704例突发性耳聋疗效分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.052

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的

分析不同听力损失程度及听力曲线类型患者的疗效，为突发性耳聋的临床治疗提供参考。

方法

以2015 年1月至2018年12月于广州中医药大学附属中山中医院耳鼻咽喉科住院治疗且确诊及临床资料完整的704例（805耳）突发性耳聋患者为研究对象，对比分析不同听力损失程度的不同听力曲线类型突发性耳聋患者的疗效。

结果

172例低频下降型患者中，轻度与中度的痊愈率分别为64.66%、53.33%，差异无统计学意义（χ²=0.122，P=0.727），总有效率分别为78.66%、73.33%，差异无统计学意义（ χ²=0.012，P=0.913）；205例高频下降型患者中，轻度、中度、中-重度、重度者痊愈率分别为5.98%、4.34%、0、0，不同程度听力损失者的痊愈率差异无统计学意义（χ²=2.636，P=0.451），轻度、中度、中-重度、重度者总有效率分别为22.22%、19.56%、38.46%、40.00%，不同程度听力损失者的总有效率差异无统计学意义（χ²=5.067，P=0.167）；226例平坦下降型患者中，轻度、中度、中-重度、重度者痊愈率分别为34.14%、4.76%、10.44%、9.21%，轻度与中度、中重度及重度间差异有统计学意义（χ²=9.325、6.956、7.852，P=0.007、0.021、0.013），轻度、中度、中-重度、重度者总有效率分别为57.44%、37.09%、50.74%、52.63%，不同程度听力损失者的总有效率差异无统计学意义（χ²=4.103，P=0.129）；101例全聋型患者中，重度与极重度的痊愈率分别为12.50%、1.07%，差异有统计学意义（χ²=4.954，P=0.026），重度与极重度者的总有效率分别为62.50%，34.40%，差异无统计学意义（χ²=2.504，P=0.114）。

结论

听力损失程度对突发性聋的疗效有重要影响，除低频下降型外，其余听力曲线类型疗效均较差。

关键词: 突发性聋, 听力损失, 治疗结局

Abstract: Objective

To analyze the therapeutic outcome based on the hearing loss level and hearing curve in sudden deafness and to provide clinical treatment strategies.

Methods

In total, 704 patients (805 ears) with sudden deafness hospitalized in the Otorhinolaryngology Department of Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2015 to December 2018 were selected for the study. The therapeutic outcomes based on the hearing loss level and hearing curve in sudden deafness were compared and analyzed.

Results

Among 172 cases of low frequency hearing loss, the recovery rates of cases involving mild and moderate deafness were 64.66% and 53.33%, respectively, with no significant differences (χ²= 0.122; P = 0.727), and the total effective rates were 78.66% and 73.33%, respectively, with no significant differences (χ²= 0.012; P = 0.913). Among 205 cases involving high frequency hearing loss, the recovery rates of cases involving mild, moderate, moderate-severe, and severe deafness were 5.98%, 4.34%, 0%, and 0%, respectively, with no significant differences (χ²= 0.012; P = 0.913), and the total effective rates were 22.22%, 19.56%, 38.46%, and 40.00%, respectively, with no significant differences (χ²= 5.067; P = 0.167). Among 226 cases of flat hearing loss, the recovery rates of those with mild, moderate, moderate-severe, and severe deafness were 34.14%, 4.76%, 10.44%, and 9.21%, respectively, with no significant differences (χ² = 9.325, 6.956, and 7.852, respectively; P = 0.007, 0.021, and 0.013, respectively), and the total effective rates were 57.44%, 37.09%, 50.74%, and 52.63%, respectively, with no significant differences (χ² = 4.103; P = 0.129). Among 101 cases of total deafness, the recovery rates of cases involving severe and extremely severe deafness were 12.50% and 1.07%, respectively, which was statistically significant (χ² = 4.954; P = 0.026), and the total effective rates were 62.50% and 34.40%, respectively, with no significant differences (χ² = 2.504; P = 0.114).

Conclusions

The degree of hearing loss is a factor influencing the therapeutic outcome in sudden deafness. Except for low frequency hearing loss, all other types showed a poor therapeutic outcome.

Key words: Sudden deafness, Hearing loss, Theatment outcome

中图分类号:

R764.43

叶毅良,卢标清. 704例突发性耳聋疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 44-47.

Yiliang YE,Biaoqing LU. Therapeutic outcome analysis of 704 cases of sudden deafness[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(5): 44-47.

参考文献 12

1	中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会 . 突发性聋诊断和治疗指南(2015)[J]. 2015, 50(6): 443-447. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1673-0860.2015.06.002 . doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1673-0860.2015.06.002
2	马荣峰, 朱富高, 孙美红, 等 . 突发性聋预后的相关因素分析及疗程选择[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(4): 69-74.
	MA Rongfeng , ZHU Fugao , SUN Meihong , et al . Analysis on the relevant prognostic factors of sudden deafness and selection of course of treatment[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2016, 30(4): 69-74.
3	司建平,杜海荣,严佳亮,等 .秦皇岛地区324例突发性聋患者疗效分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2018,16(3):408-411.
4	中国突发性聋多中心临床研究协作组 . 中国突发性聋分型治疗的多中心临床研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2013, 48(5) : 355-361. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2013.05.002 . doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2013.05.002
	Chinese sudden hearing loss multi-center clinical . Prospective clinical multi-center study on the treatment of sudden deafness with different typings in china[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2013, 48(5): 355-361. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2013.05.002 . doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2013.05.002
5	李宝环, 姜子刚 . 不同听力损失程度突发性聋疗效分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 30(14): 1124-1126. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.14.008 . doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.14.008
	LI Baohuan , JIANG Zigang . Curative effect analysis of different degree of hearing loss in sudden deafness patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2016, 30(14): 1124-1126. doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.14.008 . doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.14.008
6	Cao XY , Liu YS , Lei MX , et al . Comparison of curative effect and prognosis analysis of patients with spinal metastases treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with postoperative radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone[J]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2016, 96(47):3805-3810.
7	Li FJ , Wang DY , Wang HY , et al . Clinical study on 136 children with sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2016,129(8):946-952.doi:10.4103/0366-6999.179791 . doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.179791
8	Tüzemen G . The importance of the first three days and other diagnostic indicators in sudden hearing loss[J]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg, 2016, 26(6): 333-341. doi:10.5606/kbbihtisas.2016.66915 . doi: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2016.66915
9	Choo OS , Yang SM , Park HY , et al . Differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis of sudden low- and high-frequency hearing loss[J]. The Laryngoscope, 2017, 127(8): 1878-1884. doi:10.1002/lary.26382 . doi: 10.1002/lary.26382
10	Lee HS , Lee YJ , Kang BS , et al . A clinical analysis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss cases[J]. Korean J Audiol, 2014, 18(2): 69. doi:10.7874/kja.2014.18.2.69 . doi: 10.7874/kja.2014.18.2.69
11	司建平, 姜子刚, 杨丽莉, 等 . 全频下降型突发性聋患者听力初始恢复频率与预后相关性研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2017, 24(10): 547-548. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2017.10.015 . doi: 10.16066/j.1672-7002.2017.10.015
12	Bae SC , Noh HI , Jun BC , et al . Efficacy of intratympanic steroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: comparison with systemic steroid therapy and combined therapy[J]. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 2013, 133(5): 428-433. doi:10.3109/00016489. 2012. 749520 . doi: 10.3109/00016489. 2012. 749520

相关文章 15

[1]	王敏,刘皓,姜露涵,谭立约,李文,付小龙. AAV-ie-Tnfaip8l2的包装及其对Tnfaip8l2^-/-小鼠听觉功能的改善效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 7-15.
[2]	王梦慧,黎奥,魏浩,姜玥,吴星光,李鹿晞,钱晓云. 乙型肝炎病毒致聋多机制与临床预警[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 110-114.
[3]	王凯健,王威,陈雪生,樊春笋,何颖颖,黄冬玲,钱村慧,丁树军. 中性粒淋巴细胞比值与成年人听力损失及听力阈值的关系:基于NHANES数据库的横断面研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 18-28.
[4]	陶朵朵,史彬,赵云舒,李勇刚,刘济生. 年龄相关性听力损失患者前扣带回神经递质水平及其与听力水平关系的初步研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 31-39.
[5]	张丽霞,李琳. 基于GEO数据库筛选年龄相关性听力损失关键基因的分析研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 104-114.
[6]	王鑫,原晶晶,郝鹏鹏,闫占峰,刘建华,钟利群,刘思溟,吴薇,赵晓阳,张莹. 中药复方治疗突发性聋的疗效和可能机制:一项结合网络药理学研究的回顾性临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 6-17.
[7]	郭翔,马永强,伊海金. 突发性聋磁共振检查的现状与进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 140-144.
[8]	李培培,卢彦青,侯楠. 机器学习预测模型在突发性聋中的临床应用研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 145-151.
[9]	陈丹萍,何子键,虞幼军,周晓娓. 儿童突发性聋10年住院病例的疗效及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 16-22.
[10]	梁俊杰,张佳佳,张琳婧,孟言,李阳,白鹏. 中西医结合治疗突发性聋合并手足口病1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 91-95.
[11]	张静祎,董湘依,牟亚魁,宋西成. 细胞焦亡在耳鼻咽喉科疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 140-148.
[12]	张佳佳,石安妮,邢御,洪玉颖,白鹏. 针刺联合西药治疗全聋型突发性聋1例与文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 88-92.
[13]	王欣怡,杨文杰,余文兴,徐艳红,胡纯红,母晓松,蒲晓兵,任建君,赵宇. 家庭化个体多元复合声治疗对耳鸣伴听力损失患者的疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 70-76.
[14]	黄岚,高伟陈钢钢. 内耳疾病继发BPPV的发病机制和临床特征的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 108-113.
[15]	马宁, 陈敏, 刘薇, 杨扬, 邵剑波, 郝津生, 刘冰, 张晓, 段晓岷, 张祺丰, 张杰. 儿童颞骨骨折临床特点和治疗策略[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(1): 13-19.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed