山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 54-62.

• 气道变态反应性疾病:从机制到实践 • 上一篇    

老年过敏性鼻炎患者哮喘共病风险预测列线图:多因素模型的构建与临床验证

刘丹凤1,潘庆春2,封雪飞1,李昊佚1,任健1,李代波1   

  1. 1.四川大学华西医院眉山市医院/眉山市人民医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 四川 眉山 620010;
    2.川北医学院附属医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 四川 南充 637000
  • 发布日期:2026-11-03
  • 通讯作者: 李代波. E-mail:290361202@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2024年度第二批眉山市级指导性科技计划项目(2024KJZD104)

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting asthma comorbidity in elderly patients with allergic rhinitis

LIU Danfeng1, PAN Qingchun2, FENG Xuefei1, LI Haoyi1, REN Jian1, LI Daibo1   

  1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Cluster for West China Hospital/Meishan People's Hospital, Meishan 620010, Sichuan, China 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China
  • Published:2026-11-03

摘要: 目的 探讨老年过敏性鼻炎(allergic rhinitis, AR)患者共病支气管哮喘(bronchial asthma, BA)的影响因素,构建风险预测列线图模型,为早期识别高危人群及制定个体化预防策略提供科学依据。 方法 选取2019年1月至2024年12月于眉山市人民医院就诊的老年AR患者523例,按7︰3的比例随机分为训练集(366例)和验证集(157例)。根据是否共病BA,将患者分为AR共病BA组与单纯AR组。采用LASSO回归对潜在影响因素进行初步筛选,再纳入多因素logistic回归分析确定独立影响因素,据此构建列线图预测模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线评估模型区分度,Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验及校准曲线评估模型校准度,决策曲线分析评估模型临床适用性。 结果 523例老年AR患者中,共病BA者138例(26.39%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,BA家族史(OR=2.224,95%CI:1.322~3.744)、职业粉尘接触史(OR=3.614,95%CI:2.107~6.199)、多重过敏原(OR=2.787,95%CI:1.585~4.900)及未规律使用鼻用糖皮质激素或抗组胺药(OR=2.381)是老年AR患者共病BA的独立影响因素(P<0.05)。基于上述因素构建的列线图模型在训练集的AUC为0.759(95%CI:0.704~0.813),验证集的AUC为0.745(95%CI:0.650~0.832)。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示模型拟合良好(训练集P=0.244,验证集P=0.958),校准曲线显示预测概率与实际观察概率具有较好一致性。决策曲线分析显示,模型在训练集(阈值概率0.090~0.610)和验证集(阈值概率0.080~0.900)范围内均具有正向临床净获益。 结论 BA家族史、职业粉尘接触史、多重过敏原及未规律用药是老年AR患者共病BA的独立危险因素,基于此构建的列线图模型具有良好的预测效能与临床适用性。该模型为早期识别高危人群提供了可视化工具,有助于实现个体化预防与社区分级管理。

关键词: 老年, 过敏性鼻炎, 支气管哮喘, 列线图模型

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influencing factors of bronchial asthma(BA)comorbidity in elderly patients with allergic rhinitis(AR)and to develop a nomogram prediction model for early identification of high-risk individuals and individualized prevention. Methods A total of 523 elderly patients with AR were enrolled from Meishan People's Hospital between January 2019 and December 2024. They were randomly divided into a training set(n=366)and a validation set(n=157)at a 7∶3 ratio. Patients were categorized into AR with BA comorbidity group and AR alone group based on the presence of BA. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO)regression was used for preliminary variable selection, followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify independent influencing factors. A nomogram was constructed based on these factors. Model discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve, calibration was assessed using Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves, and clinical applicability was evaluated using decision curve analysis(DCA). Results Among the 523 elderly AR patients, 138(26.39%)had BA comorbidity. Multivariate logistic regression showed that family history of BA(OR=2.224, 95%CI:1.322-3.744), occupational dust exposure(OR=3.614, 95%CI:2.107-6.199), multiple allergens(OR=2.787, 95%CI:1.585-4.900), and irregular use of intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines(OR=2.381)were independent influencing factors for BA comorbidity(P<0.05). The nomogram yielded an AUC of 0.759(95%CI:0.704-0.813)in the training set and 0.745(95%CI:0.650-0.832)in the validation set. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good model fit(training set P=0.244; validation set P=0.958), and calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. DCA demonstrated positive net clinical benefit across threshold probabilities of 0.090-0.610 in the training set and 0.080-0.900 in the validation set. Conclusion Family history of BA, occupational dust exposure, multiple allergens, and irregular medication use are independent risk factors for BA comorbidity in elderly AR patients. The nomogram constructed based on these factors exhibits good predictive performance and clinical applicability, providing a visual tool for early identification of high-risk individuals and facilitating individualized prevention and community-based stratified management.

Key words: Elderly, Allergic rhinitis, Bronchial asthma, Nomogram model

中图分类号: 

  • R763
[1] Nappi E, Paoletti G, Malvezzi L, et al. Comorbid allergic rhinitis and asthma: important clinical considerations[J]. Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 2022, 18(7): 747-758. DOI: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2089654
[2] Shah A, Pawankar R. Allergic rhinitis and co-morbid asthma: perspective from India: ARIA Asia-Pacific Workshop report[J]. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 2009, 27(1): 71-77
[3] Narasimhan R, Roy S, Koralla M, et al. Expert panel consensus recommendations for allergic rhinitis in patients with asthma in India[J]. Pulm Ther, 2025, 11(2): 129-155. DOI: 10.1007/s41030-024-00273-z
[4] 王文利, 杨立军, 彭晶, 等. 老年变应性鼻炎的临床特征及危险因素[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2023, 22(9): 692-695. DOI: 10.11915/j.issn.1671-5403.2023.09.145
[5] 李二乐, 韩继明, 薛亚娟, 等. 延安市宝塔区变应性鼻炎合并哮喘相关因素分析[J]. 延安大学学报(医学科学版), 2021, 19(1): 34-37. DOI: 10.19893/j.cnki.ydyxb.2021-0043
[6] 朱永红, 巴军凤. 血清总IgE、EOS、LDH和呼出气一氧化氮对过敏性鼻炎合并支气管哮喘的预测价值[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(4): 360-364. DOI: 10.11958/20250328
[7] 商胜利, 姚雅君, 陈明, 等. 个体化预测支气管哮喘患儿并发过敏性鼻炎风险的列线图模型建立及验证[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(6): 1000-1004. DOI: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003553
[8] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组. 中国变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南(2022年,修订版)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 57(2): 106-129. DOI: 10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2022.02.023
[9] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会. 支气管哮喘防治指南(2024年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2025, 48(3): 208-248. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20241013-00601
[10] Chen K, Shen Z W, Gu W J, et al. Prevalence of obesity and associated complications in China: a cross-sectional, real-world study in 15.8 million adults[J]. Diabetes ObesMetab, 2023, 25(11): 3390-3399. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15238
[11] Ciprandi G, Comite P, Ferrero F, et al. Serum allergen-specific IgE, allergic rhinitis severity, and age[J]. Rhinology, 2016, 54(3): 231-238. DOI: 10.4193/Rhino15.300
[12] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会, 高血压联盟(中国), 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会高血压分会, 等. 中国高血压防治指南(2024年修订版)[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2024, 32(7): 603-700. DOI: 10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2024.07.002
[13] 中国成人血脂异常防治指南修订联合委员会. 中国成人血脂异常防治指南(2016年修订版)[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2017, 16(1): 15-35. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2016.10.005
[14] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes—2024[J]. Diabetes care, 2024, 47(Suppl_1): S20-S42. DOI: 10.2337/dc24-S002
[15] Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(2024 report)[EB/OL].(2023-11-13)[2024-12-08]. https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/GOLD-2024_v1.2-11Jan24_WMV-1.pdf
[16] Fokkens W J, Lund V J, Hopkins C, et al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020[J]. Rhinology, 2020, 58(Suppl S29): 1-464. DOI: 10.4193/Rhin20.600
[17] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组. 中国慢性鼻窦炎诊断和治疗指南(2018)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 54(2): 81-100. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2019.02.001
[18] Khan S J, Dharmage S C, Matheson M C, et al. Is the atopic March related to confounding by genetics and early-life environment? A systematic review of sibship and twin data[J]. Allergy, 2018, 73(1): 17-28. DOI: 10.1111/all.13228
[19] Gelardi M, Iannuzzi L, Tafuri S, et al. Allergic and non-allergic rhinitis: relationship with nasal polyposis, asthma and family history[J]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2014, 34(1): 36-41.
[20] Gentile D A, Skoner D P. Allergic rhinitis[M] //Pediatric Allergy: Principles and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2010: 291-300. DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4377-0271-2.00028-6
[21] Meng Y F, Wang C S, Zhang L. Recent developments and highlights in allergic rhinitis[J]. Allergy, 2019, 74(12): 2320-2328. DOI: 10.1111/all.14067
[22] Terreehorst I, Oosting A J, Tempels-Pavlica Z, et al. Prevalence and severity of allergic rhinitis in house dust mite-allergic patients with bronchial asthma or atopic dermatitis[J]. Clin Exp Allergy, 2002, 32(8): 1160-1165. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.01461.x
[23] Poole J A, Romberger D J, Wyatt T A, et al. Age impacts pulmonary inflammation and systemic bone response to inhaled organic dust exposure[J]. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 2015, 78(19): 1201-1216. DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2015.1075165
[24] Demoly P, Passalacqua G, Pfaar O, et al. Management of the polyallergic patient with allergy immunotherapy: a practice-based approach[J]. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol, 2016, 12: 2. DOI:10.1186/s13223-015-0109-6
[25] 鹿伟理, 姜涛, 李宪华. 多重致敏儿童变应性鼻炎患者sIgE特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 260-265, 274. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.438
[1] 徐娟, 崔彪, 黄建平, 陈以标, 施建飞, 王燕雯, 刘赞华, 张剑伟. 电子喉镜评估老年肺部感染患者的吞咽功能[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 74-79.
[2] 章娜娜,黄冠江,卢标清. 联合中医证型分析喉癌变的影响因素及构建预测模型[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 29-37.
[3] 杜康丽,郑振宇,徐战将,张宇,陈露,卢梦垚. 鼻中隔偏曲并发慢性鼻窦炎风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 78-86.
[4] 黄焕,华红利,邓玉琴,江承洋,王雨薇,杨星海. 儿童过敏性鼻炎、扁桃体腺样体肥大和鼻窦炎之间相关性及其对临床指导价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 34-41.
[5] 李辉,赵永强,贺祯,杨惠敏,赵叶,田秀娟,陈剑秋. 下颌提拉平卧位下床旁老年患者经皮扩张气管切开的安全性探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 87-93.
[6] 孙鸿翔,曹娟. 老年白内障患者心理脆弱现状及其与希望水平和述情障碍的相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 89-95.
[7] 李逢将,魏婕,刘红丹,张丽,赵伟超,武娜娜,王磊,吴玮,王瑞娟. 老年肺炎患者胃食管反流病和咽喉反流性疾病25例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 103-107.
[8] 张杰,陈敏,申征征,吴宇华,刘原虎,孙浩,谭新华,倪树仁,杨书勋,史雪峥,倪鑫. 过敏性鼻炎与儿童新冠病毒肺炎感染及症状的关联性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 36-42.
[9] 张真,杨卓莹,周佳妮,张大为,陈仁杰. 环索奈德鼻喷剂治疗季节性过敏性鼻炎疗效与安全的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 13-20.
[10] 乌日柴夫,苏日古格,孟永梅. 卵清蛋白诱导的过敏性鼻炎豚鼠模型的建立与评价及蒙医舌尿诊的初步分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 32-38.
[11] 周颖东,张梦娴,王青玲,康浩然,郭向东. 氧化应激在老年性聋发病机制中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 72-78.
[12] 王剑,杜伟嘉,薛涛,陈福权. 利用百度指数分析中国过敏性鼻炎及相关变应性疾病的流行特征[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(5): 31-41.
[13] 王晓嫒,张欠欠,程翔宇,李志鹏,张维天,叶海波. 翼管神经切断术治疗2型慢性鼻窦炎伴过敏性鼻炎的临床疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(5): 42-49.
[14] 毕晓云,马本绪,王心茹,李旭豪,杨继国. 穴位贴敷治疗小儿过敏性鼻炎随机对照试验的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 75-85.
[15] 周加敏,宋玉婉,孙岩. 细胞焦亡在老年退行性疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 172-180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!