山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 80-83.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.404

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼疗效观察

姜洋,李莹,王忠海,金玉梅,刘小伟   

  1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医院眼科, 北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-26 出版日期:2016-04-16 发布日期:2016-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 李莹. E-mail:liyingpumch@126.com E-mail:jiangyangpumch@126.co
  • 作者简介:姜洋. E-mail:jiangyangpumch@126.co

Effect of the implantation of lacrimal plug for dry eyes after laser assisted in-situ keratomiLeusis.

JIANG Yang, LI Ying, WANG Zhonghai, JIN Yumei, LIU Xiaowei   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academic of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2015-09-26 Online:2016-04-16 Published:2016-04-16

摘要: 目的 评估可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼的临床效果及安全性。 方法 将2009年7月至2013年12月就诊拟行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(Laser Assisted In-situ KeratomiLeusis,LASIK)且术前伴有轻到中度干眼的患者65例(130眼)纳入研究,手术完成后于当日行术眼下泪小点可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓植入。记录患者术前,术后1周、1个月及3个月干涩感、异物感、烧灼感、畏光感、视疲劳及视力模糊6项症状评分,并于各时间点对患者进行基础泪液分泌试验(Schirmer I test,SIt)、泪膜破裂时间(break-up time,BUT)以及角膜荧光素染色(fluorescein staining,FS)检查。 结果 术后各时间点干涩感、异物感、烧灼感、畏光感、视疲劳及视物模糊6项症状评分均有下降,差异有统计学意义(F=125.64263.16123.229.8076.815105.19,P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.002、0.000、0.000)。术后各时间点SIt值及BUT值均有提高,FS评分均有下降,差异有统计学意义(F=45.9967.8749.01,P=0.000、0.000、0.000)。全部受试者在观察时间内均未发生感染、塞栓溢出或丢失、局部肉芽肿形成等泪道塞栓植入等情况。 结论 应用可降解型VisiPlug泪道塞栓可安全、有效地增加准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后患者眼表泪液量,改善泪膜稳定性,缓解干眼症状。

关键词: 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术, 泪道塞栓, 干眼

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of the implantation of lacrimal plug for dry eyes after laser assisted in-situ keratomi leusis(LASIK). Methods Patients with mild to moderate dry eye were included in the study before LASIK. The implantation of VisiPlug was conducted immediately after the surgery. The scores of dryness, foreign body sensation, burning sensation, photophobia, visual fatigue and blurred vision were recorded on preoperative and postoperative 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. Schirmer I test(SIt), break-up time(BUT)and corneal fluorescein staining(FS)were also tested on each time points. Results There were 130 eyes of 65 patients included in the study, including 22 males and 43 females with the average age of 28.32±7.24(18-47)years. The scores of dryness, foreign body sensation, burning sensation, photophobia, visual fatigue and blurred vision were significantly decreased on each time points after the implantation of the lacrimal plug(F value: 125.64, 263.16, 123.22, 9.80, 76.815, 105.19; P value: 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.002, 0.000, 0.000). Schirmer I test(SIt), break up time(BUT)and corneal fluorescein staining(FS)were also significantly improved on each time points(F value: 45.99, 67.87, 49.01; P value: 0.000, 0.000, 0.000). There was no infection, plug in the overflow, local granulation, and the effect of corneal flap healing. Conclusion Lacrimal plug could be effective and safe in the management of dry eyes after refractive surgery.

Key words: Dry eye, Lacrimal plug, Laser assisted in-situ keratomileusis

中图分类号: 

  • R777
[1] Solomon K D, Fernández de Castro L E, Sandoval H P, et al. Refractive surgery survey 2003[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(7):1556-1569.
[2] Jabbur N S, Sakatani K, OBrien T P. Survey of complications and recommendations for management in dissatisfied patients seeking a consultation after refractive surgery[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(9):1867-1874.
[3] Albietz J M, Lenton L M, McLennan S G. Chronic dry eye and regression after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(3):675-684.
[4] 杨斌, 王铮, 吴君舒, 等. 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后泪膜的早期改变[J].中华眼科杂志, 2002,2(1):76-84. YANG Bin, WANG Zheng, WU Junshu, et al. The early changes of tear film after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2002, 2(1):76-84.
[5] Kim W S, Kim J S.Change in corneal sensitivity following laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1999, 25(3):368-373.
[6] Linna T U, Vesaluoma M H, Pérez-Santonja J J, et al. Effect of myopic LASIK on corneal sensitivity and morphology of subbasal nerves[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000, 41(2):393-397.
[7] Albietz J, Lenton L, McLennan S. The effect of tear film and ocular surface management on myopic LASIK outcomes[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2002, 506(Pt A):711-717.
[8] 晏晓明.重视对LASIK围手术期干眼的认识和处理[J]. 眼科, 2006,3(2):154-157. YAN Xiaoming. Stress on recognition and perioperative management of dry eye after LASIK[J]. Ophthalmol Chin, 2006, 3(2):154-157.
[9] Albietz J M, Lenton L M. Management of the ocular surface and tear film before, during, and after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Refract Surg, 2004, 20(1):62-71.
[10] Alfawaz A M, Algehedan S, Jastaneiah S S, et al. Efficacy of punctal occlusion in management of dry eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2014, 39(3):257-262.
[11] Yung Y H, Toda I, Sakai C, et al. Punctal plugs for treatment of post-LASIK dry eye[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2012, 56(3):208-213.
[12] Huang B, Mirza M A, Qazi M A, et al. The effect of punctal occlusion on wavefront aberrations in dry eye patients after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004,137(1):52-61.
[13] 刘睿, 周行涛, 于志强, 等. 泪道栓治疗准分子激光角膜屈光术后干眼疗效评价[J]. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志, 2011, 11(1):22-28. LIU Rui, ZHOU Xingtao, YU Zhiqiang, et al. Therapeutic effect of lacrimal plug for dry eyes after refractive surgery[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 11(1):22-28.
[14] 陶爱平, 接英. 可降解泪小管栓塞治疗准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后患者干眼症疗效观察[J]. 安徽医学, 2012, 33(11):1444-1447. TAO Aiping, JIE Ying. Effects of degradable lacrimal plug on treating dry eye after Lasik surgery[J]. Anhui Med, 2012, 33(11):1444-1447.
[15] Kojima T, Matsumoto Y, Ibrahim O M, et al. Evaluation of a thermosensitive atelocollagen punctal plugtreatment for dry eye disease[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 157(2):311-317.e1.
[16] Paparizos S C, Edward D P, Osmanovic S. Plug surface defects as a late complication of silicone punctal plugs[J]. Cornea, 2013, 32(9):1224-1226.
[17] Kaido M, Ishida R, Dogru M, et al. Visual function changes after punctal occlusion with the treatment of short BUT type of dry eye[J]. Cornea, 2012, 31(9):1009-1013.
[1] 李凯,罗丹. 润目灵方激活LC3-ATG5自噬通路抑制炎症因子表达改善干眼大鼠眼表损伤的机制[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 92-101.
[2] 杨冠英,李元彬. 人工智能在干眼管理中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 115-120.
[3] 方璐, 雷玉丹, 王华. 环孢素滴眼液联合玻璃酸钠滴眼液治疗干眼临床效果的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 65-73.
[4] 宁煜赟,李彤,张馨心. 睑板腺功能障碍相关干眼的局部药物治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 125-132.
[5] 李语辰,王旭. 巩膜镜治疗严重眼表疾病的有效性和安全性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 149-154.
[6] 毕赵静,李元彬. 睑板腺功能障碍实验模型及应用现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 159-165.
[7] 叶强,洛松巴宗,南苏亭,王浩,马进海,律鹏,张文芳. 色素上皮衍生因子与干眼的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 151-156.
[8] 王佳慧,刘学勤. 全球近10年干眼相关生活质量研究——基于VOSviewer和CiteSpace的文献计量学及可视化分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 61-72.
[9] 段练,孟凡兰,党光福. 干眼对屈光性白内障手术的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 1-6.
[10] 李彦松综述朱玉广审校. 泪膜稳定性对超声乳化术后视觉质量影响的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 19-25.
[11] 白伶伶,王红星,王立春. 可吸收泪小管塞栓联合人工泪液治疗中重度干眼的有效性及对视觉相关生存质量的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 78-82.
[12] 狄宇,李莹. 干眼炎症反应机制及抗炎治疗的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 144-150.
[13] 黄天泽,陈迪,李莹. 机器学习在眼表疾病诊断及角膜手术中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 13-19.
[14] 肖西立,聂渝晓,陈婕. 国内近10年干眼相关研究——基于Citespace的可视化分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(2): 86-97.
[15] 张晶,陶冶,李福生,王燊,曲冬懿,李莹,周跃华. OCT导航的飞秒激光制作角膜瓣的优势分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 17-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!