山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 15-18.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.126

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

突发性聋伴耳鸣患者耳鸣特征

钟晓声1, 杨海弟2, 郑亿庆2   

  1. 1. 中山大学附属博济医院/增城市人民医院耳鼻喉科, 广东 增城 511300;
    2. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院耳鼻喉科, 广东 广州 510120
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-18 修回日期:2015-05-20 出版日期:2015-08-16 发布日期:2015-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 郑亿庆。E-mail：yiqingzheng@hotmail.com E-mail:yiqingzheng@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:钟晓声。E-mail：masonic@126.com

Characteristics of tinnitus in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

ZHONG Xiaosheng1, YANG Haidi2, ZHENG Yiqing2   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Boji-Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University(Zengcheng People's Hospital), Zengcheng 511300, Guangdong, China;
    2. Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2015-03-18 Revised:2015-05-20 Online:2015-08-16 Published:2015-08-16

PDF (PC)

1484

被引次数

10

摘要： 目的 分析研究突发性聋伴耳鸣患者的耳鸣特点、耳鸣与听力损失的关系、耳鸣对患者的影响程度, 探讨突聋患者耳鸣的产生机制。 方法 突发性聋伴有耳鸣患者231例常规采集病史, 填写耳鸣致残量表(THI)及视觉模拟得分表(VAS), 同时进行纯音听阈测试、耳声发射、耳鸣检测及掩蔽试验等检查。分析患者的耳鸣特点、耳鸣与听力的关系、耳鸣的THI及VAS得分以及它们特点。 结果 ①听力损失特点：低中频下降型20例(占8.7%), 中高频下降型60例(占26.0%), 平坦型44例(占19.0%), 全聋型79例(占34.2%), 不规则型28例(占12.1%);②耳鸣频率:低频耳鸣(≤500 Hz)49例(占21.2%), 中频耳鸣(51～2 000 Hz)54例(23.4%), 高频耳鸣(>2 000 Hz)122例(52.8%), 未匹配6例(占2.6%)。其中听力损失类型为低中频下降型的患者中, 低频、中频、高频耳鸣的比例分别为75%、15%、10%;中高频下降型患者中, 低频、中频、高频耳鸣的比例分别为13.3%、26.7%、60.0%;全聋型患者中, 低频、中频、高频耳鸣的比例分别为17.1%、19.0%、63.3%。听力下降最明显的频率对数与耳鸣频率对数呈线性关系, r=0.592, P<0.01;③耳鸣响度:0～30 dB HL 45例(占19.5%), 31～60 dB HL 60例(占26.0%), 60～90 dB HL 102例(占44.2%), 大于90 dB HL 18例(占27.8%), 未匹配6例(占2.6%)。耳鸣响度与听力损失程度(250～4 000 Hz平均听阈)有相关性, 相关系数r=0.216, P=0.001<0.05。④耳鸣致残级别:按照Newman等依据THI得分将耳鸣残疾分级, 其中1级27例(占11.7%), 2级耳鸣44例(占19.0%), 3级66例(占28.6%), 4级94例(占40.7%)。⑤THI及VAS得分特点:THI得分与听力损失程度无相关性r=0.087, P=0.287>0.05。VAS得分与听力损失程度无相关性r=0.002, P=0.982>0.05。THI得分与耳鸣频率对数无相关性, 相关系数r=-0.056, P=0.402>0.05。VAS得分与耳鸣频率对数无相关性, 相关系数r=-0.003, P=0.970>0.05。THI得分与耳鸣响度无相关性, 相关系数r=0.039, P=0.563>0.05。VAS得分与耳鸣响度无相关性, 相关系数r=0.136, P=0.110>0.05。结论 ①突发性聋伴耳鸣患者中高频耳鸣最常见;②耳鸣频率与听力损失类型显著相关, 低中频下降型以低频耳鸣多见, 而中高频下降型及全聋型以高频耳鸣多见;③听力损失最大的频率与耳鸣的频率有较高的一致性;④突发性聋伴耳鸣患者急性期的耳鸣致残程度以3～4级为多;⑤THI及VAS得分与听力损失的程度、耳鸣的频率、耳鸣的响度均无相关性。

关键词: 突发性聋, 视觉模拟得分表, 耳鸣致残量表, 耳鸣

Abstract: Objective To analyze the characteristics of tinnitus, correlation between tinnitus and hearing loss, effects of tinnitus, and mechanism of tinnitus in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Methods Clinical data of 231 tinnitus patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss were retrospectively reviewed. Results of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), visual analogue scale (VAS), pure tone audiometry, acoustic emission, tinnitus test and masking test were analyzed. Results ① Characteristics of hearing loss: Low-intermediate frequency hearing loss (rise type) was 8.7%, high-frequency hearing loss (fall type) was 26%, flat-type was 19%, total-deafness type was 34.2%, irregular type was 12.1%. ② Frequency of tinnitus: Low-frequency (<500 Hz) tinnitus was 21.2%, medium-frequency (51-2 000 Hz) tinnitus was 23.4%, high-frequency (>2 000 Hz) tinnitus was 52.8%, unmatched tinnitus was 2.6%. Of hearing loss with low-intermediate frequency, low, medium and high frequency tinnitus was 75%, 15% and 10% respectively. Of hearing loss with medium-high frequency, low, medium and high frequency tinnitus was 13.3%, 26.7% and 60.0% respectively. Of total deafness, low, medium and high frequency tinnitus was 17.1%, 19.0% and 63.3% respectively. There was an linear relationship between the frequency hearing loss and tinnitus frequency (r=0.590, P<0.01). ③ Tinnitus volume: Tinnitus volume was 0-30 dB HL(19.5%), 31-60 dB HL(26%), 60-90 dB HL(44.2%), >90 dB HL (27.8%), and unmatched (2.6%). Tinnitus volume was correlated with the degree of hearing loss (r=0.216, P<0.05). ④ Tinnitus disability level: According to THI scores, the tinnitus disability level was: grade 1 (11.7%), grade 2 (19%), grade 3 (28.6%), and grade 4 (40.7%). ⑤ The characteristics of THI and VAS scores: there was no correlation between THI scores and degree of hearing loss (r=0.087, P=0.287), no correlation between VAS score and degree of hearing loss (r=0.002, P=0.982), no correlation between THI and the logarithm of tinnitus frequency (r=-0.056, P=0.402), no correlation between VAS score and frequency of tinnitus (r=-0.003, P=0.970), no correlation between THI score and tinnitus volume, r=0.03, P=0.563), no correlation between VAS score and tinnitus volume (r=0.136, P=0.110). Conclusion ① High-frequency tinnitus with idiopathic sudden deafness is the most common among all types of hearing loss. ② There is a significant correlation between tinnitus frequency and type of hearing loss. ③ The frequency of the greatest hearing loss is consistent with the frequency of tinnitus. ④ Tinnitus disability level is grade 3-4 during the acute period of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. ⑤ THI and VAS scores are not correlated with degree of hearing loss, tinnitus, tinnitus volume and frequency.

Key words: Tinnitus handicap inventory, Visual analogue scale, Tinnitus, Idiopathic sudden deafness

中图分类号: 

  • R764.437
[1] 刘敏, 陈锡辉, 汪广理, 等. 性别、年龄和听力损害程度与突发性聋患者耳鸣症状相关性分析[J] . 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2007, 15(3):174-176. LIU Min, CHEN Xihui, WANG Guangli, et al. Association of sex, age and hearing loss severity with tinnitus among cases with sudden sensorineural hering loss[J]. Chin J Otorhinolarynol Head Neck Surg, 2007, 15(3):174-176.
[2] Psifidis A D, Psillas G K, Daniilidis J C H. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Long- term follow- up results[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 134(5):809-815.
[3] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会.突发性聋的诊断和治疗指南(2005年.济南).中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2006, 41(8): 569-569. Chinese Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Society of Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Guideline of diagnosis and treatment of sudden deafness (2005, Jinan) [J]. Chin J Otorhinolarynol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 41(8):569-569.
[4] Jastreboff P J, Gray W C, Gold S L. Neurophysiological approach to tinnitus patients[J]. Am J Otol, 1996, 17(2):236-240.
[5] Newman C W, Sandridge S A, Bolek L. Development and psychometric adequacy of the screening versin of the tinitus hadicap inventory[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2008, 29(3):276-281.
[6] 朱亚骄, 薛飞, 王秋萍. 90例耳鸣患者心理声学特征研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2014, 28(5): 14-17. ZHU Yajiao, XUE Fei, WANG Qiuping. Psychoacoustic characteristics of 90 tinnitus patients[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2014, 28(5):14-17.
[7] 杨海弟, 郑亿庆, 张志钢, 等. 主观性耳鸣的掩蔽及习服治疗效果分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2010, 24(10):442-446 . YANG Haidi, ZHENG Yiqing, ZHANG Zhigang, et al. Analysis and comparison of the masking and TRT for patients with subjective tinnitus[J]. Clin J Otorhinolarynol Head Neck Surg, 2010, 24(10):442-446.
[1] 高奇歌,张华. 搏动性耳鸣的治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 95-101.
[2] 凌雯琛,陈佳旭,徐智辉,郑伟,刘广宇,赵鑫宇,黄平. 基于R语言数据挖掘技术对黄平教授治疗耳鸣用药规律及诊疗特色[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 8-19.
[3] 王莹,蔡燕文. 以听力减退为主要表现的中枢神经系统表面铁沉积症1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 89-96.
[4] 王鑫,原晶晶,郝鹏鹏,闫占峰,刘建华,钟利群,刘思溟,吴薇,赵晓阳,张莹. 中药复方治疗突发性聋的疗效和可能机制:一项结合网络药理学研究的回顾性临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 6-17.
[5] 董雪林,张治军. 掩蔽声治疗慢性主观性耳鸣的焦虑抑郁状态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 18-24.
[6] 郭翔,马永强,伊海金. 突发性聋磁共振检查的现状与进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 140-144.
[7] 李培培,卢彦青,侯楠. 机器学习预测模型在突发性聋中的临床应用研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 145-151.
[8] 郭振平,李雪冰. 慢性主观性耳鸣患者心理特征、睡眠质量调查及与临床效果相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 1-7.
[9] 陈丹萍,何子键,虞幼军,周晓娓. 儿童突发性聋10年住院病例的疗效及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 16-22.
[10] 卜苓南,李茂才,宫丽丽. 以搏动性耳鸣就诊的外伤性颞浅动静脉瘘1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 101-104.
[11] 梁俊杰,张佳佳,张琳婧,孟言,李阳,白鹏. 中西医结合治疗突发性聋合并手足口病1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 91-95.
[12] 张佳佳,石安妮,邢御,洪玉颖,白鹏. 针刺联合西药治疗全聋型突发性聋1例与文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 88-92.
[13] 陈倬诣,郑亿庆,杨海弟. 慢性主观性耳鸣分类、发生发展机制及治疗新进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 1-12.
[14] 罗伊雯,肖永涛,高敏倩,杨嘉仪,杨海弟. 慢性主观性耳鸣的声治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 13-23.
[15] 张红,李欣. 中枢神经系统活动异常在耳鸣发生中的作用与机制[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 24-29.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发