Catquest-9SF的研究进展及临床应用

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.521

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着手术技术和材料设备的发展,白内障手术已成为屈光性手术,其治疗目标从早期的单纯复明发展到追求功能性视力和精准化医疗。值得注意的是,部分白内障患者尽管术后主观视力和客观视觉质量恢复良好,却仍不满意术后效果。由于视功能相关生存质量研究作为评价白内障手术干预效果的工具,能够提供前述指标以外的重要的信息,在临床上越来越受到重视。Catquest-9SF是一种评价白内障视功能相关生存质量量表,经翻译、回译及跨文化调试后目前已经在国际被广泛应用。本文将对其演变进程以及近年来临床和科研中的应用情况进行综述。

关键词: 白内障, 视功能, Catquest-9SF, 量表, 临床应用

Abstract: With the development of surgical technology, materials, and equipment, cataract surgery has become refractive, and its treatment goals have evolved from early simple rehabilitation to functional vision and precision medicine. Although subjective and objective visual qualities of some patients with cataract recover well, they are dissatisfied with postoperative results. As a tool to evaluate effects of cataract surgery, visual function-related quality of life research can provide information other than the aforementioned indicators and has been receiving increasing clinical attention. Catquest-9SF, which is a scale to evaluate the quality of life related to cataract visual function, has been widely used worldwide after translation, back translation, and cross-cultural debugging. In this article, we will review its evolution and application in clinical and scientific research in recent years.

Key words: Cataract, Visual performance, Catquest-9SF, Scale, Clinical application

中图分类号:

R776.1

海玥,廖萱. Catquest-9SF的研究进展及临床应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 142-146.

HAI Yue,LIAO Xuan. Research progress and clinical application of Catquest-9SF[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 142-146.

参考文献

[1] 文佰伟, 兰长骏, 廖萱. 视觉质量评价方法的研究进展[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201. WEN Baiwei, LAN Changjun, LIAO Xuan. Research progress on visual quality assessment methods[J]. Rec Adv Ophthalmol, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201.
[2] Dean S, Mathers JM, Calvert M, et al. “The patient is speaking”: discovering the patient voice in ophthalmology[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2017, 101(6): 700-708. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309955.
[3] Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Performance and repeatability of the NEI-VFQ-25 in patients with dry eye[J]. Cornea, 2002, 21(6): 578-583. doi:10.1097/00003226-200208000-00009.
[4] Lundström M, Roos P, Jensen S, et al. Catquest questionnaire for use in cataract surgery care: description, validity, and reliability[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1997, 23(8): 1226-1236. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80321-5.
[5] Lundström M, Pesudovs K. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(3): 504-513. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.038.
[6] Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, et al. The outcome of cataract surgery measured with the Catquest-9SF[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2011, 89(8): 718-723. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01801.x.
[7] Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, et al. One million cataract surgeries: Swedish National Cataract Register 1992-2009[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(8): 1539-1545. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.021.
[8] Kabanovski A, Hatch W, Chaudhary V, et al. Validation and application of Catquest-9SF in various populations: a systematic review[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2020, 65(3): 348-360. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.12.002.
[9] Skiadaresi E, Ravalico G, Polizzi S, et al. The Italian Catquest-9SF cataract questionnaire: translation, validation and application[J]. Eye Vis(Lond), 2016, 3: 12. doi:10.1186/s40662-016-0043-9.
[10] Grimfors M, Lundström M, Hammar U, et al. Patient-reported visual function outcome in cataract surgery: test-retest reliability of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2020, 98(8): 828-832. doi:10.1111/aos.14461.
[11] Visser MS, Dieleman M, Klijn S, et al. Validation, test-retest reliability and norm scores for the Dutch Catquest-9SF[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017, 95(3): 312-319. doi:10.1111/aos.13287.
[12] Nielsen E, Lundström M, Pesudovs K, et al. Validation of Catquest-9SF in Danish: developing a revised form of the Catquest-9SF-the Danish Catquest-7SF[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2019, 97(2): 173-177. doi:10.1111/aos.13921.
[13] Khadka J, Huang JH, Chen HS, et al. Assessment of cataract surgery outcome using the modified catquest short-form instrument in China[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(10): e0164182. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164182.
[14] Adnan TH, Mohamed Apandi M, Kamaruddin H, et al. Catquest-9SF questionnaire: validation of Malay and Chinese-language versions using Rasch analysis[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2018, 16(1): 5. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0833-3.
[15] To QG, Huynh VAN, Do DV, et al. Psychometric properties of the Vietnamese catquest-9 short form questionnaire[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2020, 97(3): 192-197. doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000001493.
[16] Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, et al. Catquest questionnaire: re-validation in an Australian cataract population[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2009, 37(8): 785-794. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02133.x.
[17] Sparrow JM, Grzeda MT, Frost NA, et al. Cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures: a head-to-head comparison of the psychometric performance and patient acceptability of the Cat-PROM5 and Catquest-9SF self-report questionnaires[J]. Eye(Lond), 2018, 32(4): 788-795. doi:10.1038/eye.2017.297.
[18] Schlenker MB, Minotti SC, Kabanovski A, et al. Catquest-9SF questionnaire and eCAPS: Validation in a Canadian population[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(9): e0237788. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237788.
[19] Lin X, Li M, Wang M, et al. Validation of Catquest-9SF questionnaire in a Chinese cataract population[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(8): e103860. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103860.
[20] 黄锦海, 陈海丝, 高蓉蓉, 等. 国人白内障视功能相关生存质量简表的研制及其测量特性评价[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2015, 17(7): 402-406. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.07.005. HUANG Jinhai, CHEN Haisi, GAO Rongrong, et al. Development and assessment of a revised Chinese version of the catquest 9SF questionnaire for a Chinese cataract population[J]. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2015, 17(7): 402-406. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.07.005.
[21] Xu Z, Wu S, Li W, et al. The Chinese Catquest-9SF: validation and application in community screenings[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2018, 18(1): 77. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0743-0.
[22] Stolk-Vos AC, Visser MS, Klijn S, et al. Effects of clinical parameters on patient-reported outcome in cataract patients: a multicentre study[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(6): 586-591. doi:10.1111/aos.13747.
[23] Samadi B, Lundström M, Kugelberg M. Improving patient-assessed outcomes after cataract surgery[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2017, 27(4): 454-459. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000927.
[24] Grimfors M, Lundström M, Höijer J, et al. Intraoperative difficulties, complications and self-assessed visual function in cataract surgery[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(6): 592-599. doi:10.1111/aos.13757.
[25] Mollazadegan K, Lundström M. A study of the correlation between patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes after cataract surgery in ophthalmic clinics[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2015, 93(3): 293-298. doi:10.1111/aos.12490.
[26] Harrer A, Gerstmeyer K, Hirnschall N, et al. Impact of bilateral cataract surgery on vision-related activity limitations[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(5): 680-685. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.028.
[27] Rönbeck M, Lundström M, Kugelberg M. Study of possible predictors associated with self-assessed visual function after cataract surgery[J]. Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(9): 1732-1738. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.013.
[28] Hammond MD, Potvin R. Visual outcomes, visual quality and patient satisfaction: comparing a blended bifocal approach to bilateral extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2019, 13: 2325-2332. doi:10.2147/opth.s232800.
[29] Rementería-Capelo LA, Contreras I, García-Pérez JL, et al. Visual quality and patient satisfaction with a trifocal intraocular lens and its new toric version[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2019, 45(11): 1584-1590. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.014.
[30] Claesson M, Armitage WJ, Byström B, et al. Validation of catquest-9SF-A visual disability instrument to evaluate patient function after corneal transplantation[J]. Cornea, 2017, 36(9): 1083-1088. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001255.
[31] Bohman E, Wyon M, Lundström M, et al. A comparison between patients with Epiphora and cataract of the activity limitations they experience in daily life due to their visual disability[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(1): 77-80. doi:10.1111/aos.13447.

相关文章 15

[1]	王新萌,姬俊雅,于浩南,付鸿臣,王翔,郑泽坤,李艳,钟莹莹. 急性闭角型青光眼超声乳化联合房角分离术后屈光预测准确性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 74-79.
[2]	李世强,马燕,王家伟. 光学相干断层扫描血管成像在全身疾病中的临床应用研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 127-134.
[3]	黄旗,邓旭雯,王佩佩,陈烨群,古学军. 基于EyeSi手术模拟器评估眼科医师白内障手术水平[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 83-88.
[4]	汪盛,黄旭东. 铁死亡与年龄相关性白内障的研究新进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 161-168.
[5]	孙鸿翔,曹娟. 老年白内障患者心理脆弱现状及其与希望水平和述情障碍的相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 89-95.
[6]	魏鑫,邢东升,翟振伟,阎艾慧,刘振宇,曹弘薇. 妊娠期女性咽喉反流症状指数调查及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 96-102.
[7]	刘小红,张青青,郭瑞昕,强茵,石瑶,杨皓楠,曹楠,加伟,谢萌. 伴有幽门螺杆菌感染的咽喉反流患者的反流类型分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 108-114.
[8]	杜晨,闫燕,王丽,鹿培泉. 酸反流事件阈值设定对咽喉酸反流性疾病诊疗的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 115-119.
[9]	马继玲,王晓明,李琰,穆延潇,靳琳,孔慧,杨乃甫,党光福. 基于CASIA2评价白内障术后3种非球面人工晶状体囊袋内倾斜和偏心的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 76-85.
[10]	买尔哈巴·玉素甫,克里木江·阿不拉,丁琳,秦艳莉,陈雪艺. 伴发于后巩膜葡萄肿的高度近视性白内障眼底病变相关研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(5): 107-114.
[11]	许海艳,曹卫,范大川. 多元复合声治疗对突聋患者耳鸣的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 38-45.
[12]	吴波,黄天德,闫斌,陈伊,汤勇. 焦虑抑郁状态与特发性耳鸣预后的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 46-52.
[13]	李婉玉,古学军. 抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎并发巩膜炎及白内障1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 149-152.
[14]	韩宜平,张晗. 后囊膜混浊发病机制及前囊膜抛光技术的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 181-186.
[15]	张华秀,刘琴,罗五根,杨健, 陈灵云. 新型颈托式受水器在外耳道冲洗中的临床应用效果研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 7-10.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed