山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 20-30.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.524

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工耳蜗植入对老年语后聋患者疗效的Meta分析

李仕运1,谢艳2,潘佳煜1,陈美馨1,龙丹1,张春林1   

  1. 1.遵义医科大学附属医院 耳鼻喉科, 贵州 遵义 563000 ;
    2.遵义医科大学 公共卫生学院, 贵州 遵义 563000
  • 发布日期:2026-05-22
  • 通讯作者: 张春林. E-mail: echo_zcl1314@qq.com

Meta analysis of clinical efficacy of cochlear implant in elderly patients with postlingual deafness

LI Shiyun1, XIE Yan2, PAN Jiayu1, CHEN Meixin1, LONG Dan1, ZHANG Chunlin1   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, Guizhou, China2. School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, Guizhou, China
  • Published:2026-05-22

PDF (PC)

2

摘要： 目的 评估人工耳蜗植入对老年语后聋患者听力康复以及生活质量的影响。 方法 检索2000~2023年PubMed、SinoMed、CNKI、万方、维普数据库,收集老年组(≥60岁)和对照组(<60岁)语后聋人工耳蜗植入术后康复效果的研究,纳入符合标准的文献,提取数据,分别对老年组术前术后、老年组与年轻组对照组进行Meta分析,评估人工耳蜗植入后的听力康复及对生活质量的影响。 结果 共14篇文献纳入本研究,并根据不同的分析指标,纳入相应的文献进行Meta分析。老年语后聋患者人工耳蜗植入术后与术前相比,在词识别［SMD=2.20,95%CI(1.73,2.67)］、安静中句子［SMD=1.63, 95%CI(1.37, 1.89)］、噪音中句子［MD=38.91, 95%CI(33.04, 44.78)］、听觉行为分级［MD=2.81, 95%CI(2.72, 2.91)］方面均较术前明显提高,差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.001)。老年语后聋人工耳蜗植入术后在词识别［SMD=-0.59, 95%CI(-0.81, -0.36)］、听觉行为分级［MD=2.81, 95%CI(2.72, 2.91)］、安静中句子识别［SMD=-0.32, 95%CI(-0.57, -0.07)］均低于对照组患者,差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.05),而噪音中句子识别［MD=-6.94, 95%CI(-14.60, 0.71)］和纯音听阈测试［MD=1.35, 95%CI(-8.55, 11.25)］与对照组患者比较差异无统计学意义。在生活质量方面,老年组格拉斯哥受益量表总分与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(MD=-3.12, 95%CI:-22.89, 16.66 )。 结论 人工耳蜗植入可以改善老年语后聋患者术后听觉能力;在噪音中句子识别和生活质量评分方面,可以获得与年轻患者相似的术后康复效果,但在词识别、安静中句子识别、听觉行为分级等听觉康复方面效果差于低于年轻患者。

关键词: 人工耳蜗植入, 听力康复, 生活质量, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective Evaluate the impact of cochlear implant on hearing rehabilitation and quality of life in elderly patients with postlingual deafness. Methods Search was conducted in the PubMed, SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang data and VIP databases from 2000 to 2023. Studies on the postoperative rehabilitation effects of cochlear implantation in the elderly group(≥60 years old)and the young control group(<60 years old)with postlingual deafness, and last include literature that meets the standards and extract data. After all these steps, Meta analysis was conducted on the elderly group before and after surgery, as well as the elderly group and the year group control group, to evaluate the hearing rehabilitation and its impact on quality of life after cochlear implantation. Results A total of 14 literature were included in this study, and corresponding literature was included for Meta-analysis based on different analysis indicators. After cochlear implantation in elderly patients with postlingual deafness, compared to before surgery, in terms of word recognition rate ［SMD=2.20, 95%CI(1.73, 2.67)］, sentence recognition rate in quiet environment［SMD=1.63, 95%CI(1.37, 1.89)］, sentencerecognition rate in noisy environment ［MD=38.91, 95%CI(33.04, 44.78)］, and auditory performance ［MD=2.81, 95%CI(2.72, 2.91)］, there were significant improvements compared to preoperative results,and these differences are statistically significant(all P<0.001). The word recognition rate ［SMD=-0.59, 95%CI(-0.81, -0.36)］, auditory Performance ［MD=2.81, 95%CI(2.72, 2.91)］ and sentence recognition rate in a quiet environment ［SMD=-0.32, 95%CI(-0.57, -0.07)］ after cochlear implantation in elderly patients with postlingual deafness were lower than those in the young control group, and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in sentence recognition rate ［MD=-6.94, 95%CI(-14.60, 0.71)］ and pure tone hearing threshold test ［MD=1.35, 95%CI(-8.55, 11.25)］ in noisy environment compared to the control group patients. In terms of quality of life, there was no statistically significant difference in the total score of the Glasgow Benefit Scale ［MD=-3.12, 95%CI(-22.89, 16.66, P>0.05)］ between the elderly group and the control group. Conclusion Cochlear implantation can improve postoperative hearing ability in elderly patients with postlingual deafness. In terms of sentence recognition and quality of life scoring in noisy environments, similar postoperative rehabilitation effects can be achieved as young patients. However, the effectiveness of aural rehabilitation in terms of word recognition rate, sentence recognition rate in quiet environments, and auditory performance is lower than that of young patients.

Key words: Cochlear implant, Aural rehabilitation, Quality of life, Meta analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R764.9
[1] 高芬琦, 王林娥. 成人语后聋人工耳蜗植入的现状及研究进展[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2017, 15(1): 36-39. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2017.01.011 GAO Fenqi, WANG Line. The recent research progress for cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf adults[J]. Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation, 2017, 15(1): 36-39. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2017.01.011
[2] 赵春红, 刘玉和. 成人语后聋人工耳蜗植入诊疗进展[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2018, 16(1): 39-43. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2018.01.010 ZHAO Chunhong, LIU Yuhe. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of cochlear implantation in adults with postlingual hearing loss[J]. Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation, 2018, 16(1): 39-43. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2018.01.010
[3] Vermeire K, Brokx JPL, Wuyts FL, et al. Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2005, 26(2): 188-195. doi:10.1097/00129492-200503000-00010
[4] Rostkowska J, Skarzynski PH, Kobosko J, et al. Health-related quality of life in adults with profound postlingual hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2021, 278(9): 3393-3399. doi:10.1007/s00405-021-06866-7
[5] Schafer EC, Miller S, Manning J, et al. Meta-analysis of speech recognition outcomes in younger and older adults with cochlear implants[J]. Am J Audiol, 2021, 30(3): 481-496. doi:10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00141
[6] Andrade C. Mean difference, standardized mean difference(SMD), and their use in Meta-analysis: as simple as It Gets[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2020, 81(5): 20. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20f13681
[7] Zwolan TA, Henion K, Segel P, et al. The role of age on cochlear implant performance, use, and health utility: a multicenter clinical trial[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2014, 35(9): 1560-1568. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000583
[8] Friedland DR, Runge-Samuelson C, Baig H, et al. Case-control analysis of cochlear implant performance in elderly patients[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2010,136(5):432-438. doi:10.1001/archoto.2010.57
[9] Lee S, Park HJ, Cho HH, et al. Speech perception and auditory performance following cochlear implantation in elderly Koreans[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2017, 96(3): 112-118. doi:10.1177/014556131709600310
[10] Ghiselli S, Nedic S, Montino S, et al. Cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults and elderly patients: analysis of audiometric and speech perception outcomes during the first year of use[J]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2016, 36(6): 513-519. doi:10.14639/0392-100X-1222
[11] Shew MA, Herzog JA, Kallogjeri D, et al. The Impact of Age on Noise Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2022, 43(1):72-79. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003385
[12] Roberts DS, Lin HW, Herrmann BS, et al. Differential cochlear implant outcomes in older adults[J]. Laryngoscope, 2013,123(8): 1952-1956. doi:10.1002/lary.23676
[13] Sorrentino T, Donati G, Nassif N, et al. Cognitive function and quality of life in older adult patients with cochlear implants[J]. Int J Audiol, 2020, 59(4): 316-322. doi:10.1080/14992027.2019.1696993
[14] Calvino M, Sánchez-Cuadrado I, Gavilán J, et al. Effect of cochlear implantation on cognitive decline and quality of life in younger and older adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2022, 279(10): 4745-4759. doi:10.1007/s00405-022-07253-6
[15] 郑梦梦, 王凯, 严降雨, 等. 不同年龄成人语后聋患者人工耳蜗植入的疗效研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2020, 27(02): 94-97. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2020.02.010 ZHENG Mengmeng, WANG Kai, YAN Xiangyu, et al. Study on the efficacy of cochlear implantation in adult patients with postlingual deafness of different ages[J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2020, 27(2): 94-97. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2020.02.010
[16] Knopke S, Gräbel S, Förster-Ruhrmann U, et al. Impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life and mental comorbidity in patients aged 80 years[J]. Laryngoscope, 2016, 126(12): 2811-2816. doi:10.1002/lary.25993
[17] Issing C, Baumann U, Pantel J, et al. Cochlear Implant Therapy Improves the Quality of Life in Older Patients-A Prospective Evaluation Study[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2020, 41(9): 1214-1221. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002741
[18] Knopke S, Häussler S, Gräbel S, et al. Age-dependent psychological factors influencing the outcome of cochlear implantation in elderly patients[J]. and, 2019, 40(4): e441-e453. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002179
[19] Manrique-Huarte R, Calavia D, Huarte Irujo A, et al. Treatment for hearing loss among the elderly: auditory outcomes and impact on quality of life[J]. Audiol Neurootol, 2016, 21(Suppl 1): 29-35. doi:10.1159/000448352
[20] Völter C, Götze L, Haubitz I, et al. Benefits of cochlear implantation in middle-aged and older adults[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2020, 15: 1555-1568. doi:10.2147/CIA.S255363
[21] 高芬琦, 王林娥, 王伟, 等. 植入年龄对成人语后聋患者人工耳蜗植入术后听觉言语康复效果的影响[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2019, 27(4): 414-416. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2019.04.016 GAO Fenqi, WANG Line, WANG Wei, et al. The rehabil itative effect of implanted age on cochlear implants in adults with postl ingual deafness[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2019, 27(4): 414-416. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2019.04.016
[22] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会, 中国残疾人康复协会听力语言康复专业委员会. 人工耳蜗植入工作指南(2013)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2014, 49(02): 89-95. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2014.02.001 Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Society of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese Medical Association, Hearing and Language Rehabilitation Committee of China Association of Rehabilitation of Disabled Persons. Guideline of cochlear implant(2013)[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2014, 49(02): 89-95. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2014.02.001
[23] Chen DS, Clarrett DM, Li LS, et al. Cochlear implantation in older adults: long-term analysis of complications and device survival in a consecutive series[J]. and, 2013, 34(7): 1272-1277. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182936bb2
[24] Carlson ML, Lohse CM, Marinelli JP, et al. Perceptions surrounding cochlear implants among at-risk and qualifying older adults in the United States[J]. and, 2023, 44(10): 1021-1026. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004041
[25] Zhao EE, Dornhoffer JR, Loftus C, et al. Association of patient-related factors with adult cochlear implant speech recognition outcomes: a meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2020, 146(7): 613-620. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0662
[26] Völter C, Götze L, Dazert S, et al. Can cochlear implantation improve neurocognition in the aging population?[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2018, 13: 701-712. doi:10.2147/CIA.S160517
[27] Chung J, Chueng K, Shipp D, et al. Unilateral multi-channel cochlear implantation results in significant improvement in quality of life[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2012, 33(4): 566-571. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182536dc2
[28] Aylward A, Murphy-Meyers M, Allen CM, et al. Frailty and quality of life after cochlear implantation in older adults[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 166(2): 350-356. doi:10.1177/01945998211004589
[29] Mosnier I, Vanier A, Bonnard D, et al. Long-term cognitive prognosis of profoundly deaf older adults after hearing rehabilitation using cochlear implants[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2018, 66(8): 1553-1561. doi:10.1111/jgs.15445
[30] Aimoni C, Ciorba A, Hatzopoulos S, et al. Cochlear implants in subjects over age 65: quality of life and audiological outcomes[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2016, 22: 3035-3042. doi:10.12659/msm.896869
[31] Beyea JA, McMullen KP, Harris MS, et al. Cochlear implants in adults: effects of age and duration of deafness on speech recognition[J]. Otol Neurotol,2016,37(9):1238-1245. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001162
[32] Atak HBO, Sennaroglu G, Sennaroglu L. Speech recognition and quality of life outcomes of adults with cochlear implants following a quarter-century of deafness: what should be the maximum duration?[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2023, 280(11): 4903-4913. doi:10.1007/s00405-023-08214-3
[33] Lin FR, Chien WW, Li L, et al. Cochlear implantation in older adults[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2012, 91(5): 229-241. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e31826b145a
[34] Bourn SS, Goldstein MR, Morris SA, et al. Cochlear implant outcomes in the very elderly[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2022, 43(1): 103200. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103200
[35] Ernst A, Basta D, Mittmann P, et al. Can hearing amplification improve presbyvestibulopathy and/or the risk-to-fall?[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2021, 278(8): 2689-2694. doi:10.1007/s00405-020-06414-9
[1] 方璐, 雷玉丹, 王华. 环孢素滴眼液联合玻璃酸钠滴眼液治疗干眼临床效果的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 65-73.
[2] 雷玉丹,方璐,陈健,彭昌福. 托珠单抗治疗激素抵抗或不耐受的中重度甲状腺相关性眼病临床疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 54-67.
[3] 许雪萌,樊磊,喻望博,蒋芝月,潘晨,黄泳芹. 奥马珠单抗联合特异性免疫治疗变应性鼻炎疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 26-33.
[4] 孙春晓,王文晴,岳田,刘济生. 高低累积顺铂剂量同步放化疗治疗鼻咽癌的疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 31-41.
[5] 郑泽皓,魏佳俐,刘嘉涛,周玉麒,孙文婷,李雨轩,白鹏. 特定部位针刺法治疗突发性聋的疗效及安全性评价:一项系统综述和网状Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 114-127.
[6] 池文月,林垦,马静,杜玉玲,高映勤,周丽娟,张珩颖,张铁松. 不同语言环境及父母知信行对人工耳蜗植入术后患儿听觉言语康复的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 8-15.
[7] 米雪芹,李松哲,邓英杰,李圣洋,肖丁齐,樊磊. 质子泵抑制剂与胃黏膜保护剂治疗咽喉反流性疾病临床疗效及安全性对比的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 136-142.
[8] 王凯健,陈雪生,王威. 血小板-淋巴细胞比值与喉鳞状细胞癌预后相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 67-73.
[9] 李飏,刘鸫,曹文捷. 红光治疗对近视儿童等效球镜度、眼轴长度及脉络膜厚度影响的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 74-81.
[10] 李霞,侯冉,王丽萍. 基于Web of Science近10年鼻腔冲洗治疗鼻腔疾病的文献计量学分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 52-60.
[11] 王佳慧,刘学勤. 全球近10年干眼相关生活质量研究——基于VOSviewer和CiteSpace的文献计量学及可视化分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 61-72.
[12] 张真,杨卓莹,周佳妮,张大为,陈仁杰. 环索奈德鼻喷剂治疗季节性过敏性鼻炎疗效与安全的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 13-20.
[13] 毕晓云,马本绪,王心茹,李旭豪,杨继国. 穴位贴敷治疗小儿过敏性鼻炎随机对照试验的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 75-85.
[14] 李泽鹏,李文建,孙志佳. 中成药治疗急性咽炎数据挖掘及网状Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(4): 111-118.
[15] 翟睿,李园,于敬龙,陈溪,郑酉友,刘兆兰,王俊宏. 揿针治疗变应性鼻炎临床疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 35-45.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发