日常生活无影响。本组患者术前TEQ评分为10.44±3.08,术后1个月TEQ评分为3.68±1.75,术后3个月TEQ评分为2.76±1.23,术后6个月TEQ评分为2.72±1.17。术后1个月、术后3个月及术后6个月TEQ评分均低于术前,表明患者术后耳鸣症状得到明显改善。术后3个月及术后6个月的TEQ评分低于术后1个月,但术后3个月与术后6个月的TEQ评分比较无统计学意义,表明患者术后耳鸣的改善程度逐渐趋于稳定。本组患者术后1个月听力检查结果与术前相比较无统计学差异。

结论

静脉源性搏动性耳鸣可通过仔细询问病史、查体及影像学检查进行诊断。采用局麻下手术治疗便于术者术中观察患者耳鸣改善情况,准确掌握对乙状窦的塑形程度,减少并发症发生率。

关键词: 搏动性耳鸣, 手术, 疗效

Abstract: Objective

To summarize the clinical characteristics of patients with venous pulsatile tinnitus and provide reference data for clinical diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Methods

Clinical data of 25 patients with venous pulsatile tinnitus were analyzed. During surgery, a small incision was made in the posterior auricular region under local anesthesia, and mastoid exploration plus sigmoid sinus constriction or sigmoid sinus retraction were performed. The tinnitus evaluation questionnaire (TEQ) was used to quantify improvement in tinnitus after the operation (1st, 3rd, and 6th months). The preoperative hearing test results were compared with those obtained in the 1st month postoperatively to determine whether the surgery had adverse effects on hearing.

Results

As reported by the patients, pulsatile tinnitus had disappeared during the follow-up period in 21 patients. Four patients had mild pulsatile tinnitus in the 6th month postoperatively; however, this conscious tinnitus did not affect the patients’daily lives. The preoperative TEQ score of the patients was 10.44±3.08. The postoperative TEQ scores in the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months were 3.68±1.75, 2.76±1.23, and 2.72±1.17, respectively, which were significantly lower than the preoperative TEQ score. The postoperative TEQ scores in the 3rd and 6th months were lower than that in the 1st month postoperatively, but there was no statistical difference between the TEQ scores in the 3rd and 6th months postoperatively. It was observed that the improvement in postoperative tinnitus stabilized gradually. There was no significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative hearing test results.

Conclusion

Venous pulsatile tinnitus can be diagnosed by careful medical history taking, physical examination, and imaging. Surgery under local anesthesia is convenient for the surgeon to observe real-time improvement in tinnitus, which aids in accurate evaluation of the shape of the sigmoid sinus and reducing the incidence of complications. Therefore, its clinical application is recommended.

Key words: Pulsatile tinnitus, Surgery, Therapeutic effect

中图分类号: 

  • R764.65

图1

右侧乙状窦及颈静脉球异常 A~C:右侧乙状窦扩张前置; D~F:右侧乙状窦扩张前置及右侧颈静脉球高位伴扩张。"

图3

右侧颈静脉球及双侧乳突导静脉异常 A:右侧颈静脉球高位;B:左侧乳突导静脉位置异常伴扩张;C:右侧乳突导静脉畸形。"

图2

右侧乙状窦及乳突导静脉异常 A:右侧乙状窦憩室;B:右侧乳突导静脉扩张;C~D:右侧乙状窦及颈静脉球扩张。"

图4

耳后切口示例"

图5

乙状窦异常部位的术中暴露及填塞 A~B:乙状窦异常部位的暴露; C~D:示术中采用颞肌瓣填塞乙状窦。"

1 Baguley D , McFerran D , Hall D . Tinnitus[J]. Lancet, 2013, 382(9904): 1600-1607. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60142-7 .
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60142-7
2 Stouffer JL , Tyler RS . Characterization of tinnitus by tinnitus patients[J]. J Speech Hear Disord, 1990, 55(3): 439-453.
3 曾嵘, 王国鹏, 龚树生 . 搏动性耳鸣研究进展[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2011, 46(11): 957-961. doi:10. 3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2011.11.024 .
doi: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2011.11.024
4 刘蓬, 徐桂丽, 李明, 等 . 耳鸣评价量表的信度与效度研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012, 47(9): 716-719. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.09.004 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.09.004
LIU Peng , XU Guili , LI Ming , et al . Study on reliability and validity of the Tinnitus Evaluation Questionnaire[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2012, 47(9): 716-719. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.09.004 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.09.004
5 陈知己, 郑芸, 钟萍, 等 . 耳鸣评价量表的临床应用价值研究[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2017, 25(3): 242-246. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.03.006 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.03.006
CHEN Zhiji , ZHENG Yun , ZHONG Ping , et al . The investigation of clinical value of tinnitus evaluation questionnaire[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2017, 25(3): 242-246. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.03.006 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.03.006
6 侯志强 . 静脉源性搏动性耳鸣[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2011, 19(6): 573-575. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2011.06.029 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2011.06.029
7 Amans MR , Haraldsson H , Kao E , et al . MR venous flow in sigmoid sinus diverticulum[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2018, 39(11): 2108-2113. doi:10.3174/ajnr.a5833 .
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.a5833
8 Li YD , Chen HJ , He L , et al . Hemodynamic assessments of venous pulsatile tinnitus using 4D-flow MRI[J]. Neurology, 2018, 91(6): e586-e593. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005948 .
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005948
9 Lansley JA , Tucker W , Eriksen MR , et al . Sigmoid sinus diverticulum, dehiscence, and venous sinus stenosis: potential causes of pulsatile tinnitus in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension?[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2017, 38(9): 1783-1788. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5277 .
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5277
10 Wang AC , Nelson AN, Pino C , et al . Management of sigmoid sinus associated pulsatile tinnitus: A systematic review of the literature[J]. And, 2017, 38(10): 1390-1396. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001612 .
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001612
11 梁熙虹, 王振常, 龚树生, 等 . 乙状窦沟异常致搏动性耳鸣的影像分析[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2010, 44(4): 361-364.doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.04. 006 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.04.006
LIANG Xihong , WANG Zhenchang , GONG Shusheng , et al . Imaging findings of pulsatile tinnitus caused by sigmoid sinus abnormalities[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2010, 44(4): 361-364. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.04.006 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.04.006
12 Eisenman DJ , Raghavan P , Hertzano R , et al . Evaluation and treatment of pulsatile tinnitus associated with sigmoid sinus wall anomalies[J]. Laryngoscope, 2018, 128: S1-S13. doi:10.1002/lary.27218 .
doi: 10.1002/lary.27218
13 Houdart E , Chapot R , Merland JJ . Aneurysm of a dural sigmoid sinus: a novel vascular cause of pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Ann Neurol, 2000, 48(4): 669-671.doi:10.1002/1531-8249(200010)48:4<669::aid-ana16>3.3.co;2-y .
doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200010)48:4<669::aid-ana16>3.3.co;2-y
14 Sanchez TG , Murao M , de Medeiros IR , et al . A new therapeutic procedure for treatment of objective venous pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Int Tinnitus J, 2002, 8(1): 54-57.
15 Otto KJ , Hudgins PA , Abdelkafy W , et al . Sigmoid sinus diverticulum: a new surgical approach to the correction of pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2007, 28(1): 48-53. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000247814.85829.f6 .
doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000247814.85829.f6
16 Duvillard C , Ballester M , Redon E , et al . Pulsatile tinnitus cured by mastoidectomy[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2004, 113(9): 730-733. doi:10.1177/000348940411300910.
doi: 10.1177/000348940411300910.
17 Overton SB , Ritter FN . A high placed jugular bulb in the middle ear: a clinical and temporal bone study[J]. Laryngoscope, 1973, 83(12): 1986-1991. doi:10.1288/00005537-197312000-00008 .
doi: 10.1288/00005537-197312000-00008
18 Wadin K , Wilbrand H . The jugular bulb diverticulum. A radioanatomic investigation[J]. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh), 1986, 27(4): 395-401.
19 Madani G , Connor SE . Imaging in pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Clin Radiol, 2009, 64(3): 319-328. doi:10.1016/j.crad. 2008.08.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.crad. 2008.08.014
20 Zenteno M , Murillo-Bonilla L , Martínez S , et al . Endovascular treatment of a transverse-sigmoid sinus aneurysm presenting as pulsatile tinnitus. Case report[J]. J Neurosurg, 2004, 100(1): 120-122. doi:10.3171/jns. 2004.100.1.0120 .
doi: 10.3171/jns. 2004.100.1.0120
21 Park YH , Kwon HJ . Awake embolization of sigmoid sinus diverticulum causing pulsatile tinnitus: simultaneous confirmative diagnosis and treatment[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2011, 17(3): 376-379. doi:10.1177/15910-1991101700316 .
doi: 10.1177/15910-1991101700316
22 Su H , Li BM , Wang J , et al . Headache attributed to cranial venous sinus stenting: A case series and literature review[J]. Cephalalgia, 2019: 333102419847752. doi:10.1177/0333102419847752 .
doi: 10.1177/0333102419847752
23 吴松林, 李茜, 龚元, 等 . 乙状窦憩室致搏动性耳鸣手术治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2015, 22(7): 337-340. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2015.07.004 .
doi: 10.16066/j.1672-7002. 2015.07.004
WU Songlin , LI Qian , GONG Yuan , et al . Analysis of the surgical effect of the pulsatile tinnitus caused by sigmoid sinus diverticulum[J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2015, 22(7): 337-340. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002. 2015.07.004 .
doi: 10.16066/j.1672-7002. 2015.07.004
24 郭平, 王武庆 . 乙状窦缩窄术治疗乙状窦相关静脉源性搏动性耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2013, 48(4): 265-269. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2013.04.001 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1673-0860.2013.04.001
GUO Ping , WANG Wuqing . Effect of sigmoid sinus plasty in sigmoid sinus original pulsatile tinnitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2013, 48(4): 265-269. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1673-0860.2013.04.001 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1673-0860.2013.04.001
25 Zhang C , Li Q , Li SF . Physical and psychological outcomes of simple sigmoid sinus bony wall repair for pulsatile tinnitus due to sigmoid sinus wall anomalies[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2019, 276(5): 1327-1334. doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05380-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05380-1
[1] 张国民,王茂华,高松,吴文斌,虞幼军. 持续灌流模式耳内镜下粘连性中耳炎手术疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 16-19.
[2] 方璐, 雷玉丹, 王华. 环孢素滴眼液联合玻璃酸钠滴眼液治疗干眼临床效果的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 65-73.
[3] 高奇歌,张华. 搏动性耳鸣的治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 95-101.
[4] 雷玉丹,方璐,陈健,彭昌福. 托珠单抗治疗激素抵抗或不耐受的中重度甲状腺相关性眼病临床疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 54-67.
[5] 朱明琼,李征,刘茹,田涛,彭婧利,吕倩怡,谭华霞. 基于OCT/OCTA的AI筛查系统在抗VEGF治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者效果评价中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 68-73.
[6] 孙庆祝,沈健,陈星,吴雁冰,曾论. 代谢指标在预测糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者雷珠单抗疗效中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 74-81.
[7] 卢朝阳, 翟兆雪, 王慧康, 邵丽婷, 张宇. 新冠肺炎治疗引发糖尿病酮症酸中毒合并鼻眶脑型毛霉菌病1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 90-94.
[8] 高娟娟,许嘉,陈雯婧,梁思超,郭振平,陈俊言,郭翔,伊海金. 保留面神经功能的面神经鞘瘤次全切除手术治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 8-16.
[9] 刘玉柱,陈尧,苑铁君,李春森,李波. 喉纤维肉瘤1例并相关文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 133-137.
[10] 陈涛,姜洋,李莹. SMILE矫正PRK术后屈光回退1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 148-153.
[11] 刘怡君,谷悦,官大宇,杨玉成,沈暘. 翼管神经切断术在难治性变应性鼻炎中远期临床疗效和安全性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 42-48.
[12] 黄旗,邓旭雯,王佩佩,陈烨群,古学军. 基于EyeSi手术模拟器评估眼科医师白内障手术水平[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 83-88.
[13] 孙春晓,王文晴,岳田,刘济生. 高低累积顺铂剂量同步放化疗治疗鼻咽癌的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 31-41.
[14] 王再兴,唐志元,李定波,石照辉,曾宪海,张秋航. 鼻咽癌放疗后肿瘤复发及颅底骨坏死引起颈内动脉破裂的治疗方案[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 49-58.
[15] 孙芳,谢楚波,邱前辉. 营养指标对鼻咽癌放射性颅底坏死患者创面修复影响的回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 59-68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!