山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 7-10.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.453

• ·论著· • 上一篇    下一篇

耳鸣声学特征与扩展高频听阈的关系

黄娟,庞宇峰,龚静蓉,董玥辉   

  1. 2013WYQJ09)第一作者:黄娟。 E-mail:yueguangcaojuan@163.com通讯作者:庞宇峰。 E-mail:yfent@qq.comDOI:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.453耳鸣声学特征与扩展高频听阈的关系黄娟, 庞宇峰, 龚静蓉, 董玥辉(上海市第五人民医院耳鼻咽喉科, 上海 200240
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-30 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 庞宇峰. E-mail:yfent@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市第五人民医院科研课题项目(2013WYQJ09)

Relationship between the psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus and high frequency hearing threshold

HUANG Juan, PANG Yufeng, GONG Jingrong, DONG Yuehui   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, The Fifth Peoples Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200240, China
  • Received:2017-10-30 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-20

摘要: 目的 探讨纯音听阈正常的耳鸣患者耳鸣音调与扩展高频听阈的关系。 方法 对156例纯音听阈正常的耳鸣患者进行耳鸣生理声学检测,以纯音听阈正常的无耳鸣患者为对照组,对两组均进行扩展高频听阈检测。按年龄(25~35岁、36~45岁、46~55岁、≥55岁)分组,比较各组扩展高频听阈的平均值。将耳鸣组患者按耳鸣音调进行分类:低频组(125 Hz、250 Hz、500 Hz)、中频组(1.5 kHz、3 kHz)、高频组(4 kHz、6 kHz、8 kHz、≥9 kHz),一共9组,将各扩展高频平均听阈值(9 kHz、10 kHz、11.2 kHz、12.5 kHz、14 kHz、16 kHz)与对照组患者分别比对分析。 结果 耳鸣组和无耳鸣组之间比较,扩展高频各频率平均阈值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但各年龄组之间对比,年龄、是否耳鸣对扩展高频平均听阈都有显著影响。耳鸣音调1.5 kHz耳鸣组中9 kHz、耳鸣音调3 kHz耳鸣组中11.2 kHz、耳鸣音调4 kHz耳鸣组中10 kHz、耳鸣音调6 kHz耳鸣组中10 kHz和11.2 kHz、耳鸣音调8 kHz耳鸣组中10 kHz和11.2 kHz、耳鸣音调≥9 kHz耳鸣组中10 kHz、11.2 kHz和12.5 kHz平均阈值与对照组比较差异有统计学意义。 结论 扩展高频听阈下降与是否耳鸣、年龄有关。10 kHz、11.2 kHz平均听阈值下降与中、高频耳鸣有关联,特别是对高频耳鸣的患者很敏感,可以作为早期评估高频耳鸣患者早期耳蜗功能的敏感指标。

关键词: 声学特征, 扩展高频听阈, 耳鸣

Abstract: Objective To investigate the relationship between the pitch of tinnitus and high frequency hearing threshold(HFHT). Method A total of 156 patients with tinnitus and normal hearing thresholds between 125 and 8 000 Hz were included. Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus and HFHT were recorded. The HFHTs of subjects with normal hearing thresholds but without tinnitus were measured as a control group. The patients were then divided into four groups according to age(25-35 years old, 36-45 years old, 46-55 years old, and ≥55 years old). The patients were divided into nine groups based on their tinnitus pitch: low-frequency group(125 Hz, 250 Hz, and 500 Hz), middle-frequency group(1.5 kHz and 3 kHz), and high-frequency group(4 kHz, 6 kHz, 8 kHz, and ≥9 kHz). The data available from the nine groups and the control group were analyzed. Results No correlation was found between the groups with and without tinnitus. Age, presence of tinnitus, and interaction had significant influence on HFHT. There was no difference between the low-frequency and control groups. In the middle-frequency group, there was significant hearing loss related to frequency, including at 9 kHz in the 1.5 kHz group and at 11.2 kHz in the 3 kHz group. In the high-frequency group, there was significant hearing loss related to frequency, including at 10 kHz in the 4 kHz group, at 10 kHz and 11.2 kHz in the 6 kHz group, at 10 kHz in the 8 kHz group, and at 10 kHz and 12.5 kHz in ≥9 kHz group. The hearing levels at 11.2 kHz in the 8 kHz and ≥9 kHz groups were statistically significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.01). Conclusion HFHT correlated with age and presence of tinnitus. The decrease of hearing thresholds at 10 kHz and 11.2 kHz in the middle-frequency and high-frequency groups may be a sensitive indicator for alterations in the basal cochlea, which could lead to clinical therapy for high-frequency tinnitus.

Key words: High frequency hearing threshold, Psychoacoustic characteristics, Tinnitus

中图分类号: 

  • R764
[1] Fabijańska A, Smurzyński J, Hatzopoulos S, et al.The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and extended high-frequency audiometry in tinnitus patients. Part 1: Normally hearing patients with unilateral tinnitus[J]. Med Sci Mon Inter Med J Exp Clin Res, 2012, 18(12):765-770.
[2] Omidvar S, Jafari Z, Mahmoudian S, et al. The relationship between ultra-high frequency thresholds and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults with tinnitus[J]. Med J Islamic Repub Iran, 2016, 30(1):449.
[3] 蔡艺,汤建国,李旋.扩展高频气导听阈和耳鸣的关系[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2004,18(1):8-11. CAI Yi, TANG Jianguo, LI Xuan. Relationship between high frequency hearing threshold and tinnitus[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol, 2004, 18(1):8-11.
[4] Vielsmeier V, Lehner A, Strutz J, et al. The relevance of the high frequency audiometry in tinnitus patients with normal hearing in conventional pure-tone audiometry[J]. Biomed Res Inter, 2015, 2015(3):1-5.
[5] 韩德民.临床听力学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:11.
[6] 赵娟,张华,吉彬,等.扩展高频测听对常规纯音测听正常的耳鸣患者早期听力损失的诊断价值[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2010,24(7):318-319.
[7] 李桂芳,王春华,刘朝兵.250例耳鸣患者听力结果分析[J].河北医科大学学报,2016,37(7):806-813. LI Guifang, WANG Chunhua, LIU Chaobing. The analysis of hearing results in 250 patients with tinnitus[J]. J Hebei Med Univ, 2016, 37(7):806-813.
[8] 宋凡,陈秀兰,王斌,等.急、慢性耳鸣的临床和心理声学特征分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2017,15(1):71-76. SONG Fan, CHEN Xiulan, WANG Bin, et al. Clinical and psychoacoustic characteristics in patients with acute and chronic tinnitus[J]. Chin J Otol, 2017, 15(1):71-76.
[9] Prabhu PP, Chandan HS. Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder[J]. Audiol Res, 2014, 4(1):52-55.
[10] 陈秀兰,秦兆冰.伴感音神经性聋的耳鸣患者临床表现及心理声学特点[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2011,18(2):77-79. CHEN Xiulan, QIN Zhaobing. Clinical and psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus patients with sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Chin Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2011, 18(2):77-79.
[1] 高奇歌,张华. 搏动性耳鸣的治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 95-101.
[2] 凌雯琛,陈佳旭,徐智辉,郑伟,刘广宇,赵鑫宇,黄平. 基于R语言数据挖掘技术对黄平教授治疗耳鸣用药规律及诊疗特色[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 8-19.
[3] 王莹,蔡燕文. 以听力减退为主要表现的中枢神经系统表面铁沉积症1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 89-96.
[4] 董雪林,张治军. 掩蔽声治疗慢性主观性耳鸣的焦虑抑郁状态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 18-24.
[5] 郭振平,李雪冰. 慢性主观性耳鸣患者心理特征、睡眠质量调查及与临床效果相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 1-7.
[6] 卜苓南,李茂才,宫丽丽. 以搏动性耳鸣就诊的外伤性颞浅动静脉瘘1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 101-104.
[7] 陈倬诣,郑亿庆,杨海弟. 慢性主观性耳鸣分类、发生发展机制及治疗新进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 1-12.
[8] 罗伊雯,肖永涛,高敏倩,杨嘉仪,杨海弟. 慢性主观性耳鸣的声治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 13-23.
[9] 张红,李欣. 中枢神经系统活动异常在耳鸣发生中的作用与机制[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 24-29.
[10] 董洪松,王春丽,俞艳萍,陈涛,聂国辉. 声音疗法联合药物治疗慢性主观性耳鸣的临床随机对照研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 30-37.
[11] 许海艳,曹卫,范大川. 多元复合声治疗对突聋患者耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 38-45.
[12] 吴波,黄天德,闫斌,陈伊,汤勇. 焦虑抑郁状态与特发性耳鸣预后的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 46-52.
[13] 刘广宇,谭君颖,霍岩,张剑宁,李明. “治鸣六穴”治疗脾胃虚弱型耳鸣患者的临床疗效观察及脑效应机制研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 53-61.
[14] 熊彬彬,卢子昂,杨晶,徐文强,周潞茹,孙平原,袁丁,朱佳浩. 纯音听阈值正常的中青年耳鸣群体耳蜗功能分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 62-67.
[15] 王楠,黄晶,彭涛,冯勃. OSAHS与耳鸣的相关性研究现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(2): 122-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!