山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 70-73.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2014.299

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

CO2激光治疗声门下淀粉样变2例并文献复习

耿阳, 王惠忠, 孙丰林, 王孝, 王海鹏, 许荣, 夏拥军   

  1. 淄博市中心医院耳鼻咽喉科, 山东 淄博 255031
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-05 出版日期:2015-04-16 发布日期:2015-04-16
  • 作者简介:耿阳。E-mail: victor_geng@yahoo.com

CO2 laser treatment in subglottic amyloidosis (two cases report and a literature review)

GENG Yang, WANG Hui-zhong, SUN Feng-lin, WANG Xiao, WANG Hai-peng, XU Rong, XIA Yong-jun   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, Central Hospital of Zibo, Zibo 255031, Shandong, China
  • Received:2014-09-05 Online:2015-04-16 Published:2015-04-16
  • Contact: 王惠忠。E-mail:zbwhz1216@163.com E-mail:zbwhz1216@163.com

PDF (PC)

699

摘要： 目的 探讨CO2激光治疗声门下淀粉样变的确切疗效。方法 回顾性分析2例激光手术治疗声门下区淀粉样变患者的临床资料。结果 2例患者术中及术后未出现明显并发症, 患者术后声音嘶哑、喉梗阻症状较术前明显改善。术后随访期间(随访期限分别为术后9个月和14个月)均未发现复发。结论 CO2激光辅助治疗声门下淀粉样变疗效确切。若首次激光手术时切除彻底, 短期内预后良好,远期疗效仍需继续随访观察。

关键词: 淀粉样变性, 喉部病变, CO2激光

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effectiveness of Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser in the treatment of subglottic amyloidosis. Methods Clinical data of two cases of subglottic amyloidosis from Jan.2010 to Oct.2014 were reviewed. Results No obvious complication was found in the two patients after laser operation. Symptoms, including hoarseness and laryngeal obstruction, were relieved dramatically after the surgery. Follow-up period was 9 months and 14 months, respectively. During the follow-up, no recurrence happened on both patients. Conclusion CO2 laser is effective to treat subglottic amyloidosis. Short-term clinical outcomes are satisfactory if complete resection is achieved, however, long-term effects need further observation.

Key words: Amyloidosis, Laryngeal diseases, Carbon dioxide laser

中图分类号: 

  • R767.91
[1] Pribitkin E, Friedman O, O'Hara B, et al. Amyloidosis of the upper aerodigestive tract[J]. Laryngoscope, 2003, 113(12):2095-2101.
[2] Kennedy T L, Patel N M. Surgical management of localized amyloidosis[J]. Laryngoscope, 2000, 110(6):918-923.
[3] Gillmore J D, Hawkins P N. Amyloidosis and the respiratory tract[J]. Thorax, 1999, 54(5):444-451.
[4] Utz J P, Swensen S J, Gertz M A. Pulmonary amyloidosis. The Mayo Clinic experience from 1980 to 1993[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1996, 124(4):407-413.
[5] Thompson L D, Derringer G A, Wenig B M. Amyloidosis of the larynx: a clinicopathologic study of 11 cases[J]. Mod Pathol, 2000, 13(5):528-535.
[6] Simpson G T 2nd, Strong M S, Skinner M, et al. Localized amyloidosis of the head and neck and upper aerodigestive and lower respiratory tracts[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1984, 93(4 Pt 1):374-379.
[7] Firlinger I, Setinek U, Koller H, et al. A case of tracheobronchial amyloidosis treated with endoscopic debulking and external beam radiation therapy[J]. Pneumologie, 2013, 67(7):398-400.
[8] Neben-Wittich M A, Foote R L, Kalra S. External beam radiation therapy for tracheobronchial amyloidosis[J]. Chest, 2007, 132(1):262-267.
[1] 林云仙,马玲国. 咽鼓管圆枕淀粉样变性伴中耳积液1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 86-90.
[2] 李利杰,田秀芬. CO2激光联合低温等离子治疗早期声门型喉癌40例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 79-85.
[3] 龙婷,刘雨薇,王生才,张杰,李艳珍,张雪溪,刘悄吟,刘志勇,孙念,倪鑫. 内镜CO2激光烧灼术治疗273例儿童先天性梨状窝瘘的临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 125-130.
[4] 陈国平,傅敏仪,叶飞,徐建慧. 早期声门型喉癌钬激光与CO2激光手术对比研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 8-11.
[5] 牛子捷,肖洋,王军,马丽晶. 喉乳头状瘤手术治疗的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(4): 96-100.
[6] 谭凤武,邓亚萍,黎可华. 低温等离子射频消融与CO2激光手术治疗早期声门型喉癌疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(6): 63-71.
[7] 徐进敬,胡京华,吴元庆,邓毅,喻唯唯. CO2激光显微手术在喉癌前病变和早期声门型喉癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(3): 129-133.
[8] 沈敏,屈季宁,姜义道. 客观嗓音分析比较CO2激光术与传统剥脱术治疗声带白斑患者的疗效[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(1): 67-70.
[9] 刘雅琴,张立庆,张佳程,董伟达,周涵. 头颈部淀粉样变性23例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(1): 72-77.
[10] 黄志刚. CO2激光手术治疗咽喉部肿瘤[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 1-3.
[11] 刘鸣. 声门上型喉癌的CO2激光治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 4-7.
[12] 雷文斌,刘其洪. CO2激光手术治疗复发性呼吸道乳头状瘤[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 8-12.
[13] 李文明,魏东敏,钱晔,曹晟达,许雅,刘大昱,潘新良,雷大鹏. 支撑喉镜下CO2激光治疗喉癌的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 13-17.
[14] 刘大昱,孙睿杰,李学新,姜震,岳建林,林云,雷大鹏,潘新良. 支撑喉镜下CO2激光杓状软骨部分切除术治疗双侧声带麻痹的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(6): 18-21.
[15] 郝艳,李栋才,蓝建平. CO2激光显微手术与传统显微手术切除声带息肉疗效比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(6): 68-70.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发